A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
Itnia
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
The results of quantum theory were described as "spooky" by Drs.
Einstein, Podalsky, and Rosen because quantum theory seemed to reject
"objective reality". They believed that all observed effects must be
produced by "local" causality. Their conclusion resulted from their firm
belief that information could not travel faster than the velocity of light.
Indeed, if this were the case, quantum theory would indeed be "spooky".
Quantum theory required, for example, that "paired photons" maintain
polarizations which were opposite in direction . If the polarization angle
of one of the "paired photons" were changed, the polarization angle of the
other photon of the pair must instantaneously change to match. ("Paired
photons" are produced by the self annihilation of an artificial atom
composed of an electron and a positron. They are polarized in opposite
directions and are emitted in opposite directions. Their polarization angle
is, of course, random with respect to the external world.)
Since the "paired photons" are emitted in opposite directions, they
rapidly become separated in space. The required instantaneous coupling of
their polarization implies that information must travel at an infinite
velocity and, since these personages were firmly committed to the idea that
information could not be transmitted faster than the velocity of light, they
had to conclude that the process was "spooky" and required the existence of
"hidden variables". (These allegedly "hidden" variables are not necessarily
hidden, one of them for example, is the polarization coupling of "paired
photons".Since this coupling had been shown to propagate at an "impossible"
infinite velocity, it was necessary for orthodox physics to accept the idea
of "spookiness". If the effect were accepted without the idea of
"spookiness" it, the existence of an absolute velocity reference frame for
space (i.e.- the Aether) would have to be accepted. Since this is currently
dogmatically unacceptable, a problem remained.
An alternative explanation, proposed by the "Copenhagen School" of
physicists asserted that there was no objective reality, there was only the
reality as seen by the observer. This interpretation led to Schroedinger's
Cat Paradox which asserted that a cat in a closed box that would be subject
to cyanide poisoning if the decay of a radioactive atom was detected by
instruments within the box. It was further asserted that, since the decay of
the atom and thus the death of the cat, the creature was both dead and alive
until an external observer opened the box and looked. The reasoning behind
this was the idea that an event does not occur until it is observed. This
does not seem to be an objectionable idea, per se, but the observation that
counts in this Paradox is the decay of the radioactive atom, not the
observation by an external observer. The cat is not both alive and dead
prior to his observation, it is one or the other, but not both. The fact
that the observer does not know is meaningless. It is only attributed as
having meaning as a result of intellectual sloppiness. Schroedinger's Cat
Paradox is not a paradox.
A different approach to resolving the "spookiness" of Quantum theory is
the idea of Parallel Universes. In this interpretation, each particle in the
Universe creates an unobservable twin every time it makes a quantum
"decision" The result is that each particle creates an unobservable
"Parallel Universe" at virtually every instant of time occurring since our
Universe began. When one considers the number of particles in the Universe,
the number of ways in which they can interact, and the number of instants of
time since the Universe began, the number of Universes which are required
under this theory is, incredibly, at least 10^160. What is equally
incredible is that each of these Universes contains the same amount of
energy as our own and each of its particles occupies the same space at the
same time as do its brothers. This interpretation seems to have a large
number of believers of high reputation. In spite of this, the writer has no
qualms about asserting that any physicist who would accept such a concept is
in the wrong line of work. I understand that Wal-Mart is hiring.
When one examines the concept that information cannot propagate faster
than the velocity of light one finds that it is based on the fact that
information is almost always encoded in the form of energy. Since the
Lorentz Transformation for energy is 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 (the same as the
Lorentz Transformation for Length), it is obvious why information cannot
propagate faster than the velocity of light. At the velocity of light, the
Lorentz Transformation for Energy becomes infinite. The transformation
becomes imaginary! Information encoded in the form of energy certainly
cannot propagate faster that the velocity of light. When information is
encoded in the form of the polarization angles of "paired photons", however,
this limitation does not occur. Changing the polarization angle of a photon
does not change its energy. As a result, no energy transfer is involved in
changing their polarization angles. If one extracts the Lorentz
Transformation for Angle using the conventional Lorentz Transformations, one
find that this transformation is unity since angle is equal to a LENGTH
along an arc divided by the LENGTH of the radius of that arc. Accordingly,
the Lorentz Transformation for Angle becomes
((1-V^2/C^2)/(1-V^2/C^2))^0.5 or unity. One might conclude, therefore, that
the relativistic processes do not impose a velocity limit on the propagation
of the polarization angle of the "paired photons" and it is reasonable to
expect that velocity to be infinite. "Spookiness" is not needed.
