@@@ NEW VISITORS READ THIS FIRST (uASF FAQ) @@@ 2005-06-06-05
Formhandle
Alt.Seduction.Fast is an unmoderated usenet group and is commonly
referred to as "uASF". Since there is no moderated version of this
newsgroup on usenet, there's a privatized evolution to this group,
"Moderated ASF". Most people, now, who use the shorthand "ASF"
are primarily referring to mASF, not uASF.
IMPORTANT, IF YOU DO NOTHING ELSE:
*** DON'T FEED THE TROLLS, IT'S REALLY NOT WORTH IT ***
*** LURK FOR A FEW DAYS BEFORE POSTING OR REPLYING ***
*** READ THE MATERIALS BEFORE POSTING (SEE BELOW) ***
*** WHEN IN DOUBT, DO A SEARCH FIRST, POST SECOND ***
ASF (Alt.Seduction.Fast) FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions):
http://www.fastseduction.com/asf-faq.shtml
- Read the FAQ before asking newbie questions.
- Lurk for at least a few days before making your first post.
- If you want to post a question, check the FAQ first to make
sure it isn't already answered there.
After you're done reading the FAQ, here are some other resources:
Moderated ASF groups (mASF):
http://www.fastseduction.com/discussion/
New visitor guide for fastseduction.com:
http://www.fastseduction.com/youarenew/
Main group-related sites:
http://www.fastseduction.com/ (Formhandle's site)
http://www.pickupguide.com/ (Maniac's site)
Player Guide:
http://www.fastseduction.com/guide/
Complete ASF acronym List:
http://www.fastseduction.com/acronyms.shtml
Most commonly recommended books/movies on ASF:
http://www.fastseduction.com/books.shtml
Master kill-filter (aka killfile or kill-file) list for ASF:
http://www.fastseduction.com/filters.shtml
For a better uASF experience:
USE THE KILL-FILTER LIST!!!!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
However, that will leave you with almost no useful postings to
peruse so it's highly recommended that you, instead, access mASF.
Postings on how to access mASF are made available here weekly.
--
Form [formh...@fastseduction.com]
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
Ray Gordon
alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
The previous posting references a commercial message board and website where
the owner receives a percentage of revenue from products which are sold
through the site.
A post that does nothing more than promote a commercial website on this
newsgroup certainly isn't adding on-topic content. They may be promoting a
website with content that would be on-topic here IF IT WERE POSTED HERE, but
otherwise it's just promotion of a commercial website.
--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Four FREE books on how to get laid by beautiful women
http://www.cybersheet.com/chess.html
Free Chess E-book: Train Like A Chess Champion
Don't buy anything from experts who won't debate on a free speech forum.
SluttyFox
"> There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. If there were, it would be called
> alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>
> The previous posting references a commercial message board and website
> where the owner receives a percentage of revenue from products which are
> sold through the site.
>
> A post that does nothing more than promote a commercial website on this
> newsgroup certainly isn't adding on-topic content. They may be promoting
> a website with content that would be on-topic here IF IT WERE POSTED HERE,
> but otherwise it's just promotion of a commercial website.
Then when you bring your board online it will be FREE speech all the way
with no moderation, correct?
SluttyFox
Ray Gordon
There will be a free-speech folder on the boards, yes, for anyone who whines
about being "moderated" on the other boards. The lone exception are posts
involving me which I would take legal action over, since a court would note
that I had the power to mitigate damages by removing them. Where others are
concerned, I offer to preserve any evidence regarding IP addresses should
someone make a federal case out of anything, so that people can be held
accountable for what they say.
Sponsored boards will be labelled as such, but within that context, negative
posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a sponsor
doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if their product
is good. No "review" folders will require my prior approval for posting.
SluttyFox
>>
>> Then when you bring your board online it will be FREE speech all the way
>> with no moderation, correct?
>
> There will be a free-speech folder on the boards, yes, for anyone who
> whines about being "moderated" on the other boards. The lone exception
> are posts involving me which I would take legal action over, since a court
> would note that I had the power to mitigate damages by removing them.
> Where others are concerned, I offer to preserve any evidence regarding IP
> addresses should someone make a federal case out of anything, so that
> people can be held accountable for what they say.
>
> Sponsored boards will be labelled as such, but within that context,
> negative posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a
> sponsor doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if
> their product is good. No "review" folders will require my prior approval
> for posting.
The newsgroup you made was a flop, what makes you think the board will be
any different....as he pushes the mic closer to his face..........
