Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Oct 13, 2011, 6:15:52 PM10/13/11
to
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414

Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability

Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011

Here’s your final exam question in Middle Eastern studies:

A mass of Coptic Christians marches through Cairo to protest the
military government’s failure to protect them from Muslim radicals.
They are attacked by stone-throwing, club-wielding rowdies. Armed
forces security personnel intervene, and the Copts fight it out with
the soldiers, with two dozen dead and scores injured on both sides.
Who is to blame?

The full credit answer is: Benjamin Netanyahu, for building apartments
in Jerusalem. If that’s not what you wrote, don’t blame me if you
can’t get a job at the New York Times.

Rarely in the course of human events have so few been blamed for so
much by so many. There are precedents, for example, when Adolf Hitler
claimed that a Jewish “stab in the back” lost World War I for Germany.
The notion that the problems of three hundred million Arabs revolve
around the governance of a few million Palestinians has the same order
of credibility.

Israeli-Palestinian negotiations always presumed that Israel’s peace
treaties with Egypt and Jordan would remain intact – that Egypt would
interdict terrorists infiltrating Israel from the Sinai, stop weapons
from reaching Hamas in Gaza, and otherwise fill its obligations. But
Egypt is dissolving. The Egyptian army crossed a red line on October
9, according to Egyptian blogger Issander al-Armani. [1] Soldiers
attacked Coptic demonstrators who were demanding protection from the
army, the military not only shut down news coverage of the massacre,
but used state television to call on Egyptian Muslims to “defend the
army from the Copts”.

On September 19, the Egyptian army showed that it could not protect
Israel’s embassy in Cairo; on October 9, it showed itself ready to
murder members of the country’s Christian minority. Egypt is
dissolving because it can’t feed itself, and it can’t feed itself
because it is going bankrupt. Former International Atomic Energy chief
Mohamed ElBaradei, now a candidate for Egypt’s presidency, warned last
week that Egypt would run out of money within months, according to the
English-language edition of Almasry Alroum:

“Egypt might face bankruptcy within six months, Egyptian reform
advocate and presidential hopeful Mohamed ElBaradei warned on Monday.
During a meeting with labor leaders at the Center for Trade Unions and
Workers Services (CTUWS) in Helwan, south of Cairo, ElBaradei attacked
the ‘failing’ policies of Egypt’s ruling military council. He
criticized the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) for what he
called incompetence and lack of experience, saying that experienced
government officials don’t have enough power. Egypt is currently
relying on its cash reserve with no gross domestic product, he said
[2].”

ElBaradei, the undeserved winner of the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize (he
helped Iran cover its tracks en route to enriching uranium to near
weapons grade), nonetheless is the closest thing to a responsible
figure in Egyptian politics. His warning that Egypt is burning its
cash reserves is accurate. On October 5, the Financial Times reported
that Egypt’s foreign exchange reserves had fallen from $35 billion in
January to only $19.4 billion, [3] enough to cover less than five
months’ worth of imports.

The central bank had reported $25 billion of reserves in August, [4]
so the monthly decline appears to be around $6 billion; it is hard to
tell precisely because the Egyptian central bank publishes
contradictory data about its reserve position. The earlier $25 billion
figure might have counted loans expected from the Gulf states, but as
the FT explains, “Only $500m of some $7bn of promised aid from Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have arrived so far.”

Almost 60% of Egyptians live in rural areas, yet the country imports
half its caloric consumption and spends $5.5 billion a year in food
subsidies. When it runs out of money, millions will starve. Many
already are hungry. The state-controlled newspaper al-Dostour warned
on October 9 that an “insane” increase in the price of food – up 80%
so far this year – has left citizens “screaming”. [5]

The newspaper added that the “current state of lawlessness has left
merchants and businesses with no supervision”, leading to hoarding,
price-gouging and shortages. This was evident at the outset of the
uprisings, [6] and a breakdown of the country’s food distribution
system was evident by May, as I wrote at the time. [7]

The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces appears baffled. Its leader,
Field Marshall Hussein Tantawi, does not appear in public. Previously
he ran Egypt’s military industries. Prime Minister Essam Sharaf was
briefly transportation minister, having taught highway engineering for
most of his career.

