>Well, it *would have been* without her knowledge if he hadn't posted the >details to the internet.
>That he name-dropped several well known names in the course of his bragging >only served to get the media a little more interested.
And you can name this person, and or the source of this info..?
..come on..then answer this:
** You admitted (see below) you ".wished." ** a child would die, JUST to get revenge on ** her mother for her crime of ".loving you."
SO, the question is, Mr. Gordon Roy Parker:
".how old was Michelle's daughter Cierra when you "wished" she would die, and if your "wish" could come true, what would you "wish" to happen to her.. ?????? ."
...Usenet records seem to note her age at 6 or 7...
>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news >>Cc: cavema...@nni.com >>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400 >>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake >>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The______Seduction_________Libr...@juno.com> >>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11 >>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106, >>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,2 06-207,212-213, >>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,2 74-275,289-290,293-300 >>X-Juno-Att: 0 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Type: text/plain >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>From: The Seduction Library <the______seduction_________libr...@juno.com> >>Mail-To-News-Contact: postmas...@nym.alias.net >>Organization: mail2n...@nym.alias.net >>Newsgroups: alt.romance >>Lines: 307 >>Xref: news alt.romance:246369 >>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way, >>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup >>they can stay the hell out of my threads. >>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people >>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by >>attacks on its creator. >>I am going to clear the record on a few things here: >>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an >>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation >>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID >>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling >>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four >>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love >>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I >>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her). >>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in >>anger, after MONTHS of provocation
Main Entry: mo·lest Pronunciation: m&-'lest Function: transitive verb Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French molester, from Latin molestare, from molestus burdensome, annoying; akin to Latin moles mass
1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile intent or injurious effect
2 : to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to force physical and usually sexual contact on
Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an invasion of privacy.
Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the practice might ever stumble across it.
>Some gurus are just DUMB. >> >They just don't make gurus like they used to.
EVERYBODY SING !!!!!
"..OHHHHHHHHHHHHH <me me me me me..U U U U U...>
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee ..he got no money and he can't get laid.. So he haunts the Net till his, um, 'hellen' goes limp-wrist.. ..It sure sucks to be ray...
(CONGA LINE !!!!!)
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee ..he gots no money while he can't get laid.. ....he haunts the Net till his dollies goes nite-nite.. ..It sure sucks to be ray...
(NOW, a SOLO from Fuz da BUN ! )
..it's always Saturday nite and he can't scam no ladies: ..he got no money and 'hellen' just can't get paid.. ..REALITY is so much fun, come join us and party.... ..oppps..I forgot.., the loser's's name is ray..
(NOW JUST THE WOMEN)
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee ..even if with tons of money we just laugh his way HEY, his dolly(s) get more HOT action then he does.... ..It sure sucks to be ray... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
(now the men..)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
..IT SURE SUCKS TO BE RAY....
<in closing, for those of U on drugs....>
A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee ..he got no money and he can't get laid.. So he haunts the Net till his, um, 'hellen' goes nite-nite.. ..It sure sucks to be ray...
G U R you..?
<I'm not at ALL happy with the Flash-Card section !!!!!>
> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an > invasion of privacy.
> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures > and videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is > stupid enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power > to stop the practice might ever stumble across it.
> Some gurus are just DUMB.
If you're going to make posts like this one then you need to provide verifiable evidence. You know this - why do you ignore it?
-- KTO
------------------ Everything I post is my opinion. If you don't like my opinions then killfile me, if you have the balls.
"Ray Gordon" wrote: > "Search DejaNews [http://www.dejanews.com] and put my names (Ray > Gordon or Gordon Roy Parker) in, and check the posts [...] Let go of > my anger? Not a chance. I have a few favors to return, and an amount > of power to return them that you couldn't even comprehend. I know who > has harmed me, who has stood by and did nothing, and who has helped > me. Each group will be treated accordingly. [...] I'm just a 'loser.' > Look at the way women treat 'losers' and you will see why they wind up > beaten, murdered, raped, robbed, disrespected, and oppressed. It is > because women DESERVE it. The ones who harmed me should thank their > lucky stars that I didn't react like a primate and just dump them six > feet underground. Unfortunately, premeditated murder would ruin this > ethical thing I have going for me, although on a primal level it is > quite appealing." -- Gordon Roy Parker > [19981102.144604.26486.3.r____a___y_gor...@juno.com] (Read the full > message and thread in Google Groups [http://www.dejanews.com] for > context.)
> Actually it is. You have not cited any verifiable references and > therefore you are making it all up.
Actually, the appropriate place to verify it would be to law enforcement, since there is an invasion of sexual privacy of the women who don't know they are being filmed. I'm sure the woman in question would not be pleased to learn that her likeness was being used in such an intimate manner for such a purpose.
Given that the woman in question repeatedly said "no" and was "forcibly taken," there is also reason to believe that a rape occurred.
in article jV6id.3512$fw2.1636@trndny01, Ray Gordon at r...@cybersheet.com wrote on 11/3/04 10:35 AM:
>> Fabricated bullshit.
> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an > invasion of privacy.
> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and > videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid > enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the > practice might ever stumble across it.
> Some gurus are just DUMB.
Of course, Gordon won't NAME the person involved because he'd then be sued.
>> Actually it is. You have not cited any verifiable references and >> therefore you are making it all up.
> Actually, the appropriate place to verify it would be to law enforcement, > since there is an invasion of sexual privacy of the women who don't know > they are being filmed. I'm sure the woman in question would not be pleased > to learn that her likeness was being used in such an intimate manner for > such a purpose.
