photon is dark mattter is fabric is gravity
thatguy
for all criticism
points...explains black holes, dark matter, string theory, shows that
magnetism and gravity are related, but not in that they affect each
other (they compliment each other and that is all). defeats speed of
light,
AND relates GRAVITY, MASS, Magnetism LIGHT & DARK MATTER all together
in a resonable way
MY Theory of Everything
JC Biggs
“In the beginning God Created the heaven and the earth...” Who Knows
whether God REALLY exist. Maybe God does exist, which I believe HE
does...or maybe the bible was put here by some ancient alien race to
give us clues to live moral lives, and at the same time giving us
clues to the Under workings of the universe. Now one really knows. But
its here. And it has a meaning and its real. That we can all agree
Now I am no physicist (case in point I had to use spell check to make
sure I spelled it right!) But I do believe in science, and I also
believe in a higher power. I believe mankind is looking in the wrong
places for answers that are right in front of us. My scientific theory
came to me after seriously considering is there really “more.” My
ultimate decision is that we know all that we need to know already, we
have just not put it together to complete the puzzle. The biggest
challenge for mankind right now is understanding the creation and
evolution of the universe. And more specifically, light, time, and
dark matter. I attempt to give a knew look at the universe as we know
it. (Call me crazy, and it might be futile, but this started as a
dream...and just came to me in a way nothing ever has. Divine
intervention? Maybe. All I know is to me it is so beautiful and clear,
and is so simple..it HAS to work.
The GOD? Particle
First off you have to understand that I believe we are looking for
things that exist but we don't “need,” to come to a conclusion. I
believe the answer to everything is in the Photon. I am not saying
that the photon is a singular element, or that it was alone in the
earliest moments of the universe, but I believe that it is the
orchestrator, government, and creator of space and time as we know it.
“And GOD saw the light, that It was good. And GOD divided the light
from the darkness.”
Hence you have the photon. An elusive, mysterious little booger that
is there, but that we cant feel, or contain. (but we can capture its
energy) And this is where my theory starts.
You start with a star. Any star. Big, Small, dwarf. Any star that
gives off light. Now when that photon is first emitted by the nuclear
reaction in a star, converting Mass into energy, that Photon is
STRONG, its vibrant, we can see it, we can harness its energy. But,
what happens when that same photon has existed for eons with no
outside forces affecting it. In my theory, that photon becomes dark. I
feel that with no longer having energy to give off, this photon
becomes something between mass, and energy. Some sort of transitional
point. A waiting period to grow old until the cycle is started again.
(I will take you through this cycle)
At this point it is no longer a photon, but what I like to call a
darkron (or, the higgs boson). Or if you want to go on a limb...call
it dark matter. We know that mass can not simply “vanish.” We also
know that the universe is expanding, and seems to be held together by
some “dark matter” where does this matter come from? As stated I
believe this matter is the so called darkron.
So what happens to these darkrons after the have spent their energy? I
believe that they become a member of a Fabric. This Fabric consisting
of strings of darkrons that are all interwoven together, that over
time, solidify into a stable environment. Hence, darkrons ARE space.
Darkrons make up the environment that all other matter exist in. I
believe this can explain both the string theory, and the dark matter
theories. and explanding universe theories in one fell swoop.
Strings
A photon that has traveled across a galaxy is still connected to its
origination point by a string of other photons (and darkrons) Hence
solving why something affected on one side of the galaxy can cause an
affect on a distant object. The Space we know is simply a big woven
mass of this “darkron fabric”
The fabric passes through all objects. (until light speed is reached
then it no longer can because it cant keep up) think about it...how
does light pass through your finger when you put it on a flash light?
the "fabric" must be present there to allow it to be seen. there is
not enough mass to cause sufficient bending to make it go around your
finger
Black Holes
I believe that darkrons and photons, while being mass-less, are
affected by mass. or more so, the area the mass occupies, "upsets the
fabric." This leads to the incorporation of “black holes” I believe
that a black hole is simply a large superdense object in space. I
believe that this mass pushes out all fabric, and that the strings
break from their original strand and surrounds the solid internal
matter. The black holes become black becuause all of the light energy
is spent trying to "reconnect" with the fabric of space. I DONT
believe that black holes are constantly devouring material. I believe
there is a point where they have release all of the core material they
have captured (through radiation, gamma ray burst, etc) and it simply
becomes a space filled entirely with darkrons. These darkrons (having
been ripped from their original strings) have become a large tangled
web which is so tangled that other photons simply cannot penetrate. I
also feel that over time, the outer layer of darkrons will once again
become part of a string, ever so slowly start to untangle, and the
space as we knew it will once again be stable. All of the energy
release from the black hole and star explosion explains how star dust
and elements have been spread all over the universe.
