Hey guys,

One of my prospects is this HB 7.5 who seems very religious and
"wholesome".  I sarged her in a coffee shop about two weeks ago and got
her # and email.  We've exchagned about 4 emails so far because I've been
busy with other girls (for the first time in my life!), and have had fun
keeping her primed via email.  I introduced my latest email with this:

"
You remember those nice chocolate candies .. "Andes".  They tasted
so good. They could MELT in your mouth and you'd get to TASTE
that wonderful mint in the middle.  (Okay, off on a tangent here :-) )
"

Now the reason I chose "Andes" is because it kinda bears a resemblance to
her name in a way.  My point here was to try to induce some sexual
thoughts into her subconcious.

Anyway, she wrote me back a nice reply suggesting we get together, but
added that she felt uncomfortable with my "pattern". Here's what she
said:

"
...I must admit that I was a little uncomfortable with this part of your
last email:  You remember nice chocolate candies .. "Andes".  They tasted
so good. They could MELT in your mouth and you'd get to TASTE
that wonderful mint in the middle.  (Okay, off on a tangent here :-) )
Yes, I remember the candy, but no, I'm not likely to be compared to
edibles, if that's what you meant. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but let's
keep it all  good, clean fun, okay:)
"

So I figure that either she's not comfortable with her sexuality, or is
reluctant to enter that area yet.  We are going to meet up next week, so
I'd like to have any tips from any of you guys that have dealt with
"wholesome" type girls before.   Also, should I respond to her objection
in my next email, or just blow it off?

Thanks,
Elkston

--

 Of utmost importance  "... is the desire to swing"
   -Chick Corea, Liner notes on "Tones for Joans Bones"

745d32e3

(Regulars: you may filter this message via the author name "Disclaimer")

Disclaimer re: "Bet For A Living" aka Ray Gordon (fake name) aka Gordon
Roy Parker (real name)

IF YOU ARE NEW to this group take note:

Gordon Roy Parker currently makes frequent daily posts to the following
usenet groups:
alt.seduction.fast
alt.romance
alt.hypnosis
alt.sports.gymnastics

In all four groups Gordon is widely regarded as an idiot.  In all four
groups Gordon threatens to sue people, sometimes daily. In all four
groups Gordon's posts are considered to detract from the functioning of
the group and he is generally regarded as having emotional problems.
The alt.hypnosis group ALSO posts a disclaimer after each of his posts.

Gordon Roy Parker suffers from a serious mental illness called
"Manic/Depression" sometimes also called "Bi-Polar Disorder".  This
disorder is characterized by alternating periods of mania and
depression. In a manic phase the sufferer experiences a euphoric high
and experiences delusions of both grandeur and superior abilities.  The
cycle then gradually swings to the depressive phase, where the suffer
can experience crippling depressive symptoms.  It should be noted that
Gordon Roy Parker has indeed made past usenet posts in which he
threatened to kill himself.

Most would agree that Gordon's predicament is unfortunate.  But rather
than obtain adequate treatment for his problem and explore his issues
with a trained therapist to hopefully move his life in a positive
direction, Gordon instead insists on spending every available waking
moment on usenet where he has alienated himself from most of the
remaining usenet population by being as disruptive, vengeful and
taunting as possible. He has sometimes made in excess of 35 usenet
posts in a single 24 hour period (eg August 11, 2001).

Gordon Roy Parker clearly suffers from an inferiority complex. This is
evident from both the sheer number of posts he makes and also the
content.  His goal is not to engage in meaningful or otherwise useful
conversation but simply to engage in ANY conversation and be
recognized.  Because of this, he often resorts to flaming others with
insults or making otherwise provocative and inflamatory statements.

Gordon is 34 years old, lives in his mother's basement, doesn't hold a
job and currently lacks the emotional skills to do so.  He readily
admits to having herpes and that his mother is an ex-prostitute.  And
he feels qualified to offer YOU unsolicited advice and spam YOU with
ads for his products.

While Gordon's condition is unfortunate and we would wish him the best
if he sought treatment, his current behavior detracts from the
functioning of our group. Please keep your interaction with him to a
minimum or filter his comments out of your newsreader listings.

You may also consider contacting Gordon's mother and encouraging her to
get Gordon the help he needs.  Her contact information is:
     Penny Parker
     4247 Locust Street, #806
     Philadelphia, PA  19104
     (215) 386-7366
     PennyParke...@aol.com

Remember, all the info you need is free.  Knowledgeable people with
experience will help you out and they won't try to sell you something
in the process.