> Given that the woman in question repeatedly said "no" and was "forcibly > taken," there is also reason to believe that a rape occurred.
> What does this have to do with YOU, anyway?
Anyone here is free to question Gordon's credibility.
He may not like it but there's fuck all he can do about it.
> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an > invasion of privacy.
first it was "rape" then in the feeble mindless mind of ray...
> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and > videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid > enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the > practice might ever stumble across it.
hmmm it gets downgraded to "conquest". gee ray, you lying, bent headed, scabby sack of vulture snot. you can't even stick to the same lie in the same post.
> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an > invasion of privacy.
> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and > videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid > enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the > practice might ever stumble across it.
> Some gurus are just DUMB.
Is Gordon willing to testify to these allegations under oath and penalty of perjury?
>> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an >> invasion of privacy.
>> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and >> videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is stupid >> enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to stop the >> practice might ever stumble across it.
>> Some gurus are just DUMB.
> Is Gordon willing to testify to these allegations under oath and penalty > of perjury?
Certainly. I've been collecting field and lay reports from all over the web for several years now, just in case any women surface and need proof of what was done. When someone said he was going to "Columbine" one of his college professors, I figured out who appeared to be from my database and notified his school. In some cases, the person gives away their identity long before they admit to breaking the law, and adding two and two connects the dots.
Anytime I see men talking about posting pictures or videos of their conquests, I notify law enforcement of the potential invasion of privacy, which gives them probable cause to investigate.
I mean, anyone out to PROTECT WOMEN would definitely be outraged by this conduct (unless they had a hidden agenda they weren't revealing), and wouldn't hesitate to report what they find as I do.
>>> Actually, it is not. What the guru did was RAPE, and filming it was an >>> invasion of privacy.
>>> Seems this guru also has a practice of taking unauthorized pictures and >>> videos of his "conquests" and posting them to the internet, and is >>> stupid enough to brag about it publicly, as if no one with the power to >>> stop the practice might ever stumble across it.
>>> Some gurus are just DUMB.
>> Is Gordon willing to testify to these allegations under oath and penalty >> of perjury?
> Certainly. I've been collecting field and lay reports from all over the > web for several years now, just in case any women surface and need proof > of what was done. When someone said he was going to "Columbine" one of > his college professors, I figured out who appeared to be from my database > and notified his school. In some cases, the person gives away their > identity long before they admit to breaking the law, and adding two and > two connects the dots.
> Anytime I see men talking about posting pictures or videos of their > conquests, I notify law enforcement of the potential invasion of privacy, > which gives them probable cause to investigate.
> I mean, anyone out to PROTECT WOMEN would definitely be outraged by this > conduct (unless they had a hidden agenda they weren't revealing), and > wouldn't hesitate to report what they find as I do.
Finally, a direct answer. Now, why hasn't Gordon gone to the authorities, and will he soon?
>Anyone here is free to question Gordon's credibility.
Not only that, but I spit in his face. I demand he backs up his child molesting cakehole. He won't
JJT
(sung to the Faces Song "..Stay with me..") :
In the mornin' don't say you'll sue me, 'Cause I really can't stop laughing as it is.. You say your name is Gordon, but we know you as grp-ie The G-U-R-You who is full of, oh, so much shit..
Don't need to yell "coercion" I don't care about your perversions', 'cause with a 'life' like that you got nothin' to laugh about. Gumby head, hair-lip and STD, You say you're a nasty 'ol S.O.B. Anytime you want to prove it, just feel free..
PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me Shut yer mouth or fuckin' sue me PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me Shut yer trap or fuckin' sue me
So, in the real world, please don't say you'll sue me, Unless you have the balls to back up your cakehole Yeah, you know where is my home, your dollies even know my phone, Just don't tell the world I hide from your whinning, coward's moan..
PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me Shut yer mouth or fuckin' sue me PLEASE grp-ie, PLEASE sue me Shut yer trap or fuckin' sue me
Want sum mo' apples now..?
(this song really works if ya include the guitar lines, and walking bass. Try it :)
>Anyone who copies my postings should be aware of the possibility.
** You admitted (see below) you ".wished." ** a child would die, JUST to get revenge on ** her mother for her crime of ".loving you."
SO, the question is, Mr. Gordon Roy Parker:
".how old was Michelle's daughter Cierra when you "wished" she would die, and if your "wish" could come true, what would you "wish" to happen to her.. ?????? ."
...Usenet records seem to note her age at 6 or 7...
>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news >>Cc: cavema...@nni.com >>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400 >>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake >>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The______Seduction_________Libr...@juno.com> >>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11 >>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106, >>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,2 06-207,212-213, >>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,2 74-275,289-290,293-300 >>X-Juno-Att: 0 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Type: text/plain >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>From: The Seduction Library <the______seduction_________libr...@juno.com> >>Mail-To-News-Contact: postmas...@nym.alias.net >>Organization: mail2n...@nym.alias.net >>Newsgroups: alt.romance >>Lines: 307 >>Xref: news alt.romance:246369 >>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way, >>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup >>they can stay the hell out of my threads. >>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people >>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by >>attacks on its creator. >>I am going to clear the record on a few things here: >>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an >>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation >>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID >>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling >>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four >>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love >>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I >>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her). >>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in >>anger, after MONTHS of provocation
Main Entry: mo·lest Pronunciation: m&-'lest Function: transitive verb Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French molester, from Latin molestare, from molestus burdensome, annoying; akin to Latin moles mass
1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile intent or injurious effect
2 : to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to force physical and usually sexual contact on