Physicists have also concluded that even if information could be
transmitted by the use of "paired photons", that information could not be
decoded singe the polarization angle of the "paired photons" emitted by
their source was completely random. This apparent limitation is not
fundamental problem, it is a signal to noise ratio problem. The information
is actually being transmittted but it is swamped by the noise level of
background photons. If the singal to noise ratio of the transmission could
be sufficiently improved,communicating over a distance at a quasi-infinite
velocity would be found to be perfectly feasible. The most dangerous part of
this conclusion is that it would establish the existence of "absolute time"
and the existence of the classical Aether and would demolish the
hare-brained concept of "space-time". See http://einsteinhoax.com/cf53.htm.
Omit the 45 degree polarizers. They may destroy the polarization coupling.)
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einste...@verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
KONCHOK.PENDAY
Itnia [it...@verizon.net] wrote:
> A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
>
> (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
>
> The results of quantum theory were described as "spooky" by Drs.
> Einstein, Podalsky, and Rosen because quantum theory seemed to reject
> "objective reality".
YES!
That's quite a serious flaw
in a theory purporting to
EXPLAIN objective reality!
SO WE'LL JUST IGNORE
THAT OBJECTION AS RUDE!
> They believed that all observed effects must be produced
> by "local" causality.
HOW SENSIBLE!
> Their conclusion resulted from their firm belief that
> information could not travel faster than the velocity of light.
I'm a believer too!
> Indeed, if this were the case, quantum theory
> would indeed be "spooky".
As well as "what-if?", stupid,
brain damaging and irrelevant!
> Quantum theory required, for example, that "paired photons"
> maintain polarizations which were opposite in direction . If the
> polarization angle of one of the "paired photons" were changed, the
> polarization angle of the other photon of the pair must
> instantaneously change to match. ("Paired photons" are produced
> by the self annihilation of an artificial atom composed of an
> electron and a positron. They are polarized in opposite
> directions and are emitted in opposite directions.
> Their polarization angle is, of course, random with respect
> to the external world.)
Quantum Theory may require that
the budget be balanced! So what?
> Since the "paired photons" are emitted in opposite directions, they
> rapidly become separated in space. The required instantaneous coupling
> of their polarization implies that information must travel at an
> infinite velocity and, since these personages were firmly committed
> to the idea that information could not be transmitted faster than
> the velocity of light, they had to conclude that the process was
> "spooky" and required the existence of "hidden variables". (These
> allegedly "hidden" variables are not necessarily hidden, one of
> them for example, is the polarization coupling of "paired
> photons". Since this coupling had been shown to
> propagate at an "impossible" infinite velocity, it was
> necessary for orthodox physics to accept the idea of
> "spookiness". If the effect were accepted without the
> idea of "spookiness" it, the existence of an absolute
> velocity reference frame for space (i.e.- the Aether)
> would have to be accepted. Since this is currently
> dogmatically unacceptable, a problem remained.
SPOOKY = WANK!
FLUSH TWICE!
WE DON'T HAVE TO PONDER
THE DIFFICULTIES OF THINGS
TRAVELING FASTER THAN LIGHT!
THERE AREN'T ANY!
Unless you just made
a stunning discovery?
WANK TRAVELS AS FAST
AS YOU WANT IT TO!
> An alternative explanation, proposed by the "Copenhagen School" of
> physicists asserted that there was no objective reality, there was
> only the reality as seen by the observer. This interpretation led to
> Schroedinger's Cat Paradox which asserted that a cat in a closed box
> that would be subject to cyanide poisoning if the decay of a
> radioactive atom was detected by instruments within the box.
> It was further asserted that, since the decay of the atom and
> thus the death of the cat, the creature was both dead and alive
> until an external observer opened the box and looked.
EXTRACTED FROM:
"A LAWYER DOES PHYSICS!"
> The reasoning behind this was the idea that an event
> does not occur until it is observed.
YOU KILLED MY CAT
BY OPENING THE BOX!
IT JUST *LOOKS* LIKE IT'S
BEEN DEAD FOR TWO YEARS!
Just like my turds don't exist
until I see them in the toilet!
Which mental institution claims
credit for that profound thought?
> This does not seem to be an objectionable idea, per se,
????
> but the observation that counts in this Paradox is the decay
> of the radioactive atom, not the observation by an external observer.
> The cat is not both alive and dead prior to his observation,
> it is one or the other, but not both.
Excellent!
I'm sure they will
let you right in
to second grade!
> The fact that the observer does not know is meaningless.
I think you are
third grade material!
> It is only attributed as having meaning as a result of
> intellectual sloppiness. Schroedinger's Cat Paradox is not a paradox.