Two great and REPUTABLE sites to get you started are:
http://www.fastseduction.com/
http://www.pickupguide.com/

If you wish to filter out Gordon's posts, as well as those of other
identified trolls, the recommended kill-filter for this newsgroup can
be found at
http://www.fastseduction.com/filters.shtml

745d32e3

believe me you don't want any part of a chick who's into religion... they come
with tons of mental baggage and they weird out when it's time to hit the sack

From what i've learned from Kakol's posts about church girls is that you
don't want to push the issue or argue with them about it.  That will make
them more resistant.  Instead try to focus their feelings on how good it
feels to be with you and how good other things feel.

Sounds like you were a little too blatant here and she picked up on it.  
I once made the same mistake with a church-girl type in person and got
slapped in the face.  My tonality was blatant innuendo while talking
about chocolate.  Here by saying "off on a tangent" you are admitting to
your innuendo.  A man does not apologize for his desires.

I think your best bet is to say that if she interpreted it as unwholesome
she was mistaken and you were just being playful.

You may want to try handwriting analysis to get a feel for her sex drive.  
In high school I dated a church girl type who my friend told me he
thought she was suppressing a lot of sexual desire, well she did a good
job of it because I never knew.  Now that I think back she had all the
handwriting traits of HD and sexual frustration.  If only I knew then...

My final suggestion would be to search the archives for Kakol's posts on
"church girls" or similar keywords.  A lot of good stuff.

W

--
Wintermute <> RAFC-
wintermuteatcrackdealerdotcom
I do my ASF homework at:
http://www.fastseduction.com
http://www.pickupguide.com
http://www.seduction.com
http://www.nlpinfo.com

news:MPG.15e5c008e1379fb39896cd@news.supernews.com...

Whoa sailor . . . you just set yourself back a few weeks with this
chyck depending on what it's worth for you to fuck her. You say she's
a 7.5. What are you willing to put up with to fuck a chyck at this
appearance level? The fact is that church chycks aren't any fucking
different then any other chyck with one glaring exception that causes
mass confusion in their feeble minds; Every week and possibly every
fucking day they are programmed by some other religious zealot that
sex is a wonderful, beautiful, thing that they should avoid like the
plague unless or until they're married because if they don't, every
other good thing about them or that they've ever done will be invalid.
IOW they will be at the gates of hell before their life even begins.
That's some pretty heavy shit to put on a kid don't you think?

So whether or not you have a chance to lay the chyck depends a great
deal on how deeply she believes this shit and what her experience is
with sex to date. IOW some chycks use religion as a way of simply
hiding from past sexual experiences that were unpleasant or even
abusive. These are chycks to steer clear of if you are also young and
inexperienced IMO. They need a good therapist, not a lover. For other
chycks religion is simply a part of their bitch shield. The fact is
they've been fucked, they like fucking, they've already found out that
they aren't going to grow hair on their chest for being fucked, etc.
These chycks kind of take religion tongue in cheek. That is, they like
the fact that it puts them on a pedestal and gives unrealistic value
to their pussy. However, if they can convince YOU of that they will
never fuck you. Get it?

The key to laying religious chycks is taking the time necessary to
gain their trust then continually doing what is necessary to get them
dripping wet and then withdrawing, dripping wet, withdraw, dripping
wet, withdraw. It takes a lot of self control on the part of the PUA
and a lot of patience. It isn't conducive to a fast seduction. OTOH if
you know what you're doing I have laid these chycks in a relatively
short time frame. The key for me is knowing MORE about religion then
they do and being able to communicate that knowledge in an
unthreatening way that eventually begins to create doubt in their
minds about the truth of their own rather limited information, while
at the same time making me appear like a man with wisdom beyond my
years. However, this needs to be done without argument and without
being defensive. IOW you have to be very understanding and respectful
of their beliefs and at the same time demand that they respect yours.
Subtly, dig? You will automatically develop very deep rapport that
they've probably never experienced with a man if you are able to do
this, but if you're a beginner keep your expectations low and you
won't be disappointed.

Introducing sex talk before you've even spent any private time with
the chyck is a sure fire path to crash and burn. You just tipped your
hand to the bitch and put her on guard with you. IME it's ok to talk
about sex with the bitch but only after you've discovered where she
stands on the issue. First of all, how deeply does she adhere to the
typical rules of Christian values? IOW is it just a facet of her bitch
shield or does she actually deeply believe that shit and follow it
word for word? What are her personal rules? Has she ever had sex? etc.

For now just ignore the remark you made and proceed with your normal
sarge. But be aware that you have put her on guard with you before you
even started so there is likely going to be a lot of resistance on her
part to your moves to get more intimate. Whether or not you want to
move forward depends on what kind of response you get from her at your
initial meeting. If she's totally resistant to any kind of kino,
kissing, and light petting, her bitch shield may be too massive to
bother with trying to overcome it. Might be better to eject and save
yourself the time and frustration.