Now that we have affected the darkrons and photons by mass, what
effect does the vice-versa have? I have resolved that the interwoven
collection of darkrons and photons simply provide a place for
everything to exist. Much like water in a pond allows fishes to float
around, oblivious to what is actually supporting their life and
movements. I believe that this web also cause the effect of limiting
the speed of light. It is my thinking that the darkron is the base,
and that light energy is simply transferred from one darkron to
another. In this theory, the speed of light is simply the speed at
which energy can be transferred from one darkron to another. This
would eliminate the problem of never allowing anything to exceed to
speed of light. And would prove E=mc^2 to be faulty. (while it is true
mass increase at speed, this has always be measured at the proton
level, and we have never had the required energy to push beyond it.) I
believe that you can move faster that the speed of light, but that
doing so would create a rip in the fabric of the darkrons. This rip
caused by the fact that the normal “give” of the plane of space simply
will not have time to “give” and will have to rip. However do to the “
magnetic” nature of the darkrons, this rip would repair itself with no
affect on its surrounding. Much the way a sonic boom tears a hole in
the air. (however, there is no air in space and hence no “boom”) To
move faster than the speed of light, the only way is to create a
controlled rip in space. (or what is know as a worm hole) the only way
to rip Darkrons from their strings is with huge amounts of mass and
gravity, but once started, is easily maintained. This will allow you
to “reach out”, and pull a section of space to you (or you to it.)
This jump in space is effectively traveling faster than the speed of
light. or perhaps tearing space will eliminate all resistance and you
will be able to travel as fast as propellant will push you with no
resistance (i assume much faster than with resistance)
gravity
The bigger the mass, the more the space fabric bunches up around the
mass...this “bunching” affect explains why more massive/bigger objects
have more gravity. The denser it is, the less fabric that can pass
through the object, exponentially increasing bunching around that
object. similar to atmospheric pressure, you get gravity.... in
conjunction you get a void of fabric, so magnetic forces attract you
more easily as you are not supported by the fabric. magnetism and
gravity are similar (in a sense) but ARE NOT related they act the
same, but not on each other. Magnestism also does not affect the
spacefabric as a primary (if magnetism moves something, the object
affects the fabric, but the magnetism it self does not)
Q. why is the universe still expanding instead of retracting with the
pull of gravity.
A. The creation of new darkrons is constantly expanding the universe.
The masses, resting in a given space, are not moving at all. They are
maintaining their original position but the new darkron matter has
created a bigger plane. With more space between the masses. Obviously
if two massive units get close enough the mass will pull them
together.
Q. but what about time? Isn't it related to light?
A. In a word? No. if you want, classify “time” as the amount of time
required for light energy to travel a given distance. This talk about
someone getting older slower because they are moving faster is Horse
Radish. The atomic clock test that “proved that” was simply affected
by gravity. And the slight variance they saw was of no significance
when you relate gravity, and accelerations affect on all matter.
(atoms included)
Q. what about this “glow” in the universe astronomers see when they
use infrared telescopes
A. Its just that . In fared light, that will one day slow to a point
with no light energy, and become a darkron.
Q. So what happens when matter runs out and there Is nothing left to
turn into photons.
A. This will be the end of time. I have yet to solicit a way for
photons and darkrons to return to mass. I would like to. As it would
cause the universe to be “timeless.” but I don't believe It is
possible. (see answer C) But this will take billions upon billions
upon billions of years to happen. Eventually, A) the darkrons will
become a solid sheet of fabric. One darkron wide in perfect woven
symmetry, and at this point this plane in space has no use. Or B) they
remain woven in a sort of sphere, floating around in whatever space
contains our universe with no matter or elements left to use. Or C)
maybe darkrons are building blocks much the way 1s and 0s make up
binary code. If you move them the right way, and under the right
circumstance, they create a atom, with mass. Perhaps inside every atom
is a code of darkrons? Maybe the release of energy when splitting the
atom is a release of huge amounts of this code. And why it is so hard
to combine two atoms. (the space is already full)
Q. What do you need to prove your theory
A. Find the transition point from photon to darkron.
Next time: How Photons and Darkrons Relate to the atom, and why the
universe, elements, and life will always be here.
KONCHOK.PENDAY
thatguy [565cu...@gmail.com] wrote:
> ok guys...call me crazy, but here goes )
Good for you!
> 10 minute read..max. Im open
> for all criticism
Way Cool!