SluttyFox
Johannes Seppi
>>"> There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. If there were, it would be
>>called
>>
>>>alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>>>
>>>The previous posting references a commercial message board and website
>>>where the owner receives a percentage of revenue from products which are
>>>sold through the site.
>>>
>>>A post that does nothing more than promote a commercial website on this
>>>newsgroup certainly isn't adding on-topic content. They may be promoting
>>>a website with content that would be on-topic here IF IT WERE POSTED
>>>HERE, but otherwise it's just promotion of a commercial website.
>>
>>
>>Then when you bring your board online it will be FREE speech all the way
>>with no moderation, correct?
>
>
> There will be a free-speech folder on the boards, yes, for anyone who whines
> about being "moderated" on the other boards. The lone exception are posts
> involving me which I would take legal action over, since a court would note
> that I had the power to mitigate damages by removing them. Where others are
> concerned, I offer to preserve any evidence regarding IP addresses should
> someone make a federal case out of anything, so that people can be held
> accountable for what they say.
>
So do I understand it right, ASF is your folder for whining about being
"moderated" on other boards? Fits the truth remarkably well, especially
coming from you.
Ray Gordon
>> negative posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a
>> sponsor doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if
>> their product is good. No "review" folders will require my prior
>> approval for posting.
>
>
> The newsgroup you made was a flop,
It was invaded by several people who swore they would stay on their side of
the fence, and the group was never propagated enough.
>what makes you think the board will be any different....as he pushes the
>mic closer to his face..........
This is 2005, and the media is giving us exposure. Much different ballgame.
Johannes Seppi
>>>Sponsored boards will be labelled as such, but within that context,
>>>negative posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a
>>>sponsor doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if
>>>their product is good. No "review" folders will require my prior
>>>approval for posting.
>>
>>
>>The newsgroup you made was a flop,
>
>
> It was invaded by several people who swore they would stay on their side of
> the fence, and the group was never propagated enough.
>
Well the newsgroup was propagated far enough so I could read it here in
Austria. That's no reason for the failure of the group. Face it.
>
>>what makes you think the board will be any different....as he pushes the
>>mic closer to his face..........
>
>
> This is 2005, and the media is giving us exposure. Much different ballgame.
>
Who is us?
Ray Gordon
>> of the fence, and the group was never propagated enough.
>>
>
> Well the newsgroup was propagated far enough so I could read it here in
> Austria. That's no reason for the failure of the group. Face it.
The group was invaded by ASFers who defeated the purpose for creating it.
It is still not on RoadRunner, which is millions of users right then and
there.
>>>what makes you think the board will be any different....as he pushes the
>>>mic closer to his face..........
>>
>>
>> This is 2005, and the media is giving us exposure. Much different
>> ballgame.
>>
>
> Who is us?
Us = ASF
Johannes Seppi
>>>It was invaded by several people who swore they would stay on their side
>>>of the fence, and the group was never propagated enough.
>>>
>>
>>Well the newsgroup was propagated far enough so I could read it here in
>>Austria. That's no reason for the failure of the group. Face it.
>
>
> The group was invaded by ASFers who defeated the purpose for creating it.
> It is still not on RoadRunner, which is millions of users right then and
> there.
>
No wonder it is not there now. There are no messages there to speek of,
The group was still born. Perhaps there was not enough interest in it to
begin with?
>
>
>>>>what makes you think the board will be any different....as he pushes the
>>>>mic closer to his face..........
>>>
>>>
>>>This is 2005, and the media is giving us exposure. Much different
>>>ballgame.
>>>
>>
>>Who is us?
>
>
> Us = ASF
>
Says the guy who throws a fit everytime anybdy else talks about "we"...
Miss Multiverse
<snip>
>
> There will be a free-speech folder on the boards, yes, for anyone who
> whines
> about being "moderated" on the other boards. The lone exception are posts
> involving me which I would take legal action over, since a court would
> note
> that I had the power to mitigate damages by removing them. Where others
> are concerned, I offer to preserve any evidence regarding IP addresses
IP addresses are spoofed all of the time, retread. Now what?
> should someone make a federal case out of anything, so that people can be
> held accountable for what they say.
<snip>
You are an idiot.
--
"Some people think cross-posting is "bad". In and of itself, it's good
behaviour - it allows you to reach more groups with less impact on the
net." - Spam Thresholds FAQ
"Don't.... Don't-Don't-Don't Believe the Hype! MUAHAHAHAHA!" - Public Enemy
No. 1
Big Bad "Roberta" Wolfe
Kookwatch Nanny, Plague upon cretins, Mike Davis' and Cujo's Keeper, and
Official Grand Wizard of alt.fuck alt.military.collecting.medals,
alt.folklore.kooks and THIS FROUP! (coming soon)
INSTRUCTIONS: Only replies x-posted to alt.fuck will be responded to.