The main thing to remember with church girls is not to treat them any
different then you would any other chyck you want to fuck. Just know
that when things get hot and heavy, most of the time they will pull
back. When they do, the evening is over. IOW you need to let them know
in no uncertain terms that you're not going to spend your valuable
time making them feel wonderful all over or giving them manual orgasms
and then go to bed and pull cord alone later. After a couple of
evenings of getting all worked up and put away wet, chycks like this
will usually relent and give you the fucking of your life. But first
you have to do some heavy EV to find out what their real rules are.
Based on this post I would have to question if you have the necessary
experience to pull this one off. But practice makes perfect so at this
stage you have little to lose other than some time.

HTH

Kakol

I think this is a great tactic if worked right...but Kakol...i do have
this question...

I've tried it with a few women and my problem is the following.  With
the church chycks they really seem to want to believe that you're in
it for more than the sex.  so when you END the evening due to not
getting your sex they put up the "So is it's all about sex huh?" and
"why don't we just feel good holding each other" bullshit.

How do you disarm that?  I mean it is all about sex, but saying that
to a church chick will do nothing but alienate her.  I sense that your
tactic is defuse/divert attention.  how could one do the effective
takeaway AND not piss her off?

news:2c6f4f00.0108170453.11e6649b@posting.google.com...
<news:fx1f7.36629$K6.14764841@news2>...
<Snip>

The thing to remember about ALL women is that very few of them that
are actually attractive make it to their first marriage as virgins. At
some point they give in to their natural desire and fuck somebody. My
attitude has always been that, that "somebody" might as well be me. If
not ME than I can guar-an-fucking-tee you it WILL be someone else.
That's why REAL jealousy is such an insecure AFC behavior that drives
PEOPLE away. It's also what makes the "Withdraw" in the Reach &
Withdraw technique actually work.

When as a human being you learn to accept the fact that procreation
and propagation of the species is THEE major part of your ENTIRE
PURPOSE for being alive, without feeling guilty about it because of
your social conditioning, you WILL control your destiny instead of
being controlled by the environment you happen to find yourself in.
Most people never self analyze deeply enough to arrive at this
conclusion. Too scary. It means accepting that you DON'T know what you
will experience when you die. It means accepting responsibility for
your behavior ALL of the time. It's easier if you can just blame your
behavior on the influence of the devil. That way you always have an
out. It wasn't me, the devil made me do it. The thing is this,
religious people are PEOPLE who have not, due to social conditioning,
accepted this position as FACT. They are instead taught to believe
that there is ONE single person walking the planet that they have been
preordained by someone else (GOD) to fulfill their core purpose with.
Problem is, they don't know who that is. Could be anybody. Could be
YOU :)

Because of this, the "withdraw" in the Reach & Withdraw method works
even better with people like this IME. They are taught to believe that
they will know WHO this person is when they finally happen to run into
them. They are taught that they will recognize this person because the
person will "rock their world" just by being in the same room
together. Well, here they are, in a room with a guy that's rocking
their world, building a tremendous amount of value because he COULD be
the ONE. That's some pretty heavy shit, especially for a young chyck.
By denying you, she may be denying her whole purpose for being alive.
So when you withdraw the prize, (YOU/your dick) she panics and REACHES
for it. (Gives in)

The whole thing IMO is one of the biggest fucking fairy tales I think
I've ever heard. Yet it's doubtful that without modern science I would
have been able to arrive at these conclusions as easily. In spite of
all of this, I remain a very spiritual person believe it or not. One
of my main points when debating religious people is; knowing what I
know, and more importantly have come to internalize, (accept as fact)
about my life and my purpose for living it, takes MORE faith to remain
a spiritual person than what they believe. And the reality IMO is
this; even without modern science, I still think that I would have
arrived at this conclusion somehow anyway. I truly believe that
somewhere in the inner subconscious of EVERY human being is the belief
that this religious shit is largely a pile of mythical crap. For them
it's the devil that's speaking to them subconsciously. For me, it's
just the way it is.

Now to answer your question. You disarm the chyck by AGREEING with her
position with an explanation for your agreement. It's really a shit
test on her part even though she may not realize it. She EXPECTS you
to DENY that it's all about sex. That's what AFC's do all the time.

You see, accepting the above, you also have to accept the fact that
women are given a great deal of natural power in the fulfillment of
your purpose. They control the pussy. In order for you to fulfill your
purpose (or the act of it) YOU must control that pussy. That's the
game. By simply denying that it's all about sex and giving in to the
false belief that simply hugging should be fulfillment enough, leaves
her in the power position. That is, in control of the pussy.
Ultimately, she will relinquish control to you even if you're AFC
because she has to, to fulfill her core purpose in life. The point is,
WHEN will she do this? If you're AFC it will probably take months or
even years if you're a total fucking chump. If you're PUA and you know
what you're doing, you can narrow this down to a matter of a couple of
weeks, days, or even hours with the right chyck.