He has spoken publicly about only one topic of political importance,
namely the peace treaty with Israel, which he proposes to change, as
he told Turkish television on October 8. [8] Egypt’s leaders face a
crisis brewing for two generations in which the Egyptian government
kept half of its population illiterate and mired in rural poverty as
an instrument of social control. As ElBaradei warns, they have no idea
what they are doing.

Syria, meanwhile, is in civil war, which may turn into a proxy war
between the Sunni powers and Iran. And Iraq’s leader Nuri al-Maliki,
the leader of the supposed Iraqi democracy we spent a trillion dollars
and 4,000 lives to put in place, is backing the Bashar al-Assad regime
in alliance with Iran. [9]

Turkey, the self-styled rising power in the region, is about to get
its come-uppance in the form of a nasty economic downturn. Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s belligerence has risen in inverse
proportion to the market price of the Turkish lira:

I warned in August of the “instant obsolescence of the Turkish model”
as the credit bubble engineered by the ruling party explodes. [10]
Markets have already anticipated a sudden turnaround in the Turkish
economy. The lira fell by a quarter between November 2010 and
September 2011, making it the world’s worst-performing emerging market
currency. The stock market has fallen in dollar terms by 40%, making
Turkey the worst performer after Egypt among all the markets in the
MSCI Tradable Index during 2011.

A hard landing for Turkey has now become the Wall Street consensus.
“Goldman Sachs Group Inc added Garanti to its focus sell list, saying
the stock’s gain last month was based on optimistic macroeconomic
assumptions that don’t account for a ‘relatively high probability’ of
a recession,” Bloomberg News [11] reported on October 6.

The Russian brokerage Renaissance Capital [12] and my own firm,
Macrostrategy LLC [13] have published warnings about the Turkish
banking system, which has increased lending at a 40% annual rate for
the past couple of years.

In short, there is not a patch of ground in Israel’s proximity that is
not roiling and boiling with political and economic turmoil. Echoing
in the ears of Israel’s leaders are the words of Isaiah (57:20-21),
which Jews around the world read on October 8 on the Day of Atonement:
“The wicked are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest, whose
waters cast up mire and dirt. There is no peace, saith my God, to the
wicked.”

Spengler’s corollary states: Neither is there peace to the stupid. We
have Nicholas Kristof writing in the October 6 New York Times:

“Now it is Israel that is endangered most by its leaders and
maximalist stance. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is isolating his
country, and, to be blunt, his hard line on settlements seems like a
national suicide policy. Nothing is more corrosive than Israel’s
growth of settlements because they erode hope of a peace agreement in
the future.”

Kristof is talking about the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo, which was
undeveloped land before 1967 and which every conceivable peace
agreement would assign to Israel.

Nothing will appease the liberals, because if liberal social
engineering can’t fix the problems of the Middle East, the world will
have no need of liberals. The New York Times will demand [14] that
Israel concede and apologize, as surely as a gumball will roll out of
the machine when I crank in a quarter. Existential need trumps
rationality, most of all among the self-styled priesthood of
rationality.

For extra credit, class: If 15 million Egyptians starve to death, and
all the Copts are murdered, and Syria plunges into a genocidal civil
war, and Turkey kills another 40,000 Kurds, and the Iraqi Shi’ites and
Iraqi Sunnis all fight to the death, whose fault will it be?

I bet you guessed right this time. Israel’s, for building apartments
in Gilo.

Never have so few been blamed
for so much by so many
By Spengler

Here’s your final exam question in Middle Eastern studies:

A mass of Coptic Christians marches through Cairo to protest the
military government’s failure to protect them from Muslim radicals.
They are attacked by stone-throwing, club-wielding rowdies. Armed
forces security personnel intervene, and the Copts fight it out with
the soldiers, with two dozen dead and scores injured on both sides.
Who is to blame?

