Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Do you believe in Physics ?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

socratus

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 6:19:31 PM11/20/09
to
Do you believe in Physics ?
You don’t have to be so sure. Why ?
=== .
How does Physics look now?
#
The basis of the Physics consists of:
1.
Abstract ‘ inertial movement’.
2.
Abstract ‘ideal gas and ideal particles.’
3.
Abstract ‘absolute black body.’
4.
Abstract ‘entropy’
5.
Abstract SRT negative 4 - D space,
abstract 5D, …….and 11 - dimensional spaces. .
6.
Abstract separated absolute space and time of Newton.
7.
Abstract ‘virtual particles’, ‘dark matter and dark energy’.
8.
Abstract ‘big bang’.
9.
Abstract " method of renormalization ". . . . . . etc.
=========..
And therefore we can read.
Conclusion from the book ‘ The Holographic Universe ’
by Michael Talbot.
‘ Science is not always as objective as we would like to believe.’
#
Conclusion from some article:
‘ One of the best kept secrets of science is
that physicists have lost their grip on reality.’
============ . .
In my opinion to understand the paradoxes we must
reconsider the old basis of the Physics.
=== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=23624&st=15
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2547&st=105
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548
================== . .

KONCHOK.PENDAY

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 7:10:55 PM11/20/09
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:19:31 -0800,
socratus [isr...@yahoo.com] wrote:

> Do you believe in Physics ?

SURE!

I CAN SEE IT IN THE SKY!
AND IT'S ALL AROUND ME,
RIGHT HERE ON EARTH!

> You don�t have to be so sure. Why ?


> === .
> How does Physics look now?
> #
> The basis of the Physics consists of:
> 1.

> Abstract � inertial movement�.
> 2.
> Abstract �ideal gas and ideal particles.�
> 3.
> Abstract �absolute black body.�
> 4.
> Abstract �entropy�


> 5.
> Abstract SRT negative 4 - D space,

> abstract 5D, ��.and 11 - dimensional spaces. .


> 6.
> Abstract separated absolute space and time of Newton.
> 7.

> Abstract �virtual particles�, �dark matter and dark energy�.
> 8.
> Abstract �big bang�.


> 9.
> Abstract " method of renormalization ". . . . . . etc.
> =========..
> And therefore we can read.

> Conclusion from the book � The Holographic Universe �
> by Michael Talbot.
> � Science is not always as objective as we would like to believe.�

SURE!

THE LAST CENTURY IS
TOTAL HALLUCINOGENIC WANK!

> Conclusion from some article:
> � One of the best kept secrets of science is
> that physicists have lost their grip on reality.�
> ============ . .

FOR THE LAST CENTURY!

> In my opinion to understand the paradoxes we must
> reconsider the old basis of the Physics.
> === .

IF YOU MEAN THE AETHER OF
FARADAY, MAXWELL, AND NOW RADO,
I COMPLETELY CONCUR.


READ RADO!

BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================

NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!

It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!

Even better than
Richard McKeon!

But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!

HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!

THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.

THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!

CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!

Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/

My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm

See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!

Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.

That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!


O
--- )
\


NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1475


socratus

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:54:48 AM11/26/09
to
Some more ‘ true’ Physical fables and fantasies.
=== .
1.
The Big Bang.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and their
girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of
waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons…
gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a ‘single point ‘
=== .
I don’t agree with the ‘big bang’ theory because nobody
knows how the ‘ big bang’ can change into ‘single point ‘
if Hawking’s radiation from ‘ black hole’ doesn’t give it
to happen.
2.
Most of elementary particles were got in artificial way,
using accelerators. This way, in my opinion, is mistaken.
=== .
In the Ancient Egypt people believed in many gods with
human body and animal’s head. They thought they really
existed. For me these new discovered elementary artificial
particles are similar to Egyptian’s gods because we cannot
meet them into any atom, in any physical, chemical, biological
processes on our Earth.
In the Ancient Greek the people believed that sphinxes and
centaurs really exist. Maybe now some geneticists can create
a centaur, but it will be Devil’s work. I am sorry to tell that,
but it seems to me, physicists, creating such elementary
artificial particles look like those ‘some geneticists’.
( The mad CERN’s way.
http://www.spacekb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/astronomy/13338/The-mad-CERN-s-project
).
=========== .
3.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, there was ‘ bin bang’.
And every particle appears with its own spin as derivative from
the Big Bang.
== .
I think the spin of quantum particle doesn’t come from
big bang, but it comes with ‘ virtual particle from Dirac’s sea’.
Why?
We have the real particle – electron. Nobody doubts
it is a real particle. But a strange thing happens when it
interacts with Vacuum. All its physical parameters become
infinite. Why? Is it possible? What is the reason?
#
The conditions of the ocean permitted to create different kinds
of fish. The terrestrial’s conditions permitted to create different
kinds of animals. And the ‘mixed’ conditions of water, earth
and air on Earth permitted to create, for example, birds, which
live and act in these three conditions.
And if we take Universe as a whole, it is Two- Measured:
close by Material ( Gravity) World exists Infinite Vacuum World.
The conditions in these two Worlds are different.
And when electron moves from Material (Gravity) World to the
Infinite Vacuum World its physical parameters changes.
" The law of conservation and transformation energy / mass"
is connected with electron’s transformation.

We know the electron is very important particle in our live.
It acts in Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
It acts in the atom.
But how electron acts in cell and in Outer space we don’t know.
We need time to understand this fact.
=== .
P.S.
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ Somebody./
==== .
Another ‘ true’ Physical fables and fantasies:
The time that stretches and space that expands,
dark matter, dark energy, Higgs boson, quarks, gluons
and tachyons, axions and partons, qravitino , . . etc.
========== .
P.S.
"One thing I have learned in a long life:
that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive
and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have."
/ Einstein./
This quote is correct, because, at last, only Physics can
logically explain us the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
==========.

0 new messages