Being a casual student of David DeAngelo for 18 months or so, my view of the seduction scene is governed by excercises and techniques reminding guys that in order to be men, they have to stop being so needy, etcetera, etcetera.
I found out that there were other players in this scene of helping guys a few months ago, and never really gave it much thought - they were simply other guys like David D looking to make some money out of the techniques they had amassed and developed, all in a very friendly manner. I saw clips of Mystery after having seen him in David D's Body Language seminar, and was struck by his arrogance and separation from women, resulting in an apparent lack of connection with women. I listened to David D's interview with Tyler, and found the guy to be fascinating; intelligent, fairly well spoken, and original. So formed my first conceptions of the other facets to the seduction community.
Then, out of sheer coincidence, my best friend suggested that if I was getting into all this Attraction Isn't A Choice deal, I should read "The Game". This was fairly surprising, given that my best friend is an AFC under the disguise of a very well built guy with a long-term girlfriend. The good build, however, came from an insecritu about his natural genetic big-bonedness, which led him to go crazy in the gym. He no longer looked overweight, but due to his body shape, he still looked large. Even though he had now formed a body that I would kill to have, he still felt an insecurity about it. As for his long-term girlfriend, she was an unattractive nymphomaniac with at least as many insecurities and issues as he had. Their relationship was a strange dynamic of both being so clingy to each other that the clingyness negated in a strange nullifying defiance of social law, that I imagine is highly uncommon.
I then realised that he had not read the book. Instead, it had been recommended to him by a mutual friend of ours, who fancied himself as a bit of a ladies ban, though in reality he had as much game as a donut. Apparently he had read "The Game", and tried to use the "techniques" therein to attract members of the opposite sex. What it ultimately came to, though was simply him targeting drunken girls wearing huge pairs of beer goggles, and making highly sexual advances on the dancefloor, which were nothing more than the accidental good moves of a guy with the balls to slide his hand up a girl's leg. The poor dear probably thought he had all the moves, and was a maestro in bed, but the truth was, the only girl he'd had sex with was a promiscuous girl I'd fooled around with behind his back. I could have slept with her were it not for the fact that I realised that she wasn't at all attractive, with fucked teeth and an overbite that wasn't even close to being Britney Spears cute. That, and the threat of divine knife-wielding retribution from her man lest he find out.
And so, when I was told to read this book, I approached it thinking it would be yet another AFC pretending to be a pickup artist (See Player's Guide on askmen.com for an example), with no game, and simply rephrasing the points found in dating handbooks written by alleged experts in the field of human interaction. (See "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus" for the greatest example of a man getting it wrong, and hordes of men follwing him) I was, however, blown away.
The author described himself in a way that was not completely dissimilar from myself, though the man was far older with much more life experience than I. Several pages in, he mentioned David DeAngelo, Mystery, and others. My interest was piqued. These were names I had heard of, and knew of - knew that they were real, and weren't just bullshitters.
I progressed further into the book, and started to see this world of underground seduction through the eyes of a man who thought in much the same way I did, though I do not say this in a way that implies that Neil Strauss in any way have a connection on any level. As I saw these people I had seen online and studied in a new light, my view of the whole community changed. All of a sudden, I realised that in this community, there were those who were naturals teaching what they knew, and nerds who learned the programming, and teaching the programming to other nerds. I wasn't sure what to make of it all.
The irony is, I picked up the book a few months ago, and got to the scene in which the sheltered Catholic "Extramask" had his first sexual encounter with a woman. ("Extramask", I learned later, has now become an instructor for the Mystery Method spinoff Real Social Dynamics, who goes by the callsign "Twenty-Six") I only started reading the book again two days ago. Since then all of the important points have come out of the woodwork.