The full credit answer is: Benjamin Netanyahu, for building apartments
in Jerusalem. If that’s not what you wrote, don’t blame me if you
can’t get a job at the New York Times.

Rarely in the course of human events have so few been blamed by

so much for so many. There are precedents, for example, when Adolf
Hitler claimed that a Jewish “stab in the back” lost World War I for
Germany. The notion that the problems of three hundred million Arabs
revolve around the governance of a few million Palestinians has the
same order of credibility.

Israeli-Palestinian negotiations always presumed that Israel’s peace
treaties with Egypt and Jordan would remain intact – that Egypt would
interdict terrorists infiltrating Israel from the Sinai, stop weapons
from reaching Hamas in Gaza, and otherwise fill its obligations. But
Egypt is dissolving. The Egyptian army crossed a red line on October
9, according to Egyptian blogger Issander al-Armani. [1] Soldiers
attacked Coptic demonstrators who were demanding protection from the
army, The military not only shut down news coverage of the massacre,
but used state television to call on Egyptian Muslims to “defend the
army from the Copts”.

On September 19, the Egyptian army showed that it could not protect
Israel’s embassy in Cairo; on October 9, it showed itself ready to
murder members of the country’s Christian minority. Egypt is
dissolving because it can’t feed itself, and it can’t feed itself
because it is going bankrupt. Former International Atomic Energy chief
Mohamed ElBaradei, now a candidate for Egypt’s presidency, warned last
week that Egypt would run out of money within months, according to the
English-language edition of Almasry Alroum:

Egypt might face bankruptcy within six months, Egyptian reform
advocate and presidential hopeful Mohamed ElBaradei warned on Monday.
During a meeting with labor leaders at the Center for Trade Unions and
Workers Services (CTUWS) in Helwan, south of Cairo, ElBaradei attacked
the “failing” policies of Egypt’s ruling military council.He
criticized the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) for what he
called incompetence and lack of experience, saying that experienced
government officials don’t have enough power. Egypt is currently
relying on its cash reserve with no gross domestic product, he said
[2].

ElBaradei, the undeserved winner of the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize (he
helped Iran cover its tracks en route to enriching uranium to near
weapons grade), nonetheless is the closest thing to a responsible
figure in Egyptian politics. His warning that Egypt is burning its
cash reserves is accurate. On October 5, the Financial Times reported
that Egypt’s foreign exchange reserves had fallen from $35 billion in
January to only $19.4 billion, [3] enough to cover less than five
months’ worth of imports.

The central bank had reported $25 billion of reserves in August, [4]
so the monthly decline appears to be around $6 billion; it is hard to
tell precisely because the Egyptian central bank publishes
contradictory data about its reserve position. The earlier $25 billion
figure might have counted loans expected from the Gulf states, but as
the FT explains, “Only $500m of some $7bn of promised aid from Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have arrived so far.”

Almost 60% of Egyptians live in rural areas, yet the country imports
half its caloric consumption and spends $5.5 billion a year in food
subsidies. When it runs out of money, millions will starve. Many
already are hungry. The state-controlled newspaper al-Dostour warned
on October 9 that an “insane” increase in the price of food – up 80%
so far this year – has left citizens “screaming”. [5]

The newspaper added that the “current state of lawlessness has left
merchants and businesses with no supervision”, leading to hoarding,
price-gouging and shortages. This was evident at the outset of the
uprisings, [6] and a breakdown of the country’s food distribution
system was evident by May, as I wrote at the time. [7]

The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces appears baffled. Its leader,
Field Marshall Hussein Tantawi, does not appear in public. Previously
he ran Egypt’s military industries. Prime Minister Essam Sharaf was
briefly transportation minister, having taught highway engineering for
most of his career.

