On Sep 1, 9:56 pm, Pertti Koivisto <pertt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Some of the most powerful quakes of the month . > Quake rate seems to be moderately high level. > 9.8.2008 Etelämanner 6.5 > 9.8.2008 Macquarie etelämanner 6.3 > 10.8.2008 Andamaanit Intia 6.2 > 11.8.2008 Keski-Atlantti 6.0 > 15.08.2008 Samar Filippiinit 6.0 > 19.08.2008 Tonga 6.1 > 21.08.2008 Myanmar-Kiina 6.0 > 22.08.2008 Mauritius 6.0 > 25.08.2008 Länsi-Tibet 6.7 > 26.08.2008 Pojois-Peru 6.4 > 27.08.2008 Baikal-järvi Venäjä 6.2 > 28.08.2008 Pohjois-Afrikka Ascension 6.3 > 30.08.2008 Itä-Uusi Guinea 6.3
Besides Earth cooling and unavoidably shrinking, how's the alignment of our Selene/moon?
All by itself, seems our extremely nearby and massive Selene/moon is worth 2e20 N, and it further seems that its tidal flexing force is continually applied for each and every second of each and every day that's getting applied throughout our 98.5% fluid Earth.
<pertt...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Some of the most powerful quakes of the month . >Quake rate seems to be moderately high level. >9.8.2008 Etelämanner 6.5 >9.8.2008 Macquarie etelämanner 6.3 >10.8.2008 Andamaanit Intia 6.2 >11.8.2008 Keski-Atlantti 6.0 >15.08.2008 Samar Filippiinit 6.0 >19.08.2008 Tonga 6.1 >21.08.2008 Myanmar-Kiina 6.0 >22.08.2008 Mauritius 6.0 >25.08.2008 Länsi-Tibet 6.7 >26.08.2008 Pojois-Peru 6.4 >27.08.2008 Baikal-järvi Venäjä 6.2 >28.08.2008 Pohjois-Afrikka Ascension 6.3 >30.08.2008 Itä-Uusi Guinea 6.3
Maybe the Muslim god, Allah, didn't place enough mountains on the earth to hold it still, after all.
Koran Sura 31:9 Without pillars that can be seen hath He created the heavens, and on the earth hath thrown mountains lest it should move with you; and He hath scattered over it animals of every sort: and from the Heaven we send down rain and cause every kind of noble plant to grow up therein.
<pertt...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Some of the most powerful quakes of the month . >Quake rate seems to be moderately high level. >9.8.2008 Etelämanner 6.5 >9.8.2008 Macquarie etelämanner 6.3 >10.8.2008 Andamaanit Intia 6.2 >11.8.2008 Keski-Atlantti 6.0 >15.08.2008 Samar Filippiinit 6.0 >19.08.2008 Tonga 6.1 >21.08.2008 Myanmar-Kiina 6.0 >22.08.2008 Mauritius 6.0 >25.08.2008 Länsi-Tibet 6.7 >26.08.2008 Pojois-Peru 6.4 >27.08.2008 Baikal-järvi Venäjä 6.2 >28.08.2008 Pohjois-Afrikka Ascension 6.3 >30.08.2008 Itä-Uusi Guinea 6.3
Polar ice melt has reduced the weight of the polar tectonic plates and they are rising while the melt water that flowed into the oceans has increased the weight of the oceans and the tectonic plates under the oceans are sinking. The volume of the earth remains constant, but these adjustments due to mass (weight) transfer seem to be causing an increase in frequency and intensity of earthquakes.
This on-going polar ice melt started about 20,000 years ago, when the last ice age ended. If geologic history repeats, as ice core sample information indicates it has before, we may be at or very near the end of this current interglacial warm period. The next cool-down into an ice age could start very soon...and last about 87,000 years before the next interglacial warm period begins. In fact, industrial age atmospheric pollution may have delayed the onset of the next ice age a bit.
What causes these ice age - interglacial warm period cycles? Solar output cyclical variations is the most likely explanation, but this has not yet been proven.