Whereas I once envied and respected "Tyler", I now have not the slightest iota of respect for him. His lack of a sense of honour, and a lack of interest in women, disgust me, when I hear of the things he has done (and maybe still does) in this world of female seduction. The fact that he can reduce virtually any social interaction to the mechanics and understand it that way totally removes any romanticism that could be associated with him. Perhaps it is because of the fact that I love women, and enjoy making women feel fantastic, and adore the spirituality of inimacy, and having a connection with a woman, that I find his breakdown of that which I love so disgusting. The kid manipulates women by flicking their imaginary switches, and puts down other PUAs tho threaten his "game". He doesn't do this because he loves being with women and making them feel fantastic (a la Casanova), rather he loves the power he feels over other guys who try to "game" women and make them his. In breaking down the entire mating process and understanding how to manipulate it as he saw fit, he totally destroyed his chances of feeling any intimacy with any woman. At first I thought that perhaps he was gay, using his control of women in front of other men to get back at the jocks who had teased him for his effeminacy in his youth. But then I figured that if he was this cold and negative to men, particularly other men (or boys pretending to be men) who had skill in "gaming" women, the chance of him actually wanting to love another man were miniscule. Therefore, I decided that Tyler Durden was an androgynous male robot, who understood how to get a woman to do whatever he wanted, but had no desire to ever make a true connection with a woman.
Of course, this portrayal of this university student with too much babyfat and silly hair could be completely false - perhaps an attempt by a jealous fellow PUA to discredit him by making him appear robotic and cold - but I was tempted to think that Neil Strauss's perception of him was true.
What really astounded me, though was when I came to this newsgroup, and saw that it only had around 1600 subscribers. From the hype built up in The Game and on Mystery's website, I assumed that by now hundreds of thousands of men had flocked to this newsgroup, and every other out there, and totally destroyed any close-knit group of seducers. This isn't to say that 1600+ isn't a large number, but all the same, I had expected more.
And so, after my lengthy babble and first post in this newsgroup, perhaps you could share with me your perceptions of the world of seduction. Is it as I think it is? Is there a place in it for a guy who simply wants to make a great connection with an attractive woman and achieve new levels of intimacy with her? Any and all replies will be greatly appreciated.
I am also new to this community and to be honest not sure what to expect from it. I know from my own web based enterprises that groups do not necessarily become overly large any more, I think due to the hundred of new ways to express one else, such as MySpace, private forums, blogs and podcasts, etc.
I am thrilled to find this community, however, because as a guy approaching midlife, and seeking new experiences with women and wishing to learn what makes them tick and having some fun before possibly settling down again (and after a divorce - the motto is definitely once bitten, twice shy!) I have found it hard to get back into the dating game. It was some 18 years ago that I needed 'attraction' skills and the world has moved on and women much more 'power assertive'.
I haven't read The Game, and couldn't tell whether you were recommending it or not, but I have read a few of the ebooks from Juggler, Mystery and DD, excellent ideas and concepts contained within, and I looking for find what works for me as a British guy in his early 40's - and also as such, what will attract women of the 30-38 age bracket to me!
I think the best information that I have gleaned from what I have read, is simply that men CAN be the selectors of their women. I am actually for equal power to both sexes. Before, I was of the hapless opinion that women did all the selecting - but now I feel equal to them on this. A vast improvement for me.
Alas where I live isn't a great pool of beauties, both in terms of men or women. A friend calls the folk around here the 'Circus of the Grotesque', which is perhaps a bit cruel, but I see his point, so in order to meet potential women I have to travel further afield.
Anyway, I wish you well in your search and like has been said to me when I joined, only yesterday, share your views, join in and tell us of your successes. I think this encourages us all and teaches us much.
>I looking for find what works for me as a British guy in his early > 40's - and also as such, what will attract women of the 30-38 age > bracket to me!
Those women are empty-netters.
Fire at will.
-- Money is not "game." Looks are not "game." Social status or value is not "game." Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.
A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not teaching you "game," but how to be an AFC. He uses his students' money to get women and laughs that "AFCs pay my rent."
> I think the best information that I have gleaned from what I have read, > is simply that men CAN be the selectors of their women.
