On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:18:27 -0500,
Itnia [it
...@verizon.net] wrote:
> A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
>
> (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
>
> The results of quantum theory were described as "spooky" by Drs.
> Einstein, Podalsky, and Rosen because quantum theory seemed to reject
> "objective reality".
YES!
That's quite a serious flaw
in a theory purporting to
EXPLAIN objective reality!
SO WE'LL JUST IGNORE
THAT OBJECTION AS RUDE!
> They believed that all observed effects must be produced
> by "local" causality.
HOW SENSIBLE!
> Their conclusion resulted from their firm belief that
> information could not travel faster than the velocity of light.
I'm a believer too!
> Indeed, if this were the case, quantum theory
> would indeed be "spooky".
As well as "what-if?", stupid,
brain damaging and irrelevant!
> Quantum theory required, for example, that "paired photons"
> maintain polarizations which were opposite in direction . If the
> polarization angle of one of the "paired photons" were changed, the
> polarization angle of the other photon of the pair must
> instantaneously change to match. ("Paired photons" are produced
> by the self annihilation of an artificial atom composed of an
> electron and a positron. They are polarized in opposite
> directions and are emitted in opposite directions.
> Their polarization angle is, of course, random with respect
> to the external world.)
Quantum Theory may require that
the budget be balanced! So what?
> Since the "paired photons" are emitted in opposite directions, they
> rapidly become separated in space. The required instantaneous coupling
> of their polarization implies that information must travel at an
> infinite velocity and, since these personages were firmly committed
> to the idea that information could not be transmitted faster than
> the velocity of light, they had to conclude that the process was
> "spooky" and required the existence of "hidden variables". (These
> allegedly "hidden" variables are not necessarily hidden, one of
> them for example, is the polarization coupling of "paired
> photons". Since this coupling had been shown to
> propagate at an "impossible" infinite velocity, it was
> necessary for orthodox physics to accept the idea of
> "spookiness". If the effect were accepted without the
> idea of "spookiness" it, the existence of an absolute
> velocity reference frame for space (i.e.- the Aether)
> would have to be accepted. Since this is currently
> dogmatically unacceptable, a problem remained.
SPOOKY = WANK!
FLUSH TWICE!
WE DON'T HAVE TO PONDER
THE DIFFICULTIES OF THINGS
TRAVELING FASTER THAN LIGHT!
THERE AREN'T ANY!
Unless you just made
a stunning discovery?
WANK TRAVELS AS FAST
AS YOU WANT IT TO!
> An alternative explanation, proposed by the "Copenhagen School" of
> physicists asserted that there was no objective reality, there was
> only the reality as seen by the observer. This interpretation led to
> Schroedinger's Cat Paradox which asserted that a cat in a closed box
> that would be subject to cyanide poisoning if the decay of a
> radioactive atom was detected by instruments within the box.
> It was further asserted that, since the decay of the atom and
> thus the death of the cat, the creature was both dead and alive
> until an external observer opened the box and looked.
EXTRACTED FROM:
"A LAWYER DOES PHYSICS!"
> The reasoning behind this was the idea that an event
> does not occur until it is observed.
YOU KILLED MY CAT
BY OPENING THE BOX!
IT JUST *LOOKS* LIKE IT'S
BEEN DEAD FOR TWO YEARS!
Just like my turds don't exist
until I see them in the toilet!
Which mental institution claims
credit for that profound thought?
> This does not seem to be an objectionable idea, per se,
????
> but the observation that counts in this Paradox is the decay
> of the radioactive atom, not the observation by an external observer.
> The cat is not both alive and dead prior to his observation,
> it is one or the other, but not both.
Excellent!
I'm sure they will
let you right in
to second grade!
> The fact that the observer does not know is meaningless.
I think you are
third grade material!
> It is only attributed as having meaning as a result of
> intellectual sloppiness. Schroedinger's Cat Paradox is not a paradox.
Thank you!
Fourth Grade seems certain!
> A different approach to resolving the "spookiness" of
> Quantum theory
IS TO FLUSH TWICE *AND*
USE THE AIR FRESHENER!
> is the idea of Parallel Universes. In this interpretation, each
> particle in the Universe creates an unobservable twin every time
> it makes a quantum "decision" The result is that each particle
> creates an unobservable "Parallel Universe" at virtually every
> instant of time occurring since our Universe began. When one
> considers the number of particles in the Universe, the number
> of ways in which they can interact, and the number of instants
> of time since the Universe began, the number of Universes which
> are required under this theory is, incredibly, at least 10^160.
CLEARLY WANK!
> What is equally incredible is that each of these Universes contains
> the same amount of energy as our own and each of its particles
> occupies the same space at the same time as do its brothers.
HIGH CLASS WANK!
> This interpretation seems to have a large number of believers of
> high reputation. In spite of this, the writer has no qualms about
> asserting that any physicist who would accept such a concept is
> in the wrong line of work. I understand that Wal-Mart is hiring.
