Guru rapes his date, posts her pic on the net without her knowledge
Ray Gordon
details to the internet.
That he name-dropped several well known names in the course of his bragging
only served to get the media a little more interested.
--
Everything you need to know about women. FREE!
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
JJT
>details to the internet.
>
>That he name-dropped several well known names in the course of his bragging
>only served to get the media a little more interested.
And you can name this person, and or the source of this info..?
..come on..then answer this:
** You admitted (see below) you ".wished."
** a child would die, JUST to get revenge on
** her mother for her crime of ".loving you."
SO, the question is, Mr. Gordon Roy Parker:
".how old was Michelle's daughter Cierra
when you "wished" she would die, and if
your "wish" could come true, what would
you "wish" to happen to her.. ?????? ."
...Usenet records seem to note her age at 6 or 7...
..again..PLEASE..for the record... Tell us all..
Does this refresh your memory, Mr. Parker..?
>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
>>Cc: cave...@nni.com
>>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400
>>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake
>>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The...@juno.com>
>>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106,
>>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,206-207,212-213,
>>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,274-275,289-290,293-300
>>X-Juno-Att: 0
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>From: The Seduction Library <the______seductio...@juno.com>
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance
>>Lines: 307
>>Xref: news alt.romance:246369
>>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way,
>>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup
>>they can stay the hell out of my threads.
>>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people
>>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by
>>attacks on its creator.
>>I am going to clear the record on a few things here:
>>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an
>>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation
>>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID
>>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling
>>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four
>>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love
>>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I
>>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her).
>>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in
>>anger, after MONTHS of provocation
Main Entry: mo·lest
Pronunciation: m&-'lest
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French molester, from
Latin molestare, from molestus burdensome, annoying; akin to
Latin moles mass
1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile
intent or injurious effect
2 : to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to
force physical and usually sexual contact on
- mo·les·ta·tion /"mO-"les-'tA-sh&n, "mä-, -l&s-/ noun
- mo·lest·er /m&-'les-t&r/ noun
Formhandle
> Well, it *would have been* without her knowledge if he hadn't posted the
> details to the internet.
>
> That he name-dropped several well known names in the course of his bragging
> only served to get the media a little more interested.
Fabricated bullshit. It is not possible for Parker to validate this claim.
--
Form <formh...@fastseduction.com>
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
Say goodbye to trolls, newsloons, and spam.
Gain (FREE) access to the moderated ASF newsgroups at:
http://www.fastseduction.com/discussion/
Ray Gordon
Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an
invasion of privacy.
Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and
videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid
enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the
practice might ever stumble across it.
Some gurus are just DUMB.
HC
>
>Actually, it is not.
Nobody believes a word you say, FREAK.
JJT
>Some gurus are just DUMB.
>> >They just don't make gurus like they used to.
EVERYBODY SING !!!!!
"..OHHHHHHHHHHHHH <me me me me me..U U U U U...>
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..he got no money and he can't get laid..
So he haunts the Net till his, um, 'hellen' goes limp-wrist..
..It sure sucks to be ray...
(CONGA LINE !!!!!)
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..he gots no money while he can't get laid..
....he haunts the Net till his dollies goes nite-nite..
..It sure sucks to be ray...
(NOW, a SOLO from Fuz da BUN ! )
..it's always Saturday nite and he can't scam no ladies:
..he got no money and 'hellen' just can't get paid..
..REALITY is so much fun, come join us and party....
..oppps..I forgot.., the loser's's name is ray..
(NOW JUST THE WOMEN)
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..even if with tons of money we just laugh his way
HEY, his dolly(s) get more HOT action then he does....
..It sure sucks to be ray... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
(now the men..)
HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA
..IT SURE SUCKS TO BE RAY....
<in closing, for those of U on drugs....>
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..he got no money and he can't get laid..
So he haunts the Net till his, um, 'hellen' goes nite-nite..
..It sure sucks to be ray...
G U R you..?
<I'm not at ALL happy with the Flash-Card section !!!!!>
Krus T. Olfard
news:jV6id.3512$fw2.1636@trndny01:
If you're going to make posts like this one then you need to provide
verifiable evidence.
