Sell LCD telephone Burglar Alarm Systems
lense...@gmail.com
security products. Our manily products is about GSM house alarm
systems,auto-dial alarm systems,CCTV DVRs,IP cameras,security locks.
We assure our customers the most competitive price, the most timely
delivery,the best service.
Alarm systems:
1. GSM home alarm systems: LS-GSM-I/ LS-GSM-II/ LS-GSM-III/ LS-GSM-
MMS
2. Auto-dail alarm systems: LS-800 /LS-801 /LS-802
3. Alarm accessories: gas detectors, smoke detectors, emergency
button, PIR detectors, wireless flashing siren, wireless remote
control,power supply and so on.
Stand alone DVRs:
4. MJPEG format: 4-channel DVR
5. MPEG4 format: 4-channel DVR
6. H.264 format: 4/8/16-channel DVR
GPS/GSM/GPRS trackers:
7. GPS car tracker
8. GPS personal tracker
9. GPS pet tracker
Alice Hsu
Marketing Department
Lenser Technology Co.,Ltd
MSN:lense...@hotmail.com
SKYPE:alicexu007
mleuck
CH®IS
>
> Wow even G Morgan can install one of these
>
> http://yukagroup.diytrade.com/sdp/534616/4/pd-2804056/4904789-0/Sell_LCD_telephone_Burglar_Alarm_Systems.html
I'm confused about three things on that page...
First... It has "8 wireless different zones and 8 wires zones." It also has
"13 LED to indicate the alarm zone." So if those last three zones go into
alarm you just have to guess at what's happening?
Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button:
Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work?
And third... everything else on that page.
Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas?
alarman
> Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas?
Yes, they are detachable, but it limits the range to about 10".
--
js
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
alarman
> It beats what you like to install: http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9
I bet you have that page bookmarked.
--
js
KingFish
"CH�IS" <s...@dy.ca> wrote in message news:LteVl.30392$PH1.15179@edtnps82...
>> "mleuck" wrote...
>>
>> Wow even G Morgan can install one of these
>>
>> http://yukagroup.diytrade.com/sdp/534616/4/pd-2804056/4904789-0/Sell_LCD_telephone_Burglar_Alarm_Systems.html
>
> I'm confused about three things on that page...
>
> First... It has "8 wireless different zones and 8 wires zones." It also
> has "13 LED to indicate the alarm zone." So if those last three zones go
> into alarm you just have to guess at what's happening?
>
> Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button:
> Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work?
HOME/AWAY. HOME=NO PIR
AWAY=YES PIR
mleuck
And I'm sure they have his credit card memorized by now
CH®IS
news:7VfVl.1$y4...@newsfe21.iad...
> CH�IS wrote:
>> Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas?
>
> Yes, they are detachable, but it limits the range to about 10".
>
So it probably doesn't matter if they're attached or not. First they say
>250m (perfect for convering fields), then 30-50m (it's not their fault you
went and put walls in your house), now we're down to 10". On the other
hand, this may be why you have to order at least 100 systems.
CH®IS
news:lTfVl.49812$b9....@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button:
>> Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work?
>
> HOME/AWAY. HOME=NO PIR
> AWAY=YES PIR
>
You know, that little comment makes more sense than anything else on that
page.
Robert L Bass
>
> Are you denying you're a flaming homo?
I wonder where that expression, "flaming" came from. I've seen a few but
never one that was smoking, much less flaming. :^)
Robert L Bass
>
> Maybe Liberace inspired the term with his outfits. ??
Probably so.
--
Regards,
Robert L Bass
==============================>
Bass Home Electronics
DIY Alarm and Home Automation Store
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
Sales & Service 941-870-2310
Fax 941-870-3252
==============================>
Doug
"Robert L Bass" <Sa...@BassBurglarAlarms.com> wrote in message
news:1MSdnSz-R8v9SrjX...@giganews.com...
You could try turning the lights on, if that doesn't help then try one of
those gizmo's that Grahams hawking.
Doug
KingFish
"CH�IS" <s...@dy.ca> wrote in message news:p8gVl.30403$PH1.131@edtnps82...
jsut guessing. I have got pretty good a chinklish though after years of
using import DVR's
mleuck
> > "mleuck" wrote...
>
> > Wow even G Morgan can install one of these
>
>
> I'm confused about three things on that page...
>
> First... It has "8 wireless different zones and 8 wires zones." It also has
> "13 LED to indicate the alarm zone." So if those last three zones go into
> alarm you just have to guess at what's happening?
>
> Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button:
> Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work?
>
> And third... everything else on that page.
