FR Bending of Light = GR 1919 Eddington Experiment
Phil Bouchard
bending of light, we find the exact same angle that was observed in the
1919 Eddington eclipse experiment or 1.75 arc-sec.
Furthermore in the latest paper that can be found at the following link
FR also represents low surface brightness galaxy rotation curves,
which basically comes down to a different scaling factor:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-sci_physics.pdf
Once again the simulator previously used to approximate the calculations
can be found here:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe
And AVI versions of the aforementioned simulator here:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-lb.avi
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-pp.avi
The bending of light calculations are available upon request and I would
like being aware of available mentorship in the subject or any updates.
Everything has been proven and there can be no reason not to, if not
to spend another year of nothingness or political indoctrination. All
the necessary mathematical calculations are done, can be easily used and
are ready for a presentation.
Thank you,
-Phil
Androcles
"Phil Bouchard" <ph...@fornux.com> wrote in message
news:4B445F39...@fornux.com...
Speed of Earth ~= 2pi * 1AU year = 0.0001c in the frame of the
fixed stars.
atan (0.0001c/c) = 9.9999999666666668666666652380952e-5 radians
= 0.00573 degrees
= 20.626 arc seconds
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Shapiro/Crapiro.htm
All the necessary mathematical calculations are done, can be easily seen
above and have already been presented.
Thank you, - Androcles.
dlzc
Mindless spam reported.
Sam Wormley
Still trying to hustle your "book" on USENET, Phil?
Same old wrong shit!
Why are you spamming these newsgroups?
>
> Customer Reviews
> Finite Relativism And Dark Matter Disproof: General Relativity Reegineered
> http://www.amazon.com/Finite-Relativism-Dark-Matter-Disproof/dp/1441453105/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top
>
> 'My name appears in the Acknowledgments of this book, therefore, I should
> contribute a review. "Finite Relativism And Dark Matter Disproof" is an
> attempt by the author to disprove special relativity, Dark Matter and to
> solve many of what the author perceives as "dilemmas" such as singularities,
> black hole behaviors and natural worm holes. Unfortunately, the author
> demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of special or general
> relativity or the underlying mathematics of either theory. The author
> confuses the concepts of acceleration and velocity in the abstract and
> goes downhill from there. One can open the book to almost any page and
> find the conceptual arguments and calculations wrong. In a section on GPS,
> the author plots gravitational time dilation as a function of altitude
> which is totally contradicted by general relativity predictions and
> observations of time dilation in earth satellite clocks. I cannot
> recommend this book to anyone, even as an example of how not to write
> about science. -- Sam Wormley, Adj. Prof. Astronomy'
>
Dono.
> All
> the necessary mathematical calculations are done, can be easily used and
> are ready for a presentation.
>
Phil Bouchard
> On 1/6/10 4:00 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> It turns out by using the exact mathematical formulation of FR on the
>> bending of light, we find the exact same angle that was observed in the
>> 1919 Eddington eclipse experiment or 1.75 arc-sec.
[...]
> Still trying to hustle your "book" on USENET, Phil?
> Same old wrong shit!
> Why are you spamming these newsgroups?
Sam basically says General Relativity is wrong by getting 1.75 arc-sec!
Sam Wormley
Nope... I (Sam) says you haven't the foggiest understanding of
general relativity and that what you pst in these newsgroups is
utter nonsense.
Androcles
Androcles says GR is wrong!
Androcles says Bouchard is a fuckwit!
eric gisse
Let's see the calculations, Phil.
It only took you the better part of what, two years?
>
>
> Thank you,
> -Phil
Phil Bouchard
>>
>> Sam basically says General Relativity is wrong by getting 1.75 arc-sec!
>
> Nope... I (Sam) says you haven't the foggiest understanding of
> general relativity and that what you pst in these newsgroups is
> utter nonsense.
Getting the right answers has nothing to do with General Relativity.
Phil Bouchard
>
> Let's see the calculations, Phil.
>
> It only took you the better part of what, two years?
Exactly one year in my spare time.
I am willing paying anybody reviewing it and helping me submitting it
hopefully this month. It should be fairly easy since all the required
calculations including the bending of light are done.
PD
And empirically fitting a function to data by twiddling parameters has
nothing to do with a physical theory, Phil.
But I see you're lonely again and need some more abuse to fill your
love bucket.
PD
You'll pay me to review it? Sure, send me an email. We'll discuss
rates in that avenue.
Note a review does not mean doing revisions necessary to make it
publishable. You'd have to do that work, as is required by anyone in
the same shoes.
Phil Bouchard
>
> You'll pay me to review it? Sure, send me an email. We'll discuss
> rates in that avenue.
> Note a review does not mean doing revisions necessary to make it
> publishable. You'd have to do that work, as is required by anyone in
> the same shoes.
To make it publishable we need having enough evidence and I think I went
through everything, including LSB galaxy rotation curves.
But thanks PD, I appreciate. I will send you an email tonight.
bert
> It turns out by using the exact mathematical formulation of FR on the
> bending of light, we find the exact same angle that was observed in the
> 1919 Eddington eclipse experiment or 1.75 arc-sec.
>
> Furthermore in the latest paper that can be found at the following link
> FR also represents low surface brightness galaxy rotation curves,
> which basically comes down to a different scaling factor:http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-sci_physics.pdf
>
> Once again the simulator previously used to approximate the calculations
> can be found here:http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe
>
>
> The bending of light calculations are available upon request and I would
> like being aware of available mentorship in the subject or any updates.
> Everything has been proven and there can be no reason not to, if not
> to spend another year of nothingness or political indoctrination. All
> the necessary mathematical calculations are done, can be easily used and
> are ready for a presentation.
>
> Thank you,
> -Phil
To Ya All Light goes with the gravity curving of space.It can curve
concave and convex. So you see how easy it was for me to come up with
my "Concave & Covex theory"Its Nobel thinking Oi ya Bert
Sam Wormley
> To Ya All Light goes with the gravity curving of space.It can curve
> concave and convex. So you see how easy it was for me to come up with
> my "Concave& Covex theory"Its Nobel thinking Oi ya Bert
I was beginning to think you were dead, Herb.
eric gisse
Shoot me an email and we'll discuss it. I might as well get paid for my
time.
Phil Bouchard
>
> Shoot me an email and we'll discuss it. I might as well get paid for my
> time.
Send me proof of a PhD.
eric gisse
I don't have one. Not that the consideration is relevant because you won't
listen to Paul either.
Why don't you post your calculations and we'll have a go anyway just for
giggles?