(...not.)
I would like to dedicate this sig to the little people:
"I've had multiple Usenet accounts for years, kook." - Mike Davis
http://tinyurl.com/aepsr
"Wow, getting multiple accounts just so you can try to troll Usenet with
your lame sock puppet act is really kooky" - Mike Davis
http://tinyurl.com/8bgy4
"You have multiple accounts? Most kooks do so that they have at least one
place to whine from when their access is nuked." - Cujo DeCrotchPuppet
http://tinyurl.com/8e7ay
"I am sending a copy of your post to the abuse department of your ISP with
CCs to the FTC and the FBI." - Mike Davis Fukking Loses it Completely,
Wayne Manzo Style. http://tinyurl.com/bj5zj
This sig has recieved raving reviews (from raving lunatics):
"Thanks for keeping me in your .sig for months and years." - Lunch Lady J***
torlled again.
"Thanks for continuing to admit who owns you in your .sig." - Lunch lady
J*** "ignoring" me.
"Kept us in his .sig for quite a while now, I see." - Lunch Lady J***
"Tell me is Roberta still wandering usenet displying the names of his owners
proudly in his .sig?" - Lunch Lady J*** wondering aloud about all of that
stuff she claims to "ignore".
"Still hot for your handlers, I see. Add my name to your .sig several more
times then." Lunch Lady J*** proves that she does not understand sarcasm.
"Are you hot for retards?" - Lunch Lady J*** begging me to defowler her
sntach again.
"What's w/ the sig?" - HVAC http://tinyurl.com/cqz4s
"You must really be hard up for sig material, mop jockey. Well, looking at
your recent sigs, I can see why." - Michael Davis http://tinyurl.com/c7s9w
"I see you added more proof of my ownership of your gender-confused carcass
to your sig, you morphing freak." - Cujo DeSuckpuppet ($1 reward for a
Google Groups URL)
"Forgot about your sig, didn't you. DOOP!" - Michael Davis is Obese ($.75
reward for Google Groups URL)
"Wax in your inner ear, doodoo in your outer ear Two cows, a zebra will jump
through your atmosphere" - Dr. Octagon PHd. (Paging Doctor Octagon)
"Your sig is too long and boring (hell I made it down to line 16)." - Some
Toothless Brit (who admittedly can't read more than 16 lines of text)
"That's probably *the* most boring sig ive ever read. Is there an award that
boring sig type people can share? Youre sig makes me want to limp. That's
it." - Some "thing" calling itself "Adie"
"Everyone reads usenet. Apporval here means approval everywhere." -
ja...@my-deja.com
Your Usenet Moment of Zen:
CUJO: Still stalking folks in local hierarchies, Mop Jockey?
RW: Thank you, thank you, and welcome to "You Bet Cujo's Life"...
Say what local hierarchy "alt.fuck.the.skull.of.jesus" belongs to and the
duck will come down and give you fifty dollars!
"This mop jockey sock is *plonked*" - mop jockey borks teh robots.
Aardvark
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>"> There is no "moderated ASF" on USENET. If there were, it would be
>>called
>>
>>>alt.seduction.fast.moderated.
>>>
>>>The previous posting references a commercial message board and website
>>>where the owner receives a percentage of revenue from products which are
>>>sold through the site.
>>>
>>>A post that does nothing more than promote a commercial website on this
>>>newsgroup certainly isn't adding on-topic content. They may be promoting
>>>a website with content that would be on-topic here IF IT WERE POSTED
>>>HERE, but otherwise it's just promotion of a commercial website.
>>
>>
>>Then when you bring your board online it will be FREE speech all the way
>>with no moderation, correct?
>
>
> There will be a free-speech folder on the boards, yes, for anyone who whines
> about being "moderated" on the other boards. The lone exception are posts
> involving me which I would take legal action over, since a court would note
> that I had the power to mitigate damages by removing them. Where others are
> concerned, I offer to preserve any evidence regarding IP addresses should
> someone make a federal case out of anything, so that people can be held
> accountable for what they say.