> points...explains black holes, dark matter, string theory, shows that
> magnetism and gravity are related,
YES!
They are both AETHER FLOWS!
> but not in that they affect each
> other (they compliment each other and that is all).
They are similar, but different.
> defeats speed of light,
????
> AND relates GRAVITY, MASS, Magnetism LIGHT & DARK MATTER all together
> in a resonable way
OK!
> MY Theory of Everything
> JC Biggs
>
>
> �In the beginning God Created the heaven and the earth...� Who Knows
> whether God REALLY exist. Maybe God does exist, which I believe HE
> does...or maybe the bible was put here by some ancient alien race to
> give us clues to live moral lives, and at the same time giving us
> clues to the Under workings of the universe. Now one really knows. But
> its here. And it has a meaning and its real. That we can all agree
It's real to me.
But it keeps
changing too.
> Now I am no physicist (case in point I had to use spell check to make
> sure I spelled it right!)
OK!
> But I do believe in science,
GOOD!
>and I also believe in a higher power.
GOOD!
> I believe mankind is looking in the wrong
> places for answers that are right in front of us.
As a Radonite, I say YESSENCE!
> My scientific theory
> came to me after seriously considering is there really �more.�
OK!
> My ultimate decision is that we know all
> that we need to know already,
Perhaps thee Potential to know?
> we have just not put it together to complete the puzzle.
YES! TO COMPLETE THE PUZZLE!
THAT'S THE MAGIC SECRET!
> The biggest challenge for mankind right now
> is understanding the creation and
> evolution of the universe.
I AGREE THAT'S A HUGE CHALLENGE!
> And more specifically, light, time, and dark matter.
"Dark Matter" is simply the NEW NAME for AETHER!
Would you settle for understanging ferromagnetics,
electromagnetics, gravity and electrostatics?
> I attempt to give a knew look at the universe as we know it.
Good for you.
I admire your audacity
As well as you innocence.
> (Call me crazy,
I find you rather refreshing.
> and it might be futile, but this started as a dream...
Way Cool!
And it might
lead you to
what you seek.
> and just came to me in a way nothing ever has. Divine
> intervention? Maybe.
Maybe!
> All I know is to me it is so beautiful and clear,
> and is so simple..it HAS to work.
You are correct that what works IS
beautiful, clear and simple, but I
don't think your theory is rigorous.
I see you as more poet than physicist.
I like you.
I think you would appreciate
RADO'S SOLUTION TO PHYSICS.
You're bright, interested,
and sincere. I think you
would get it and love it!
> The GOD? Particle
Pretty close!
Rado would say the
INDIVISIBLE PARTICLES,
that comprise AETHER.
[Very tiny, maybe a
million in an electron?]
> First off you have to understand that I believe we are looking for
> things that exist but we don't �need,� to come to a conclusion.
OK!
> I believe the answer to everything is in the Photon.
Right idea, but not quite.
The Aethron is the
indivisible particle.
> I am not saying
> that the photon is a singular element, or that it was alone in the
> earliest moments of the universe, but I believe that it is the
> orchestrator, government, and creator of space and time as we know it.
That's TRUE of the aethrons,
but the photon is much bigger.
> �And GOD saw the light, that It was good.
> And GOD divided the light
> from the darkness.�
The aether is dark/invisible
until the light shines.
Of course light is aether too.
> Hence you have the photon. An elusive, mysterious little booger that
> is there, but that we cant feel, or contain. (but we can capture its
> energy) And this is where my theory starts.
You are starting a bit too UPSCALE.
> You start with a star. Any star. Big, Small, dwarf. Any star that
> gives off light. Now when that photon is first emitted by the nuclear
> reaction in a star, converting Mass into energy, that Photon is
> STRONG, its vibrant, we can see it, we can harness its energy. But,
> what happens when that same photon has existed for eons with no
> outside forces affecting it. In my theory, that photon becomes dark. I
> feel that with no longer having energy to give off, this photon
> becomes something between mass, and energy. Some sort of transitional
> point. A waiting period to grow old until the cycle is started again.
> (I will take you through this cycle)
You're starting to lose me now.
I don't find this to be rigorous science,
but more of an emotional approach..
> At this point it is no longer a photon, but what I like to call a
> darkron (or, the higgs boson). Or if you want to go on a limb...call
> it dark matter. We know that mass can not simply �vanish.� We also
> know that the universe is expanding, and seems to be held together by
> some �dark matter� where does this matter come from? As stated I
> believe this matter is the so called darkron.
Darkron seems to be the AETHER?
