@@@ mASF (aka "Moderated ASF") Forum Info & Access @@@ 2006-12-13 15:00
Formhandle
Welcome to unmoderated alt.seduction.fast (uASF).
uASF is a public USENet newsgroup and, as such, is essentially an
unmoderated discussion forum within a communication anarchy. In many
ways, this is good. However, this leads to a problem with what the
USENet community refers to as "trolls", "flame wars", "newsloons",
"off-topic" posts, "cross" posts, "spam", and a mess of other annoying
disturbances which disrupt the topic of discussion.
Since there is no moderated version of this newsgroup on usenet, there
is an evolution to this group, mASF, which is available through:
http://www.fastseduction.com/discussion/
mASF is a moderated discussion forum.
PLEASE read the Posting Guidlines for mASF before posting on it.
No membership is required to browse/lurk the discussions through that
web site. Membership is free. Once signed up, you will be able to post
using the web interface as well as read/post to the groups using your
newsreader or through the mailing list features.
If you want to post, a legitimate e-mail address is required to sign up
and you will receive a password to the address you provide. You can
edit your account profile to keep your address private. Posts made
through all interfaces do not expose any identifying information such as
IP address or host name.
Access to the newsgroup interface of the discussion system is available
to registered members at:
discussion.fastseduction.com
news://discussion.fastseduction.com (link for your web browser)
You can subscribe to that news server just like any other news server.
Your username/password is required to access the newsgroup interface.
You obtain your username/password by registering for membership.
The groups available on that server are:
alt.seduction.fast.general (replacement for ASF)
alt.seduction.fast.tactics-techniques
alt.seduction.fast.fieldreports
alt.seduction.fast.advanced
alt.seduction.fast.sex
alt.seduction.fast.relationships
alt.seduction.fast.playettes
alt.seduction.fast.missions
alt.seduction.fast.off-topic
fastseduction.com.suggestions
Additionally, the discussions can be read and posted to via the mailing
list support feature of the system. You can choose to receive each post
individually through e-mail or in a daily digest format. More
information about the features and how to use them are available within
the help system of the web interface.
Since the main part of the site receives contributions and generates
it's own revenue, access to mASF is FREE! ENJOY!
--
Form [formh...@fastseduction.com]
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"
There is no moderated ASF group on USENET. Such a group would be called
alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
--
Ray Gordon, Author
The OFFICIAL Ray Gordon Blog:
http://moderncaveman.typepad.com
"Formhandle" <formh...@fastseduction.com> wrote in message
news:fh.1166040000_b3d5...@discussion.fastseduction.com...
ZFORCE
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:ZdmdnbTyg6ZrwR3Y...@pghconnect.com...
> The previous poster is SPAMMING this group for his commecial website.
>
Pot, kettle, black Gordita.
HC
speeding
>
> On 13-Dec-2006, "Ray Gordon, NetKook" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>
>> There is no moderated ASF group on USENET. Such a group would be
>> called alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>
> Why woudn't it be alt.seduction.moderated? WHO appointed you the
> Arbiter of USENET names?
It would be, if created under alt.seduction. Under this group, it would
be alt.seduction.fast.moderated. It's not that Gordon has that authority.
It's the newsadmins that do, and yes, they ARE the arbiter of Usenet
names. If they say it happens... it does. If they say it doesn't. It
won't. Our newsadmin guy used to say God was limited. His way of saying
that as far as the newsgroups went, he WAS God.
> What if I wanted to start such a group, and moderate only messages
> from YOU?
> Since I'm not "in the business", why would I not be perfectly with my
> rights to do that? If I started such a group in google groups, would
> I not own the group? But wait, have you not been telling us all this
> time that these groups can't be owned? What if Ross shut this one
> down, can't he do that? Or how about Lewis DePayne, isn't he the one
> that set the group up in the first place?
In Google Groups, perhaps. I don't know how they work. But Usenet groups
aren't owned. They are created and deleted, but not owned. The newsadmins
really ARE the Gods of Usenet. They can shut off a newsfeed, regardless
of what the creator of the group desires. Or, they can leave it on and
open, even if the creator of the group wants it cut off.