He has spoken publicly about only one topic of political importance,
namely the peace treaty with Israel, which he proposes to change, as
he told Turkish television on October 8. [8] Egypt’s leaders face a
crisis brewing for two generations in which the Egyptian government
kept half of its population illiterate and mired in rural poverty as
an instrument of social control. As ElBaradei warns, they have no idea
what they are doing.

Syria, meanwhile, is in civil war, which may turn into a proxy war
between the Sunni powers and Iran. And Iraq’s leader Nuri al-Maliki,
the leader of the supposed Iraqi democracy we spent a trillion dollars
and 4,000 lives to put in place, is backing the Bashar al-Assad regime
in alliance with Iran. [9]

Turkey, the self-styled rising power in the region, is about to get
its come-uppance in the form of a nasty economic downturn. Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s belligerence has risen in inverse
proportion to the market price of the Turkish lira:

I warned in August of the “instant obsolescence of the Turkish model”
as the credit bubble engineered by the ruling party explodes. [10]
Markets have already anticipated a sudden turnaround in the Turkish
economy. The lira fell by a quarter between November 2010 and
September 2011, making it the world’s worst-performing emerging market
currency. The stock market has fallen in dollar terms by 40%, making
Turkey the worst performer after Egypt among all the markets in the
MSCI Tradable Index during 2011.

A hard landing for Turkey has now become the Wall Street consensus.
“Goldman Sachs Group Inc added Garanti to its focus sell list, saying
the stock’s gain last month was based on optimistic macroeconomic
assumptions that don’t account for a ‘relatively high probability’ of
a recession,” Bloomberg News [11] reported on October 6.

The Russian brokerage Renaissance Capital [12] and my own firm,
Macrostrategy LLC [13] have published warnings about the Turkish
banking system, which has increased lending at a 40% annual rate for
the past couple of years.

In short, there is not a patch of ground in Israel’s proximity that is
not roiling and boiling with political and economic turmoil. Echoing
in the ears of Israel’s leaders are the words of Isaiah (57:20-21),
which Jews around the world read on October 8 on the Day of Atonement:
“The wicked are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest, whose
waters cast up mire and dirt. There is no peace, saith my God, to the
wicked.”

Spengler’s corollary states: Neither is there peace to the stupid. We
have Nicholas Kristof writing in the October 6 New York Times: “Now it
is Israel that is endangered most by its leaders and maximalist
stance. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is isolating his country,
and, to be blunt, his hard line on settlements seems like a national
suicide policy. Nothing is more corrosive than Israel’s growth of
settlements because they erode hope of a peace agreement in the
future.”

Kristof is talking about the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo, which was
undeveloped land before 1967 and which every conceivable peace
agreement would assign to Israel.

Nothing will appease the liberals, because if liberal social
engineering can’t fix the problems of the Middle East, the world will
have no need of liberals. The New York Times will demand [14] that
Israel concede and apologize, as surely as a gumball will roll out of
the machine when I crank in a quarter. Existential need trumps
rationality, most of all among the self-styled priesthood of
rationality.

For extra credit, class: If 15 million Egyptians starve to death, and
all the Copts are murdered, and Syria plunges into a genocidal civil
war, and Turkey kills another 40,000 Kurds, and the Iraqi Shi’ites and
Iraqi Sunnis all fight to the death, whose fault will it be?

I bet you guessed right this time. Israel’s, for building apartments
in Gilo.

Notes
1. See here.
2. See here.
3. See here (registration required).
4. Egypt government to rely less on local banks: Finance Minister
Ahramonline. October 2.
5. See here.
6. See Food and failed Arab states Asia Times Online, February 2,
2011.
7. See The hunger to come in Egypt Asia Times Online, May 10, 2011.
8. See here.
9. See Iraq, siding with Iran, sends essential aid to Syria’s Assad
Washington Post, October 9.
10. See Instant obsolescence of the Turkish model Asia Times Online,
August 10.
11. See here.
12. See here.
13. See here.
14. See here.

