My excellent, mercifully brief treatment of Relativity
Tao
http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html
On the last line of that text is a link to my fuller treatment of the topic, 14 pages
in length with a couple of diagrams.
My site has no cookies or ads or hidden scripting -- nothing like that, as you'll soon
see.
It's there just for cerebral enjoyment; 'hope you enjoy it plenty.
Androcles
"Tao" <wrapth...@essay2b0.net> wrote in message
news:486d5417$0$2690$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
<yawn>
Hello Earthling.
Please answer me this question.
Why did your fellow ape Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?
What do you Earthlings do when you encounter the insane?
Do you shoot them as you should for your cerebral enjoyment, cretin?
aka Tao
"Androcles" <Headm...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
news:Tiibk.229518$aE7....@newsfe16.ams2...
>
> "Tao" <wrapth...@essay2b0.net> wrote in message
> news:486d5417$0$2690$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
> | My 1-page briefing explaining Relativity can be read at
> | http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html
> | On the last line of that text is a link to my fuller treatment of the
> topic, 14 pages
> | in length with a couple of diagrams.
> | My site has no cookies or ads or hidden scripting -- nothing like that, as
> you'll soon
> | see.
> | It's there just for cerebral enjoyment; 'hope you enjoy it plenty.
> |
>
> <yawn>
>
>
> Hello Earthling.
> Please answer me this question.
>
> Why did your fellow ape Einstein say
> the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
> the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
> the "time" each way is the same?
HELL if I know! Maybe he slugged down a few too many the night prior!
Possible reasons for a man making a goofy statement conceive to the myriad. That goes
without saying - and I am not obliged to be answerable for the utterances of some
historical figure and/or that figure's rationale. Because none of that is in context
about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein, ie. always.
The fundaments of said principles are laid forth in my documents.
>
> What do you Earthlings do when you encounter the insane?
> Do you shoot them as you should for your cerebral enjoyment, cretin?
It's not about personages; relativity is factual. You're all-greek-to-me, Androcles.
Androcles
"aka Tao" <wrapth...@essay9b0.net> wrote in message
news:486df991$0$2668$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
|
| "Androcles" <Headm...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
| news:Tiibk.229518$aE7....@newsfe16.ams2...
| >
| > "Tao" <wrapth...@essay2b0.net> wrote in message
| > news:486d5417$0$2690$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
| > | My 1-page briefing explaining Relativity can be read at
| > | http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html
| > | On the last line of that text is a link to my fuller treatment of the
| > topic, 14 pages
| > | in length with a couple of diagrams.
| > | My site has no cookies or ads or hidden scripting -- nothing like
that, as
| > you'll soon
| > | see.
| > | It's there just for cerebral enjoyment; 'hope you enjoy it plenty.
| > |
| >
| > <yawn>
| >
| >
| > Hello Earthling.
| > Please answer me this question.
| >
| > Why did your fellow ape Einstein say
| > the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
| > the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
| > the "time" each way is the same?
|
| HELL if I know! Maybe he slugged down a few too many the night prior!
Score 9/10 for an accurate assessment of the prior cause.
However, no later correction was made and therefore he must
have remained permanently inebriated.
The correct answer is: He was raving mad.
| Possible reasons for a man making a goofy statement conceive to the
myriad. That goes
| without saying - and I am not obliged to be answerable for the utterances
of some
| historical figure and/or that figure's rationale. Because none of that is
in context
| about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein,
ie. always.
|
Fair enough.
| The fundaments of said principles are laid forth in my documents.
Which is one page. Hardly "documents" plural, and contains the
statement "Contradictory it’s not" which is certainly is.
Hell if you know.
Ben Bean
"Androcles" <Headm...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
>
> | about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein,
> ie. always.
> |
> Fair enough.
>
> | The fundaments of said principles are laid forth in my documents.
>
> Which is one page. Hardly "documents" plural, and contains the
> statement "Contradictory it's not" which is certainly is.
> Hell if you know.
>
The portion that contains that citation is my 14-page fuller treatise, linked to from
the 1-pager.
I repeat with emphasis about relativity -- for I know -- CONTRADICTORY IT'S NOT
Never mind Androcles; others I invite to learn from
http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html and following.
Androcles
"Ben Bean" <wrapth...@essay9b0.net> wrote in message
news:486e9850$0$2660$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com...
|
| "Androcles" <Headm...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
| news:QHnbk.183561$Ek2....@newsfe17.ams2...
| >
| > | about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before
Einstein,
| > ie. always.
| > |
| > Fair enough.
| >
| > | The fundaments of said principles are laid forth in my documents.
| >
| > Which is one page. Hardly "documents" plural, and contains the
| > statement "Contradictory it's not" which is certainly is.
| > Hell if you know.
| >
|
| The portion that contains that citation is my 14-page fuller treatise,
linked to from
| the 1-pager.
| I repeat with emphasis about relativity -- for I know -- CONTRADICTORY
IT'S NOT
Obviously you have no idea what "contradictory" means.
Hell if you know.
|
| Never mind Androcles; others I invite to learn from
<snip crap>
Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to
answer the question
Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?
Hell if you know.
I'll give you a hint: It's contradictory.
Ben Bean
"Androcles" <Headm...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
>
> Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to
> answer the question
'Been smokin' that stuff again, mister?
You're all-greek-to-me, Androcles
But, enough said
Ben Bean
"Androcles" <Headm...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
>
> Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to
> answer the question
Androcles
Fuck off.
*plonk*
Crow's Nest
>>>>Meow.
To which Androcles retorted:
>>> Hiss! <spit> <spit>
After which, Ben Bean replied with:
>> REOWRRRRRRLLL!!!
To which Androcles uttered in conclusion:
>mmmmmrrrrrrrrr.... <HISS! HISS!> <swish> <slash> <spit>
I love mature, intelligent debate among fellow scientific-types. ;-)
Androcles
"Crow's Nest" <Crow...@10Poral.com> wrote in message
news:j7e074lmhkmhev4pd...@4ax.com...
Of course you do, which is why you've joined in. <snarl>
However ....
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SR.GIF
SR can probably be used if there is no gravity.
Else it is totally worthless, carry on using Newtonian Mechanics.