> So what happens to these darkrons after the have spent their energy? I
> believe that they become a member of a Fabric. This Fabric consisting
> of strings of darkrons that are all interwoven together, that over
> time, solidify into a stable environment. Hence, darkrons ARE space.
> Darkrons make up the environment that all other matter exist in. I
> believe this can explain both the string theory, and the dark matter
> theories. and explanding universe theories in one fell swoop.
I think your METAPHORS
are not clearly defined
and are not scientifically
useful, but I think you
miaght LOVE to READ RADO!
Your clearly seem
to be seeking!
WHY NOT FIND TOO?
READ RADO!
BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================
NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!
It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!
Even better than
Richard McKeon!
But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!
HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!
THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.
THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!
CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!
Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/
My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!
Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.
That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1394
==================================================
> Strings
> A photon that has traveled across a galaxy is still connected to its
> origination point by a string of other photons (and darkrons) Hence
> solving why something affected on one side of the galaxy can cause an
> affect on a distant object. The Space we know is simply a big woven
> mass of this �darkron fabric�
> The fabric passes through all objects. (until light speed is reached
> then it no longer can because it cant keep up) think about it...how
> does light pass through your finger when you put it on a flash light?
> the "fabric" must be present there to allow it to be seen. there is
> not enough mass to cause sufficient bending to make it go around your
> finger
>
> Black Holes
> I believe that darkrons and photons, while being mass-less, are
> affected by mass. or more so, the area the mass occupies, "upsets the
> fabric." This leads to the incorporation of �black holes� I believe
> caused by the fact that the normal �give� of the plane of space simply
> will not have time to �give� and will have to rip. However do to the �
> magnetic� nature of the darkrons, this rip would repair itself with no
> affect on its surrounding. Much the way a sonic boom tears a hole in
> the air. (however, there is no air in space and hence no �boom�) To
> move faster than the speed of light, the only way is to create a
> controlled rip in space. (or what is know as a worm hole) the only way
> to rip Darkrons from their strings is with huge amounts of mass and
> gravity, but once started, is easily maintained. This will allow you
> to �reach out�, and pull a section of space to you (or you to it.)
> This jump in space is effectively traveling faster than the speed of
> light. or perhaps tearing space will eliminate all resistance and you
> will be able to travel as fast as propellant will push you with no
> resistance (i assume much faster than with resistance)
>
> gravity
> The bigger the mass, the more the space fabric bunches up around the
> mass...this �bunching� affect explains why more massive/bigger objects
> have more gravity. The denser it is, the less fabric that can pass
> through the object, exponentially increasing bunching around that
> object. similar to atmospheric pressure, you get gravity.... in
> conjunction you get a void of fabric, so magnetic forces attract you
> more easily as you are not supported by the fabric. magnetism and
> gravity are similar (in a sense) but ARE NOT related they act the
> same, but not on each other. Magnestism also does not affect the
> spacefabric as a primary (if magnetism moves something, the object
> affects the fabric, but the magnetism it self does not)
>
>
>
>
>
> Q. why is the universe still expanding instead of retracting with the
> pull of gravity.
> A. The creation of new darkrons is constantly expanding the universe.
> The masses, resting in a given space, are not moving at all. They are
> maintaining their original position but the new darkron matter has
> created a bigger plane. With more space between the masses. Obviously
> if two massive units get close enough the mass will pull them
> together.
>
> Q. but what about time? Isn't it related to light?
> A. In a word? No. if you want, classify �time� as the amount of time
> required for light energy to travel a given distance. This talk about
> someone getting older slower because they are moving faster is Horse
> Radish. The atomic clock test that �proved that� was simply affected
> by gravity. And the slight variance they saw was of no significance
> when you relate gravity, and accelerations affect on all matter.
> (atoms included)
>
> Q. what about this �glow� in the universe astronomers see when they
> use infrared telescopes
> A. Its just that . In fared light, that will one day slow to a point
> with no light energy, and become a darkron.
>
> Q. So what happens when matter runs out and there Is nothing left to
> turn into photons.
> A. This will be the end of time. I have yet to solicit a way for
> photons and darkrons to return to mass. I would like to. As it would
> cause the universe to be �timeless.� but I don't believe It is
thatguy
"force" these equations to work, when we should have to force nothing.
for example...we build the biggest science project in the world to
prove that the higgs boson exist. the higgs boson is nothing more that
a remainder in a imperfect equation. if we find the particle, the
equation works, if we dont find it... the equation doesnt work (my bet
is that we dont find it, and have to start over) it should have popped
up in other accelerators, something that has the effect of a higgs
boson shouldnt be hard to find.
by the way...what DOES happen to a photon after the light energy is
spent?
