Journeyman: A Love That Transcends Time?
Tim Bruening
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
When Dan Vassar time jumps, his ex-fiance Livia often time jumps to his
current space/time location. Are they psychically linked? Is their
love a love that transcends time?
If they were to embrace, would they be able to control their time jumps?
Ar Q
"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:48A514B7...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
| Spoilers for entire series:
| 1
The series has been cancelled for long now, there is no need for
spoiler space.
|
| When Dan Vassar time jumps, his ex-fiance Livia often time jumps
to his
| current space/time location. Are they psychically linked?
No. But both have unique birth time. So unique that it only
happened twice in the last 60 years.
| Is their love a love that transcends time?
|
No. Dan and his wife have more significant love and relationship.
| If they were to embrace, would they be able to control their
time jumps?
They were lovers. Have been in bed and done more than just
embracing, nothing happened.
Peter Hucker
Not enough ones, this is a 1600*1200 monitor.
> When Dan Vassar time jumps, his ex-fiance Livia often time jumps to his
> current space/time location. Are they psychically linked? Is their
> love a love that transcends time?
>
> If they were to embrace, would they be able to control their time jumps?
>
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
Send all problems by email
Only phone me with EMERGENCY problems (e.g. LPT1 on fire)
Peter Hucker
> 1920x1200 straight ahead, 1600x1200 slightly to my right. I see the world
> all at once.
I can beat that. 1600*1200 straight ahead, left, and right.
Dear Diary,
I've had this odd feeling for a little while. It's a surrealistically subconscious feeling that I was abducted by aliens and thoroughly probed.
Then a friend of mine told me they got me really drunk and dropped me off at a gay bar.
The bastards.
Tim Bruening
Ar Q wrote:
At the time Dan and Livia were lovers, Dan had not yet become a time
jumper!
Peter Hucker
> 'Cept 'ya atin't got no wide screen.
Wide screen is for television. Computers need more vertical than horizontal.
> The 1600x1200 is a 21" and the
> 1920x1200 is a 24".
Middle is 20" LCD, other two are 19" CRTs.
> And I run four virtual desktops, which I don't use very
> much. It's really kind of overkill and just silly. The 24" is where I "do
> stuff" and the small one is just full of widgets and shit.
Just one desktop across the three. What I'm working on in front of me. Another big thing I'm keeping an eye on or referring to on the right, and little bits on the left.
___ ¨˜¸.·´ '\˜¨
¯¨˜// ', ; \\-.,¸_
`²,'/·--..,¸ '\ ' ¸,\\,.-· ¯¨`·-.,¸
|| ` ´¨ '\\ \
¸, ¸||¸ ,¸ ¸\\¸ |
/:·´ , `*·;,,,;´ //|||\, ·.¸ '¡
'/·´ . `;' //||||||\\ `·,¡
( O ) ,; ll|||||||||||||l |
,.;¹, 'l|||||||||||||// /
`. ¸ ·´' ', jl|||||||||||//,·´
'`·-.,,.,.,.,.,.,.-·´ `·-.,¸ //|||||||//·
Peter Hucker
> Indeed, which is why it's nice when I watch downloaded movies and HDTV
> programs.
Don't be absurd. How big is your monitor again? My TV is 65".
> Full screen is a perfect fit. And it's nice when I use programs
> which have columns. File managers, email clients, etc.
I always find I want more vertically. For example I have the list of emails at the top and the preview pane at the bottom. Not enough height for both. Although I suppose with a very wide screen you could put them side by side?
"Flashlights are tubular metal containers kept in a flight bag for the purpose of storing dead batteries."
Peter Hucker
> Yes, but currently the only way I can get an avi (actually anything but a
> wmv) to the TV is to convert it and shoot it through Media Center (which I
> hate and never use) via the 360 (which I haven't turned on in months). Not
> going to happen. Directly in front of a 24" monitor in a very comfortable
> computer chair works quite nicely.
What's wrong with Sky TV?
