Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why lifestyle game is inferior: Kate vs. The OTL

16 views
Skip to first unread message

BettorO...@aol.com

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 1:12:47 AM4/25/12
to
This is discussed at length in Bettor Off Single (link to free book
BELOW-ME), but it's worth discussing here, particularly in light of
how many gurus teach "lifestyle game." As I will demonstrate, this
teaching is generally flawed, not becuase it doesn't work, but because
the women on whom it does work are simply inferior to what you can get
if you learn how to ATTRACT a woman, rather than BUY her.

When I was sixteen, I fell in love with my "one true lust," a/k/a
"The OTL." A year later (1984), she smashed my heart when she hooked
up with a multimillionaire in his mid-twenties, who spent tons of cash
on her, and was a typical "lifestyle PUA." I actually met this man at
the Billy Joel concert that June, qand it was obvious he was just a
tool with money, a "random rich guy" who meant nothign to her, and who
she would never marry. By contrast, the OTL and I had an amazingly
close friendship (one which taught me a ton about game and how to
relate to women), but her price tag was fatal to our destiny.

Since I figured my soulmate was not a golddigger, I continued my
"VCABM" (Virginal Crash And Burn Mission"), with the new condition
that my "designated soulmate" would have to be superior to the OTL in
every way possible. Also like many "lifestyle PUAs," I figured that
"LimoDude's" game was the way to go, which is why I reacted to this
rejection by immediately planning to become a Harvard-educated
attorney, with a 4.0 undergrad GPA. I figured that by my mid-
twenties, I would be able to get women like the OTL, if not the OTL
herself.

Then I met Kate.

Kate was a future fashion diva, who would wind up making millions in
the fashion industry, all on her own efforts, rather than on her back,
via men. Kate never took a dime from me, and the times we were in
dating-type situations (three-hour cafeteria dinner, isolation at my
Keg party), it was because she was ATTRACTED to me, not because of
what I could give or buy her. Kate too would break my heart, but in
her case I had an easy lay, though I passed on that becuase I wanted
her as a wife, not a hookup. What I learned from Kate would set the
table for almost every "super-elite" I would lay from then on, so it
was hardly a long-term failure. By contrast, my easy lay of
HBHalloween later that year, where I corrected the "mistakes" I made
with Kate, tqaught me nothing.

Kate and the OTL offer a stark contrast in the difference between
attrackging and buying women. The OTL *needed* men to pay her bills,
which is why she was on good terms with almost all of them, resulting
in a traffic jam of my childhood friends as rivals for her affection.
Kate, on the other hand, did not need money from men, which meant she
did not need to string them along, judge them financially, or even pit
me against a single rival. Kate was also classier, more independent,
and far less *sluttier* than the OTL, while being every bit as
physically beautiful.

While I would agree that attracting women like Kate, or Le Club,
SHBDancer, and the many women I would later seduce because of what
Kate taught me about myself (that artists get laid even more than
millionaires), are not easy to game, it is worth doing so, becuase you
are actually attracting them, rather than just negotiating a price on
a whore. I may call them "Diamonds," but they are still just WHORES,
as they have price tags. Super-elite Diamonds, unlike the typical bar
sluts, must also like the guy, as money just gets them in the door.

With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear now more than ever why I
viewed Kate as superior to the OTL. Though not immediately apparant,
the OTL had to move in circles that included men who might give her
money, while Kate could retain her privacy, and her sexual dignity,
because she chose instead to earn her money rather than to whore out
for it. In other words, Kate had CLASS, something the women a
"lifestyle PUA" settles for will not get.

Had I never met Kate, I could have taken the easy way out, and I'd
probably be a wealthy Wall Street attorney now, with millions of
dollars, and a physically beautiful wife, but I would not have the
"game" I learned by taking the more difficult route through Kate, and
her progeny.


To the man who has relied on "lifestyle game" his entire life, it is
easy for him to think that this is the best he can do as a PUA,
because women like Kate simply never land on his radar. She is
literally one or more levels above the quality of any woman he has
ever had. He literally cannot fathom her existence, so not only does
he have no concept of how to "game" her, even the female teachers who
are not in her league will have no clue about how to teach a man to
seduce her. The only way to learn this level of game is to have a
woman like Kate actually consider fucking you.

Ray Gordon
Bettor Off Single: Why Commitment Is A Bad Gamble For Men
http://www.toosmarttofail.com/bos.pdf
(FREE!)

I am the stated reason the "seduction community" came into existence.
There is proof of this.




0 new messages