Female morals...
Day Brown
faithful to a given set of values, but because of their instinct to
seek consensus, change as the attitudes of the group does.
Plotinus noted how girls of 14 give up their studies, and study only
to adorn themselves, seeing that their futures lay in being what we
now call sexual objects. And while he lamented this, and others have
as well, that's pretty much the way it was for the last 2000 years.
But now, the girls are doing better in school, and see future careers
as productive individuals. They are also engaging in sex without deep
emotional attachment. Their attachments are to their careers, for that
is what provides what financial security there is in this world. Not a
relationship with a man.
And while everyone now gets their panties in a wad over men have sex
with girls, when women run a system, that is what they arrange. One of
the better documented examples are the 18th century Brit reports on
the rituals to Kali in Bengal. That begins with the girls
experimenting with a set of dildos that range in size from 10cm on up
to the size of massive male members, the "Elephant" men as Vatsyayana
referred to them in the Kama Sutra.
The first time the girls (and I do mean girls, they dont wait until
age 18) perform with a meat dildo, the owner is a brahmin. We cant
really say he 'deflowers' them because the dildos already did that. In
contrast to the problem Plotinus noted, the girls dont see themselves
as sex objects, and are not emotionally attached.
Which is where all the flap about virginity is really coming from. The
men instinctively know that if they can initialize sex with a girl and
continue with the practice, because of what we now call the "stockholm
effect', the girls will become devoted to them.
Its not really about sex; its about attachment and the power that
comes of it. All the hype about "child abuse" is not helpful; that
only changes the self image of the girl from that of a lover (who the
ancients understood had power over those they provide pleasure to) to
a victim.
And as a victim, they never achieve the status of independent sentient
being, and their ability to pursue a career is severely damaged. So,
all these self righteous rants about pedophilia only make things worse.
Jerry Kraus
Women are more socially oriented, less individualistic. Probably
because they need society to protect the relatively small number of
children they can bear in a lifetime, in order to spread their gene
pool. So, whatever their social environment requires of them, they
feel quite comfortable giving to it, for their children's sake.
In contrast, men can conceive untold thousands of children in a
lifetime, given the opportunity. They are individualists, with their
own set of values and morals. They are truly independant of society.
They don't need society, in order to spread their gene pool. They
just need to survive and prosper. Plenty of their children will
surive, as long as they do. Which is, therefore, their natural
orientation.
Day Brown
> Women are more socially oriented, less individualistic. Probably
> because they need society to protect the relatively small number of
> children they can bear in a lifetime, in order to spread their gene
> pool. So, whatever their social environment requires of them, they
> feel quite comfortable giving to it, for their children's sake.
>
> In contrast, men can conceive untold thousands of children in a
> lifetime, given the opportunity. They are individualists, with their
> own set of values and morals. They are truly independant of society.
> They don't need society, in order to spread their gene pool. They
> just need to survive and prosper. Plenty of their children will
> surive, as long as they do. Which is, therefore, their natural
> orientation.
effective method to stay in the gene pool; And while I can see a
hookup leading to progeny, the mother is far more likely to be stupid,
and the smart women far more likely to be very selective in sperm
donation.
And now, as a recent article in Cosmopolitan shows, they are going to
fertility clinics to choose from among thousands of more promising Y
chromosome lines than are found in the balls of usenet posters. Which
thot has a lot of them upset.
And like you say, for their children's sake, they will select from
only among the healthiest Y chromosome lines, perhaps even aided with
genealogy, but in any case matching markers for immune response so
far, and we all know for talent, charisma, sociability, and
intelligence as soon as those DNA patterns get recognized. Moreover,
the mothers who do this are networking, comparing the results they
have with different Y chromosome lines. These networks are becoming
extended families- clans.
And considering how gifted the younger generation is, will form very
powerful political and economic entities just like clans. Moreover,
the more successful they become, the more other young women will want
to join their operations.
Entrepreneurial operations whose moral values are dramatically
different from "family values". It'll be very stiff competition for
the nuclear family household. I know some women that are already
involved in real estate- but not quite like you think. They will be
using their professional career incomes to purchase some of the vast
McMansions coming on the market at low prices. But as full partners in
a Sub Chapter S, or similar corporation, their per capita costs would
be dramatically lower than if each of them rented or bought an
apartment, condo, townhouse, or typical single family bungalow.
At the end of the day, the Almighty Dollar determines moral values. I
imagine that each communal house will make its own rules, which vary
widely, but are rather unlikely to be based on scripture.