He can select among those women who would have him.
In the "hookup culture," with all the hotties forever on the market, it's much easier to get a hottie, but far more difficult to keep one, wihch is due to simple supply and demand.
Guys who are free agents are going to thrive because they won't get bogged down in "relationships" with women who will either be cheating on them or ready to move on the second a better offer comes along.
-- Money is not "game." Looks are not "game." Social status or value is not "game." Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.
A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not teaching you "game," but how to be an AFC. He uses his students' money to get women and laughs that "AFCs pay my rent."
late.romantic...@gmail.com writes: > Being a casual student of David DeAngelo for 18 months or so, my view > of the seduction scene is governed by excercises and techniques > reminding guys that in order to be men, they have to stop being so > needy, etcetera, etcetera.
> [SNIP]
First let me say welcome. Next let me say i like your writing and wish you had something more original to say because your good English skills are a pleasure to read. Third let me say that style uses the word "news group" to mean "on-line forum." Style did at one time post here, but only for a short time. As for the "1600 subscibers" googlegroups is not usenet, usenet is international and pre-dates the internet. The group that is most populated is at fastseduction.com that group was created either to avoid the posting of Ray Gordon, or in Ray Gordon's opinion to sell stuff. If you do go over to fastseduction.com aka mASF (moderated ASF) instead of staying at alt.seduction.fast uASF (umoderated ASF) don't post your "i just read the game" post as it has been done over and over and over again.
So again, welcome and keep posting.
--
The guy who fails at the game is the one who goes out looking for women to make him feel good about himself.
The guy who succeeds at the game is the one who goes out and makes other people feel good about themselves. - Style
Hey, maybe they have a minor child you can "..wish to die.." and do the whole Gordon Roy "i was jesus' Parker effect..
>Fire at will.
Yeah, someone might come right up to you and go "BOO!"
BTW, grp-ie. Where is the Police case # (s) you MUST have since you have posted that you have contacted them about me. AND..where is that "..lawyer in my hometown.." ready to deal with me..I want to talk to them..
See, asswipe child molester. U have a choice.
U can back up yer herpes infested, mommie's BF bloodied, dolly kissing mouth...or watch ya back. Maybe I'll contact the Police in YOUR AREA and inform them you are making impotent threats USING THEIR power. Maybe I'll just stop by and ask Penny out for coffee. Maybe something else..maybe nothing @ all.
Cause I have to be in PA in Dec, before NAMM in Jan.
...I want to give U the chance to back up yer cakehole.
U have my cell #, all me. Maybe I'll call ya mom and make a coffee date. Bet she has alot to say about 'ray-world'..
..If this upsets you, Please contact any Law/Enf office you want.
..I have your files ready to show them...
JJTj
** You admitted (see below) you ".wished." ** a child would die, JUST to get revenge on ** her mother for her crime of ".loving you."
SO, the question is, Mr. Gordon Roy Parker:
".how old was Michelle's daughter Cierra when you "wished" she would die, and if your "wish" could come true, what would you "wish" to happen to her.. ?????? ."
...Usenet records seem to note her age at 6 or 7...
>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news >>Cc: cavema...@nni.com >>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400 >>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake >>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The______Seduction_________Libr...@juno.com> >>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11 >>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106, >>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,2 06-207,212-213, >>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,2 74-275,289-290,293-300 >>X-Juno-Att: 0 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Type: text/plain >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>From: The Seduction Library <the______seduction_________libr...@juno.com> >>Mail-To-News-Contact: postmas...@nym.alias.net >>Organization: mail2n...@nym.alias.net >>Newsgroups: alt.romance >>Lines: 307 >>Xref: news alt.romance:246369 >>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way, >>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup >>they can stay the hell out of my threads. >>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people >>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by >>attacks on its creator. >>I am going to clear the record on a few things here: >>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an >>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation >>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID >>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling >>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four >>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love >>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I >>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her). >>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in >>anger, after MONTHS of provocation
Main Entry: mo·lest Pronunciation: m&-'lest Function: transitive verb Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French molester, from Latin molestare, from molestus burdensome, annoying; akin to Latin moles mass
1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile intent or injurious effect
2 : to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to force physical and usually sexual contact on
> Being a casual student of David DeAngelo for 18 months or so, my view > of the seduction scene is governed by excercises and techniques > reminding guys that in order to be men, they have to stop being so > needy, etcetera, etcetera.