Unfortunately, when you simply deny that it's all about sex, you are
inadvertently building value into her natural power position. Putting
her pussy up on an even higher pedestal than the one her social
conditioning has already put it on. If she takes you at your word,
you've fucked yourself. Now you have to play the fucking game by HER
rules. Which means, she decides after an appropriate amount of time
has passed, talked to her friends and relatives about their
impressions of you and so on and so forth when or IF you will ever get
to the oil well. With this method you may indeed get to the well in
time. The problem is once you get there, whether by time, engagement,
or marriage, and she gains enough sexual experience to discover that
it's really not all that big of a deal as everyone in her social
circle told her it was all her life, it is most likely these days that
you will eventually end up splitting cereal coupons in front of a
judge eventually.

Why? Because you never established control of the power in the
relationship. The pussy. Think about it. If women didn't have a pussy
would you even want to hang around with them much? Fuck no! Other than
cooking, cleaning, and doing laundry, you'd have little or no use for
the bitches. Nor would they have much use for you these days. That's a
modern twist that we're dealing with today that makes a lot of this
new mind-set necessary if you want to get laid, and laid often.

It wasn't that long ago that even after realizing that sex was not all
that big a deal that the woman was socially conditioned to believe it
was, that she would stick around anyway because she needed a man in
her life for survival reasons. That's no longer the case today. She no
longer needs you for anything BUT sex, and she doesn't even need you
for that if she's not hetro. You are nearly useless to her UNLESS you
can rock her world sexually. Accept it and learn to deal with it to
get what you want.

The thin thread that's holding it all together these days is simply
the knowledge that children who ARE NOT raised in the typical two
parent household tend to have an enormous amount of additional
emotional baggage that fucks them up later in life than children who
are. That's a pretty thin fucking thread if you ask me. Especially
since the government will now step in to act as "daddy" in your
absence.

No, today you're basically fucked from the start in regards to being
"of value" to women. That is why I stress in my posts that you MUST,
absolutely, positively, and without question, learn to rock her world
sexually if you want to control the pussy in the relationship. It is
about the only thing that separates you from the AFC anymore. And you
have to be willing to let her fuck an AFC (or several) WITHOUT
becoming jealous about it in order for the point to be driven home to
her. Eventually she will choose to not fuck anyone else just because
she's already proven to herself that it's pointless to do so as you
are already providing her with that which she is seeking, so why
bother? The actual game isn't that fun for her, but terrific sex that
continues to naturally get better the longer she hangs around IS.

As I've stated in previous posts, my primary, who happens to be a very
religious chyck, is with me for exactly two reasons. I know this
because she reminds me of it all the time in her communications with
me. She doesn't like the way I live, she doesn't like the way I think,
she doesn't like my vices, she doesn't like the beliefs that I hold as
fact, she doesn't even really like the way I LOOK. She ONLY likes the
fact that I'm the only guy she's ever been with sexually that
continues to rock her world consistently. And she respects my
intellect. That's it.

The physical fuck and the mind fuck. Totally and simply sexual. With
the mind fuck being the MOST sensitive and important sexual organ of
all. At least in human beings. Those are the ONLY two things that keep
me in control of her pussy. She is TOTALLY self sufficient other than
those two things and has no other need for me or ANYBODY for anything
other than that in regards to personal relationships and the
fulfillment of her life purpose.

As men, who want to be laid often in today's world, the sooner you
recognize your TRUE value to the modern female and accept and
internalize it without the socially conditioned guilt previously
associated with this line of thinking, as the way of life as we now
know it, the sooner you will be able to build the type of value that
REALLY matters in the subconscious minds of your targets and tap the
well of the ACT of your life purpose. Comfortably, and without apology
for your actions and behaviors.

Ah . . . but I digress. What was ...

read more »

Kakol,

That was fucking brilliant.  Into the seduction file it goes.

- pump

--------------------------------------------------
newbies: please read the resources before posting.

http://www.fastseduction.com/asf-faq.shtml
http://www.pickupguide.com
http://www.seduction.com

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing.  Lot's of good insights.  The whole
religious chick thing is a moot point for me though, I decided a while ago not
to deal with chicks like that.  Too much of a pain in the ass.

***Chris MD***

pump <nospamfo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:3B7D972B.E4FCBE50@bellsouth.net:

Yeah, I think I'll be going after some religious snatch to play this game.

High Quality!

Good post, K.

"I do my part...behind the lines...
 Swabbing door handles of cop cars
 With D.M.S.O.....mixed with L.S.D." -- Dead Kennedys