Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Incomplete equations
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
jmfbahciv
Aug 18, 2008, 6:10:15 AM8/18/08
to
The TimeLord wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:16:38 -0700 schrieb Freiddie <fei.y...@gmail.com>
> in 8b1620b2-f4f7-4f47...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com in
> sci.physics.relativity:
>
>> On Aug 16, 5:25 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Of what use are Partial differential equations if you are using
>>> equations with parts left out?
>>>
>>> Mitch Raemsch
>> I don't think that's what *partial* differential equations mean. It
>> means using *partial derivatives*, not equations "with parts left out".
>>
>> Freiddie
>
> I don't think Mitch Raemsch knows much about math or physics. The fact
> that he is asking such a stupid question, shows he knows nothing about
> differential equations, let alone partial derivatives.
>
You should, occasionally, think about other readers and speak
through this Mitch to them.
> Am Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:16:38 -0700 schrieb Freiddie <fei.y...@gmail.com>
> in 8b1620b2-f4f7-4f47...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com in
> sci.physics.relativity:
>
>> On Aug 16, 5:25 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Of what use are Partial differential equations if you are using
>>> equations with parts left out?
>>>
>>> Mitch Raemsch
>> I don't think that's what *partial* differential equations mean. It
>> means using *partial derivatives*, not equations "with parts left out".
>>
>> Freiddie
>
> I don't think Mitch Raemsch knows much about math or physics. The fact
> that he is asking such a stupid question, shows he knows nothing about
> differential equations, let alone partial derivatives.
>
You should, occasionally, think about other readers and speak
through this Mitch to them.
/BAH
The TimeLord
Aug 23, 2008, 1:47:08 PM8/23/08
to
Am Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:10:15 -0400 schrieb jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@aol> in
r5OdncMDHesy1DTV...@rcn.net:
r5OdncMDHesy1DTV...@rcn.net:
I have given up on Mitch, particularly in sci.physics.relativity, since
he spouts so much nonsense and refuses to admit observational facts. In
this NG it would be ok, but in a science forum like
sci.physics.relativity, he is unwelcomed and has been killfiled by most
of the posters there, including me.
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
0 new messages