Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 281 - Collapse all   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
George Hammond  
View profile
 More options Jan 2, 9:07 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:07:51 GMT
Local: Wed, Jan 2 2008 9:07 am
Subject: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
   NOTE:  The author is an MS Physics ('67) and perhaps one
of the all time greatest stooges in Physics himself being
totally ignorant of God until past the age of 50 so I would
ask physicists not to take any great personal offence at the
title of this post.
   The purpose of this post then is to upgrade the social
awareness of the Physics dept. so that they might become
more at ease in the erudite company of other non-scientific
authorities, such as the ecclesiastical authorities.  It
pains me to the core to see our great physicists, such as
Stepehen Hawking looking stupid while visiting the Pope!
   It turns out that the most IMPORTANT consequence
of General Relativity is that it is a scientific explanation
of "GOD"

  PHYSICS is totally IGNORANT of this!

  GENERAL RELATIVITY has almost NO IMPACT on
modern technology or everyday life.  Quantum
Mechanics itself could even CARE LESS about GR.
   Science writers continually marvel that the world's
most "exotic theory", the world's most "sophisticated
discovery" seems to have NO VISIBLE IMPACT on
science, technology or the world!  

                HOW CAN THIS BE
                THEY KEEP ASKING

This while BILLIONS OF PEOPLE are in a state of
utter turmoil about something called "G-O-D".

How long will it be before the
socially challenged physics
dept. puts 2 and 2 together?

How long will it be before physicists
realize that the central physical
manifestation of General Relativity
is in fact the phenomenon of "G-O-D"?

How long will the discovery
of a scientific proof of God
be suppressed by the religious
ignorance of Physics?

    THE DISCOVERY IS SIMPLE

  It is so simple a high school graduate
can understand it!
   There is both "objective" and "subjective"
spacetime.
   Objective spacetime is measured with
rulers and clocks.  Subjective spacetime
is measured by your body size and mental speed.
   Amazingly it has been discovered that subjective
spacetime is ALSO CURVED just like objective
spacetime is.  The curvature of objective
spacetime causes Gravity (Einstein 1915).
It turns out he curvature of subjective spacetime
causes God (Hammond, 2003).
   The curvature of subjective spacetime is much
LARGER than the curvature of objective spacetime,
hence GOD is a much larger visible effect than
Gravity!
   At any rate, the discovery that subjective
spacetime is CURVED constitutes the world's first
scientific proof of God, and it's high time that the
physics department knew about it.
  The discovery has been published by me in the
peer reviewed literature and you can read all about
it including my published papers at my website at:
=====================================
     SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
 http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
   mirror site:
 http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
      GOD=G_uv   (a folk song on mp3)
 http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Helmut Wabnig  
View profile
 More options Jan 2, 9:15 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@ .- --- -. DOT .- t>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:15:00 +0100
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:07:51 GMT, George Hammond

<Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

>How long will the discovery
>of a scientific proof of God
>be suppressed by the religious
>ignorance of Physics?

Where is that "proof"?

Never seen one.

w.

--
Thanks God that I am an Atheist.
  Gottseidank bin ich Atheist.

          (Who cares?)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dono  
View profile
 More options Jan 2, 11:34 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: Dono <sa...@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:34:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Jan 2 2008 11:34 am
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
On Jan 2, 6:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:

>    NOTE:  The author is an MS Physics ('67) and a confirmed:

http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/855/35092155.JPG

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jeckyl  
View profile
 More options Jan 2, 9:04 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: "Jeckyl" <no...@nowhere.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:04:36 +1100
Local: Wed, Jan 2 2008 9:04 pm
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
"George Hammond" <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote in message

news:clrmn3l5jb8slnolvvbb0o3pptdgsvm2cf@4ax.com...

>   NOTE:  The author is an MS Physics ('67)

Which has nothing to this supposed proof

> and perhaps one
> of the all time greatest stooges in Physics

Yes .. you are a stooge

> himself being
> totally ignorant of God until past the age of 50

When you lost your marbles

[snip a load of religious crap]

>   It turns out that the most IMPORTANT consequence
> of General Relativity is that it is a scientific explanation
> of "GOD"

Utter crap .. it is no such thing, and you certainly have NOT ever produced
a proof that it was. I've read what you claim as a proof .. so have many
others .. all agree it is crap.

>  PHYSICS is totally IGNORANT of this!

And rightly so

>  GENERAL RELATIVITY has almost NO IMPACT on
> modern technology or everyday life.

Irrelevant

> Quantum
> Mechanics itself could even CARE LESS about GR.

Irrelevant

>   Science writers continually marvel that the world's
> most "exotic theory", the world's most "sophisticated
> discovery" seems to have NO VISIBLE IMPACT on
> science, technology or the world!

Incorrect.

>                HOW CAN THIS BE
>                THEY KEEP ASKING

No .. they don't

> This while BILLIONS OF PEOPLE are in a state of
> utter turmoil about something called "G-O-D".