Topaz

unread,
Oct 13, 2011, 8:39:20 PM10/13/11
to

Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce

"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.

Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.

So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.

Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.

As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.

And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.

There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.

Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.

Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.

The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.

Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.

Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.

How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?

Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.

Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."

Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.

Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.

In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."

Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.

The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.

Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.

The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.

Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.

Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.

Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.

Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.

Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Topaz

unread,
Oct 13, 2011, 8:41:25 PM10/13/11
to
By Jim Taylor

I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.

The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Oct 13, 2011, 9:22:29 PM10/13/11
to
On Oct 13, 5:39 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Tiptoeing around Our Problems
> By Dr. William Pierce
He has not been doing much tiptoeing these days.


Michael

A Moose in Love

unread,
Oct 13, 2011, 9:25:10 PM10/13/11
to
On Oct 13, 6:15 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414
>
> Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability
>
> Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
> By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011
>
> Here’s your final exam question in Middle Eastern studies:
>
> A mass of Coptic Christians marches through Cairo to protest the
> military government’s failure to protect them from Muslim radicals.
> They are attacked by stone-throwing, club-wielding rowdies. Armed
> forces security personnel intervene, and the Copts fight it out with
> the soldiers, with two dozen dead and scores injured on both sides.
> Who is to blame?

You probably would like to blame black African men such as myself.
That's because you are a racist.

>
> The full credit answer is: Benjamin Netanyahu, for building apartments
> in Jerusalem. If that’s not what you wrote, don’t blame me if you
> can’t get a job at the New York Times.

I would never apply to that racist outfit. They have already let me
know that they don't want no truck with black people.

>
> Rarely in the course of human events have so few been blamed for so
> much by so many. There are precedents, for example, when Adolf Hitler
> claimed that a Jewish “stab in the back” lost World War I for Germany.

WW1 was won by black only regiments of the army of the Imperial USA.

> The notion that the problems of three hundred million Arabs revolve
> around the governance of a few million Palestinians has the same order
> of credibility.
>
> Israeli-Palestinian negotiations always presumed that Israel’s peace
> treaties with Egypt and Jordan would remain intact – that Egypt would
> interdict terrorists infiltrating Israel from the Sinai, stop weapons
> from reaching Hamas in Gaza, and otherwise fill its obligations. But
> Egypt is dissolving. The Egyptian army crossed a red line on October
> 9, according to Egyptian blogger Issander al-Armani. [1] Soldiers
> attacked Coptic demonstrators who were demanding protection from the
> army, the military not only shut down news coverage of the massacre,
> but used state television to call on Egyptian Muslims to “defend the
> army from the Copts”.

If Egypt had let it's black people live, you wouldn't have any
problems. They shipped all black people back to the un irrigated
desert and gave them only 4 days supply of food, and a canteen of
water. My people were forced to dig for water every day. Many
perished, and the Coptic Christians came to help, but they perished as
well.

>
> On September 19, the Egyptian army showed that it could not protect
> Israel’s embassy in Cairo; on October 9, it showed itself ready to
> murder members of the country’s Christian minority. Egypt is

> dissolving because it can’t feed itself, and it can’t feed itselfbecause it is going bankrupt. Former International Atomic Energy chief


> Mohamed ElBaradei, now a candidate for Egypt’s presidency, warned last
> week that Egypt would run out of money within months, according to the
> English-language edition of Almasry Alroum:
>
>       “Egypt might face bankruptcy within six months, Egyptian reform
> advocate and presidential hopeful Mohamed ElBaradei warned on Monday.
> During a meeting with labor leaders at the Center for Trade Unions and
> Workers Services (CTUWS) in Helwan, south of Cairo, ElBaradei attacked

> the ‘failing’ policies of Egypt’s ruling military council. Hecriticized the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) for what he