>
> Sponsored boards will be labelled as such, but within that context, negative
> posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a sponsor
> doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if their product
> is good. No "review" folders will require my prior approval for posting.
so you admit that you've set this up as just another scam (you hope) to
fleece people out of their money in court.
thanks for coming clean, fathead.
not go forth throughout the land and...
shut up, stupid.
aardvark
Ray Gordon
>> negative posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a
>> sponsor doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if
>> their product is good. No "review" folders will require my prior
>> approval for posting.
>
>
> so you admit that you've set this up as just another scam (you hope) to
> fleece people out of their money in court.
There is no scam whatsoever in that arrangement.
jjt
>There is no scam whatsoever in that arrangement.
** You admitted (see below) you ".wished."
** a child would die, JUST to get revenge on
** her mother for her crime of ".loving you."
SO, the question is, Mr. Gordon Roy Parker:
".how old was Michelle's daughter Cierra
when you "wished" she would die, and if
your "wish" could come true, what would
you "wish" to happen to her.. ?????? ."
...Usenet records seem to note her age at 6 or 7...
..again..PLEASE..for the record... Tell us all..
Does this refresh your memory, Mr. Parker..?
>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
>>Cc: cave...@nni.com
>>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400
>>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake
>>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The...@juno.com>
>>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106,
>>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,206-207,212-213,
>>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,274-275,289-290,293-300
>>X-Juno-Att: 0
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>From: The Seduction Library <the______seductio...@juno.com>
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance
>>Lines: 307
>>Xref: news alt.romance:246369
>>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way,
>>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup
>>they can stay the hell out of my threads.
>>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people
>>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by
>>attacks on its creator.
>>I am going to clear the record on a few things here:
>>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an
>>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation
>>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID
>>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling
>>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four
>>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love
>>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I
>>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her).
>>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in
>>anger, after MONTHS of provocation
Main Entry: mo·lest
Pronunciation: m&-'lest
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French molester, from
Latin molestare, from molestus burdensome, annoying; akin to
Latin moles mass
1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile
intent or injurious effect
2 : to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to
force physical and usually sexual contact on
- mo·les·ta·tion /"mO-"les-'tA-sh&n, "mä-, -l&s-/ noun
- mo·lest·er /m&-'les-t&r/ noun
Aardvark
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>Sponsored boards will be labelled as such, but within that context,
>>>negative posts concerning the sponsor will be allowed to stand. That a
>>>sponsor doesn't run from these rules I believe is considered a plus if
>>>their product is good. No "review" folders will require my prior
>>>approval for posting.
>>
>>
>>so you admit that you've set this up as just another scam (you hope) to
>>fleece people out of their money in court.
>
>
> There is no scam whatsoever in that arrangement.
clam up, fathead, you already admitted to the scam. you just mistakenly
think that you're not as stupid as you are in real life. you are only a
tiny fraction of as much intelligent, as those you are trying to scam,
kro-mag head.
don't expect anyone to just suddenly start to believe that you are not
trying to pull yet another scam, if you even go through with it, gumby.
the last time you put up a message board it only collected information
(like names, cities, passwords etc.) on people but didn't let them in to
the site, you disgusting scab farm.
all this time you had been ignoring me, booger ray. i knew that you
hadn't killfiled my words. since you're so morbidly afraid of even the
slightest discouraging word from me, you may not be able to summon up
the gumption to reply but that won't keep you from wanting to sniff
around my ass.
i'll bet that everytime i fart in your face you can tell what i ate for
lunch, you dope.
another day for you...another embarrassment for you. another day that i
say...
shut up, stupid.
aardvark
Ray Gordon
>>>so you admit that you've set this up as just another scam (you hope) to
>>>fleece people out of their money in court.
>>
>>
>> There is no scam whatsoever in that arrangement.
>
> clam up, fathead,
Oh how tough he talks when anonymous.
>you already admitted to the scam. you just mistakenly think that you're not
>as stupid as you are in real life. you are only a tiny fraction of as much
>intelligent, as those you are trying to scam, kro-mag head.
Still no mention of the alleged scam.
> don't expect anyone to just suddenly start to believe that you are not
> trying to pull yet another scam, if you even go through with it, gumby.
Still no mention of the alleged scam.
> the last time you put up a message board it only collected information
> (like names, cities, passwords etc.) on people but didn't let them in to
> the site, you disgusting scab farm.
That is incorrect. The board was taken down for maintenance. Still no
mention of the alleged scam.
> all this time you had been ignoring me, booger ray. i knew that you hadn't
> killfiled my words. since you're so morbidly afraid of even the slightest
> discouraging word from me, you may not be able to summon up the gumption
> to reply but that won't keep you from wanting to sniff around my ass.
