Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

@@@ mASF (Moderated ASF) Forum Info & Access @@@ 2005-04-27 15:00

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Formhandle

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 2:59:06 PM4/27/05
to
[this message is auto-posted to alt.seduction.fast regularly]

Welcome to unmoderated alt.seduction.fast (uASF).

uASF is a public USENet newsgroup and, as such, is essentially an
unmoderated discussion forum within a communication anarchy. In many
ways, this is good. However, this leads to a problem with what the
USENet community refers to as "trolls", "flame wars", "newsloons",
"off-topic" posts, "cross" posts, "spam", and a mess of other annoying
disturbances which disrupt the topic of discussion.

There is an evolution to this group, mASF, which is available
through:

http://www.fastseduction.com/discussion/

mASF is a moderated discussion forum.
PLEASE read the Posting Guidlines for mASF before posting on it.

No membership is required to browse/lurk the discussions through that
web site. Membership is free. Once signed up, you will be able to post
using the web interface as well as read/post to the groups using your
newsreader or through the mailing list features.

If you want to post, a legitimate e-mail address is required to sign up
and you will receive a password to the address you provide. You can
edit your account profile to keep your address private. Posts made
through all interfaces do not expose any identifying information such as
IP address or host name.

Access to the newsgroup interface of the discussion system is available
to registered members at:

discussion.fastseduction.com
news://discussion.fastseduction.com (link for your web browser)

You can subscribe to that news server just like any other news server.

Your username/password is required to access the newsgroup interface.
You obtain your username/password by registering for membership.

The groups available on that server are:

alt.seduction.fast.general (replacement for ASF)
alt.seduction.fast.tactics-techniques
alt.seduction.fast.fieldreports
alt.seduction.fast.advanced
alt.seduction.fast.sex
alt.seduction.fast.relationships
alt.seduction.fast.playettes
alt.seduction.fast.missions
alt.seduction.fast.off-topic
fastseduction.com.suggestions

Additionally, the discussions can be read and posted to via the mailing
list support feature of the system. You can choose to receive each post
individually through e-mail or in a daily digest format. More
information about the features and how to use them are available within
the help system of the web interface.

IT'S ALL FREE! ENJOY!

--
Form [formh...@fastseduction.com]

Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...

Ray Gordon

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 3:18:54 PM4/27/05
to
There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. Such a group would be called
alt.seduction.fast.moderated.

The message board referenced in the previous posting is one of many
commercial message boards on the net. It is not, however, a "replacement"
for this group in any way, shape or form.


--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy. Get this book FREE when you buy participating
affiliated books!

http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
The Seduction Library. Four free books to get you started on your quest to
get laid.

Don't buy anything from experts who won't debate on a free speech forum.


SluttyFox

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 3:41:26 PM4/27/05
to

> There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. Such a group would be called
> alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>
> The message board referenced in the previous posting is one of many
> commercial message boards on the net. It is not, however, a "replacement"
> for this group in any way, shape or form.
>

You are right, they have meaningful discussions there. Where there is
nothing but flames here. Your method is so unlike the others you should
create your own group for it. Then you could control the conversation and
truly be happy..:)


SluttyFox

Ray Gordon

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 3:35:25 PM4/27/05
to
>> There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. Such a group would be called
>> alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>>
>> The message board referenced in the previous posting is one of many
>> commercial message boards on the net. It is not, however, a
>> "replacement" for this group in any way, shape or form.
>>
>
> You are right, they have meaningful discussions there. Where there is
> nothing but flames here.

Subjective assertions mean nothing but your personal opinion.

>Your method is so unlike the others you should create your own group for
>it. Then you could control the conversation and truly be happy..:)

Commercial message boards bear little resemblance to USENET.

SluttyFox

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 3:52:24 PM4/27/05
to

>>> There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. Such a group would be called
>>> alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>>>
>>> The message board referenced in the previous posting is one of many
>>> commercial message boards on the net. It is not, however, a
>>> "replacement" for this group in any way, shape or form.
>>>
>>
>> You are right, they have meaningful discussions there. Where there is
>> nothing but flames here.
>
> Subjective assertions mean nothing but your personal opinion.
>
>>Your method is so unlike the others you should create your own group for
>>it. Then you could control the conversation and truly be happy..:)
>
> Commercial message boards bear little resemblance to USENET.
>

LOL, you are so right, usenet is nothing but a toilet. My assertion seems to
be felt by about anyone here....don't believe me?..ask posters then.

SluttyFox

Ray Gordon

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 8:01:04 PM4/27/05
to
>> Commercial message boards bear little resemblance to USENET.
>>
>
> LOL, you are so right, usenet is nothing but a toilet.

They also aren't owned by anyone, there is total free speech, and no
sponsorship influences.

>My assertion seems to be felt by about anyone here....don't believe
>me?..ask posters then.

You're making claims about a consumer audience at large. Proving statements
of that kind usually require some rather extensive surveys.

User3247

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 10:45:05 PM4/27/05
to
"SluttyFox" <do...@manchester.com> wrote:

Replaced subject.

Slutty Fox wrote:

A group WAS created specifically for Ray's <snicker> theories
(alt.seduction.outfoxing). But since no one took him seriously, no one
posted in that group. It is now a spam deposit, if you can find a server
that takes it seriously enough to carry.

Alex

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 10:07:30 PM4/29/05
to
in article smksocx2tu72h8f.270420051541@IntPC, SluttyFox at
do...@manchester.com wrote on 4/27/05 3:41 PM:

He's tried it several times but they've always failed due to lack of
interest.

0 new messages