Now you're getting irrelevant again.

> How long will it be before the
> socially challenged physics
> dept. puts 2 and 2 together?

How long will you keep posting shit?

> How long will it be before physicists
> realize that the central physical
> manifestation of General Relativity
> is in fact the phenomenon of "G-O-D"?

Infinitely long, hopefully, as it is a load of crap.

> How long will the discovery
> of a scientific proof of God
> be suppressed by the religious
> ignorance of Physics?

Until there is such a proof .. you have not presented one

>    THE DISCOVERY IS SIMPLE

You are simple

>  It is so simple a high school graduate
> can understand it!

That doesn't make it correct .. just simplistic.

[snip crap]


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tani JantsangŠ  
View profile
 More options Jan 2, 10:46 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: "Tani JantsangŠ" <tjs...@spampost.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:46:58 -0500
Local: Wed, Jan 2 2008 10:46 pm
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS

"George Hammond" <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote in message

news:clrmn3l5jb8slnolvvbb0o3pptdgsvm2cf@4ax.com...

>   NOTE:  The author is an MS Physics ('67) and perhaps one
> of the all time greatest stooges in Physics himself being
> totally ignorant of God until past the age of 50 so I would
> ask physicists not to take any great personal offence at the
> title of this post.
>   The purpose of this post then is to upgrade the social
> awareness of the Physics dept. so that they might become
> more at ease in the erudite company of other non-scientific
> authorities, such as the ecclesiastical authorities.  It
> pains me to the core to see our great physicists, such as
> Stepehen Hawking looking stupid while visiting the Pope!
>   It turns out that the most IMPORTANT consequence
> of General Relativity is that it is a scientific explanation
> of "GOD"

Mehh, why do you keep posting this crap on here?  None of this explains me,
or my people, or our cultural philosophy that has NO centralized conception
of any god-being at all.  None.  Are so many of us immune to the curvature
of space?   This doesn't explain billions of Chinese who are not known for
being a people steeped in superstitious idiocy.

People INVENT gods in their OWN IMAGES - but I must say that not ALL people
tend to do this kind of thing at all.  My people NEVER did it - not at any
time.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
George Hammond  
View profile
 More options Jan 3, 4:31 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:31:21 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jan 3 2008 4:31 am
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:46:58 -0500, "Tani JantsangŠ"

[Hammond]
1.  Because "God" is applied Relativity theory.
2.  Because I'm a graduate physicist (MS).
3.  Because there are supposed to be
     other competent physicists here.

>  None of this explains me,
>or my people, or our cultural philosophy that has NO centralized conception
>of any god-being at all.  None.  Are so many of us immune to the curvature
>of space?   This doesn't explain billions of Chinese who are not known for
>being a people steeped in superstitious idiocy.

[Hammond]
   "Your people" didn't discovere automobiles, atomic
energy, or Democracy either.  The discovery of "God" is a
very sophisticated achievement and requires a high
civilization..... which is why the existence of "God" was
first discovered by the Egyptian Empire 4,000 years ago and
why that historic achievement remains inscribed on the walls
of the Pyramids to this day.

>People INVENT gods in their OWN IMAGES -

[Hammond]
  "God" was discovered to ber an "invisible man" and have
the form of a man thousands of years ago.  Thus, every man
IS a walking "image of God".

> but I must say that not ALL people
>tend to do this kind of thing at all.  My people NEVER did it - not at any
>time.

[Hammond]
   The Third World, even China with 2 billion PAGAN citizens
is destined to jump right from a state with "no religion" to
a state with a "scientific religion"- virtually overnight!
   This is because, above all else China and the 3rd World
have infinite faith in Science, so when they find out that a
scientific proof of God has been discovered, they'll realize
the truth of it immediately and sieze upon it for their own
protection..... protection against the elite white Christian
West mainly.  The Chinese don't think much of a middle
eastern minority guy being nailed to a cross and held up in
the air by a bunch of white Christians, ya know!
   This is why it's important for the Christians to
recognize this discovery of a scientific proof of God and
overhaul Christianity ASAP and base it on science rather
than the archaic cultural monstrosity of Antisemitism.
 =====================================
     SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
 http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
   mirror site:
 http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
      GOD=G_uv   (a folk song on mp3)
 http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================  

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
George Hammond  
View profile
 More options Jan 3, 5:45 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic, alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:45:36 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jan 3 2008 5:45 am
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:12:51 -0800 (PST), Immortalist

<reanimater_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>    It turns out that the most IMPORTANT consequence
>> of General Relativity is that it is a scientific explanation
>> of "GOD"

>Before we prance off and consider spacetime, please define this GOD.
>What is you definition of it, since the term means many things to many
>people. Only then could we see if it is a consequence of GR.

[Hammond]
   My discovery addresses the WELL KNOWN popular, historical
(and Biblical) definition of "God"... namely that he is:

             "An invisible man who  lives in an
               invislbe world called Heaven, and
               that he miraculously rules the
               world and human destiny from there."