>
> Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas?
Doesn't everyone want door contacts with fancy antennas?
CH®IS
> > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas?
>
> Doesn't everyone want door contacts with fancy antennas?
Somehow I doubt it would go over well with many people.
Many of my customers are unhappy about the size of the wireless contacts
from DSC, even the newer ones which are a little bit smaller than the last
version of them.
I haven't tried the new "vanishing" contacts yet, but they look like they'll
be more appealing. On the other hand, they're from Secure Wireless (?), not
DSC. The other Secure Wireless contacts I've used (small surface) don't
have as good of a range on them as the regular DSC stuff.
- Chris
Doug
"CH�IS" <s...@dy.ca> wrote in message news:l6FVl.30521$PH1.10806@edtnps82...
I've had no problems whatsoever with the DSC "vanishing" contacts.
If they have a reduced range, I can't say that I've noticed it.
Doug
Frank Olson
Ditto!
mleuck
> dealer. My sales volume is so much that I get better wholesale prices then
> everybody else in the world on ball gags.
And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online
mleuck
The vanishing contacts from DSC are made by Secure Wireless. I've had
a couple up and running since they came out and they work great, the
magnet is very powerful
mleuck
> "mleuck" wrote...
> > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas?
>
> > Doesn't everyone want door contacts with fancy antennas?
>
> Somehow I doubt it would go over well with many people.
>
> Many of my customers are unhappy about the size of the wireless contacts
> from DSC, even the newer ones which are a little bit smaller than the last
> version of them.
>
Ever tried the recessed sensors?
CH®IS
Actually, I have acquired a hatred for the recessed contacts. Though not as
much as my hatred for other products (ademco panels for one)
Perhaps it was the low quality drill bits I was using when they first came
out. Ever use a spade bit that large (3/4"?) and try to get a good, even,
level hole drilled?
Perhaps it's the fact that the end cap doesn't want to stay on securely.
Or perhaps it's the fact that you'll never get the contact out in the future
to replace it. You may not even be able to get the board out of the casing
to replace the battery. I suppose the best solution here would be to use
the optional end cap that gets screwed onto the door frame and drill a
little too large intentionally.
Although the last one I installed had to go into the door with the magnet in
the frame. It was very easy on that one, but probably not the best option
for the longevity of the contact. Ironically, this was a place where we
were trying to keep people from breaking out, and all the surface contacts
were either destroyed or thrown out the window into a forest. The only one
the has survived is that recessed contact.
- Chris
CH®IS
Within a normal house, I wouldn't expect a problem with the Secure Wireless
contacts. The problems I've had with their small surface contacts have been
when the receiver is in the house and the contact is in a detached shop.
Unfortunately, there's lots of those around here.
The most surprising one I had was a shop about 100 feet from the house.
Wood siding on the house and metal siding on the shop. The door was about
120-130 feet from the receiver, going through the outer wall of the shop,
and two interior walls of the house (garage door was open). The Secure
Wireless contact would only open and close the zone up to about 100 feet of
the receiver (without the metal-sided shop wall in the way). Close enough
where you could still here the keypads door chime. Switched it out with a
standard DSC contact... didn't have a problem at all.
The only time a DSC contact has failed me for range was going through a log
wall, perhaps a couple interior walls (long time ago), about 500-600 feet of
field with a couple trees, and two wood-framed plywood walls in a shop. On
the other hand, the contact on the other side of that last wall works fine.
Of course... ymmv.
- Chris
Robert L Bass
>
> You could try turning the lights on...
And find out what you look like? Naah.
Doug
"Robert L Bass" <Sa...@BassBurglarAlarms.com> wrote in message
news:AY6dnXLk-KIrTLrX...@giganews.com...
> "Doug" wrote:
>>
>> You could try turning the lights on...
>
> And find out what you look like? Naah.
That's just wishful thinking on your part
Doug
alarman
> Perhaps it was the low quality drill bits I was using when they first
> came out. Ever use a spade bit that large (3/4"?) and try to get a
> good, even, level hole drilled?
>
> Perhaps it's the fact that the end cap doesn't want to stay on
> securely.
> Or perhaps it's the fact that you'll never get the contact out in the
> future to replace it. You may not even be able to get the board out
> of the casing to replace the battery. I suppose the best solution
> here would be to use the optional end cap that gets screwed onto the
> door frame and drill a little too large intentionally.