> I found out that there were other players in this scene of helping guys > a few months ago, and never really gave it much thought - they were > simply other guys like David D looking to make some money out of the > techniques they had amassed and developed, all in a very friendly > manner. I saw clips of Mystery after having seen him in David D's Body > Language seminar, and was struck by his arrogance and separation from > women, resulting in an apparent lack of connection with women. I > listened to David D's interview with Tyler, and found the guy to be > fascinating; intelligent, fairly well spoken, and original. So formed > my first conceptions of the other facets to the seduction community.
> Then, out of sheer coincidence, my best friend suggested that if I was > getting into all this Attraction Isn't A Choice deal, I should read > "The Game". This was fairly surprising, given that my best friend is an > AFC under the disguise of a very well built guy with a long-term > girlfriend. The good build, however, came from an insecritu about his > natural genetic big-bonedness, which led him to go crazy in the gym. He > no longer looked overweight, but due to his body shape, he still looked > large. Even though he had now formed a body that I would kill to have, > he still felt an insecurity about it. As for his long-term girlfriend, > she was an unattractive nymphomaniac with at least as many insecurities > and issues as he had. Their relationship was a strange dynamic of both > being so clingy to each other that the clingyness negated in a strange > nullifying defiance of social law, that I imagine is highly uncommon.
> I then realised that he had not read the book. Instead, it had been > recommended to him by a mutual friend of ours, who fancied himself as a > bit of a ladies ban, though in reality he had as much game as a donut. > Apparently he had read "The Game", and tried to use the "techniques" > therein to attract members of the opposite sex. What it ultimately came > to, though was simply him targeting drunken girls wearing huge pairs of > beer goggles, and making highly sexual advances on the dancefloor, > which were nothing more than the accidental good moves of a guy with > the balls to slide his hand up a girl's leg. The poor dear probably > thought he had all the moves, and was a maestro in bed, but the truth > was, the only girl he'd had sex with was a promiscuous girl I'd fooled > around with behind his back. I could have slept with her were it not > for the fact that I realised that she wasn't at all attractive, with > fucked teeth and an overbite that wasn't even close to being Britney > Spears cute. That, and the threat of divine knife-wielding retribution > from her man lest he find out.
> And so, when I was told to read this book, I approached it thinking it > would be yet another AFC pretending to be a pickup artist (See Player's > Guide on askmen.com for an example), with no game, and simply > rephrasing the points found in dating handbooks written by alleged > experts in the field of human interaction. (See "Men are from Mars, > Women are from Venus" for the greatest example of a man getting it > wrong, and hordes of men follwing him) I was, however, blown away.
> The author described himself in a way that was not completely > dissimilar from myself, though the man was far older with much more > life experience than I. Several pages in, he mentioned David DeAngelo, > Mystery, and others. My interest was piqued. These were names I had > heard of, and knew of - knew that they were real, and weren't just > bullshitters.
> I progressed further into the book, and started to see this world of > underground seduction through the eyes of a man who thought in much the > same way I did, though I do not say this in a way that implies that > Neil Strauss in any way have a connection on any level. As I saw these > people I had seen online and studied in a new light, my view of the > whole community changed. All of a sudden, I realised that in this > community, there were those who were naturals teaching what they knew, > and nerds who learned the programming, and teaching the programming to > other nerds. I wasn't sure what to make of it all.
