The Vortex Model Atom vs. The Smart Model Atom

[S. Enterprize Company]

The Vortex Model Atom vs. The Smart Model Atom

The Vortex Model is similar to The Smart Model. The main difference I think
is, The Smart Model considers ((internal structure)) as well as external
structure of the Helix Spiral Spinning Fields of atoms and sub-particles. The
Vortex Model deals mostly with just the (external) vortex fields of atoms.

The earliest mention of models like these goes back to Lord Kelvin in the
1800's.

Here are some LINKS of The Vortex Model Atom

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Kelvin.html

http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/Sidharth.html#electron

http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfroids/anglais/vortex_an.html

http://members.tripod.com/~SDAI_labs/AVT8.html

S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

[S. Enterprize Company]

>The Vortex Model Atom vs. The Smart Model Atom
>
> The Vortex Model is similar to The Smart Model. The main difference I
>think
>is, The Smart Model considers ((internal structure)) as well as external
>structure of the Helix Spiral Spinning Fields of atoms and sub-particles. The
>Vortex Model deals mostly with just the (external) vortex fields of atoms.
>

>The earliest mention of a models like these goes back to Lord Kelvin in the

>1800's.
>
>Here are some LINKS of The Vortex Model Atom
>
>http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Kelvin.html
>
>http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/Sidharth.html#electron
>
>http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfroids/anglais/vortex_an.html
>
>http://members.tripod.com/~SDAI_labs/AVT8.html
>
>

Oh BTW, I just found out about Lord Kelvin's Vortex Atom on March 1, 2003.
It seems he started on the right track about the true structure of the atom,
then the electron was discovered later, throwing out this Vortex model atom.
Then QM started and so on. Well thanks to my original work and theories, this
Vortex Atom model is shown to be correct, from an external structure point of
view of the atom.
As I mentioned before, I used no references in the foundations of The Smart
Atomic Model. I tried to remain as original as possible. I started the
foundation of the Smart Model about 10 years ago. In 1998 is when I started
using references to show others with similar works that point to the fact that
The Smart Model is correct.
I noticed that Lord Kelvin had a vision of the future of how that atom
really worked, then he started his vortex model atom. I believe I am his vision
he had that started his work. Who else could it be in the future days. As far
as I know, I was the only one the started the internal and external structure
of atoms, sub-particles, sub-sub-particles, and so on all the way to the
unification of all the fields in the universe. I even have shown on my Website
how Creation really started.

past present future
<----------------|--------------|---------------->
0 2003
creation starts here
then expands outward

There is no 0 time starting point in this universe. Creation starts now in
our general time frame. As sequential time moves in the present time, --> then
the past and future time frames are being formed, to make the present frame
TRUE. In other words, the Big Bang Universe is being "filled in" to make our
present time TRUE.
Lord Kelvin saw this ( our) present time frame we live in and then started
his
Vortex model atom. It was later rejected by QM. Just like QM has rejected me
now. But as time moves forward, the TRUE atomic model is being shown. The Smart
Model is the TRUE model of the universe.