>
> Although the last one I installed had to go into the door with the
> magnet in the frame. It was very easy on that one, but probably not
> the best option for the longevity of the contact. Ironically, this
> was a place where we were trying to keep people from breaking out,
> and all the surface contacts were either destroyed or thrown out the
> window into a forest. The only one the has survived is that recessed
> contact.
> - Chris
Try the spade bit, and if it starts to wander, stop. Finish with a hole saw
to keep the hole true. Try the transmitter case, if you have to force it,
stop. Use the spade bit again to ream the hole a little at a time til your
case fits perfectly. Use a little ALEX caulk or silicone to hold in place if
necessary.
mleuck
Yes but not long term
Robert L Bass
>
> That's just wishful thinking on your part
You flatter yourself. Oh well, I guess someone has to.
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
>
> >> Ever tried the recessed sensors?
>
> >Yes but not long term
>
> your concentration?
The recessed sensor question wasn't mine
motley me
news:59b3659a-d167-4d23...@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
I have used them, nad they work well.
mleuck
Tell it to G Morgan, apparently he's the one asking :)
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online
>
What is "this"?
mleuck
> sensors?"....
>
> Now you're denying you wrote it. Here is irrefutable proof you wrote it: ( I
> see you cancelled it with Google)
>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C59b3659a-d16...
I never canceled any post, and I didn't write that
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >I never canceled any post, and I didn't write that
>
> imposter also lives in the same area as you:http://www.ip2location.com/66.25.41.224
>
You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot
Robert L Bass
>
>> You're a liar or you have a fan impersonating you...
>
> You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot
I thought he was being polite by leaving that option out.
Jim
wrote:
;-)
mleuck
Oh look Jim's right behind Robert, that might make Frank mad
KingFish
"mleuck" <m.l...@tx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:36ba5577-1c69-431f...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
they went from hating each other to a cluster fuck. change you can believe
in?
Robert L Bass
>
>> I thought he was being polite by leaving that option out.
>
> ;-)
Oh look Jim's right behind Robert, that might make Frank mad
I suspect Frank, like Jim, appreciated the humor (or, in his case, the
humour). You did leave yourself wide open for the retort.
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot
>
> called you a liar?
Keep dreaming in that alcohol-fueled haze, you did no such thing
Doug
"G. Morgan" <usenet...@gawab.com> wrote in message
news:3fd7e4f1824e5add9...@mypost.invalid...
> mleuck wrote:
>
>>You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot
>
>
> What? Are you doing the 'Mark-Like-A-Nova' now because I shut you down
> and
> called you a liar?
>
It just doesn't have the same ring to it as the Bass-O-Nova
Doug
mleuck
> bother, but it's the principle of the matter now. You wrote it, and you're
> lying about it. I would call out anybody who lies (ask your buddy in FL)
> here, and you're it.
>
> So....
I don't know why you bother either, must be the booze
> Maybe someone else will step in and prove me wrong, but we both know that's
> not happening because I'm right.
No it's not happening because nobody else is interested
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >I don't know why you bother either, must be the booze
>
>
> >> Maybe someone else will step in and prove me wrong, but we both know that's
> >> not happening because I'm right.
>
> >No it's not happening because nobody else is interested
>
> continue to deny something that has been proven with irrefutable evidence.
Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've
dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first
came out so I doubt I'd ever ask someone else how well they work.
You seem more than barely interested
> Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be
> tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy.
And if I recall you and Frank were at the head of the pack at that
kind of stuff
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've
> >dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first
> >came out so I doubt I'd ever ask someone else how well they work.
>
> very well done forgery?
>
> >You seem more than barely interested
>
> to imagine someone blatantly lying & denying while faced with hard evidence.
> It's mostly curiosity regarding the psychology behind your deception, not the
> content of the lie itself.
Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence
Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence
A copied text file or link to a web post isn't hard evidence, if you
really want to examine bizarre thought processes start with your own
> >> Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be
> >> tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy.
>
> >And if I recall you and Frank were at the head of the pack at that
> >kind of stuff
>
> Yeah.
At least we agree on that
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence
> >Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence
>
>
> >A copied text file or link to a web post isn't hard evidence, if you
> >really want to examine bizarre thought processes start with your own
>
> never will be DNA evidence, Mark.
>
> >> Yeah.
>
> >At least we agree on that
>
>
> So, tell me your theory as to how that message with your name and header
> properties all over it showed up please....
Sure, my theory is someone else wrote it and it was included along
with the rest of someone's post that I replied to. I should think to
most people that be common sense.
BTW Who is helping you will all those big words you typed?
mleuck
Don't you think it's a little odd that all this bothers you so much?
