Science or Religion ?
socratus
Religion tells us nothing but fables and fantasies!
That is the truth.
So, what is Religion?
Religion is the poor man's philosophy.
Modern Physics tells us nothing but fables and fantasies!
That is the truth.
For example: One Galaxy can eat another Galaxy.
#
Cosmic cannibalising:
Images show one galaxy engulfing another
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/cosmic-cannibalising-images-show-one-galaxy-engulfing-another-1780652.html
#
The Discovery of one Galaxy "Attacking" Another
http://www.astronomyexpert.co.uk/the-recent-discovery-of-one-galaxy-attacking-another.html
. . .. etc
So, what is Physics?
Physics is the poor man's philosophy.
== .
What to do?
I think we must answer to the simple classic question:
what did come first the chicken or the egg ?
If somebody didn’t understand this question, I will ask it simpler:
What was before Vacuum or Gravity ?
Does Gravity exist in Vacuum or vice versa?
Why I ask these questions.
Because the Universe ( as a whole ) is Two- Measured,
there are two Worlds: Vacuum and Gravity.
=== .
Israel Socratus.
socratus
=== .
1.
The Big Bang.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and their
girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of
waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons…
gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a ‘single point ‘
=== .
I don’t agree with the ‘big bang’ theory because nobody
knows how the ‘ big bang’ can change into ‘single point ‘
if Hawking’s radiation from ‘ black hole’ doesn’t give it
to happen.
2.
Most of elementary particles were got in artificial way,
using accelerators. This way, in my opinion, is mistaken.
=== .
In the Ancient Egypt people believed in many gods with
human body and animal’s head. They thought they really
existed. For me these new discovered elementary artificial
particles are similar to Egyptian’s gods because we cannot
meet them into any atom, in any physical, chemical, biological
processes on our Earth.
In the Ancient Greek the people believed that sphinxes and
centaurs really exist. Maybe now some geneticists can create
a centaur, but it will be Devil’s work. I am sorry to tell that,
but it seems to me, physicists, creating such elementary
artificial particles look like those ‘some geneticists’.
( The mad CERN’s way.
http://www.spacekb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/astronomy/13338/The-mad-CERN-s-project
).
=========== .
3.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, there was ‘ bin bang’.
And every particle appears with its own spin as derivative from
the Big Bang.
== .
I think the spin of quantum particle doesn’t come from
big bang, but it comes with ‘ virtual particle from Dirac’s sea’.
Why?
We have the real particle – electron. Nobody doubts
it is a real particle. But a strange thing happens when it
interacts with Vacuum. All its physical parameters become
infinite. Why? Is it possible? What is the reason?
#
The conditions of the ocean permitted to create different kinds
of fish. The terrestrial’s conditions permitted to create different
kinds of animals. And the ‘mixed’ conditions of water, earth
and air on Earth permitted to create, for example, birds, which
live and act in these three conditions.
And if we take Universe as a whole, it is Two- Measured:
close by Material ( Gravity) World exists Infinite Vacuum World.
The conditions in these two Worlds are different.
And when electron moves from Material (Gravity) World to the
Infinite Vacuum World its physical parameters changes.
" The law of conservation and transformation energy / mass"
is connected with electron’s transformation.
We know the electron is very important particle in our live.
It acts in Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
It acts in the atom.
But how electron acts in cell and in Outer space we don’t know.
We need time to understand this fact.
=== .
P.S.
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ Somebody./
==== .
Another ‘ true’ Physical fables and fantasies:
The time that stretches and space that expands,
dark matter, dark energy, Higgs boson, quarks, gluons
and tachyons, axions and partons, qravitino , . . etc.
========== .
P.S.
"One thing I have learned in a long life:
that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive
and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have."
/ Einstein./
This quote is correct, because, at last, only Physics can
logically explain us the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
==========.
KONCHOK.PENDAY
socratus [isr...@yahoo.com] wrote:
> Some more � true� Physical fables and fantasies.
> === .
> 1.
> The Big Bang.
> Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
> (all elementary particles and all quarks and their
> girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of
> waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons�
> gluons field �.. etc.) � was assembled in a �single point �
ANY MORON CAN SEE
THAT'S A LOAD OF SHIT!