> The irony is, I picked up the book a few months ago, and got to the > scene in which the sheltered Catholic "Extramask" had his first sexual > encounter with a woman. ("Extramask", I learned later, has now become > an instructor for the Mystery Method spinoff Real Social Dynamics, who > goes by the callsign "Twenty-Six") I only started reading the book > again two days ago. Since then all of the important points have come > out of the woodwork.
> Whereas I once envied and respected "Tyler", I now have not the > slightest iota of respect for him. His lack of a sense of honour, and a > lack of interest in women, disgust me, when I hear of the things he has > done (and maybe still does) in this world of female seduction. The fact > that he can reduce virtually any social interaction to the mechanics > and understand it that way totally removes any romanticism that could > be associated with him. Perhaps it is because of the fact that I love > women, and enjoy making women feel fantastic, and adore the > spirituality of inimacy, and having a connection with a woman, that I > find his breakdown of that which I love so disgusting. The kid > manipulates women by flicking their imaginary switches, and puts down > other PUAs tho threaten his "game". He doesn't do this because he loves > being with women and making them feel fantastic (a la Casanova), rather > he loves the power he feels over other guys who try to "game" women and > make them his. In breaking down the entire mating process and > understanding how to manipulate it as he saw fit, he totally destroyed > his chances of feeling any intimacy with any woman. At first I thought > that perhaps he was gay, using his control of women in front of other > men to get back at the jocks who had teased him for his effeminacy in > his youth. But then I figured that if he was this cold and negative to > men, particularly other men (or boys pretending to be men) who had > skill in "gaming" women, the chance of him actually wanting to love > another man were miniscule. Therefore, I decided that Tyler Durden was > an androgynous male robot, who understood how to get a woman to do > whatever he wanted, but had no desire to ever make a true connection > with a woman.
> Of course, this portrayal of this university student with too much > babyfat and silly hair could be completely false - perhaps an attempt > by a jealous fellow PUA to discredit him by making him appear robotic > and cold - but I was tempted to think that Neil Strauss's perception of > him was true.
> What really astounded me, though was when I came to this newsgroup, and > saw that it only had around 1600 subscribers. From the hype built up in > The Game and on Mystery's website, I assumed that by now hundreds of > thousands of men had flocked to this newsgroup, and every other out > there, and totally destroyed any close-knit group of seducers. This > isn't to say that 1600+ isn't a large number, but all the same, I had > expected more.
> And so, after my lengthy babble and first post in this newsgroup, > perhaps you could share with me your perceptions of the world of > seduction. Is it as I think it is? Is there a place in it for a guy who > simply wants to make a great connection with an attractive woman and > achieve new levels of intimacy with her? Any and all replies will be > greatly appreciated.
> Yours,
> The Late Romanticist
Welcome!!!
As for The Game... i'd point out a few details... first and foremost.. it's a fictional story based on true events. How much fiction and how much true is the question. Is it more like "Live From Bagdad" where it's almsot all completely on, except for a slightly hyped love story... or is it more like the recent ABC portrayal of the events leading to 9/11... where the only thing that was accurate was the date?
As for Tyler... he's a competitor. It's a fiercely competitive arena. Just as our newsloon. He'll be happy to tell you how everyone is working together to keep him down. Of course, they can't get along with each other that well, but they are working against him too. He he. Everyone is selling something. So, keep that in mind. Even here on ASF, someone will be happy to sell you on something or direct you to a commerical siote with free information... and things for sale. (the idea is that if you walk into a Wal-Mart for a bake sale... you'll walk out with a purchase or two also.)
That aside, there is also a MASSIVE flame war going on between the local newsloon and several groups... for several reasons. Hang around and you'll quickly catch on to all the hubbub. Some of the groups have personal vendettas... maybe for good reason. Some are trying to sell stuff and/or prevent the loon from selling his stuff. And some are just having fun at another's expense.