BUT THEY HAVE NO DEMAND FOR "PURE" MATH!
> When one examines the concept that information cannot propagate
> faster than the velocity of light one finds that it is based on
> the fact that information is almost always encoded in the form
> of energy. Since the Lorentz Transformation for energy is
> 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 (the same as the Lorentz Transformation
> for Length), it is obvious why information cannot propagate
> faster than the velocity of light. At the velocity of light, the
> Lorentz Transformation for Energy becomes infinite. The transformation
> becomes imaginary! Information encoded in the form of energy certainly
> cannot propagate faster that the velocity of light. When information
> is encoded in the form of the polarization angles of "paired photons",
> however, this limitation does not occur. Changing the polarization
> angle of a photon does not change its energy. As a result, no energy
> transfer is involved in changing their polarization angles. If one
> extracts the Lorentz Transformation for Angle using the conventional
> Lorentz Transformations, one find that this transformation is unity
> since angle is equal to a LENGTH along an arc divided by the LENGTH
> of the radius of that arc. Accordingly, the Lorentz Transformation
> for Angle becomes ((1-V^2/C^2)/(1-V^2/C^2))^0.5 or unity.
"Paired photons" travel faster
than the speed of light?
Are they not still light?
> One might conclude, therefore, that the relativistic processes
> do not impose a velocity limit on the propagation of the
> polarization angle of the "paired photons" and it is
> reasonable to expect that velocity to be infinite.
When did you last see a
photon travel infinitely fast?
> "Spookiness" is not needed.
Nor accepted, here.
> Physicists have also concluded that even if information could be
> transmitted by the use of "paired photons", that information could
> not be decoded singe the polarization angle of the "paired photons"
> emitted by their source was completely random. This apparent
> limitation is not fundamental problem, it is a signal to noise
> ratio problem. The information is actually being transmittted
> but it is swamped by the noise level of background photons.
> If the singal to noise ratio of the transmission could be
> sufficiently improved,communicating over a distance at a
> quasi-infinite velocity would be found to be perfectly feasible.
And if I were an angel,
I might grant you 3 wishes!
> The most dangerous part of this conclusion is that it
> would establish the existence of "absolute time" and the
> existence of the classical Aether and would demolish the
> hare-brained concept of "space-time".
WHAT WOULD WE DO THEN?
> See
> http://einsteinhoax.com/cf53.htm. Omit the 45 degree
> polarizers. They may destroy the polarization coupling.)
>
> The source material for this posting may be found in
> http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997);
> http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm (1987); and
> http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997).
KP2009DEC22 AETHRO-DYNAMICS RELEASED!+
AFTER TOO MANY MONTHS
OF SAYING "ANY DAY NOW"
IT'S FINALLY OUT!
SANTA BROUGHT IT
JUST FOR YOU!
GET IT QUICK!
YOU CAN BUY IT IN PAPER FOR $29.50
PLUS SHIPPING ON AMAZON.COM at:
http://www.amazon.com/Aethro-dynamics-Steven-Rado/dp/0966757181
AETHRO-KINEMATICS [A-K] IN 1994 FIRMLY
ESTABLISHED STEVEN RADO AS BY FAR THE
GREATEST PHYSICIST IN HUMAN HISTORY.
*NOBODY* ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE!
ONLY A FEW LIKE KEPLER, DESCARTES
GALLILEO, FARADAY, MAXWELL, ETC.
WERE EVEN ON THE RIGHT TRACK!
FOR THE LAST HUNDRED YEARS PHYSICS
HAS GONE *BACKWARDS* INTO IRRELEVANT,
UNINTELLIGIBLE MATHEMATICAL *WANK*!
[I WAS A PHYSICS MAJOR AT THE UNIVERSITY
OF CHICAGO IN THE 1960'S, UNTIL I REALIZED
HAT "PHYSICISTS" WERE JUST MATHEMATICIANS
PRETENDING* TO KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT
PHYSICS, BUT HAD *NO* UNDERSTANDING!
I FLED FROM PHYSICS IN TERROR AND
DISGUST UNTIL STEVE BROUGHT ME BACK
WITH SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MADE SENSE!]
UNTIL AETHRO-KINEMATICS,
THE 20TH CENTURY WAS A
COMPLETE AND UNMITIGATED
*CATASTROPHE* FOR PHYSICS!
BUT THAT'S ALL OVER NOW!
AETHRO-DYNAMICS [A-D] IN 2009
FAR SURPASSES EVEN A-K!
IF A-K IS THE BOOSTER
THAT PUT PHYSICS IN ORBIT,
A-D LAUNCHED IT ON IT'S
INTERSTELLAR JOURNEY!
I PRAYED FOR 15 YEARS THAT
STEVE WOULD WRITE MORE!
NOW IT'S HERE!
GET *YOUR*
...
read more »
|