You know this - why do you ignore it?
--
KTO
------------------
Everything I post is my opinion. If you don't like my opinions then
killfile me, if you have the balls.
Ray Gordon
>>
>>
>>
> If you're going to make posts like this one then you need to provide
> verifiable evidence.
This is USENET, not a lawsuit.
Player88
> "Search DejaNews [http://www.dejanews.com] and put my names (Ray
> Gordon or Gordon Roy Parker) in, and check the posts [...] Let go of
> my anger? Not a chance. I have a few favors to return, and an amount
> of power to return them that you couldn't even comprehend. I know who
> has harmed me, who has stood by and did nothing, and who has helped
> me. Each group will be treated accordingly. [...] I'm just a 'loser.'
> Look at the way women treat 'losers' and you will see why they wind up
> beaten, murdered, raped, robbed, disrespected, and oppressed. It is
> because women DESERVE it. The ones who harmed me should thank their
> lucky stars that I didn't react like a primate and just dump them six
> feet underground. Unfortunately, premeditated murder would ruin this
> ethical thing I have going for me, although on a primal level it is
> quite appealing." -- Gordon Roy Parker
> [19981102.144604.2648...@juno.com] (Read the full
> message and thread in Google Groups [http://www.dejanews.com] for
> context.)
Formhandle
>> Fabricated bullshit.
>
> Actually, it is not.
Actually it is. You have not cited any verifiable references and therefore you
are making it all up.
Ray Gordon
> therefore you are making it all up.
Actually, the appropriate place to verify it would be to law enforcement,
since there is an invasion of sexual privacy of the women who don't know
they are being filmed. I'm sure the woman in question would not be pleased
to learn that her likeness was being used in such an intimate manner for
such a purpose.
Given that the woman in question repeatedly said "no" and was "forcibly
taken," there is also reason to believe that a rape occurred.
What does this have to do with YOU, anyway?
Formhandle
> [...snip "near-incomprehensible structure and content"...]
Parker, you are a tool.
Alex
wrote on 11/3/04 10:35 AM:
Of course, Gordon won't NAME the person involved because he'd then be sued.
Alex
wrote on 11/3/04 11:47 AM:
I have nothing to add.
I want Gordon's opinion of USENET archived for posterity.
Alex
wrote on 11/3/04 2:07 PM:
Anyone here is free to question Gordon's credibility.
He may not like it but there's fuck all he can do about it.
aardvark9084
"Ray Gordon" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:jV6id.3512$fw2.1636@trndny01...
> > Fabricated bullshit.
>
> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an
> invasion of privacy.
first it was "rape" then in the feeble mindless mind of ray...
> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and
> videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid
> enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the
> practice might ever stumble across it.
hmmm it gets downgraded to "conquest". gee ray, you lying, bent headed,
scabby sack of vulture snot. you can't even stick to the same lie in the
same post.
> Some gurus are just DUMB.
>
they sure are. now shut up, stupid.
aardvark
Ray Gordon
>
> I want Gordon's opinion of USENET archived for posterity.
A DMCA notice can fix that.
HeeroYuy
Is Gordon willing to testify to these allegations under oath and penalty of
perjury?
HeeroYuy
"Ray Gordon" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:3ldid.43$EZ2.8@trndny09...
>> I have nothing to add.
>>
>> I want Gordon's opinion of USENET archived for posterity.
>
> A DMCA notice can fix that.
Oh? You gonna move to nuke Alex's post, too? Gimme a break. You have no
clout over anyone, legal or otherwise.
Ray Gordon
>>
>> A DMCA notice can fix that.
>
> Oh? You gonna move to nuke Alex's post, too?
Anyone who copies my postings should be aware of the possibility.
Ray Gordon
>> invasion of privacy.
>>
>> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and
>> videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid
>> enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the
>> practice might ever stumble across it.
>>
>> Some gurus are just DUMB.
>
> Is Gordon willing to testify to these allegations under oath and penalty
> of perjury?