UNLESS YOU BELIEVE
I CAN PULL THE SUN
OUT OF MY ASS, HOW
COULD THE ENTIRE
UNIVERSE COME FROM
SOMETHING MUCH SMALLER?
THAT DOESN'T EVEN
PASS THE PSYCH TEST!
> === .
> I don�t agree with the �big bang� theory because nobody
> knows how the � big bang� can change into �single point �
> if Hawking�s radiation from � black hole� doesn�t give it
> to happen.
YES!
IT'S OBVIOUSLY IMPOSSIBLE!
> 2.
> Most of elementary particles were got in artificial way,
> using accelerators. This way, in my opinion, is mistaken.
I AGREE!
> === .
> In the Ancient Egypt people believed in many gods with
> human body and animal�s head. They thought they really
> existed. For me these new discovered elementary artificial
> particles are similar to Egyptian�s gods because we cannot
> meet them into any atom, in any physical, chemical, biological
> processes on our Earth.
> In the Ancient Greek the people believed that sphinxes and
> centaurs really exist. Maybe now some geneticists can create
> a centaur, but it will be Devil�s work. I am sorry to tell that,
> but it seems to me, physicists, creating such elementary
> artificial particles look like those �some geneticists�.
> ( The mad CERN�s way.
YES!
WANKERS PLAYING
WITH THEIR POOP!
>http://www.spacekb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/astronomy/13338/The-mad-CERN-s-project
> ).
> =========== .
> 3.
> Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, there was � bin bang�.
> And every particle appears with its own spin as derivative from
> the Big Bang.
OR MAYBE IT WAS
SANTA CLAUS GIVING
AWAY PIXIE DUST!
> == .
> I think the spin of quantum particle doesn�t come from
> big bang, but it comes with � virtual particle from Dirac�s sea�.
> Why?
THERE ARE *NO*
QUANTUM PARTICLES!
IN QM, IT'S JUST A
PROBABILITY VECTOR!
THE SPIN OF ALL PARTICLES
COMES FROM THEIR CONSERVATION
OF MOMENTUM DURING CONDENSATION
> We have the real particle � electron.
YES!
THE PRIMARY COMPOSITE PARTICLE!
MADE OF NOTHING
BUT AETHERONS!
BUT MAKING UP
EVERYTHING ELSE!!
> Nobody doubts it is a real particle.
NOT EVEN ME!
> But a strange thing happens when it
> interacts with Vacuum. All its physical parameters become
> infinite. Why? Is it possible? What is the reason?
????
> #
> The conditions of the ocean permitted to create different kinds
> of fish. The terrestrial�s conditions permitted to create different
> kinds of animals. And the �mixed� conditions of water, earth
> and air on Earth permitted to create, for example, birds, which
> live and act in these three conditions.
OK!
> And if we take Universe as a whole, it is Two- Measured:
> close by Material ( Gravity) World exists Infinite Vacuum World.
THERE ARE AT LEAST 6
LEVELS OF COMPLEXITY:
1] THE AETHER SEA
2] THE ELECTRON SEA
3] THE PLASMA SEA
4] GASSES
5] LIQUIDS
6] SOLIDS
EVEN "VACUUM" IS
FULL OF 1, 2, AND 3!
> The conditions in these two Worlds are different.
> And when electron moves from Material (Gravity) World to the
> Infinite Vacuum World its physical parameters changes.
NO.
I THINK YOU
ARE CONFUSED.
> " The law of conservation and transformation energy / mass"
> is connected with electron�s transformation.
????
> We know the electron is very important particle in our live.
YES!
IT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL
COMPOSITE PARTICLE!
> It acts in Maxwell�s electrodynamics.
YES!
> It acts in the atom.
YES!!
> But how electron acts in cell and in Outer space we don�t know.
> We need time to understand this fact.
CATCH UP TO 1994!
READ RADO!
> === .
> P.S.
> Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
> / Somebody./
RADO'S CAREFUL
STEP BY STEP
CONSTRUCTION OF
THE ELECTRON FROM
RAW AETHER IS ONE
OF THE MOST STUNNING
INTELLECTUAL FEATS
OF ALL TIME!