Your posts will be central to a lawsuit that will be filed this week.
> i'll bet that everytime i fart in your face you can tell what i ate for
> lunch, you dope.
Oh how tough he talks from behind that monitor.
> another day for you...another embarrassment for you. another day that i
> say...
My response to your postings (and those of several others here) will be
filed in federal court by the end of this week, assuming no further delays.
Aardvark
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>>so you admit that you've set this up as just another scam (you hope) to
>>>>fleece people out of their money in court.
>>>
>>>
>>>There is no scam whatsoever in that arrangement.
>>
>>clam up, fathead,
>
>
> Oh how tough he talks when anonymous.
>
>
>
>>you already admitted to the scam. you just mistakenly think that you're not
>>as stupid as you are in real life. you are only a tiny fraction of as much
>>intelligent, as those you are trying to scam, kro-mag head.
>
>
> Still no mention of the alleged scam.
it was mentioned, you just ignore the text.
>>don't expect anyone to just suddenly start to believe that you are not
>>trying to pull yet another scam, if you even go through with it, gumby.
>
>
> Still no mention of the alleged scam.
>
>
>
>>the last time you put up a message board it only collected information
>>(like names, cities, passwords etc.) on people but didn't let them in to
>>the site, you disgusting scab farm.
>
>
> That is incorrect. The board was taken down for maintenance. Still no
> mention of the alleged scam.
>
>
>
>>all this time you had been ignoring me, booger ray. i knew that you hadn't
>>killfiled my words. since you're so morbidly afraid of even the slightest
>>discouraging word from me, you may not be able to summon up the gumption
>>to reply but that won't keep you from wanting to sniff around my ass.
>
>
> Your posts will be central to a lawsuit that will be filed this week.
>
>
>
>>i'll bet that everytime i fart in your face you can tell what i ate for
>>lunch, you dope.
>
>
> Oh how tough he talks from behind that monitor.
>
>
>
>>another day for you...another embarrassment for you. another day that i
>>say...
>
>
> My response to your postings (and those of several others here) will be
> filed in federal court by the end of this week, assuming no further delays.
come and get me, fathead. i won't volunteer you any personal information
because you will abuse it until you are caught then claim that you are
"sick in the head" to avoid punishment. (wise to that "scam" too)
you are indeed as dumb as you are rotten, you thin skinned whiny pusbag.
you are not able to run your con games on people who are smarter than
you, dopey.
even if you could get me dragged into court in philadelphia, i'll show
up in the courtroom with a chyck from your neighborhood that wouldn't
give you the time of day, just to rub your nose in it.
i'll have plenty of pictures of the liberty bell and independence hall
to make it worth my time, and i will countersue you for lost time from
work, barratry, defamation (remember your "hypnorapist", "paid shill" &
"domestic abuser" tripe? i do). not to mention that you'll be tried for
fraud for some of your bogus (yes they are fake, you can stop lying
about it) products you sell.
you file suit against me and the kid gloves come off, you scabby piece
of filth. you are nothing more than a lowlife bum who sucks his poor
mother's limited resources dry to care for a belching dungheap of a
beggar like you. you've never contributed anything to any person or
business in your life. you've only taken from others. you are worse
than a thief as at least a robber will not judge people and bad mouth
their women once he's stolen their victim's funds.
once the courts have taken away your "barratry license" then you'll have
no choise but to...
shut up, stupid.
aardvark
Ray Gordon
>they are fake, you can stop lying about it) products you sell.
Still no mention of any fraud or scam, just a defamatory allegation from him
with no supporting evidence.
jjt
>My response to your postings (and those of several others here) will be
>filed in federal court by the end of this week, assuming no further delays.
>>>>I already have a laywer who has won a big defamation case in MA willing to
>>>>take a free look at my file concerning you. Now I just have one more page
>>>>to fax him.
"..Tell us all again about this
'lawyer' in MASS you have ready
to sue me? Is there a reason WHY
you won't name 'him (her?)' BESIDES
the reason there ISN't any lawyer and
it's just you spewing another cowardly,
impotent threat..? Just WHAT is stopping U..?.."
I'm all ready to call him/her NOW..
Tell us again, coward, why you are too scared to
provide this person's name? You stated you have
spoken\fax'ed this person about me, yet you cannot
NAME this person. You have my contact INFO, I have
posted it here..tell the world, child molester...
Vince Runza
ballgame.
Not for you, GORK. You ain't "us". You never were. You never will be. You
are "a boil on the butt of humanity" -- VSR.
Vince
--
8===Ğ