Certainly. I've been collecting field and lay reports from all over the web
for several years now, just in case any women surface and need proof of what
was done. When someone said he was going to "Columbine" one of his college
professors, I figured out who appeared to be from my database and notified
his school. In some cases, the person gives away their identity long before
they admit to breaking the law, and adding two and two connects the dots.
Anytime I see men talking about posting pictures or videos of their
conquests, I notify law enforcement of the potential invasion of privacy,
which gives them probable cause to investigate.
I mean, anyone out to PROTECT WOMEN would definitely be outraged by this
conduct (unless they had a hidden agenda they weren't revealing), and
wouldn't hesitate to report what they find as I do.
HeeroYuy
I'll repeat something you snipped. You have no clout over anyone, legal or
otherwise.
HeeroYuy
Finally, a direct answer. Now, why hasn't Gordon gone to the authorities,
and will he soon?
JJT
>Anyone here is free to question Gordon's credibility.
Not only that, but I spit in his face. I demand
he backs up his child molesting cakehole. He won't
JJT
(sung to the Faces Song "..Stay with me..") :
In the mornin' don't say you'll sue me,
'Cause I really can't stop laughing as it is..
You say your name is Gordon, but we know you as grp-ie
The G-U-R-You who is full of, oh, so much shit..
Don't need to yell "coercion"
I don't care about your perversions',
'cause with a 'life' like that you got nothin' to laugh about.
Gumby head, hair-lip and STD,
You say you're a nasty 'ol S.O.B.
Anytime you want to prove it, just feel free..
PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me
Shut yer mouth or fuckin' sue me
PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me
Shut yer trap or fuckin' sue me
So, in the real world, please don't say you'll sue me,
Unless you have the balls to back up your cakehole
Yeah, you know where is my home, your dollies even know my phone,
Just don't tell the world I hide from your whinning, coward's moan..
PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me
Shut yer mouth or fuckin' sue me
PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me
Shut yer trap or fuckin' sue me
Want sum mo' apples now..?
(this song really works if ya include the
guitar lines, and walking bass. Try it :)
JJT
>Anyone who copies my postings should be aware of the possibility.
** You admitted (see below) you ".wished."
JJT
>I mean, anyone out to PROTECT WOMEN would definitely be outraged by this
>conduct (unless they had a hidden agenda they weren't revealing), and
>wouldn't hesitate to report what they find as I do.
---- Proof of Gordon Roy Parker stating women deserve to be raped & murdered :
>>From: r____a__...@juno.com (Outfoxing The Foxes)
>>Subject: Re: Need A Piece Of Advice
>>Date: 1998/11/02
>>Message-ID: <19981102.144604.2648...@juno.com>
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,3-5,10-14,23-29,32-45,47-50,55-58,60-61,74-77,
>>79-87,95-97,99-102,105-112,121-122,130-131,138-139,146-147,
>>156-157,160-161,163-164,181-182,196-197,199
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance
Ray Gordon
>> conduct (unless they had a hidden agenda they weren't revealing), and
>> wouldn't hesitate to report what they find as I do.
>
> Finally, a direct answer. Now, why hasn't Gordon gone to the authorities,
> and will he soon?
I've been going to various authorities for several years regarding this type
of conduct. If I know the area in which the conduct occurred, I fax them
what I have and leave it at that, which is about all I can do in the
situation.
There was nothing to "answer" regarding what I posted, as I posted it to
illustrate what really goes on with these "players."
JJT
>of conduct. If I know the area in which the conduct occurred, I fax them
>what I have and leave it at that, which is about all I can do in the
>situation.
Come on, you child molesting gutless coward, name
one, I'll call them in the morning and ID myself..
Just WHAT is stopping you from backing up your mouth?
Besides, being afraid... And aware of your history.