> called incompetence and lack of experience, saying that experienced
> government officials don’t have enough power. Egypt is currently
> relying on its cash reserve with no gross domestic product, he said
> [2].”
>
> ElBaradei, the undeserved winner of the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize (he
> helped Iran cover its tracks en route to enriching uranium to near
> weapons grade), nonetheless is the closest thing to a responsible
> figure in Egyptian politics. His warning that Egypt is burning its
> cash reserves is accurate. On October 5, the Financial Times reported
> that Egypt’s foreign exchange reserves had fallen from $35 billion in
> January to only $19.4 billion, [3] enough to cover less than five
> months’ worth of imports.
>
> The central bank had reported $25 billion of reserves in August, [4]
> so the monthly decline appears to be around $6 billion; it is hard to
> tell precisely because the Egyptian central bank publishes
> contradictory data about its reserve position. The earlier $25 billion
> figure might have counted loans expected from the Gulf states, but as
> the FT explains, “Only $500m of some $7bn of promised aid from Saudi
> Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have arrived so far.”
>
> Almost 60% of Egyptians live in rural areas, yet the country imports
> half its caloric consumption and spends $5.5 billion a year in food
> subsidies. When it runs out of money, millions will starve. Many

> already are hungry. The state-controlled newspaper al-Dostour warnedon October 9 that an “insane” increase in the price of food –up80%so farthisyear – has left citizens “screaming”. [5]
>
> The newspaper added that the “current state of lawlessness has leftmerchants and businesses with no supervision”, leading to hoarding,price-gouging and shortages.Thiswas evident at the outset of theuprisings, [6] and a breakdown of the country’s food distribution


> system was evident by May, as I wrote at the time. [7]
>
> The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces appears baffled. Its leader,
> Field Marshall Hussein Tantawi, does not appear in public. Previously
> he ran Egypt’s military industries. Prime Minister Essam Sharaf was
> briefly transportation minister, having taught highway engineering for
> most of his career.
>
> He has spoken publicly about only one topic of political importance,
> namely the peace treaty with Israel, which he proposes to change, as
> he told Turkish television on October 8. [8] Egypt’s leaders face a
> crisis brewing for two generations in which the Egyptian government
> kept half of its population illiterate and mired in rural poverty as
> an instrument of social control. As ElBaradei warns, they have no idea
> what they are doing.
>
> Syria, meanwhile, is in civil war, which may turn into a proxy war

> between the Sunni powers and Iran. And Iraq’s leader Nuri al-Maliki,the leader of the supposed Iraqi democracy we spent a trillion dollars


> and 4,000 lives to put in place, is backing the Bashar al-Assad regime
> in alliance with Iran. [9]
>

> Turkey, the self-styled rising power in the region, is about to getits come-uppance in the form of a nasty economic downturn. Prime


> Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s belligerence has risen in inverse
> proportion to the market price of the Turkish lira:
>
> I warned in August of the “instant obsolescence of the Turkish model”
> as the credit bubble engineered by the ruling party explodes. [10]
> Markets have already anticipated a sudden turnaround in the Turkish
> economy. The lira fell by a quarter between November 2010 and
> September 2011, making it the world’s worst-performing emerging market
> currency. The stock market has fallen in dollar terms by 40%, making
> Turkey the worst performer after Egypt among all the markets in the
> MSCI Tradable Index during 2011.
>

> A hard landing for Turkey has now become the Wall Street consensus.“Goldman Sachs GroupInc added Garanti to its focus sell list, saying


> the stock’s gain last month was based on optimistic macroeconomic
> assumptions that don’t account for a ‘relatively high probability’ of
> a recession,” Bloomberg News [11] reported on October 6.
>
> The Russian brokerage Renaissance Capital [12] and my own firm,
> Macrostrategy LLC [13] have published warnings about the Turkish

> banking system, which has increased lending at a 40% annual rate forthe past couple of years.