Thank you!
Fourth Grade seems certain!
> A different approach to resolving the "spookiness" of
> Quantum theory
IS TO FLUSH TWICE *AND*
USE THE AIR FRESHENER!
> is the idea of Parallel Universes. In this interpretation, each
> particle in the Universe creates an unobservable twin every time
> it makes a quantum "decision" The result is that each particle
> creates an unobservable "Parallel Universe" at virtually every
> instant of time occurring since our Universe began. When one
> considers the number of particles in the Universe, the number
> of ways in which they can interact, and the number of instants
> of time since the Universe began, the number of Universes which
> are required under this theory is, incredibly, at least 10^160.
CLEARLY WANK!
> What is equally incredible is that each of these Universes contains
> the same amount of energy as our own and each of its particles
> occupies the same space at the same time as do its brothers.
HIGH CLASS WANK!
> This interpretation seems to have a large number of believers of
> high reputation. In spite of this, the writer has no qualms about
> asserting that any physicist who would accept such a concept is
> in the wrong line of work. I understand that Wal-Mart is hiring.
BUT THEY HAVE NO DEMAND FOR "PURE" MATH!
> When one examines the concept that information cannot propagate
> faster than the velocity of light one finds that it is based on
> the fact that information is almost always encoded in the form
> of energy. Since the Lorentz Transformation for energy is
> 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 (the same as the Lorentz Transformation
> for Length), it is obvious why information cannot propagate
> faster than the velocity of light. At the velocity of light, the
> Lorentz Transformation for Energy becomes infinite. The transformation
> becomes imaginary! Information encoded in the form of energy certainly
> cannot propagate faster that the velocity of light. When information
> is encoded in the form of the polarization angles of "paired photons",
> however, this limitation does not occur. Changing the polarization
> angle of a photon does not change its energy. As a result, no energy
> transfer is involved in changing their polarization angles. If one
> extracts the Lorentz Transformation for Angle using the conventional
> Lorentz Transformations, one find that this transformation is unity
> since angle is equal to a LENGTH along an arc divided by the LENGTH
> of the radius of that arc. Accordingly, the Lorentz Transformation
> for Angle becomes ((1-V^2/C^2)/(1-V^2/C^2))^0.5 or unity.
"Paired photons" travel faster
than the speed of light?
Are they not still light?
> One might conclude, therefore, that the relativistic processes
> do not impose a velocity limit on the propagation of the
> polarization angle of the "paired photons" and it is
> reasonable to expect that velocity to be infinite.
When did you last see a
photon travel infinitely fast?
> "Spookiness" is not needed.
Nor accepted, here.
> Physicists have also concluded that even if information could be
> transmitted by the use of "paired photons", that information could
> not be decoded singe the polarization angle of the "paired photons"
> emitted by their source was completely random. This apparent
> limitation is not fundamental problem, it is a signal to noise
> ratio problem. The information is actually being transmittted
> but it is swamped by the noise level of background photons.
> If the singal to noise ratio of the transmission could be
> sufficiently improved,communicating over a distance at a
> quasi-infinite velocity would be found to be perfectly feasible.
And if I were an angel,
I might grant you 3 wishes!
> The most dangerous part of this conclusion is that it
> would establish the existence of "absolute time" and the
> existence of the classical Aether and would demolish the
> hare-brained concept of "space-time".
WHAT WOULD WE DO THEN?
> See
> http://einsteinhoax.com/cf53.htm. Omit the 45 degree
> polarizers. They may destroy the polarization coupling.)
>
> The source material for this posting may be found in
> http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997);
> http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm (1987); and
> http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997).
KP2009DEC22 AETHRO-DYNAMICS RELEASED!+
AFTER TOO MANY MONTHS
OF SAYING "ANY DAY NOW"
IT'S FINALLY OUT!
SANTA BROUGHT IT
JUST FOR YOU!
GET IT QUICK!
YOU CAN BUY IT IN PAPER FOR $29.50
PLUS SHIPPING ON AMAZON.COM at:
http://www.amazon.com/Aethro-dynamics-Steven-Rado/dp/0966757181
AETHRO-KINEMATICS [A-K] IN 1994 FIRMLY
ESTABLISHED STEVEN RADO AS BY FAR THE
GREATEST PHYSICIST IN HUMAN HISTORY.
*NOBODY* ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE!
ONLY A FEW LIKE KEPLER, DESCARTES
GALLILEO, FARADAY, MAXWELL, ETC.
WERE EVEN ON THE RIGHT TRACK!
FOR THE LAST HUNDRED YEARS PHYSICS
HAS GONE *BACKWARDS* INTO IRRELEVANT,
UNINTELLIGIBLE MATHEMATICAL *WANK*!