Because you KNOW what that will bring up.. hehehehe
JJT
Gordon's failing by the seat of his pants
Google is laughing, grp-ie ain't got a chance
Gordon's failing to the seduction world
He just can't get laid, by boys or by girls
Gordon's failing, all his dolls cringe in fear
All the 'gym mafia' minors, just disapeared
Gordon's failing, see he ain't got no balls
Denise won't return them, he can't grow no 'mo
[Chorus]
RICO III is coming, the joke's getting thin
Pych exam is expected, he can't duck it again
Sanity stops running, um, 'hellen' lives in fear
Gordon is failing, and the world can't stop laughing
Gordon's failing to the Internet World
"..if it were legal..", for young gymnast girls
Gordon's failing upon all lawyers of sorts
cheap "fucking' judges" in lame "fucking courts"
Gordon's failing-and I don't wanna pout
but the fleet just came in, so his mommie's gone out
[Chorus]
RICO III is coming, the joke's getting thin
Pych exam is expected, he can't duck it again
Sanity stops running, um, 'hellen' lives in fear
Gordon is failing, and his dolls can't stop laughing
Gordon's failing, his 9/11 speech spewed hate..
The traitor is proven...his 'honor' at stake..
Now get this
Gordon's failing, yeah, well, I was sued, too
An' you know what he spewed? Well, some of it was true!
Gordon's failing at the top of the pile
Drop ya draws now, won't you give him a smile?
I just can't stop laughing [fading] HA HA HA HA HA
Krus T. Olfard
Did you have an orgasm while writing that?
No proof, of course, again, of course.
HeeroYuy
I wonder, then, why the authorities didn't respond given the seriousness of
that situation.
Ray Gordon
>>> authorities, and will he soon?
>>
>> I've been going to various authorities for several years regarding this
>> type of conduct. If I know the area in which the conduct occurred, I fax
>> them what I have and leave it at that, which is about all I can do in the
>> situation.
>>
>> There was nothing to "answer" regarding what I posted, as I posted it to
>> illustrate what really goes on with these "players."
>
> I wonder, then, why the authorities didn't respond given the seriousness
> of that situation.
How would you know unless you were in rather close contact with those
involved, assuming you even knew who was involved?
JJT
>How would you know unless you were in rather close contact with those
>involved, assuming you even knew who was involved?
Just what IS your problem, child milester....??..??..??...
JJT
Don't start him posting
grp-ie will post all night
everybody laughs right at him
while he's wetting his pants in fright
no career defamation
when he hasn't got an occupation
grp-ie's dollies are getting laid
grp-ie's dollies always get their way
cause women would rather fuck anyone else
then Ray Gordon, anyday..
He had his own newsgroup online
it lasted just a little while
now it's one big laughing party
as he was bitch-slapped aside....
with grp-ie's lack of balls n vigor
it shows he's just a lame-ass white nigger..
grp-ie's dollies are getting laid
grp-ie's dollies always get their way
cause women would rather screw anyone else
then Ray Gordon, anyday..
alt.romance laughs in his face..
alt-law thinks he's a mental case..
alt.hypnosis feels it's a crime
on his mommie's telephone line
with his sock puppets and his "..wishes..",
...does 9/11 come to mind ?
but there's no danger, HA !
"..inexcusable failure.." is his career
He may sound sick and deranged
when he breaks into his coward's tears..
When he's off-line, he's even worse..
stalking women in nightclubs like a jerk..
grp-ie's dollies are getting laid
grp-ie's dollies always get their way
cause women would rather love anyone else
then Ray Gordon, anyday..
cause women don't laugh at anyone else
more then Ray Gordon, anyday..
HeeroYuy
All I hear from this are wild charges with no conclusion to this matter from
someone known for making wild charges and not backing them up with
verifiable proof. Since Gordon is trying to turn this into around and trying
to say I have anything to do with it, it leads me to believe he is lying...
again.
Krus T. Olfard
news:tviid.107120$5v2....@fe2.columbus.rr.com:
That does seem to be rather obvious.
HC
>> I have nothing to add.
>>
>> I want Gordon's opinion of USENET archived for posterity.
>
>A DMCA notice can fix that.
Gee whiz, wonder what freakboy is afraid of . . . that maybe his constant
contradictions and hypocrisy will be hius undoing in court?
Nah, not our newsloon.
