I'm beginning to wonder about this one. She's about an 8.5, and fun to be with. I've been working on her through email for about a month, and met her twice. I've gotten her from wanting to wait for marriage, to wanting to give sex a try soon, but now she starts talking crazy. I let her know that sexual compatibility is very important to developing a relationship, so she has conceded that since it's the easiest pert of the relationship to test, that it only makes since to test it first. Now she starts signing her email to me "Mrs Nina Gilmore"!!! This is the second nut case I've gotten. I can only hope that I softened her up for the next guy, because I'm having second thoughts about sleeping with her.
PS: My last crazy girl still IM's me from time to time, but she's pre-ASF so I never bagged her.
> I'm beginning to wonder about this one. She's about an 8.5, and fun to be > with. I've been working on her through email for about a month, and met her > twice. I've gotten her from wanting to wait for marriage, to wanting to give > sex a try soon, but now she starts talking crazy. I let her know that sexual > compatibility is very important to developing a relationship, so she has > conceded that since it's the easiest pert of the relationship to test, that > it only makes since to test it first. Now she starts signing her email to me > "Mrs Nina Gilmore"!!! This is the second nut case I've gotten. I can only > hope that I softened her up for the next guy, because I'm having second > thoughts about sleeping with her.
> PS: My last crazy girl still IM's me from time to time, but she's pre-ASF so > I never bagged her.
A Gilmore wrote: > Now she starts signing her email to me "Mrs Nina Gilmore"!!!
What I want to know is, why did you start TALKING about sex in a logical way with her before you actually had sex with her?
Why didn't you just seduce her when she was in your presence (you said you met her in person TWICE), and deal with token resistence when it came up rather than introducing it as a topic of "discussion"? My take on this is she may not actually be crazy and is simply "acting" crazy to get you to realize that you're not going to get anything sexual from her (not because she wouldn't want it but because you didn't pass her chyck attraction tests). She elicited from you that you weren't interested in marriage, so she's using that against you by signing her e-mails "Mrs Nina Gilmore". She's either crazy or very smart & manipulative.
Look, what you have to do now if you still want to lay her is to determine if she's actually crazy or just smart & manipulative. My bet is the latter. Re-frame and pretend she's just playing. She may very well be. Then play along, use all your psychological ammo. You'll find out soon enough whether she's really crazy by whether she keeps acting clueless or escalates the exaggeration in her comments to silly stuff. If the latter, she's got a good head on her shoulders and then you can go ahead and bang her without worrying she'll go psycho on your shit.
Ive encountered girls like this. Lately ive gotten pretty good at talking them into short term relationships (90 days or less.) The last chick I bagged, i hated her company so much, I called her 3 days later and told her that I wouldn't be seeing her anymore. She was so easy, I don't even consider her a seduction. She was really talking weird...like asking me what she thinks our kids might look like (Of course, I didn't knock her up...I put a hat on that shit and made damn sure it was from my pocket..not her dresser drawer.) and how we could go to a cabin in the woods in Canada (no fuckin' way) on our honeymoon.
I got another one locked and loaded for later tonight, hopefully she's not a psycho. She's like 6'0" making her the tallest chick ive ever gone after. Good thing im 2 inches taller than her.
As a side note, always beware of chicks who have nothing to lose if they get knocked up from you, especially if you're successful and shes...well...not. Stay away from the fuckin trailer parks at all cost.
Tz
"A Gilmore" <zaxx...@adelphia.net> wrote in message
> I'm beginning to wonder about this one. She's about an 8.5, and fun to be > with. I've been working on her through email for about a month, and met her > twice. I've gotten her from wanting to wait for marriage, to wanting to give > sex a try soon, but now she starts talking crazy. I let her know that sexual > compatibility is very important to developing a relationship, so she has > conceded that since it's the easiest pert of the relationship to test, that > it only makes since to test it first. Now she starts signing her email to me > "Mrs Nina Gilmore"!!! This is the second nut case I've gotten. I can only > hope that I softened her up for the next guy, because I'm having second > thoughts about sleeping with her.
> PS: My last crazy girl still IM's me from time to time, but she's pre-ASF so > I never bagged her.
> Why don't you seek girls by person, rather than behind a computer. You'll > prolly avoid all that.
I don't have much time lately, because of work and school. My behind the keyboard pick-ups, I do from work. With my current amout of free time, I barely have the time to see the girls I'm already seeing. I won't have the free time to go out like that untill the semester is over.
> What I want to know is, why did you start TALKING about sex in a logical > way with her before you actually had sex with her?
Because I was trying to talk her down from that "not till marriage" podium. I haven't actually had the time to bag her. One of the times I only had 4 hours, and I haven't been able to practice enough to seduce quick enough, to do that and have sex with her, before I had to go to work. The other time I had her in the mood, but couldn't get her room mate and friend to leave.
> Why didn't you just seduce her when she was in your presence (you said > you met her in person TWICE), and deal with token resistence when it > came up rather than introducing it as a topic of "discussion"? My take > on this is she may not actually be crazy and is simply "acting" crazy to > get you to realize that you're not going to get anything sexual from her > (not because she wouldn't want it but because you didn't pass her chyck > attraction tests). She elicited from you that you weren't interested in > marriage, so she's using that against you by signing her e-mails "Mrs > Nina Gilmore". She's either crazy or very smart & manipulative.
Actually she knows that I want to get married and have children, before I'm 30 (to avoid looking like my eldest sons grandfather). She also knows that I wouldn't get married unless I knew the person for at least a year.
> Look, what you have to do now if you still want to lay her is to > determine if she's actually crazy or just smart & manipulative. My bet > is the latter. Re-frame and pretend she's just playing. She may very > well be. Then play along, use all your psychological ammo. You'll find > out soon enough whether she's really crazy by whether she keeps acting > clueless or escalates the exaggeration in her comments to silly stuff. > If the latter, she's got a good head on her shoulders and then you can > go ahead and bang her without worrying she'll go psycho on your shit.
I'm already testing the waters for it being playful, rather than crazy. I hope she isn't nuts, but at least she doesn't know my address if she is.
A Gilmore" zaxx...@adelphia.net wrote on: Sat, Nov 3, 2001 1:20 AM
> I've gotten her from wanting to wait for marriage, to wanting to give >sex a try soon, but now she starts talking crazy.
She's obviously toying with you. She knows you're desperate to have sex and that's why she's not giving it to you. If she was fun to be with, you should have simply enjoyed being with her, without worrying about immediately getting " laid. "
http://www.life-n-leisure.com/romance.html Your complete online guide to dating success. All the secrets of attracting the opposite sex revealed. Free online personal ads. Free articles.
