"The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
Rediug
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
When it comes to particle physics a question arises. High Energy
experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived high-energy products. As
an example, a proton and an anti-proton, each having a mass equivalent
energy of 1 GEV are accelerated to a velocity so close to that of light so
that they each contain kinetic energy of hundreds of GEV. These particles
are then induced to collide and, in so doing, produce short lived
high-energy products having observable mass equivalent energies of hundreds
of GEV. Where did the energy they represent come from?
A:- The energy certainly wasn't in the original particles, their rest
mass indicates that their total energy was about 2 GEV.
B:- The only source of the excess energy represented by the collision
products is the kinetic energy of the impacting protons. The observed total
energy after the collision never seems to be reported as exceeding the input
energy. If the excess energy was hidden in the original protons and did not
come from their kinetic energy, then where did the kinetic energy go?
C:- Experiment indicates that electrons, and the quarks that make up
protons and neutrons have no solid structure down to the observation limit
of 10^-18 meters, as indeed they cannot have. The more rest mass energy a
particle has, the smaller it is. If quarks contained smaller particles, the
rest mass of those smaller particles would be greater than the rest mass of
the quark and the proton or neutron would be more massive than it is. On the
other hand, if particles making up the quark were less massive than the
quark they would also be larger and would not fit within the nucleon.
Rather than accept the fact that these particles contain no structure,
theoreticians have resorted to Superstring Theory that asserts that reality
consists of curled higher order dimensions having a radius 20 orders of
magnitude smaller than the nucleon (a nice choice of scale since their
observation is not likely to ever be possible). At this scale level, the
combination of Quantum Theory and General Relativity is asserted to cause
space to be a frothy foam. Unfortunately physicists would rather accept such
a concept than accept the idea that there is an error in General Relativity,
after all the quasi-religious "Faith" must not be challenged. Once the error
is admitted and the necessary corrections made, the merging of the two
theories becomes obvious. The need for the activity at 10^-34 meters
vanishes and space becomes smooth.
Everything really does become much simpler when one follows the rules
of evidence in Science as well it is done in other activities and recognize
that it is necessary to consider the effects of possible changes in the size
of the units of measurement used by instruments produced by a change in
reference frame in addition to the results of those measurements. When one
takes this step an entirely different view of reality results. This view of
reality is much more straightforward and is capable of being understood by
the average man since the operation of its mechanisms are clear.
The disturbing part of the present process is that the next generation
of scientists is having their minds destroyed by being indoctrinated into
the "True Faith".
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einste...@verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
KONCHOK.PENDAY
Rediug [red...@verizon.net] wrote:
> "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
>
> (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
>
> When it comes to particle physics a question arises.
> High Energy experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived
> high-energy products. As an example, a proton and an
> anti-proton, each having a mass equivalent energy of 1 GEV
> are accelerated to a velocity so close to that of light so
> that they each contain kinetic energy of hundreds of GEV.
> These particles are then induced to collide and, in so doing,
> produce short lived high-energy products having observable
> mass equivalent energies of hundreds of GEV. Where did
> the energy they represent come from?
PROBABLY FROM THE HUGE MAGNETS
IN THE ACCELERATOR AND THE
GIGAWATTS OF POWER IT USES!
> A:- The energy certainly wasn't in the original particles,
> their rest mass indicates that their total energy was about
> 2 GEV.
PLUS ALL THE POWER
PUT INTO THEM.
> B:- The only source of the excess energy represented by the
> collision products is the kinetic energy of the impacting
> protons. The observed total energy after the collision never
> seems to be reported as exceeding the input energy.
THAT'S REASSURING!
> If the excess energy was hidden in the original protons
> and did not come from their kinetic energy, then where did the kinetic
> energy go?
????
That's just an *IF*!
> C:- Experiment indicates that electrons,
> and the quarks that make up protons and neutrons
Have you been
drinking ether?
YOU'RE SEEING
THINGS AGAIN!
> have no solid structure down to the observation limit
> of 10^-18 meters, as indeed they cannot have.
BECAUSE THEY ARE
MADE OF PURE FANTASY!
THEY HAVE NO STRUCTURE
AT ANY LEVEL!
THEY ARE 100% PURE
HIGHLY REFINED BULLSHIT!
> The more rest mass energy a
> particle has, the smaller it is.
????
IS THAT WHY
THE LITTLE GUY
ALWAYS WINS
THE FIGHT?
> If quarks contained smaller particles,
> the rest mass of those smaller particles
> would be greater than the rest
> mass of the quark and the proton or neutron
> would be more massive than it is.
> On the other hand, if particles making up the
> quark were less massive than the quark they
> would also be larger and would not fit within the
> nucleon.
And if the seven dwarves
were actually the children
of Mrs. Claus by the Union
Rep for Santa's Workers at
the North Pole, that would
hexplain why they got no
overtime at all, but good
food almost all the time!
> Rather than accept the fact that these particles
> contain no structure,
BECAUSE THEY DON'T EVEN EXIST!
> theoreticians have resorted to Superstring Theory that asserts that
> reality consists of curled higher order dimensions having a radius 20
> orders of magnitude smaller than the nucleon (a nice choice of scale
> since their observation is not likely to ever be possible). At this
> scale level, the combination of Quantum Theory and General Relativity
> is asserted to cause space to be a frothy foam. Unfortunately
> physicists would rather accept such a concept than accept the
> idea that there is an error in General Relativity, after all the
< quasi-religious "Faith" must not be challenged. Once the error is
> admitted and the necessary corrections made, the merging of the two
> theories becomes obvious. The need for the activity at 10^-34 meters
> vanishes and space becomes smooth.
Space *ITSELF*
is very smooth!
IT'S THE STUFF IN IT
THAT GETS SO LUMPY!
> Everything really does become much simpler when one follows the rules
> of evidence in Science as well it is done in other activities and
> recognize that it is necessary to consider the effects of possible
> changes in the size of the units of measurement used by instruments
> produced by a change in reference frame in addition to the results of
> those measurements. When one takes this step an entirely different
> view of reality results. This view of reality is much more
> straightforward and is capable of being understood by the
> average man since the operation of its mechanisms are clear.
OK!
> The disturbing part of the present process is that the next
> generation of scientists is having their minds destroyed by being
> indoctrinated into the "True Faith".
THEN FIGHT BACK
AGAINST IGNORANCE!
[ ,,, snip boilerspate ...]
READ RADO!
BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================
NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!
It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!
Even better than
Richard McKeon!
But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!
HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!
THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.
THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!
CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!
Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/
My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!
Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.
That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1663