-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
[I studied with the artist who, more than anyone, got ceramics
(and not just sculpture, but wheel-thrown work as well) recognized
as a fine art medium. Peter Voulkos, starting in the 1950s, made
art with an Abstract Expressionist sensibility and such a sense
of exuberence that the art world found it hard to ignore. His
medium was ceramics, but instead of sticking with the Japanese-
inspired craft pottery fashionable at the time, he used the medium,
and the techniques associated with it, in new ways, stacking
thrown forms to make assemblages, and piercing the walls with
intrusions of different colored clays, (which he calls "pass-
throughs"). He made rough but vigorous sculpture in clay, which
brought ab-ex into 3d like nobody before him had done. Following
his lead, other sculptors started getting noticed for their work
in ceramics; people like Ken Price ( who is still going strong),
Robert Arneson (now deceased), Richard Shaw (known for his delicate
trompe l'oeil assemblages), Steven DeStaebler (who mostly works in
bronze now) and Clayton Bailey (check out his amazing website at
www.claytonbailey.com). I'd say that at this point, ceramic sculpture
is considered a classic form; right up there with bronze, which Mr.
Voulkos also rediscovered as a medium which the artist can use directly.
By working out simplified lost-wax investment casting techniques that
enable artists to control the aspects of this medium hitherto out of
reach and relegated to specialists, he became not only the man who got
ceramics recognized as art, but the one who made bronze-working
accessible as a craft.
As for the galleries, it should be understood that most of them don't
handle sculpture of any kind. For the majority, art begins and ends
with oil on canvas. Paintings are easier to store, easier to show, and
easier to sell. So sculpture is something of a specialty item to start
with. Then you have to realize that each gallery tends to champion a
certain aesthetic stance, which may- but usually doesn't- include
ceramic sculpture as a permissible vehicle. In these days, when major
fine art galleries have devoted their spaces to installations of dirt,
dung, and insects, it seems rather naive to wonder if ceramics, with
all its ancient and modern history, is capable of being considered
"fine art". Its marketablity is another issue.]
UNITED ARTWORKS- Sculpture, Jewelry, and other art stuff
http://unitedartworks.com
http://www.computersculpture.com for 3d design tools
[Andrew, so good to hear your response. I was hoping you'd be out there and
ready. Your insights into the history of ceramic arts making their move into
the fine art world were most insightful. However most of the artists you
named made their entry in the 60's and early seventies. And I'm more than
aware of the strange things that have been included of late in some pieces of
art such as dung, dirt and insects and one wonders about these. I guess what
I wanted was more anecdotal, stories from emerging sculptors who are using
clay and what the response of the market place has been for them. After all,
most of us aren't Peter Voulkos and Ken Price. Recent trends have indicated
that more and more sculpture is being shown in galleries and has met with an
equal interest by the public. Also many people(clients) are choosing to put
their sculptures out in the garden which opens up yet another range of
possiblities for ceramic sculptors. So, in fact, the issue I am asking about
is the marketability and the qualities of the ceramic sculpture that is being
purchased. Meet you on the flip flop. Jeanne.]
>
> UNITED ARTWORKS- Sculpture, Jewelry, and other art stuff
> http://unitedartworks.com
> http://www.computersculpture.com for 3d design tools
>
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
The definition of art/craft is evolving as evidenced by art history...and as
insinuated by Art Calendar (and several other art rags) fish wrap can be
art . Unfortunately your interrogatives come back to theoritical
dynamics....if you want to make art choose something that is already
accepted as "art" say Picasso ceramics, and make copies of it and vuala you
have your art and in the gallery door......the dynamic is, can a robot make
art? and, to what degree do we delinate the boundries and finally is the
King dancing without his clothes on ? William Crain
jeanne...@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
<7dgp0i$b48$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
--
Cathy Morgan, Morgan Sculpture
iron and mixed media vessel forms
One of the problems, IMHO, is the use of the term "ceramics" in many areas
"doing ceramics" has come to mean buying greenware and decorating it.
Having worked on a number of show committees this type of work does not
qualify for exhibit and sale. Many of the shows that I have done and work
with specifically weed out the "doing ceramics artists."
Fred
Both Cathy and Fred seem to have hit the nail on the head for quite a few
people. During an interview with renowned sculptor, Peter Shire, he pointed
out that the language itself can be a problem. Why should we use the term
"Ceramic Sculptor"? We don't say "Bronze sculptor", we just say sculptor. All
of us who work in clay have got to drop the "ceramic' part in any of our
written material that we might hand out or how we describe outselves. We have
so many other rules for being politically correct, what's one more? I'm still
waiting for people to tell me about their marketing experiences. How are we
moving ahead with our sculpture that happens to be made of clay? Details,
please!
>
> Fred
> Why should we use the term
> "Ceramic Sculptor"? We don't say "Bronze sculptor", we just say sculptor. All
> of us who work in clay have got to drop the "ceramic' part in any of our
> written material that we might hand out or how we describe outselves.
There is an established and discerning market for ceramics in the UK.
For these people buying contemporary ceramics is less intimidating that
buying contemporary 'art'.
> We have
> so many other rules for being politically correct, what's one more? I'm still
> waiting for people to tell me about their marketing experiences. How are we
> moving ahead with our sculpture that happens to be made of clay? Details,
> please!
For marketing purposes there is a real benefit in catagorising yourself
as a ceramic sculptor - to appeal identify yourself to those people who
buy and collect ceramics.
I find it useful to label myself 'marine sculptor' Because there are
people who look for marine art. It helps us find each other. Also it
helps me keep a handle on my identity. My CV, statement and images are
all focused around this identity.
Other sculptors do label themselves - stone-carvers, installation
artists, land artists, wood sculptor, portrait sculptor. In most cases
these help market and artist come together.
Steve
(marine artist and arts marketing consultant)
---------------------------------------------
'On a clear disk, you can seek for ever'
Stephen Rowley http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/srowley/
article <3701B2...@dial.pipex.com>,
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------