CATCH THE FREE CLUE!
> ==== .
> Another � true� Physical fables and fantasies:
> The time that stretches and space that expands,
> dark matter, dark energy, Higgs boson, quarks, gluons
> and tachyons, axions and partons, qravitino , . . etc.
THE REMEDY FOR WANK
IS TO FLUSH TWICE!
> ========== .
> P.S.
> "One thing I have learned in a long life:
> that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive
> and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have."
> / Einstein./
EINSTEIN *WAS* PRIMITIVE AND CHILDLIKE!
HE THOUGHT HE COULD GET AWAY WITH
STEALING PUBLIC INFORMATION AND
MAKING UP INSANE WANK ABOUT IT!
> This quote is correct, because, at last, only Physics can
> logically explain us the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
> ==========.
WHICH RADO DID IN 1994!
CATCH UP QUICK!
READ RADO!
BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================
NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!
It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!
Even better than
Richard McKeon!
But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!
HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!
THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.
THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!
CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!
Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/
My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!
Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.
That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1532
phil scott
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:53:00 -0800,
>
>
> > Some more ‘ true’ Physical fables and fantasies.
> > === .
> > 1.
> > The Big Bang.
> > Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
> > (all elementary particles and all quarks and their
> > girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of
> > gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a ‘single point ‘
>
> THAT'S A LOAD OF SHIT!
>
> UNLESS YOU BELIEVE
> I CAN PULL THE SUN
> OUT OF MY ASS, HOW
> COULD THE ENTIRE
> UNIVERSE COME FROM
> SOMETHING MUCH SMALLER?
>
> THAT DOESN'T EVEN
> PASS THE PSYCH TEST!
>
> > === .
> > knows how the ‘ big bang’ can change into ‘single point ‘
> > to happen.
>
> YES!
>
> IT'S OBVIOUSLY IMPOSSIBLE!
>
> > 2.
> > Most of elementary particles were got in artificial way,
> > using accelerators. This way, in my opinion, is mistaken.
>
> I AGREE!
>
> > === .
> > In the Ancient Egypt people believed in many gods with
> > existed. For me these new discovered elementary artificial
> > meet them into any atom, in any physical, chemical, biological
> > processes on our Earth.
> > In the Ancient Greek the people believed that sphinxes and
> > centaurs really exist. Maybe now some geneticists can create
> > but it seems to me, physicists, creating such elementary
>
> YES!
>
> WANKERS PLAYING
> WITH THEIR POOP!
>
> > ).
> > =========== .
> > 3.
> > Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, there was ‘ bin bang’.
> > And every particle appears with its own spin as derivative from
> > the Big Bang.
>
> OR MAYBE IT WAS
> SANTA CLAUS GIVING
> AWAY PIXIE DUST!
>
> > == .
> > Why?
>
> THERE ARE *NO*
> QUANTUM PARTICLES!
>
> IN QM, IT'S JUST A
> PROBABILITY VECTOR!
>
> THE SPIN OF ALL PARTICLES
> COMES FROM THEIR CONSERVATION
> OF MOMENTUM DURING CONDENSATION
>
>
> YES!
>
> THE PRIMARY COMPOSITE PARTICLE!
>
> MADE OF NOTHING
> BUT AETHERONS!
>
> BUT MAKING UP
> EVERYTHING ELSE!!
>
> > Nobody doubts it is a real particle.
>
> NOT EVEN ME!
>
> > But a strange thing happens when it
> > interacts with Vacuum. All its physical parameters become
> > infinite. Why? Is it possible? What is the reason?
>
> ????
>
> > #
> > The conditions of the ocean permitted to create different kinds
> > kinds of animals. And the ‘mixed’ conditions of water, earth
> > and air on Earth permitted to create, for example, birds, which
> > live and act in these three conditions.
>
> OK!
>
> > And if we take Universe as a whole, it is Two- Measured:
> > close by Material ( Gravity) World exists Infinite Vacuum World.
>
> THERE ARE AT LEAST 6
> LEVELS OF COMPLEXITY:
>
> 1] THE AETHER SEA
> 2] THE ELECTRON SEA
> 3] THE PLASMA SEA
> 4] GASSES
> 5] LIQUIDS
> 6] SOLIDS
>
> EVEN "VACUUM" IS
> FULL OF 1, 2, AND 3!
