True Value of the Fine Structure Constant Revealed
Jeff
Mechanics with Time Dilation, YES - Time Dilation, we are now able to
reveal the CORRECT value of the Fine Structure Constant to be:
7.29907563x10^-3.
We also reveal direct, absolute proof illustrating how this recently
discovered value is totally correct, plus we also prove, beyond any
doubt possible, that the value currently accepted today by Theoretical
Physics academia: 7.29735257(50)x10^-3, is completely wrong.
For more information describing this new discovery please go to:
and click on the link near the bottom left corner of the home page
entitled: "Fine Structure Constant preprint paper".
All comments and opinions welcome.
All the best,
Jeff Lee CENTER for REALITY PHYSICS
kp
LOL!
The TimeLord
7c74252b-a2fc-4148...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com in
sci.physics.relativity:
> By using an entirely new way of combining fundamental Quantum Mechanics
> with Time Dilation, YES - Time Dilation, we are now able to reveal the
> CORRECT value of the Fine Structure Constant to be: 7.29907563x10^-3.
Actually that is not the correct value.
cf
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?alph|search_for=fine+structure
+constant
and
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/alpha.html
>
> We also reveal direct, absolute proof illustrating how this recently
> discovered value is totally correct, plus we also prove, beyond any
> doubt possible, that the value currently accepted today by Theoretical
> Physics academia: 7.29735257(50)x10^-3, is completely wrong.
So post it. Simply claiming it is like claiming that you have proof that
air is toxic to humans. Let's see the derivation and if it wrong, we'll
let you know.
>
> For more information describing this new discovery please go to:
>
>> www.godcipher.com <
>
> and click on the link near the bottom left corner of the home page
> entitled: "Fine Structure Constant preprint paper".
In that paper, equation 1 is wrong. That is not how the fine structure
constant is defined. The rest of the paper seems to be metaphysical
gobbledygook.
>
> All comments and opinions welcome.
>
> All the best,
>
> Jeff Lee CENTER for REALITY PHYSICS
Once again, someone tries to improve upon real "reality" physics by
assuming garbage and concluding silly stuff. Ever hear of the phrase
"garbage in - garbage out"? It applies to logic as well.
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
socratus
The formula of it is: a = e^2 / hc.
Nobody can understand what sense of constants (a)
in the Sommerfeld.s formula of electron is.
The existence of this extremely important fundamental dimensionless
constant remained unexplained till now.
And this quantity determines a condition of an electron
It means, that diverse physical and chemical properties of substances
in many respects are determined by this quantity.
This constant remained unknown in modern physics and
on Feynman’s expression , which he said with humour
that this quantity - “ Fine Structure Constant ” is
" by the god given damnation to all physicists ".
t-online.de
"socratus" <isra...@bezeqint.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> In 1916 Sommerfeld discovered the “ Fine Structure Constant ”
> The formula of it is: a = e^2 / hc.
> Nobody can understand what sense of constants (a)
> in the Sommerfeld.s formula of electron is.
> The existence of this extremely important fundamental dimensionless
> constant remained unexplained till now.
Of course the sense is very understandable. It is the relationship of
magnetic charges, represented the perimeter speed v_u and the electric
charges by the trajectory speed v_E in the formula
a = 2 *Pi*v_u/4 *Pi*v_E
how then also the reason for the gyromagnetic constant of 2 from the
relationship
2 *Pi/4 *Pi
results
The mentioned principles this is deduced from are in that one of my home
page
www.grosch.homepage.t online; de
finding
Dieter Grosch www.grosch.homepage.t-online.de
t-online.de
"t-online.de" <DGr...@t-online.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:g8gf30$to0$03$1...@news.t-online.com...
I have forgotten, these are speeds of the ground.
Dieter Grosch www.grosch.homepage.t-online.de
socratus
> "t-online.de" <DGro...@t-online.de> schrieb im Newsbeitragnews:g8gf30$to0$03$1...@news.t-online.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "socratus" <israel...@bezeqint.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> >> In 1916 Sommerfeld discovered the " Fine Structure Constant "
> >> The formula of it is: a = e^2 / hc.
> >> Nobody can understand what sense of constants (a)
> >> in the Sommerfeld.s formula of electron is.
> >> The existence of this extremely important fundamental dimensionless
> >> constant remained unexplained till now.
>
> > Of course the sense is very understandable. It is the relationship of
> > magnetic charges, represented the perimeter speed v_u and the electric
> > charges by the trajectory speed v_E in the formula
> > a = 2 *Pi*v_u/4 *Pi*v_E
> > how then also the reason for the gyromagnetic constant of 2 from the
> > relationship
> > 2 *Pi/4 *Pi
> > results
> > The mentioned principles this is deduced from are in that one of my home
> > page
> > finding
>
> I have forgotten, these are speeds of the ground.
>
>
Dear Dieter Grosch ,
I understand that the Sommerfield’s
“ Fine Structure Constant “ (a) describes
the relationship between
magnetic charges…….and the electric charges.
Thank you.
1.
The relationship between magnetic charges…
….and the electric charges runs in electron.
The relationship goes in electron, this process goes in the electron.
My questions :
How is possible to understand this process “visual” ?
How is possible to understand the essence of this process ?
What is happen with electron in the atom, when atom
created more spectrum lines?
What is essence of the constants : (h), (a), (c) ?
What is “ electron” ?
====================
t-online.de
"socratus" <isra...@bezeqint.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:
> I understand that the Sommerfield’s
> “ Fine Structure Constant “ (a) describes
> the relationship between
> magnetic charges…….and the electric charges.
> Thank you.
> 1.
> The relationship between magnetic charges…
> ….and the electric charges runs in electron.
> The relationship goes in electron, this process goes in the electron.
> My questions :
> How is possible to understand this process “visual” ?
> How is possible to understand the essence of this process ?
> What is happen with electron in the atom, when atom
> created more spectrum lines?
> What is essence of the constants : (h), (a), (c) ?
> What is “ electron” ?
====================
1 All manifestations of nature are results of motion moulding of the matter
2., the type of the motion decides on the manifestation
3. like the planets have the electrons orbits which move in corresponding
distances with different speed
4 All constant is valid with the exception of the mass only on the ground
because they are dependent on the state of motion
H = m_eT* 1 ^ 2 *k ^ 4/2 *Pi*T_E
a = 2 *Pi*v_U/4 *Pi*v_E*K
c = 2 * v_E ^ 2 *X ^ 2 *n*k/v_U
V_U is the perimeter speed, v_E the trajectory speed in it; X the charges
number, n the quantum number, the rotation time of the ground and K = (1
+v_u/v_k) t_E a correction quantity on weightlessness, with v_k of 1. cosmic
speed: M_et is the mass of an "elementary particle" = 2.78 E 28 kg
5 An electron is around an "elementary particle" the atomic nucleuses in the
orbit which is in different quantum numbers as in the case of the planets
how in also the sqm described my "dynamic gravitation theory" on my home
page
Dieter Grosch www.grosch.homepage.t-online.de