BUT... there's also a core of ASF people that are, in my opinion... REALLY great. They stay on topic most all the time. They have graet advice and information. They are working to improve themselves. And they are happy to help others improve as well. I do honestly thing that ASF is a great board and that the information you find can and will, if you use it and let it, help you to become a much better man and much better (as it thus naturally would) at picking up ladies.
So, I sincerely hope you'll stick around, post a bit, read a bit, have some laughs, and learn
...
late.romantic...@gmail.com wrote: > ... > What really astounded me, though was when I came to this newsgroup, and > saw that it only had around 1600 subscribers. From the hype built up in > The Game and on Mystery's website, I assumed that by now hundreds of > thousands of men had flocked to this newsgroup, and every other out > there, and totally destroyed any close-knit group of seducers. This > isn't to say that 1600+ isn't a large number, but all the same, I had > expected more.
You're in the wrong place. This might have been the place 5+ years ago. We're pretty much all over at mASF now. Just Google it or look at my sig.
> And so, after my lengthy babble and first post in this newsgroup, > perhaps you could share with me your perceptions of the world of > seduction.
You're posting the kind of "I found the game" nonsense as a few hundred guys have done in the past year. It's kind fo boring. Having ready a book from a single person's perspective, you are also viewing the community through a subjective pair of goggles.
Do yourself a favor and peruse the actual community portal.
> Is it as I think it is?
Doesn't seem so.
> Is there a place in it for a guy who > simply wants to make a great connection with an attractive woman and > achieve new levels of intimacy with her?
Sure, but this is not the place. All the hints you need are here in this post.
This place is completely neutral, uncensored, and doesn't have a self-appointed "gatekeeper" profiting from the postings.
Trashing this group merely to promote one's commercial website is simply lame.
-- Money is not "game." Looks are not "game." Social status or value is not "game." Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.
A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not teaching you "game," but how to be an AFC. He uses his students' money to get women and laughs that "AFCs pay my rent."
Nice long story. I know it's a bit weird when the theory about seduction is laid out as the cold bitter truth that describes every action that you take and why you do it. But that doesn't mean you can't enjoy it or be a cold machine that spits out routines.
There are different gurus with different styles, you can look around and see which suits you best, I like Gunwitch his style because I like the:" this how you do it, no joking or fuzzy logic, just deal with it" approach. On the other hand, I like David DeAngelo his cocky and funny stuff as well because it sounds like fun.
Also this newsgroup isn't the best place too look for info because of the flaming and off-topic stuff. Formhandle already mentioned www.fastseduction.com which is a good place to start. Not that I'm trying to force you away or anything. If you lurk here long enough you will find out how it works around here and why there aren't many people here.
late.romantic...@gmail.com wrote: > Being a casual student of David DeAngelo for 18 months or so, my view > of the seduction scene is governed by excercises and techniques > reminding guys that in order to be men, they have to stop being so > needy, etcetera, etcetera.
> I found out that there were other players in this scene of helping guys > a few months ago, and never really gave it much thought - they were > simply other guys like David D looking to make some money out of the > techniques they had amassed and developed, all in a very friendly > manner. I saw clips of Mystery after having seen him in David D's Body > Language seminar, and was struck by his arrogance and separation from > women, resulting in an apparent lack of connection with women. I > listened to David D's interview with Tyler, and found the guy to be > fascinating; intelligent, fairly well spoken, and original. So formed > my first conceptions of the other facets to the seduction community.
> Then, out of sheer coincidence, my best friend suggested that if I was > getting into all this Attraction Isn't A Choice deal, I should read > "The Game". This was fairly surprising, given that my best friend is an > AFC under the disguise of a very well built guy with a long-term > girlfriend. The good build, however, came from an insecritu about his > natural genetic big-bonedness, which led him to go crazy in the gym. He > no longer looked overweight, but due to his body shape, he still looked > large. Even though he had now formed a body that I would kill to have, > he still felt an insecurity about it. As for his long-term girlfriend, > she was an unattractive nymphomaniac with at least as many insecurities > and issues as he had. Their relationship was a strange dynamic of both > being so clingy to each other that the clingyness negated in a strange > nullifying defiance of social law, that I imagine is highly uncommon.