>
> > The conditions in these two Worlds are different.
> > And when electron moves from Material (Gravity) World to the
> > Infinite Vacuum World its physical parameters changes.
>
> NO.
>
> I THINK YOU
> ARE CONFUSED.
>
> > " The law of conservation and transformation energy / mass"
>
> ????
>
> > We know the electron is very important particle in our live.
>
> YES!
>
> IT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL
> COMPOSITE PARTICLE!
>
>
> YES!
>
> > It acts in the atom.
>
> YES!!
>
> > We need time to understand this fact.
>
> CATCH UP TO 1994!
>
> READ RADO!
>
> > === .
> > P.S.
> > Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
> > / Somebody./
>
> RADO'S CAREFUL
> STEP BY STEP
> CONSTRUCTION OF
> THE ELECTRON FROM
> RAW AETHER IS ONE
> OF THE MOST STUNNING
> INTELLECTUAL FEATS
> OF ALL TIME!
>
> CATCH THE FREE CLUE!
>
> > ==== .
> > The time that stretches and space that expands,
> > dark matter, dark energy, Higgs boson, quarks, gluons
> > and tachyons, axions and partons, qravitino , . . etc.
>
> THE REMEDY FOR WANK
> IS TO FLUSH TWICE!
>
> > ========== .
> > P.S.
> > "One thing I have learned in a long life:
> > that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive
> > and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have."
> > / Einstein./
>
> EINSTEIN *WAS* PRIMITIVE AND CHILDLIKE!
>
> HE THOUGHT HE COULD GET AWAY WITH
> STEALING PUBLIC INFORMATION AND
> MAKING UP INSANE WANK ABOUT IT!
>
> > This quote is correct, because, at last, only Physics can
> > logically explain us the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
> > ==========.
>
> WHICH RADO DID IN 1994!
>
> CATCH UP QUICK!
>
> READ RADO!
>
> BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
> =============================================
> AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
> by the greatest physicist of all time!http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
> =============================================
>
> NO BULLSHIT!
> I GUARANTEE IT!
> JUST HARD-NOSED
> SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!
>
> history of physics
> ever written!
>
> Even better than
> Richard McKeon!
>
> But Rado perfectly
> illustrates both
> AND PREDICTIONS!
>
> HIS “LEAST PARTICLES”
> ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON’S
> FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!
>
> THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
> HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
> THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.
>
> DOUBLE WOW-WOW!
>
> CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
> the faint of heart!
> May be dangerous to
> preconceived prejudices!
>
>
> My intro to Steve’s work is:http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
>
> See “05* AETHER PHYSICS” in the> AND the “PHYSICS” CATEGORY
> in the left-hand column!
>
> Also see the “AETHER PHYSICS” TOPIC
> under the “2-FORUMS” in the blog PAGES.
>
> That’s the reading list for now,
> but “Aethro-dynamics” will be
> released ANY DAY NOW!
>
> O
> --- )
> \
>
> NEWSGROUPS:
> alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
> PERMALINK:http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1532
I thiink aether theory is limitlessly more accurate than the currently
in fashion big bang.
however, a black hole is almost limitlessly dense, by measurement of
its gravitational field and
speed particles spinning into it attain. the math is in place that
makes a good case for those atoms
to be ripped apart as they approach at such speeds...so that the black
hole, and eventual singularity would indeed
be dense enough to fill at least some aspects of the existing cosmos
with much less densely assembled
atomic particles... the big bank theory is not entirely without a
base.
it is just that it has not even come close to explaiing what Steven
Rado has especially regarding gravitational
waves and resonances... not possible in 'the vacuum of space' scenario
but a lock with particle/aether theory.
Further NASA had done experiments in the 70's showing instantaneious
communication between subjects, plants, animals and
humans at great distances...not possible with wave theory as wave
propagation takes time...but a natural occurance in any
ridgid system.
btw... ACW has just passed... notice was posted to ARS yesterday,
he died peacefully in his sleep.
Phil Scott