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:56:26 -0700 (PDT), Pertti Koivisto
> <pertt...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Some of the most powerful quakes of the month . > >Quake rate seems to be moderately high level. > >9.8.2008 Etelämanner 6.5 > >9.8.2008 Macquarie etelämanner 6.3 > >10.8.2008 Andamaanit Intia 6.2 > >11.8.2008 Keski-Atlantti 6.0 > >15.08.2008 Samar Filippiinit 6.0 > >19.08.2008 Tonga 6.1 > >21.08.2008 Myanmar-Kiina 6.0 > >22.08.2008 Mauritius 6.0 > >25.08.2008 Länsi-Tibet 6.7 > >26.08.2008 Pojois-Peru 6.4 > >27.08.2008 Baikal-järvi Venäjä 6.2 > >28.08.2008 Pohjois-Afrikka Ascension 6.3 > >30.08.2008 Itä-Uusi Guinea 6.3
> Polar ice melt has reduced the weight of the polar tectonic plates and > they are rising while the melt water that flowed into the oceans has > increased the weight of the oceans and the tectonic plates under the > oceans are sinking. The volume of the earth remains constant, but > these adjustments due to mass (weight) transfer seem to be causing an > increase in frequency and intensity of earthquakes.
> This on-going polar ice melt started about 20,000 years ago, when the > last ice age ended. If geologic history repeats, as ice core sample > information indicates it has before, we may be at or very near the end > of this current interglacial warm period. The next cool-down into an > ice age could start very soon...and last about 87,000 years before the > next interglacial warm period begins. In fact, industrial age > atmospheric pollution may have delayed the onset of the next ice age a > bit.
> What causes these ice age - interglacial warm period cycles? Solar > output cyclical variations is the most likely explanation, but this > has not yet been proven.
> Gordon
Greenland is also measurably rising by < 4 cm/year, adding further insult to our global warming fiasco. Perhaps the year of 2010 will see < 5 cm rise.
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:56:26 -0700 (PDT), Pertti Koivisto
> <pertt...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Some of the most powerful quakes of the month . > >Quake rate seems to be moderately high level. > >9.8.2008 Etelämanner 6.5 > >9.8.2008 Macquarie etelämanner 6.3 > >10.8.2008 Andamaanit Intia 6.2 > >11.8.2008 Keski-Atlantti 6.0 > >15.08.2008 Samar Filippiinit 6.0 > >19.08.2008 Tonga 6.1 > >21.08.2008 Myanmar-Kiina 6.0 > >22.08.2008 Mauritius 6.0 > >25.08.2008 Länsi-Tibet 6.7 > >26.08.2008 Pojois-Peru 6.4 > >27.08.2008 Baikal-järvi Venäjä 6.2 > >28.08.2008 Pohjois-Afrikka Ascension 6.3 > >30.08.2008 Itä-Uusi Guinea 6.3
> Polar ice melt has reduced the weight of the polar tectonic plates and > they are rising while the melt water that flowed into the oceans has > increased the weight of the oceans and the tectonic plates under the > oceans are sinking. The volume of the earth remains constant, but > these adjustments due to mass (weight) transfer seem to be causing an > increase in frequency and intensity of earthquakes.
> This on-going polar ice melt started about 20,000 years ago, when the > last ice age ended. If geologic history repeats, as ice core sample > information indicates it has before, we may be at or very near the end > of this current interglacial warm period. The next cool-down into an > ice age could start very soon...and last about 87,000 years before the > next interglacial warm period begins. In fact, industrial age > atmospheric pollution may have delayed the onset of the next ice age a > bit.
> What causes these ice age - interglacial warm period cycles? Solar > output cyclical variations is the most likely explanation, but this > has not yet been proven.
> Gordon >Greenland is also measurably rising by < 4 cm/year, adding further >insult to our global warming fiasco. Perhaps the year of 2010 will >see < 5 cm rise.
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:56:26 -0700 (PDT), Pertti Koivisto
> > <pertt...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Some of the most powerful quakes of the month . > > >Quake rate seems to be moderately high level. > > >9.8.2008 Etelämanner 6.5 > > >9.8.2008 Macquarie etelämanner 6.3 > > >10.8.2008 Andamaanit Intia 6.2 > > >11.8.2008 Keski-Atlantti 6.0 > > >15.08.2008 Samar Filippiinit 6.0 > > >19.08.2008 Tonga 6.1 > > >21.08.2008 Myanmar-Kiina 6.0 > > >22.08.2008 Mauritius 6.0 > > >25.08.2008 Länsi-Tibet 6.7 > > >26.08.2008 Pojois-Peru 6.4 > > >27.08.2008 Baikal-järvi Venäjä 6.2 > > >28.08.2008 Pohjois-Afrikka Ascension 6.3 > > >30.08.2008 Itä-Uusi Guinea 6.3
> > Polar ice melt has reduced the weight of the polar tectonic plates and > > they are rising while the melt water that flowed into the oceans has > > increased the weight of the oceans and the tectonic plates under the > > oceans are sinking. The volume of the earth remains constant, but > > these adjustments due to mass (weight) transfer seem to be causing an > > increase in frequency and intensity of earthquakes.