>>> Full screen is a perfect fit. And it's nice when I use programs which
>>> have columns. File managers, email clients, etc.
>>
>> I always find I want more vertically. For example I have the list of
>> emails at the top and the preview pane at the bottom. Not enough height
>> for both. Although I suppose with a very wide screen you could put them
>> side by side?
>
> Both of mine will swivel to vertical. Not for you? I tried it vertically
> once. Really freaked me out. I can see if you were a writer and you spent
> loads of time with some kind of lit work it'd be advantageous.
Never found a vertical monitor.
I am a victim of the latest scam in Columbus which is happening at the Polaris Mall.
Beware, this could happen at any mall.
The scam: Two hot 21 year old blondes come to your care as you are parking.
The first one starts wiping your windshield with a rag and Windex.
The other one say comes over to your window, says, "Hi," all the while bending over with her breasts bursting their way out of her shirt.
Of course, it's impossible not to look.
When you thank them and offer them a tip, they decline and beg you for a ride to the Easton Mall.
You agree and tell them to sit in the back.
On the way they start having oral sex with each other.
One eventually will crawl into the front seat and go down on you -- and here's the scam part -- while the other one steals your wallet.
So far, I was assaulted last Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, but I couldn't find them Saturday or Sunday.
Peter Hucker
> Dish Network in the US doesn't cary it.
Then whatever the equivalent is over there.
> And when I want something, I want it ~now~.
I don't want particular films. I watch whatever's on.
>>>>> Full screen is a perfect fit. And it's nice when I use programs
>>>>> which have columns. File managers, email clients, etc.
>>>>
>>>> I always find I want more vertically. For example I have the list of
>>>> emails at the top and the preview pane at the bottom. Not enough
>>>> height for both. Although I suppose with a very wide screen you could
>>>> put them side by side?
>>>
>>> Both of mine will swivel to vertical. Not for you? I tried it
>>> vertically once. Really freaked me out. I can see if you were a
>>> writer and you spent loads of time with some kind of lit work it'd be
>>> advantageous.
>>
>> Never found a vertical monitor.
>
> Hmm. Almost all of them I see now will swivel.
Must be a yankee thing.
Due to financial constraints, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off until further notice.
Peter Hucker
> What do you mean? Networks? Satellite, cable providers?
Some kind of TV service.
>>> And when I want something, I want it ~now~.
>>
>> I don't want particular films. I watch whatever's on.
>
> Then you're in good shape.
The angle of inclination of my stomach has nothing to do with it.
>>>>>>> Full screen is a perfect fit. And it's nice when I use programs
>>>>>>> which have columns. File managers, email clients, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I always find I want more vertically. For example I have the list of
>>>>>> emails at the top and the preview pane at the bottom. Not enough
>>>>>> height for both. Although I suppose with a very wide screen you could
>>>>>> put them side by side?
>>>>>
>>>>> Both of mine will swivel to vertical. Not for you? I tried it
>>>>> vertically once. Really freaked me out. I can see if you were a
>>>>> writer and you spent loads of time with some kind of lit work it'd be
>>>>> advantageous.
>>>>
>>>> Never found a vertical monitor.
>>>
>>> Hmm. Almost all of them I see now will swivel.
>>
>> Must be a yankee thing.
>
> I was watching a Doctor Who Confidential and there was a shot of Russell T.
> Davies with a vertical monitor on his desk, so you must have 'em over there.
There are the odd one, but you have to hunt them down.
The squaw on the hippopotamus is equal to the sons of the squaws on the other two hides!
PV
>Yes, but currently the only way I can get an avi (actually anything but a
>wmv) to the TV is to convert it and shoot it through Media Center (which I
>hate and never use) via the 360 (which I haven't turned on in months). Not
Blergh. Get a cheapo computer and plug it into your tv directly. Video
display of anything short of uncompressed HD is well within the
capabilities of computers costing less than $500, and you can run whatever
program you like to get stuff on the screen. I have an ancient mac mini
hooked to the DVI ports of my tv, and it can show any video you can watch
on a regular PC without skips, even when it's getting the video via a
shared drive over ethernet. I have a huge screen on my PC, and I still
wouldn't watch full-length video on it. It's all about the couch and
perfectly tuned viewing distance. *
--
* PV something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
like corkscrews.