> I then realised that he had not read the book. Instead, it had been > recommended to him by a mutual friend of ours, who fancied himself as a > bit of a ladies ban, though in reality he had as much game as a donut. > Apparently he had read "The Game", and tried to use the "techniques" > therein to attract members of the opposite sex. What it ultimately came > to, though was simply him targeting drunken girls wearing huge pairs of > beer goggles, and making highly sexual advances on the dancefloor, > which were nothing more than the accidental good moves of a guy with > the balls to slide his hand up a girl's leg. The poor dear probably > thought he had all the moves, and was a maestro in bed, but the truth > was, the only girl he'd had sex with was a promiscuous girl I'd fooled > around with behind his back. I could have slept with her were it not > for the fact that I realised that she wasn't at all attractive, with > fucked teeth and an overbite that wasn't even close to being Britney > Spears cute. That, and the threat of divine knife-wielding retribution > from her man lest he find out.
> And so, when I was told to read this book, I approached it thinking it > would be yet another AFC pretending to be a pickup artist (See Player's > Guide on askmen.com for an example), with no game, and simply > rephrasing the points found in dating handbooks written by alleged > experts in the field of human interaction. (See "Men are from Mars, > Women are from Venus" for the greatest example of a man getting it > wrong, and hordes of men follwing him) I was, however, blown away.
> The author described himself in a way that was not completely > dissimilar from myself, though the man was far older with much more > life experience than I. Several pages in, he mentioned David DeAngelo, > Mystery, and others. My interest was piqued. These were names I had > heard of, and knew of - knew that they were real, and weren't just > bullshitters.
> I progressed further into the book, and started to see this world of > underground seduction through the eyes of a man who thought in much the > same way I did, though I do not say this in a way that implies that > Neil Strauss in any way have a connection on any level. As I saw these > people I had seen online and studied in a new light, my view of the > whole community changed. All of a sudden, I realised that in this > community, there were those who were naturals teaching what they knew, > and nerds who learned the programming, and teaching the programming to > other nerds. I wasn't sure what to make of it all.
> The irony is, I picked up the book a few months ago, and got to the > scene in which the sheltered Catholic "Extramask" had his first sexual > encounter with a woman. ("Extramask", I learned later, has now become > an instructor for the Mystery Method spinoff Real Social Dynamics, who > goes by the callsign "Twenty-Six") I only started reading the book > again two days ago. Since then all of the important points have come > out of the woodwork.
> Whereas I once envied and respected "Tyler", I now have not the > slightest iota of respect for him. His lack of a sense of honour, and a > lack of interest in women, disgust me, when I hear of the things he has > done (and maybe still does) in this world of female seduction. The fact > that he can reduce virtually any social interaction to the mechanics > and understand it that way totally removes any romanticism that could > be associated with him. Perhaps it is because of the fact that I love > women, and enjoy making women feel fantastic, and adore the > spirituality of inimacy, and having a connection with a woman, that I > find his breakdown of that which I love so disgusting. The kid > manipulates women by flicking their imaginary switches, and puts down > other PUAs tho threaten his "game". He doesn't do this because he loves > being with women and making them feel fantastic (a la Casanova), rather > he loves the power he feels over other guys who try to "game" women and > make them his. In breaking down the entire mating process and > understanding how to manipulate it as he saw fit, he totally destroyed > his chances of feeling any intimacy with any woman. At first I thought > that perhaps he was gay, using his control of women in front of other > men to get back at the jocks who had teased him for his effeminacy in > his youth. But then I figured that if he was this cold and negative to > men, particularly other men (or boys pretending to be men) who had > skill in "gaming" women, the chance of him actually wanting to love > another man were miniscule. Therefore, I decided that Tyler Durden was > an androgynous male robot, who understood how to get a woman to do > whatever he wanted, but had no desire to ever make a true connection > with a woman.