>A DMCA notice can fix that.
>
LOL, too funny.
Hey bent headed jackass, a LOBOTOMY can fix THAT!
HC
>> Is Gordon willing to testify to these allegations under oath and penalty
>> of perjury?
>Certainly.
Of course he is, have you read his cokmplaints?
What could possibly make you think he would hesitate for even a second to lie
in court?
HC
>Since Gordon is trying to turn this into around and trying
>to say I have anything to do with it, it leads me to believe he is lying...
>again.
>
Q: How can you tell when Porker is lying?
A: His lips are moving.
HC
>Anyone who copies my postings should be aware of the possibility.
>
Anyone that acts like and talks like a PSYCHO should be aware of the
possibilities of men with white coats and leather restraints in their future.
John C. Randolph From:
>Well, it *would have been* without her knowledge if he hadn't posted the
>details to the internet.
>That he name-dropped several well known names in the course of his bragging
>only served to get the media a little more interested.
Grp,
If you have knowledge of a crime, then you have a moral duty (and in many states
a legal duty) to report it to the relevant authorities. So, you gonna name names,
or is this just you blowing smoke as usual?
-jcr
John C. Randolph From:
>> Fabricated bullshit.
>Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an
>invasion of privacy.
>Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and
>videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid
>enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the
>practice might ever stumble across it.
>Some gurus are just DUMB.
Well, that certainly sounds reprehensible, and if it in fact happened, why
aren't you naming the culprit? Careful, by protecting him you could be an
acessory to a felony.
So, gonna write out that police report, or just admit that you fabricated this
story?
-jcr
John C. Randolph From:
>>> I mean, anyone out to PROTECT WOMEN would definitely be outraged by this
>>> conduct (unless they had a hidden agenda they weren't revealing), and
>>> wouldn't hesitate to report what they find as I do.
>>
>> Finally, a direct answer. Now, why hasn't Gordon gone to the authorities,
>> and will he soon?
>I've been going to various authorities for several years regarding this type
>of conduct.
Let me guess... They've ignored you, because they don't find you credible?
-jcr
John C. Randolph From:
One of these days, if you ever manage to get a case past your major stumbling
blocks of your inability to follow FRCP, I can't wait for a judge to ask you:
If you don't want your writings to be visible in a public archive, why are you
posting them to USENET, which is by definition a collection of public archives?
Your position is nothing like that of (say) Harlan Ellison, who does not post
his books to USENET, and reasonably asks that they be removed under DMCA when
one of his over-eager fans does so.
-jcr
Byte Me
Now just exactly what ethics do you have?
1. There are copies of posts everywhere in which you abuse underage
gymnasts.
2. You have been shown to be a liar in a number of posts that I have read.
3. You are constantly filing lawsuits in an attempt to stifle dissent in
violation of the First Amendment.
4. You have certainly been extremely rude to people that have problems, or
have suffered a loss to a family member.
5. You have applauded the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens on 9/11
And these are but a few examples. So tell me oh "seduction guru" (and there
are those who would say that the entire subject of seduction is immoral)
what do YOU consider to be ethical? Most of us on Earth, would like to know
what your "ethical thing" is that you have "going for you"...?? Perhaps you
should look the word up sometime....
BM
"JJT" <jjt.everywhere.now> wrote in message
news:dc0jo05q96q6nin4n...@4ax.com...
Player88
<hSoid.837834$Gx4.2...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Byte Me"
<no_...@jose.com> wrote:
> I love the part about ruining "this ethical thing I have going for me..."
> Now just exactly what ethics do you have?
>
> 1. There are copies of posts everywhere in which you abuse underage
> gymnasts.
> 2. You have been shown to be a liar in a number of posts that I have read.
> 3. You are constantly filing lawsuits in an attempt to stifle dissent in
> violation of the First Amendment.
> 4. You have certainly been extremely rude to people that have problems, or
> have suffered a loss to a family member.