Craig Oldfield
"PV" <pv+u...@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:-r6dnbirndPKETTV...@supernews.com...
Fucking cheapskate. My mate James Follett has a home cinema bigger than most
town centre multiplexes and doesn't he let us know it.
Peter Hucker
> Yeah, that would be Dish Network. A bazillion channels, forty-something of
> them are movie channels and all crap. Prolly 'cause I've already seen what
> they show.
I've never known a film not get shown on a TV channel.
>>>>> And when I want something, I want it ~now~.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want particular films. I watch whatever's on.
>>>
>>> Then you're in good shape.
>>
>> The angle of inclination of my stomach has nothing to do with it.
>
> Bellies effect reception. You ~had~ to know that.
I do actually. A fat guy at work was having trouble with his laptop radio network reception. It actually failed to work when he was sat at the desk, and worked when I was sat there!
>>>>>>>>> Full screen is a perfect fit. And it's nice when I use programs
>>>>>>>>> which have columns. File managers, email clients, etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I always find I want more vertically. For example I have the list
>>>>>>>> of emails at the top and the preview pane at the bottom. Not
>>>>>>>> enough height for both. Although I suppose with a very wide
>>>>>>>> screen you could put them side by side?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both of mine will swivel to vertical. Not for you? I tried it
>>>>>>> vertically once. Really freaked me out. I can see if you were a
>>>>>>> writer and you spent loads of time with some kind of lit work it'd
>>>>>>> be advantageous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never found a vertical monitor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. Almost all of them I see now will swivel.
>>>>
>>>> Must be a yankee thing.
>>>
>>> I was watching a Doctor Who Confidential and there was a shot of
>>> Russell T. Davies with a vertical monitor on his desk, so you must have
>>> 'em over there.
>>
>> There are the odd one, but you have to hunt them down.
>
> Well, go get one, man! Mush!
I cannot swivel, it would be too tall at the diagonal point to fit under the protective hood.
Always talk to your wife while you're making love -- if there's a phone handy.
Peter Hucker
Everything you refer to belongs to a friend of yours. Don't you have anything of your own?
Definition of a secretary:
An office fixture that isn't permanent until it's been screwed on the boss's desk.
Craig Oldfield
"Peter Hucker" <no...@spam.com> wrote in message
news:op.uf492...@fx62.mshome.net...
My belly is my own. It is *all* mine. (And so are my pies.)
Peter Hucker
Are you sure they aren't Neils's pies? Are you sure you don't live with Neil?
"Boy, will I give YOU a haircut!" said Tom barbarously.
Craig Oldfield
>
> Are you sure you don't live with Neil?
I live with my wife and family. Neil presently lives with his daddy but that
will change when he gets married later this year.
Peter Hucker
This is leaving Neil open to ridicule.
A truck driver was driving along on the freeway. A sign comes up that reads, "Low Bridge Ahead."
Before he knows it, the bridge is right ahead of him and he gets stuck under the bridge. Cars are backed up for miles.
Finally, a police car comes up. The cop gets out of his car and walks to the truck driver, puts his hands on his hips and says, "Got stuck, huh?"
The truck driver says, "No, I was delivering this bridge and ran out of gas."
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Peter Hucker" <no...@spam.com>
bloviated:
>On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:15:30 +0100, Craig Oldfield <fatbastard@gotta_eat_em_all.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Peter Hucker" <no...@spam.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.uf65g...@fx62.mshome.net...
>>>
>>> Are you sure you don't live with Neil?
>>
>> I live with my wife and family. Neil presently lives with his daddy but that
>> will change when he gets married later this year.
>
>This is leaving Neil open to ridicule.
Doesn't the whole demon.local regular pretty much cover the "open for
ridicule" thing?