>
> In short, there is not a patch of ground in Israel’s proximity that is
> not roiling and boiling with political and economic turmoil. Echoing
> in the ears of Israel’s leaders are the words of Isaiah (57:20-21),
> which Jews around the world read on October 8 on the Day of Atonement:

> “The wicked are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest, whosewaters castupmire and dirt. There is no peace, saith my God, to the


> wicked.”
>
> Spengler’s corollary states: Neither is there peace to the stupid. We
> have Nicholas Kristof writing in the October 6 New York Times:
>
>       “Now it is Israel that is endangered most by its leaders and

> maximalist stance. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is isolating hiscountry, and, to be blunt, his hard line on settlementsseems like a


> national suicide policy. Nothing is more corrosive than Israel’s
> growth of settlements because they erode hope of a peace agreement in
> the future.”
>
> Kristof is talking about the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo, which was
> undeveloped land before 1967 and which every conceivable peace
> agreement would assign to Israel.
>
> Nothing will appease the liberals, because if liberal social
> engineering can’t fix the problems of the Middle East, the world will
> have no need of liberals. The New York Times will demand [14] that

> Israel concede and apologize, as surely as a gumball will roll out ofthe machine when I crankin a quarter. Existential need trumps


> rationality, most of all among the self-styled priesthood of
> rationality.
>
> For extra credit, class: If 15 million Egyptians starve to death, and
> all the Copts are murdered, and Syria plunges into a genocidal civil
> war, and Turkey kills another 40,000 Kurds, and the Iraqi Shi’ites and
> Iraqi Sunnis all fight to the death, whose fault will it be?
>

> I bet you guessed rightthistime. Israel’s, for building apartments


> in Gilo.
>
> Never have so few been blamed
> for so much by so many
> By Spengler
>
> Here’s your final exam question in Middle Eastern studies:
>
> A mass of Coptic Christians marches through Cairo to protest the
> military government’s failure to protect them from Muslim radicals.
> They are attacked by stone-throwing, club-wielding rowdies. Armed
> forces security personnel intervene, and the Copts fight it out with
> the soldiers, with two dozen dead and scores injured on both sides.
> Who is to blame?
>
> The full credit answer is: Benjamin Netanyahu, for building apartments
> in Jerusalem. If that’s not what you wrote, don’t blame me if you
> can’t get a job at the New York Times.
>
> Rarely in the course of human events have so few been blamed by
>
> so much for so many. There are precedents, for example, when Adolf

> Hitler claimed that a Jewish “stab in the back” lost World ...
>
> read more »

The Revd

unread,
Oct 18, 2011, 9:16:03 PM10/18/11
to
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414
>
>Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability
>
>Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
>By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011

Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?

NEMO

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 1:08:44 AM10/19/11
to
On Oct 18, 9:16 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:

\Y/
^
( )
I I
oI Io


"Gobble - gobble, slurp - slurp, lick - lick! Gulp! Yum - yum!"



Michael Ejercito

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 2:32:35 AM10/19/11
to
On Oct 18, 6:16 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414
>
> >Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability
>
> >Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
> >By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011
>
> Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?
No need for you to tell us your sexual fantasies; we all know your
sexual disorientation.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/744028e4fe196d22

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

The Peeler

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 7:32:01 AM10/19/11
to
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:16:03 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:

>>
>>Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
>>By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011
>
> Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?

Or rather another opportunity for you to make an ass of yourself in public,
The Rectum? <BG>

--
Tony Owens about The Rectum: "you are the best reason possible to support
abortion."
MID: <4e7c99a0$0$1978$607e...@cv.net>

The Revd

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 7:43:55 AM10/19/11
to
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:32:35 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 18, 6:16 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414
>>
>> >Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability
>>
>> >Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
>> >By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011
>>
>> Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?
> No need for you to tell us your sexual fantasies; we all know your
>sexual disorientation.

No need for you to tell us you suck jew rectums, gook. We know you
suck jew rectums.