KONCHOK.PENDAY
thatguy [565cu...@gmail.com] wrote:
> the point is that we are overlooking something. we keep trying to
> "force" these equations to work, when we should have to force nothing.
> for example...
YES!
When you have the RIGHT theory,
you do NOT have to fudge, at all!
To any theory:
FUDGE = DEATH!
> we build the biggest science project in the world to
> prove that the higgs boson exist. the higgs boson is nothing more that
> a remainder in a imperfect equation.
YES!
A billion dollars spent on a
MATHEMATICAL MISUDERSTANDING!
> if we find the particle, the equation works,
> if we dont find it... the equation doesnt work
INSANITY AT IT'S FINEST!
>(my bet is that we dont find it, and have to start over)
That should be obvious!
> it should have popped
> up in other accelerators, something that has the effect of a higgs
> boson shouldnt be hard to find.
If it explains the universe,
IT SHOULD BE *EVERYWHERE*!
> by the way...what DOES happen to a photon
> after the light energy is spent?
WHERE does a photon spend it's light evergy?
READ RADO!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1398
KONCHOK.PENDAY
> 2009, 10:25 xclr82xtc wrote:
>
> thanks for posting my theory here!
You're welcome!
I feel you are actually
TRYING TO UNDERSTAND!
THAT'S ALWAYS WELCOME!
> i believe that my �darkron� and your �aethron� are fundamentally the
> same.
FANTASTIC!
But it's not MY aether.
It's the 1800's aether,
slightly modified
and perfected by
Steven Rado!
I'm just a student!
> you stated that the photon is much bigger than the aethron.
YES. The Aethron is
as small as it gets.
> and we know that the mass of a photon at rest must be zero.
????
Mass is mass
whether whether
it's coming or,
not going at all
> to me you can
> make the argument that a aethron gains mass as it is accelerated to
> the speed of light (good ole e=mc^2)
No. The mass of 1 aethron = 1 aethron
It never changes.
> my argument is that energy can
> not simply dissipate and disapear,
YES! It changes into something.
> so photons that get the chance to
> expend all of their light energy must turn into �Something.�
Yes.
Everything is always aether,
in some form or another.
> I believe that something is the aethron
YES!
>(or darkron, but i like your name better)
NOT ME! FARADAY, MAXWELL, RADO!
> if the aethron is the indivisible particle, then it MUST
> be contained in everything for this to work.
YES!
YOU HAVE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED
THE CRUX OF THE MATTER!
EVERYTHING
IS MADE OF
JUST AETHER!
NOTHING ELSE
IS NEEDED!
> IE, the atom is made up of electron, neutrons, and protons,
> but what makes up these elements?
EXACTLY.
Steve exactlingly builds
the electron out of
raw uncondensed aether.
The electron is the
PRIMARY COMPOSITE PARTICLE!
Electrons build protons and neutrons!
> In my theory, the aethron is the internal �code,�
> if you will, that makes up all matter.
YES!
THE RAW MATERIAL
FROM WHICH THE
UNIVERSE IS MADE!
> much in a way binary code is nothing more than
> 1s and 0s but when put together in the correct way, in the proper
> environment you get something more.
YES!
THE "IDEAL GAS" OF AETHER,
THROUGH PURELY RANDOM MOTIONS
ORGANIZES ITSELF INTO MANY
COMPLEX SYSTEMS!
THE UNIVERSE
EVOLVES NATURALLY!
"ENTROPY" IS JUST A
GIANT FAILED *SCAM*!
>The area where aethrons are
> compiled into atoms could easily be explained as happening in
> situations of extreme heat and pressure.
YES!
AETHER EVOLVES IN
ALL TIMES AND PLACES,
BUT IT'S MOST EFFICIENT
INSIDE MASSES THEMSELVES.
STARS AND PLANETS ARE
COSMIC EVOLUTION MACHINES.
> (big bang??)
I think thats another figment
of misunderstood mathematics!
>and this would explain why the universe is never ending.
Yes. The aether has always been here.
> it also allows for matter to ALWAYS exist.
YES.
ALWAYS HAS.
ALWAYS WILL.
ALWAYS CHANGING!
>matter will never just �disapear� or �reappear� in this theory.
No.
Matter CAN dissolve back into aether,
under the right cirumstances,
but will always evolve again.
I like you!
You've assembled a
lof of clues already!
YOUR RADO ADVENTURE
AWAITS YOU NOW!
READ RADO!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1401