No, Ross or Lewis or whoever can not shut this group down. They could
send requests to the major newsadmins (large ISPs, basically) and ask for
the newsgroup to be removed. IF they get the bigger ISPs to agree, then
it's likely the group would die off, as smaller ISPs often just get their
feeds from the big guys.
It's a matter of getting the big guys to go along.
> There is an alt.seduction so why are we here anyway and not there.
> The reason FAST is in the title, is that it is RJs group, not GRPs.
> Or does that make too much sense for you?
No. Not for him it doesn't. After all, there's a foxhunting, too. It's
specifically created for his crap. And it's deader than a doornail,
posting-wise. But the group is still out there. I'm surprised GRP isn't
out there trying to sue the ISPs into having the group removed from their
feeds.
--
She wants to meet a man and God dammit! I am a man! == Scruff
HC
HC
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"
> where they are being sued.
The one in my case did.
Thom E. Geiger
\"pivot\"" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>>Even lawyers won't normally go pro se in cases
>> where they are being sued.
>
>The one in my case did.
Blah, blah, blah. If it wasn't for the plodding time delay inherent in
the legal system, your stupid bullshit would get tossed in one day.
You're a legally documented liar, Parker. The fact that you
manufacture a steady stream of lies the courts have to wade through
doesn't mean one of those lies is a fact or true. That's all you have
are lies and bullshit. Anybody who'd buy anything from or listen to a
documented liar is an idiot.
Thom E. Geiger, Domain Name Owner
ChewOnThis.Org
(the Official GRP NewsLoon tracking website)
Ray-Gordon.com
Ray-Gordon.net
Newsloon.com
Don't buy anything from any business trying to use SLAPP lawsuits to
stop criticism of the company, owners, officers or products.
Guido Gump Parker blames a baseball bat death threat on his own mother, Penny "Skull Crusher" Parker:
>The "baseball bat" remark was made by my mom in response to a gymnastics
>groupie who harassed half of the national team, with help from several chat
>hosts and gymnastics coaches and hackers.
Alex
creator of the "pivot" at r...@cybersheet.com wrote on 12/17/06 5:55 AM:
>> Even lawyers won't normally go pro se in cases
>> where they are being sued.
>
> The one in my case did.
>
Shows how abnormally stupid your suit was.
dman
On Dec 18, 7:13 am, Alex <akaufm...@nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:
> in article Weedndga5PeDvxjYnZ2dnUVZ_qemn...@pghconnect.com, Ray Gordon,
> creator of the "pivot" at r...@cybersheet.com wrote on 12/17/06 5:55 AM:
>
> >> Even lawyers won't normally go pro se in cases
> >> where they are being sued.
>
> > The one in my case did.Shows how abnormally stupid your suit was.
speeding
>
> On 14-Dec-2006, speeding <no...@biz.org> wrote:
>
>> > There is an alt.seduction so why are we here anyway and not there.
>> > The reason FAST is in the title, is that it is RJs group, not GRPs.
>> > Or does that make too much sense for you?
>>
>> No. Not for him it doesn't. After all, there's a foxhunting, too.
>> It's specifically created for his crap. And it's deader than a
>> doornail, posting-wise. But the group is still out there. I'm
>> surprised GRP isn't out there trying to sue the ISPs into having the
>> group removed from their feeds.
>
> GRP could not sue his way out of a wet paper bag. His mental problems
> are only part of the problem. Even lawyers won't normally go pro se
> in cases where they are being sued. Emotions get in the way, and you
> end up with pleadings that look more like emotional rants than proper
> court procedure. That can be clearly seen in every pleading, they drip
> with personal anger, which gets in the way of what he's trying to say.
> I love reading his stuff though, great entertainment.
One of the most popular sayings amongst attornies...
"Only a fool has himself as a client".
Yeah, it's entertaining, but in a Jackass or Borat sort of way. It's
funny for about ten minutes, but then you realize that it's mindless
stupidity. After about ten minutes of watching it, if you're still
bothering with it, you're likely missing out on somethign funier AND more
educational.
speeding
news:Weedndga5PeDvxjY...@pghconnect.com:
>>Even lawyers won't normally go pro se in cases
>> where they are being sued.
>
> The one in my case did.
You're an attorney? Where are you licensed to practice law?