> > This on-going polar ice melt started about 20,000 years ago, when the > > last ice age ended. If geologic history repeats, as ice core sample > > information indicates it has before, we may be at or very near the end > > of this current interglacial warm period. The next cool-down into an > > ice age could start very soon...and last about 87,000 years before the > > next interglacial warm period begins. In fact, industrial age > > atmospheric pollution may have delayed the onset of the next ice age a > > bit.
> > What causes these ice age - interglacial warm period cycles? Solar > > output cyclical variations is the most likely explanation, but this > > has not yet been proven.
> > Gordon > >Greenland is also measurably rising by < 4 cm/year, adding further > >insult to our global warming fiasco. Perhaps the year of 2010 will > >see < 5 cm rise.
> > ~ BG
> Tehän voisitte ottaa toisiltanne suihin.
By the way, there's also 2e20 N/s of tidal radius force taking place, and it's source is always on the move at 1023 m/sec.
>On Dec 3, 6:57 am, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:56:26 -0700 (PDT), Pertti Koivisto
(snip)
>> Polar ice melt has reduced the weight of the polar tectonic plates and >> they are rising while the melt water that flowed into the oceans has >> increased the weight of the oceans and the tectonic plates under the >> oceans are sinking. The volume of the earth remains constant, but >> these adjustments due to mass (weight) transfer seem to be causing an >> increase in frequency and intensity of earthquakes.
>> This on-going polar ice melt started about 20,000 years ago, when the >> last ice age ended. If geologic history repeats, as ice core sample >> information indicates it has before, we may be at or very near the end >> of this current interglacial warm period. The next cool-down into an >> ice age could start very soon...and last about 87,000 years before the >> next interglacial warm period begins. In fact, industrial age >> atmospheric pollution may have delayed the onset of the next ice age a >> bit.
>> What causes these ice age - interglacial warm period cycles? Solar >> output cyclical variations is the most likely explanation, but this >> has not yet been proven.
>> Gordon
>Greenland is also measurably rising by < 4 cm/year, adding further >insult to our global warming fiasco. Perhaps the year of 2010 will >see < 5 cm rise.
> ~ BG
Any region that has been covered with ice for a very long time will experience this kind of uplift as the ice melts away. But, this present and on-going ice melt isn't the result of recent industrial age atmospheric pollution. The present interglacial warming period started about 20,000 years ago, when the last ice age ended.
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:12:44 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> >On Dec 3, 6:57 am, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:56:26 -0700 (PDT), Pertti Koivisto
> (snip)
> >> Polar ice melt has reduced the weight of the polar tectonic plates and > >> they are rising while the melt water that flowed into the oceans has > >> increased the weight of the oceans and the tectonic plates under the > >> oceans are sinking. The volume of the earth remains constant, but > >> these adjustments due to mass (weight) transfer seem to be causing an > >> increase in frequency and intensity of earthquakes.
> >> This on-going polar ice melt started about 20,000 years ago, when the > >> last ice age ended. If geologic history repeats, as ice core sample > >> information indicates it has before, we may be at or very near the end > >> of this current interglacial warm period. The next cool-down into an > >> ice age could start very soon...and last about 87,000 years before the > >> next interglacial warm period begins. In fact, industrial age > >> atmospheric pollution may have delayed the onset of the next ice age a > >> bit.
> >> What causes these ice age - interglacial warm period cycles? Solar > >> output cyclical variations is the most likely explanation, but this > >> has not yet been proven.
> >> Gordon
> >Greenland is also measurably rising by < 4 cm/year, adding further > >insult to our global warming fiasco. Perhaps the year of 2010 will > >see < 5 cm rise.
> > ~ BG
> Any region that has been covered with ice for a very long time will > experience this kind of uplift as the ice melts away. But, this > present and on-going ice melt isn't the result of recent industrial > age atmospheric pollution. The present interglacial warming period > started about 20,000 years ago, when the last ice age ended.
> Gordon
More or less 12,700~12,900 BP when we obtained our icy proto-moon (Selene), and Earth got its nifty seasonal tilt plus having ended up with the extra 2e20 N/sec of tidal force added into our 98.5% fluid environment.
Actually at first, shortly after the icy lithobraking encounter, it was more like 3.2e21 N/sec until Selene managed to get a bit further away. At half distance its tidal radius force of 8e20 N/sec should have been quite interesting, though hardly survivable for most life on Earth.