> 5. You have applauded the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens on 9/11
>
> And these are but a few examples. So tell me oh "seduction guru" (and there
> are those who would say that the entire subject of seduction is immoral)
> what do YOU consider to be ethical? Most of us on Earth, would like to know
> what your "ethical thing" is that you have "going for you"...?? Perhaps you
> should look the word up sometime....
>
> BM
Byte,
Mr. Parker has already stated in one post that he has but *one* litmus
test for determining how ethical someone is: their position regarding
the alleged discrimination of male secretaries.
According to Mr. Parker, everything else is irrelevant.
ghoul
>>>> I want Gordon's opinion of USENET archived for posterity.
>>>
>>> A DMCA notice can fix that.
>>
>> Oh? You gonna move to nuke Alex's post, too?
>
> Anyone who copies my postings should be aware of the possibility.
Usenet is an open forum, you have no means of enforcing that and you greatly
overestimate your importance. It would be interesting to know your take on
frivolous lawsuits though.
Daniel
>>> Some gurus are just DUMB.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> verifiable evidence.
>
> This is USENET, not a lawsuit.
so you're admmitting your just making wild ass claims?
Daniel
>> Fabricated bullshit.
>
> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an
> invasion of privacy.
then do it.
Daniel
> Well, it *would have been* without her knowledge if he hadn't posted the
> details to the internet.
>
> That he name-dropped several well known names in the course of his
> bragging only served to get the media a little more interested.
sounds like someone is jealous.
Daniel
>> Actually it is. You have not cited any verifiable references and
>> therefore you are making it all up.
>
> Actually, the appropriate place to verify it would be to law enforcement,
> since there is an invasion of sexual privacy of the women who don't know
> they are being filmed. I'm sure the woman in question would not be
> pleased to learn that her likeness was being used in such an intimate
> manner for such a purpose.
>
> Given that the woman in question repeatedly said "no" and was "forcibly
> taken," there is also reason to believe that a rape occurred.
>
> What does this have to do with YOU, anyway?
>
>
>
YOU are the ONLY person making ANY claims of ANY wrongdoing. i suspect this
is yet another of your LIES.
Daniel
>>> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an
>>> invasion of privacy.
>>>
>>> videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is
>>> stupid enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to
>>> stop the practice might ever stumble across it.
>>>
>>
>> of perjury?
>
> web for several years now
in other words, "I subscribe to numerous porn sites, since I am unable to
actually have a date of my own".
Ray Gordon
> gymnasts.
Wrong. Gymnasts of course were threatening me and my family for three years
because I knew one of the sport's dirty little secrets.
> 2. You have been shown to be a liar in a number of posts that I have
> read.
Wrong again.
> 3. You are constantly filing lawsuits in an attempt to stifle dissent in
> violation of the First Amendment.
No, I'm filing lawsuits over people who have threatened me to further their
business, and who have defamed me.
> 4. You have certainly been extremely rude to people that have problems,
> or have suffered a loss to a family member.
Sauce for the goose: people mock employment discrimination while profiting
from their silence.
> 5. You have applauded the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens on 9/11
Never. I said that the victims were mostly assholes. And they were. The
conduct of many of the surviving families since 9/11 is nothing to write
home about, either.
JJT
>> gymnasts.
>Wrong. Gymnasts of course were threatening me and my family for three years
>because I knew one of the sport's dirty little secrets.
Then, instead of threatening minors in chatrooms, and ya
mommie wanting to hit them with baseball bats, did you not
call the cops..you have all these 'dirty secrets', yet
you shut up about them to folks who can stop it.
That makes you as bad as 'they' are..in fact worse..
>> 2. You have been shown to be a liar in a number of posts that I have
>> read.
>
>Wrong again.
Well, you just proved it...
>> 3. You are constantly filing lawsuits in an attempt to stifle dissent in
>> violation of the First Amendment.
>
>No, I'm filing lawsuits over people who have threatened me to further their
>business, and who have defamed me.
But..you say I defame you, and yet you do nothing..coward..
>> 4. You have certainly been extremely rude to people that have problems,
>> or have suffered a loss to a family member.
>
>Sauce for the goose: people mock employment discrimination while profiting
>from their silence.