   The discovery that this "God" and all his attributes and
entire historical development can be fully described as a
"Curvature of subjective spacetime" is confirmed in that the
discovery fully scientifically explains the following 13
comprehensive and well known claims about this "God":

1.   Why there physically exists an "invisible world"
      known as "Heaven" which is similar to Earth but
       is a paradise.
2.   Why God is an "invisible man" who lives there
      and is all powerful and rules the actual (visible)
      world from there.
3.    Why this God can effect miracles which transcend
       the (known) laws of Physics.
4.    Why Jesus said "God is a spirit" Jn 4:24
5.    Why historically Religion has evolved from
       Polytheism to Monotheism.
6.    Why Christianity says the world is transforming
       itself into  Heaven and will actually complete this
       at a date known as "Kingdom Come"... or the
      "end of the world".
7.   Why there is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
8.   Why it is believed that Jesus was the physical
      "incarnation of God"
9.   Why the Cross for some reason is the central
      symbol of (Western) Religion.
10. Why for some reason our main canonical text is
      written in 4 identical versions known as the
      "4-Gospel Canon".
11. How God "created the world" only a matter of
      "thousands" of years ago (Genesis) not "billions"
      of years ago (Big Bang) as Science believes.
12. Why God created man "in his own image".
13. Why there is a "Trinity of God" and what it is,
       scientifically.

   That a single simple scientific principle (God=G_uv, wch
has been experimentally measured btw... i.e. the curvature
of subjective spacetime can be and has been measured) could
comprehensively explain the entire content and history of
religion and God is, even to a casual scientific observer,
PRIMA FACIE the discovery of the world's first "scientific
proof of God"..... without question!
=====================================
     SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
 http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
   mirror site:
 http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
      GOD=G_uv   (a folk song on mp3)
 http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jeckyl  
View profile
 More options Jan 3, 6:54 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: "Jeckyl" <no...@nowhere.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:54:23 +1100
Local: Thurs, Jan 3 2008 6:54 am
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
"George Hammond" <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote in message

news:7i7pn3dt9a55o5r6ps78bf6p2rppspr5bp@4ax.com...

Crap

> 2.  Because I'm a graduate physicist (MS).

Irrelevant

> 3.  Because there are supposed to be
>     other competent physicists here.

There are .. and they know better .. your theory on god has nothing to to
with relativity.

[snip religious claptrap]


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
George Hammond  
View profile
 More options Jan 3, 10:59 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic, alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:59:43 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jan 3 2008 10:59 am
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:42:16 -0800 (PST), JessHC

<jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote:

>George Hammond wrote:
>> "Subjective spacetime" is what people call "subjective
>> reality".  when a cop gives you a sobriety test he is seeing
>> if your "subjective reality" matches up to "objective
>> reality".  If he doesn't think so because of alcohol
>> ingestion he will arrest you.

>He is not measuring the subject's "subjective reality," he's measuring
>the subject's level of physical impairment caused by a high blood
>alcohol level.

[Hammond]
 Lets not quibble over roadside sobriety tests...I'll just
prove that your CONCLUSION, cited next, is FALSE!

>  Reality isn't subjective.

[Hammond]
   You got to be kiddin... you think all people see the same
reality... clearly that's false.
   Actual measurement shows that the PFF (movie picture
fusion frequency) of a 7 year old is 10 frames/sec and
increases linearly with age to 16 frames/sec for a 15 year
old.  Technically, this means the "Fourier Cutoff Frequency"
of visible motion, as any graduate physicist or engineer
will tell you, is 33% lower for the young kid.  This means
1/3 of all motion that is visible to the 15 year old is
INVISIBLE to the 7 year old.... this is the visual analog of
the "dog whistle effect"...people can't hear a dog whistle
but dogs can....likewise,  the 15 year old can see 1/3 more
of moving reality than the 7 year old can.  Put in common
parlance "1/3 of reality is INVISIBLE to a 7 year old". Thus
SUBJECTIVE REALITY IS DIFFERENT for the two people, as any
parent will tell you.
   What does this have to do with "God"?  It's simple.  The
discovery of the  Secular Trend in human growth 100 years
ago shows that nobody is "full grown".  Actual measurement
of the Secular Trend shows that the average man is about 20%
short of full theoretical growth (this is commonly phrased
as: "he never reached his full height and weight").... this
means 20% of objective reality ..is actually INVISIBLE to
the AVERAGE MAN..... and this causes an "invisble world"
which Religion calls "Heaven".
   Try to get up to speed buddy before you start arguing
trivia with me about roadside sobriety tests for
chrissakes... this ISN'T an amateur discussion.
=====================================
     SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
 http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
   mirror site:
 http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
      GOD=G_uv   (a folk song on mp3)
 http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dono  
View profile
 More options Jan 3, 11:36 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, alt.sci.physics, sci.skeptic
From: Dono <sa...@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 3 2008 11:36 am
Subject: Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
On Jan 3, 1:31 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote: