Atmospheric volume and atmospheric pressure are defying physics under the Global Warming hypothesis

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,

Jul 19, 2011, 3:45:24 PM7/19/11

to

On 7/19/2011 1:47 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:

> Ever do those back of envelope calculations on how much volcanic
> growth would be necessary to increase sea level by 3 mm / year?
>
>
> Bret Cahill

Almost the same as the ice that would have to melt at the NORTH and
SOUTH poles to make the ocean level increase by 3 mm / year.

Water/ice or rock, they are about the same inch for inch since neither
will compress any great deal under normal conditions.

AGW Facts

unread,

Jul 21, 2011, 3:53:14 PM7/21/11

to

On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:45:24 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

> Atmospheric volume and atmospheric pressure are defying physics under
> the Global Warming hypothesis

Okay, I'll bite. Whqat is your "Global Warming hypothesis?"

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,

Jul 21, 2011, 9:37:12 PM7/21/11

to

My hypothesis is that it's a phony issue designed to scare people into
giving up freedom and taxes to the power hungry governments.

No one has proven that Man has caused any warming.

You might as well give a tithe to "your" God as to pay the evil Global
Warming God or sacrifice a virgin to it.

Global Warming is NO MORE based in science, than God is based in science.

--
Helping the poor use their money more wisely is better than government
gifts allowing more waste.

http://www.ebates.com/rf.do?referrerid=Ho50UCJGk3FsQj%2F6nmqZVA%3D%3D
http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/c234545

AGW Facts

unread,

Jul 23, 2011, 4:58:38 PM7/23/11

to

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:37:12 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

> On 7/21/2011 3:53 PM, AGW Facts wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:45:24 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> > <Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Atmospheric volume and atmospheric pressure are defying physics under
> >> the Global Warming hypothesis
> >
> > Okay, I'll bite. Whqat is your "Global Warming hypothesis?"

> My hypothesis is that it's a phony issue designed to scare people into
> giving up freedom and taxes to the power hungry governments.

Okay, so you mean you are a hysterical alarmist nutter. Golly,
you're just one of thousands.

> No one has proven that Man has caused any warming.

No one had proven that Man even exists. Nobody is trying to prove
AGW happened; no scientist says it can be proven.

> You might as well give a tithe to "your" God as to pay the evil Global
> Warming God or sacrifice a virgin to it.

Appears Mental.

> Global Warming is NO MORE based in science, than God is based in science.

Nobody claimed global warming is based on science: it is not.
Global warming is an observed phenomena caused by human-produced
CO2 (an observed fact): it is not science---- climatology is.

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,

Jul 24, 2011, 12:53:39 PM7/24/11

to

On 7/23/2011 4:58 PM, AGW Facts wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:37:12 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> <Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/21/2011 3:53 PM, AGW Facts wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:45:24 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
>>> <Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Atmospheric volume and atmospheric pressure are defying physics under
>>>> the Global Warming hypothesis
>>>
>>> Okay, I'll bite. Whqat is your "Global Warming hypothesis?"
>
>> My hypothesis is that it's a phony issue designed to scare people into
>> giving up freedom and taxes to the power hungry governments.
>
> Okay, so you mean you are a hysterical alarmist nutter. Golly,
> you're just one of thousands.

Hystarical NO.... aware of peoples duplicitous nature, YES.

AGW Facts

unread,

Jul 25, 2011, 4:10:11 PM7/25/11

to

On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:53:39 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:58:38 -0600, AGW Facts <AGWF...@ipcc.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:37:12 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> > <Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/21/2011 3:53 PM, AGW Facts wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:45:24 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> > > > <Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Atmospheric volume and atmospheric pressure are defying physics under
> > > >> the Global Warming hypothesis
> > > >
> > > > Okay, I'll bite. Whqat is your "Global Warming hypothesis?"
> >
> > > My hypothesis is that it's a phony issue designed to scare people into
> > > giving up freedom and taxes to the power hungry governments.
> >
> > Okay, so you mean you are a hysterical alarmist nutter. Golly,
> > you're just one of thousands.
> >

> > > No one has proven that Man has caused any warming.
> >
> > No one had proven that Man even exists. Nobody is trying to prove
> > AGW happened; no scientist says it can be proven.
> >
> > > You might as well give a tithe to "your" God as to pay the evil Global
> > > Warming God or sacrifice a virgin to it.
> >
> > Appears Mental.
> >
> > > Global Warming is NO MORE based in science, than God is based in science.
> >
> > Nobody claimed global warming is based on science: it is not.
> > Global warming is an observed phenomena caused by human-produced
> > CO2 (an observed fact): it is not science---- climatology is.

> Hystarical NO.... aware of peoples duplicitous nature, YES.

What? I'm sorry: I only understand English.

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,

Jul 26, 2011, 3:56:06 PM7/26/11

to

>> Hysterical NO.... aware of peoples duplicitous nature, YES.

>
> What? I'm sorry: I only understand English.

That's debatable.

From the evidence I've seen, you speak Liberalish very well.