Who the fuck cares, you are a child molesting coward..prove me wrong..
...in one of them "..fuckin' courts.." n "..fucking judges.."
as you call them.. Just what IS stopping you..besides fear..?
>> 5. You have applauded the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens on 9/11
>
>Never. I said that the victims were mostly assholes. And they were. The
>conduct of many of the surviving families since 9/11 is nothing to write
>home about, either.
Bull fucking shit, and here is the proof:
- Proof of Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon) wishing death on a child :
>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
>>Cc: cave...@nni.com
>>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400
>>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake
>>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The...@juno.com>
>>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106,
>>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,206-207,212-213,
>>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,274-275,289-290,293-300
>>X-Juno-Att: 0
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>From: The Seduction Library <the______seductio...@juno.com>
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance
>>Lines: 307
>>Xref: news alt.romance:246369
>>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way,
>>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup
>>they can stay the hell out of my threads.
>>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people
>>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by
>>attacks on its creator.
>>I am going to clear the record on a few things here:
>>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an
>>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation
>>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID
>>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling
>>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four
>>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love
>>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I
>>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her).
>>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in
>>anger, after MONTHS of provocation
- Proof of Gordon Roy Parker stating women deserve to be raped & murdered :
>>From: r____a__...@juno.com (Outfoxing The Foxes)
>>Subject: Re: Need A Piece Of Advice
>>Date: 1998/11/02
>>Message-ID: <19981102.144604.2648...@juno.com>
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,3-5,10-14,23-29,32-45,47-50,55-58,60-61,74-77,
>>79-87,95-97,99-102,105-112,121-122,130-131,138-139,146-147,
>>156-157,160-161,163-164,181-182,196-197,199
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance
>>Look at the way women treat "losers" and you will see
>>why they wind up beaten, murdered, raped, robbed, disrespected, and
>>oppressed. It is because women DESERVE it. The ones who harmed me
>>should thank their lucky stars that I didn't react like a primate and
>>just dump them six feet underground. Unfortunately, premeditated murder
>>would ruin this ethical thing I have going for me, although on a primal
>>level it is quite appealing.
- Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon) on 9/11 :
"There was no significant loss of life in those towers. Not
a one."
- Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001
"This attack happened in my HOMETOWN, a hometown I do not
live in or work in because of illegal behavior. I hope those
who swiped my ability to live there enjoy the message they got from GOD
today.........."
- Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001
"In that building existed little more than a bunch of companies
which hire "office whores" and the like. I have no sympathy for
employment discriminators, and if someone had to die in this attack, I
couldn't think of a better group of people for the terrorists to pick."
- Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001
Krus T. Olfard
Would you care to provide those posts with headers to back this up?
Thought not.
Paul Robinson
>>1. There are copies of posts everywhere in which you abuse underage
>>gymnasts.
> Wrong. Gymnasts of course were threatening me and my family for three years
> because I knew one of the sport's dirty little secrets.
Are you claiming you did not make the statements which people quoted you
saying you were making threats?
>>2. You have been shown to be a liar in a number of posts that I have
>>read.
> Wrong again.
I've caught at least three of them.
>>3. You are constantly filing lawsuits in an attempt to stifle dissent in
>>violation of the First Amendment.
> No, I'm filing lawsuits over people who have threatened me to further their
> business, and who have defamed me.
Oh so that's why every case you've filed ends up with a dismissal.
>>4. You have certainly been extremely rude to people that have problems,
>>or have suffered a loss to a family member.
> Sauce for the goose: people mock employment discrimination while profiting
> from their silence.
The alleged misconduct of others does not justify yours.
Alex
wrote on 11/16/04 5:33 PM:
>> 5. You have applauded the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens on 9/11
>
> Never. I said that the victims were mostly assholes. And they were. The
> conduct of many of the surviving families since 9/11 is nothing to write
> home about, either.
This is why Gordon nuked the Google archive.
He thinks that if Google doesn't have the record, he can spin his 9/11
temper tantrum any way he wants.
He's wrong and those of us who were here that day all know it.
He's a liar and a coward.