Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Occam's Universe: Gravity Is Expansion
7 views
Skip to first unread message
John Kennard
Jul 18, 2012, 11:08:39 AM7/18/12
to
In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansion.html
[1]
Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
b910-37b...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my-gut.html
[2]
Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
fc31ef...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
--
Where am I, Dove?
< _ The Einstein Intersection _
previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansion.html
[1]
Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
b910-37b...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my-gut.html
[2]
Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
fc31ef...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
--
Where am I, Dove?
< _ The Einstein Intersection _
mimus
Jul 18, 2012, 11:15:34 AM7/18/12
to
On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansi...
> In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
>
> [1]
>
> Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my...
>
> [2]
>
> Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
You've flipped completely. Or the Universe did. Bets?
> --
>
> Where am I, Dove?
>
> < _ The Einstein Intersection _
--
This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme
violence.
< Vyvyan
G=EMC^2
Jul 19, 2012, 8:06:59 AM7/19/12
to
On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansi...
>
> [1]
>
> Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my...
>
> [2]
>
> Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
>
> [1]
>
> Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my...
>
> [2]
>
> Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
>
> --
>
> Where am I, Dove?
>
> < _ The Einstein Intersection _
I have posted over many years my "Convex & Concave theory" It has
>
> --
>
> Where am I, Dove?
>
> < _ The Einstein Intersection _
been well accepted. Concave is for attraction(Einstein) Convex for
inflation(Glazier) TreBert
H�gar
Jul 19, 2012, 12:57:15 PM7/19/12
to
"G=EMC^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4f88aedc-bc47-4200...@m8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
The native Australians were so enamored with your theory
that they created an instrument which audibly celebrates the oscillation
between the concave and convex manifestation
of the same membrane, and they called it the digeridoo ..
boingdeoboingdeoboingdeo etc. ... until the roos come home
jonathan
Jul 19, 2012, 6:14:06 PM7/19/12
to
"John Kennard" <jdke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:747b55d0-06b7-4d01...@e20g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
Gravity attracts only for the minority of mass in the universe.
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
Dark Energy is thought to be self-repulsive.
A Quintessential introduction to Dark Energy
By Paul J. Steinhardt
Department of Physics, Princeton University,
"Most of the energy in the Universe consists of some form
of dark energy that is gravitationally self-repulsive and that
is causing the expansion of the Universe to accelerate.
Most of the energy in the Universe is not `matter'. In its first
300 years, physics has focused on the properties of matter
and radiation, including dark matter. Now we know that
they represent less than 30% of the composition of
the Universe. The rest consists of something we know
virtually nothing about. Most of the energy in the Universe
is not gravitationally attractive. We are probably the last
generation to have been taught that `gravity always
attracts', a notion which has been presented as a basic fact
of nature for hundreds of years. We are now aware that gravity
can repel, as well."
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~steinh/steinhardt.pdf
mimus
Jul 23, 2012, 9:47:19 AM7/23/12
to
On Jul 19, 8:06 am, "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> > previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> > reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> > hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> > expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> > attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> > smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> > galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> > http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansion.html
> On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> > previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> > reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> > hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> > expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> > attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> > smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> > galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
>
> > [1]
>
> > Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> > b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> > http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my-gut.html
>
> > [2]
>
> > Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> > fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> > http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
>
> > [2]
>
> > Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> > fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> > http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
>
> > Where am I, Dove?
>
> > < _ The Einstein Intersection _
>
> I have posted over many years my "Convex & Concave theory" It has
> been well accepted. Concave is for attraction(Einstein) Convex for
> inflation(Glazier) TreBert
The OP would appear to hypothesize that it's all convex.
>
> > < _ The Einstein Intersection _
>
> I have posted over many years my "Convex & Concave theory" It has
> been well accepted. Concave is for attraction(Einstein) Convex for
> inflation(Glazier) TreBert
--
Or relatively convex.
herbert glazier
Aug 4, 2012, 10:48:56 AM8/4/12
to
On Jul 23, 9:47 am, mimus <mimu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 19, 8:06 am, "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> > > previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> > > reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> > > hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> > > expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> > > attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> > > smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> > > galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> > >http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansi...
> On Jul 19, 8:06 am, "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> > > previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> > > reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> > > hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> > > expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> > > attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> > > smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> > > galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
>
> > > [1]
>
> > > Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> > > b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> > >http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my...
>
> > > [2]
>
> > > Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> > > fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> > >http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
>
> > > Where am I, Dove?
>
> > > < _ The Einstein Intersection _
>
> > I have posted over many years my "Convex & Concave theory" It has
> > been well accepted. Concave is for attraction(Einstein) Convex for
> > inflation(Glazier) TreBert
>
> The OP would appear to hypothesize that it's all convex.
>
> --
>
> Or relatively convex.
Convex is space energy(expansion of space) Concave is matter
> > > [2]
>
> > > Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> > > fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> > >http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
>
> > > Where am I, Dove?
>
> > > < _ The Einstein Intersection _
>
> > I have posted over many years my "Convex & Concave theory" It has
> > been well accepted. Concave is for attraction(Einstein) Convex for
> > inflation(Glazier) TreBert
>
> The OP would appear to hypothesize that it's all convex.
>
> --
>
> Or relatively convex.
energy(attraction energy) (contraction of space) Einstein concave
Glazier convex . Convex "out" Concave "in" Concave "blue" Convex
"red" TreBert
herbert glazier
Aug 15, 2012, 9:44:53 AM8/15/12
to
On Jul 18, 11:08 am, John Kennard <jdkenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the spirit of my cosmological and cosmogenerative musings in my
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> previous posts "The Nonintensive Universe" [1] and in particular the
> reductionism of my "Occam's Universe: The CMBR as Space" [2] , I
> hereby propose that the two mysteries gravity and the apparent
> expansion of the Universe are one and the same, gravitational
> attraction between two nodes of least expansion (from the simplest and
> smallest to the most complex and largest, from subnucleons to
> galaxies) being along and equivalent to lines of least expansion.
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/07/occams-universe-gravity-is-expansi...
>
> [1]
>
> Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my...
>
> [2]
>
> Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
>
> [1]
>
> Message-ID: <43332a93-f2f9-431d-
> b910-37b8b4e38...@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2011/07/nonintensive-universe-or-nearer-my...
>
> [2]
>
> Message-ID: <ae626030-6b87-478b-82f3-
> fc31efc19...@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
>
> http://jdkabc.blogspot.com/2012/05/occams-universe-cmbr-as-space.html
>
> --
>
> Where am I, Dove?
>
> < _ The Einstein Intersection _
My Concave & Convex theory is accepted by all. TeBet
>
> --
>
> Where am I, Dove?
>
> < _ The Einstein Intersection _
0 new messages