The Revd

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 7:51:26 AM10/19/11
to
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:08:44 -0700 (PDT), NEMO
<brianlam...@excite.com> wrote:


> \Y/
> ^
> ( )
>
>"Gobble - gobble, slurp - slurp, lick - lick! Gulp! Yum - yum!"

You'll get it right one of these days! LOL

The Peeler

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 8:19:31 AM10/19/11
to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:43:55 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:

>>> Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?
>> No need for you to tell us your sexual fantasies; we all know your
>>sexual disorientation.
>
> No need for you to tell us you suck jew rectums, gook. We know you
> suck jew rectums.

No need for you to INSIST on demonstrating your idiocy in public, The
Rectum! EVERYONE knows about it already! <G>

--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard (aka "The Rectum").

The Peeler

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 8:29:00 AM10/19/11
to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:51:26 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:

>
>> \Y/
>> ^
>> ( )
>>
>>"Gobble - gobble, slurp - slurp, lick - lick! Gulp! Yum - yum!"
>
> You'll get it right one of these days! LOL

You'll NEVER get ANYTHING right again, you hilarious housebound impotent
sexual cripple and psycho! You know it, I know it, everyone around here
knows it! LOL

--
The top 5 truths about our resident psychopath, The Rectum:

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 11:17:06 AM10/19/11
to
On Oct 19, 4:43 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:32:35 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 18, 6:16 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414
>
> >> >Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability
>
> >> >Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
> >> >By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011
>
> >> Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?
> >   No need for you to tell us your sexual fantasies; we all know your
> >sexual disorientation.
>
> No need for you to tell us you suck jew rectums, gook.  We know you
> suck jew rectums.
I suck no rectums, peter breath.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

The Revd

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 12:29:52 PM10/19/11
to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 19, 4:43 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:32:35 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 18, 6:16 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40414
>>
>> >> >Israel is an island of stability in a sea of instability
>>
>> >> >Never have so few been blamed for so much by so many
>> >> >By Spengler, Asia Times, October 12, 2011
>>
>> >> Another jew rectum for you to suck, gook?
>> >   No need for you to tell us your sexual fantasies; we all know your
>> >sexual disorientation.
>>
>> No need for you to tell us you suck jew rectums, gook.  We know you
>> suck jew rectums.
> I suck no rectums, peter breath.

You suck jew rectums, jew diarrhoea breath.

The Peeler

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 1:20:12 PM10/19/11
to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:29:52 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:

>>> No need for you to tell us you suck jew rectums, gook.  We know you
>>> suck jew rectums.
>> I suck no rectums, peter breath.
>
> You suck jew rectums, jew diarrhoea breath.

He doesn't! But YOU keep making a complete ass of yourself with every single
post of yours! Proud of it? Of COURSE, you subnormal idiot! LOL

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 5:33:43 PM10/19/11
to
I suck no rectums, nithing.

The following link explains you.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi


Michael

The Revd

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 5:45:04 PM10/19/11
to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 19, 9:29 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 19, 4:43 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:32:35 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   No need for you to tell us your sexual fantasies; we all know your
>> >> >sexual disorientation.
>>
>> >> No need for you to tell us you suck jew rectums, gook.  We know you
>> >> suck jew rectums.
>> >   I suck no rectums, peter breath.
>>
>> You suck jew rectums, jew diarrhoea breath.
> I suck no rectums, nithing.

Yes, you do, gook: 24/7.

The Peeler

unread,
Oct 19, 2011, 6:00:15 PM10/19/11
to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:45:04 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:

>>> You suck jew rectums, jew diarrhoea breath.
>> I suck no rectums, nithing.
>
> Yes, you do, gook: 24/7.

Not at all! But you keep demonstrating in public, 24/7, year after year,
that you indeed are nothing but a sick subnormal degenerate perverted
psychopathic swine! <BG>

--
Gray Guest about The Rectum: "You are a subhuman. You should not be
permitted to propagate your genes."
MID: <Xns9F7897C7F134AWe...@88.198.244.100>
0 new messages