> Of course, this portrayal of this university student with too much > babyfat and silly hair could be completely false - perhaps an attempt > by a jealous fellow PUA to discredit him by making him appear robotic > and cold - but I was tempted to think that Neil Strauss's perception of > him was true.
> What really astounded me, though was when I came to this newsgroup, and > saw that it only had around 1600 subscribers. From the hype built up in > The Game and on Mystery's website, I assumed that by now hundreds of > thousands of men had flocked to this newsgroup, and every other out > there, and totally destroyed any close-knit group of seducers. This > isn't to say that 1600+ isn't a large number, but all the same, I had > expected more.
> And so, after my lengthy babble and first post in this newsgroup, > perhaps you could share with me your perceptions of the world of > seduction. Is it as I think it is? Is there a place in it for a guy who > simply wants to make a great connection with an attractive woman and > achieve new levels of intimacy with her? Any and all replies will be > greatly appreciated.
>> ... >> What really astounded me, though was when I came to this newsgroup, >> and saw that it only had around 1600 subscribers. From the hype built >> up in The Game and on Mystery's website, I assumed that by now >> hundreds of thousands of men had flocked to this newsgroup, and every >> other out there, and totally destroyed any close-knit group of >> seducers. This isn't to say that 1600+ isn't a large number, but all >> the same, I had expected more.
> You're in the wrong place. This might have been the place 5+ years > ago. > We're pretty much all over at mASF now. Just Google it or look at > my sig.
Bullshit. There's lots of activity here now. Granted, about six months ago, ASF was near dead. But that's not true anymore. There's plenty of guys here and several, like Scruff and Biggs, are seriously good at this. They are still learning, yet still, they know more now than I currently hope to learn.
Also... 100's of thousands? No way. That would be really bad. At best, the idea, just me, I'd say would be maybe about several dozen regular posters (about seduction, not the Flame Wars) and about 1,000 or so readers, tops. If they are wanting to meet up, THEN head over to Mystery Method or PAIR to search out a wing.
And comparing the readership of a forum to a newsgroup is a lot like comparing the path of a bicyclist to a jet fighter.
>> And so, after my lengthy babble and first post in this newsgroup, >> perhaps you could share with me your perceptions of the world of >> seduction.
> You're posting the kind of "I found the game" nonsense as a few > hundred guys have done in the past year. It's kind fo boring. Having > ready a book from a single person's perspective, you are also viewing > the community through a subjective pair of goggles.
Actually, he was asking a question. "Could you share with me?"... Damn, some people just really have issues with the idea of others asking questions. Seems they don't like shared information unless they can control the information that gets shared.
> Do yourself a favor and peruse the actual community portal.
>> Is it as I think it is?
> Doesn't seem so.
So sayith one person. But, others, I'm sure, disagree.
>> Is there a place in it for a guy who >> simply wants to make a great connection with an attractive woman and >> achieve new levels of intimacy with her?
> Sure, but this is not the place. All the hints you need are here in > this post.
Yup, if you would like to read information in a forum, there's no comparision to what you would get in a newsgroup. It would be like comparing the difference between looking in at a private University library for research information to looking at your local library. Of course there will be more information stored at the private University.
Then again, you might not have access to the private University or might not want to go out of your way to get there or have to deal with having to listen to the doorman try to sell you something when you go to enter. You're already here. And it's completely free... no cost *AND* no ads. No affiliations. No business interests. No chance it's going to disappear.
Yes, there is a lot of information at www.mysterymethod.com and at www.socialskillz.com and at several other fine forums. In fact, I recently posted a honking huge list of websites that are out there. But, this isn't a website. It's a newsgroup. You *MIGHT* be welcome to go to a commerical website. Then again, you migh tget banned, censored, or simply refused. Usenet is public.
So again... keep in mind that there is a difference between public access information and privately owned business enterprise information.
-- She wants to meet a man and God dammit! I am a man! == Scruff