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >Don't you think it's a little odd that all this bothers you so much?
>
>
> So, just admit you posted it and I can move on.
LOL! uh NO
mleuck
>
> http://www.homekb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/security-alarms/9719/Sell-LCD-te...
>
> http://www.news2mail.com/subject/12938879.html
They made it up too, it's a conspiracy
mleuck
Frank isn't that smart so it has to be you
Frank Olson
> mleuck wrote:
>
>>>> They made it up too, it's a conspiracy
>>> Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank?
>> Frank isn't that smart so it has to be you
>
> Frank?
>
I'm better looking in shorts.
mleuck
> Frank?
I never said I hated Frank, it's just that you are obviously smarter
than he is
mleuck
>
> You wrote the post, then realized you answered your own question, then
> cancelled it with GoogleGroups. It's an honest mistake, but lying about it is
> not honest at all.
Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh
enlightened one?
too fat for a ladder
Maybe it's someone from one of the gay groups you think he belongs to.
What's up with that off the wall accusation anyway? You've hinted
numerous times that Mark is a little light in the loafers but never
brought proof to the table.
Maybe it's Mike or Jake taking a swipe from the grave.
It could be Rodney using a teleprompter.
It could be Mark pretending not to be Mark trolling Mark just to get a
rise out of you.
It could be part of Cooper's plot to overthrow the industry though his
special technology (forget what it was called).
If it bothers you that much just blame it on Bob Campbell. He's way
too nice to people which leads me to believe he leads a secret life as
an internet scumbag.
mleuck
> too fat for a ladder wrote:
>
> >Maybe it's someone from one of the gay groups you think he belongs to.
> >What's up with that off the wall accusation anyway? You've hinted
> >numerous times that Mark is a little light in the loafers but never
> >brought proof to the table.
>
Some guy was blowing you? That answers a few questions
mleuck
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/08c19e5db0d3c8f5
>
> Now you can not deny posting it, sucka.
So now you say a message I somehow deleted reappeared......
too fat for a ladder
Was that before or after the same sex oral encounter?
mleuck
wrote:
He said somewhere he doesn't drink.....
Robert L Bass
>
> btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I
> certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake.
Are you sure? There's a pic of him in his "riding shorts" on Stevens'
website.
mleuck
> him every chance he gets. I wonder...
You seem to wonder a lot of things
mleuck
> mleuck wrote:
> >Some guy was blowing you?
>
>
> > That answers a few questions
>
>
> btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I
> certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake.
Well thank god for that, you can now continue riding RLB's butt
mleuck
wrote:
Yup healthy and wearing riding shorts, not a thing wrong with my lungs
too fat for a ladder
> mleuck wrote:
> >Some guy was blowing you?
>
>
>
>
> certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. <
OK let's stop the innuendos (which most of you probably think is an
Italian suppository), and just tell it the way you see it.
Are you, yes or no, calling Mark a homosexual, and do you, yes or no,
have any information to support your belief, or is this just a label
you have thrown on him in retaliation for you being labeled a wino?
mleuck
G has admitted being a dunk in the past and now dreams about getting
blow jobs from men whereas I never said I was gay
Ever tried the recessed sensors?
Robert L Bass
"G. Morgan" <usenet...@gawab.com> wrote in message
news:4f4b4a8fe952ea7da...@mypost.invalid...
> him every chance he gets. I wonder...
He does what behind him? :^)
Robert L Bass
>
> Yup healthy and wearing riding shorts, not a thing wrong with my lungs
All kidding aside, I hope you stay that way.
mleuck
> >Italian suppository), and just tell it the way you see it.
> >Are you, yes or no, calling Mark a homosexual,
>
>
> > and do you, yes or no,
> >have any information to support your belief,
>
>
> >or is this just a label
> >you have thrown on him in retaliation for you being labeled a wino?
>
> and unfunny, flame. "Wow even G Morgan can install one of these"
>
> After that it just became an opportunity to tell him I think he's a queer (not
> that there's anything wrong with that, a person's sexual orientation is
> nobody's business but their own). He may not even know it yet, last I heard
> he was just experimenting with ladies hose.
Apparently you are the expert on gay stuff
Doug
"too fat for a ladder" <alarmi...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f1fdeeca-ed86-414f...@x5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Its just wishful thinking on Grahams part
Doug
mleuck
>
>
> Let's get back to your lying problem, then we can address your repressed
> gayness.
With what you've said so far I don't think I'm the one with any
repressed gayness
mleuck
>
> Now, why are you lying about posting stuff?
I'm not lying