[I WAS A PHYSICS MAJOR AT THE UNIVERSITY
OF CHICAGO IN THE 1960'S, UNTIL I REALIZED
HAT "PHYSICISTS" WERE JUST MATHEMATICIANS
PRETENDING* TO KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT
PHYSICS, BUT HAD *NO* UNDERSTANDING!
I FLED FROM PHYSICS IN TERROR AND
DISGUST UNTIL STEVE BROUGHT ME BACK
WITH SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MADE SENSE!]
UNTIL AETHRO-KINEMATICS,
THE 20TH CENTURY WAS A
COMPLETE AND UNMITIGATED
*CATASTROPHE* FOR PHYSICS!
BUT THAT'S ALL OVER NOW!
AETHRO-DYNAMICS [A-D] IN 2009
FAR SURPASSES EVEN A-K!
IF A-K IS THE BOOSTER
THAT PUT PHYSICS IN ORBIT,
A-D LAUNCHED IT ON IT'S
INTERSTELLAR JOURNEY!
I PRAYED FOR 15 YEARS THAT
STEVE WOULD WRITE MORE!
NOW IT'S HERE!
GET *YOUR* TICKET-TO-RIDE!
===========================
THESE TWO EPOCHAL BOOKS ARE
*THE* SUPREME INTELLECTUAL
TRIUMPH OF THE HUMAN RACE!
===========================
NOBODY ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE!
EVEN "GODEL, ESCHER, BACH" FADES
INTO INTELLECTUAL INSIGNIFICANCE
NEXT TO STEVE'S *UNRIVALED* WORK!
STEVE PUTS IT *ALL* TOGETHER!
THERE IS *NO* SUBSTITUTE!
IF YOU HAVE NOT READ RADO,
YOU ARE JUST PLAIN *IGNORANT*
ABOUT PHYSICS, *ESPECIALLY* IF
YOU HAVE A PHD. IN PHYSICS!
PHYSICS PHD'S KNOW
THE LEAST OF ALL!
THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW,
THAT THEY DON'T KNOW!
WHAT WANKERS!
IT'S A WHOLE *NEW* GAME NOW!
YOU HAVE GOT TO *UNLEARN*
NEWTON, COULOMB, EINSTEIN,
QUANTUM MECHANICS, DIMENSIONS
4 THROUGH N, AND EVEN
TANGLED STRING THEORY!
*THEN* YOU CAN *UNDERSTAND*!
A-K IS A HUGE [527 PAGES]
ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORY
OF PHYSICS, EXHAUSTIVELY
DOCUMENTING MOSTLY GRAVITY.
A-D IS A SMALLER [153 PAGES] WORK
WHICH WHICH EXTENDS AETHER ANALYSIS
INTO THE OTHER AREAS OF PHYSICS.
IT HAS FOUR MAJOR CHAPTERS:
[1] FERRO-MAGNETISM
[2] ELECTRO-MAGNETISM
[3] ELECTRO-STATICS
[4] GRAVITY REVISITED
ELECTRO-STATICS BREAKS
SHOCKING NEW GROUND,
THAT WILL LEAVE YOUR
HAIR STANDING ON END
AND YOUR JAW IN YOUR LAP!
A-D IS THE ABSOLUTELY THE
BEST INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICS,
AND ALSO THE MOST ADVANCED TEXT!
[NOT BAD FOR A GUY WHO
NEVER WENT TO COLLEGE,
BUT TRAINED DILIGENTYLY AS
A MYSTERY-NOVEL DETECTIVE,
WITH HIS BROTHER LAZLO,
WHO GOT SENT TO THE RUSSIAN
FRONT, AND NEVER CAME BACK!]
A-K AND A-D ARE ALSO THE
FINEST MYSTERY STORIES
EVER WRITTEN! BUT THEY
ARE TRUTH, NOT FICTION!
AFTER YOU READ A-D YOU
CAN WORK THROUGH A-K
TO GET THE FULL STORY.
===================
A-D ALSO COMES WITH
A *FREE* CD OF A-K!
===================
EVERYTHING IMPORTANT KNOWN ABOUT
PHYSICS IN ONE LITTLE PACKAGE!
FROM THE *ONE* GUY WHO
FIGURED IT *ALL* OUT!
THIS IS THE BEST DEAL
IN PHYSICS EDUCATION
THAT HAS EVER EXISTED!
DON'T WAIT TO
GET YOUR CLUES!
O
--- )
\
KONCHOK PENDAY
EDITOR, A-D
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/?p=1751