Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt . sci . physics
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Find or start a Google Group about physics.
Group info
Language: English
Group categories:
Science and Technology
More group info »
Discussions
View:  Topic list, Topic summary Topics 1 - 10 of 25738  Older »

He Rises 
  HE RISES He is not in Heaven, though He fills the skies He resides on Flat Earth, though He does arise ... if that is any comfort He does not burn sinners but neither does He feel their hurt. He is noble. He is inert. He must be why politicans sound so funny, but He is bad for your brain... more »
By Tom Keske  - 2:32pm - 1 new of 1 message    

Gravity and Vacuum. 
  Gravity and Vacuum. =. Einstein was mistaken using his Gravitation theory to the all Universe as a whole. The Gravitation theory doesn’t work in the Universe as a whole. The Gravitation theory is a local theory. Why? Because the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe ( the cosmological constant / the critical density)... more »
By socratus  - May 26 - 2 new of 2 messages    

sciencentechnologies 
  Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. In an older and closely related meaning, "science" refers to the body of reliable knowledge itself, of the type that can be logically and rationally explained since classical antiquity science... more »
By science technologies  - May 25 - 1 new of 1 message    

Einstein and Socratus. 
  Einstein and Socratus. =. Einstein, you was mistaken using your Gravitation theory to the all Universe as a whole. The Gravitation theory doesn’t work in the Universe as a whole. The Gravitation theory is a local theory. Why? Because the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe ( the cosmological constant / the critical density)... more »
By socratus  - May 25 - 1 new of 1 message    

Using Godel's PROOF(THEOREM) PREDICATE to Prove a Program HALTS() (in a separate THEORY) 
  [link] Godel's Proof began with the Hypothesis whether a PROOF(THEOREM) Predicate existed or not. This was defined as a function that input a theorem X and returned TRUE IFF a sequence of statements exists in the theory and the final line is X, deduced from the earlier statements.... more »
By Graham Cooper  - May 22 - 2 new of 2 messages    

Mitt Romney mistaken in science 
  US presidential candidate Mitt Romney said, that God has created living creatures through evolution. Times have changed when Mike Huccabee went to Iowa with landslide victory saying : " I don't believe in evolution theory". MItt's God is small and limited to evolution theory. Huccabees GOd was big in any dimensions.... more »
By Pertti  - May 22 - 4 new of 4 messages    

Halt(n) Prv(n) Cons(N) PS(N) Perm(N) Real(n) Set(n) BB(n) 
  Any more UNCOMPUTABLE<-/->FUNCTIONS need programming while I'm here! CLAY send the $8,000,000 Cheque to Kings Beach Queensland! ********************HALT(n)*** ****************************** * T |- HALT(Prog1) = Prog1|-H1() ^ Prog1|-H2() ^ .. ^ Prog1|-Hn() CONCURRENCY RULE ALL(m) ALL(n) NOT( P_m|-HALT() ^ P_m|-Hn())... more »
By Graham Cooper  - May 21 - 1 new of 1 message    

To All You Trolls Out There 
  For all you trolls out there: I'll have you know that I'm a member of the upper upper crust high society and as such you must know that I have big ball notoriety.
By Kevin  - May 21 - 4 new of 4 messages    

Plain English Physics 101 
  Plain English Physics 101 Published under new title Modified Monday, May 21, 2012 johnlawrencereed jr Excerpt on Ptolemy: Where Wigner noted the "uncanny" usefulness of mathematics, I noted that the usefulness remains, regardless of the veracity of our a priori assumptions. As an example, first consider the Ptolemaic, Earth... more »
By thejohnlreed  - May 21 - 9 new of 9 messages    

Mathelogy S 011 
  ... So you finally answered my Question from last week! "There are more Reals than Naturals." [VIRGIL] If that means that there is a surjection from the reals to the naturals but no surjection from the naturals to the reals ,Yes! What about this one? "The set of Real Numbers is bigger than the set of Natural Numbers."... more »
By Graham Cooper  - May 21 - 7 new of 7 messages    

1 - 10 of 25738   « Newer | Older »

XML