Frequency is the key to everything.
socratus
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:09 PM,
David Rountree
ghost_hunter_ 01@comcast. net wrote:
>>
Frequency is the key to everything.
It can be said a resonance at a frequency mediates momentum exchange
in our kinetic universe. We can say infrared photon pairs exchange
kinetic energy between molecules of a substance and its environment
exhibiting what we call heat, a tiny portion of the total frequency
ranges comprising the energy of the object . If you tell me the
average frequency of photons exchanging momentum between molecules
and
radiating from a body, is no different than telling me the
temperature
except in the units of measure.
>
All frequencies together give the total energy or mass of an object
An electron changes momentum only by sending and receiving photons at
particular frequencies unifying the electric and kinetic into a
singular mechanism. It is that a frequency is equivalent to a
momentum (p=h*f/c) on the bottom layer that frequency can be
everything in a world that is fundamentally kinetic. Even when we
push on something, it is resonance by exclusion of common frequencies
in common quantum state, exchanging photons that does the pushing, we
never actually touch the object, photons exhibit momentum exchange
and
all momentum exchange is by photon exchange ultimately.
>
The notion that frequency tells us how often something happens is
wrong. Each photon exchange happens independently, perhaps just once,
it need not be frequent. The photon momentum is exchanged laterally
and transversely (angular) in the exhibition of a space time interval
having a specific time period, t=1/f, and distance, x=c*t. It is the
time delay exhibited not how frequent it is that exhibits the energy,
the space, and of course time itself.
>
In the unification time is exhibited inversely to energy. High energy
is big and slow, low energy is small and fast. The resonance of
common frequencies becomes frequencies becoming distinct relatively
by
momentum exchange obeying Mead's law that the universe conspires to
prevent there from being two equal frequencies. But what is manifest
is time delay, and space by x=c*t, and seemingly solid matter not
penetrable at wide ranges of occupied frequencies. The time delay
equivalence of energy, e/h, by discrete action locally constructs a
fabric of orderings, serially as time, and in parallel as space.
>
The frequency tells us the dimension of the space time manifold
exhibited by each event. It does not repeat. It exhibits a single
delay element relatively. It exhibits a lateral and transverse
(angular) right handed or left handed twist in quantum state by
cooperative equal and opposite logical action. A delay element alone
is insufficient for logical action. And, or and not operations plus
a delay. We can expect the universe to be logical, and find the
apparent quantum logical action is universal general purpose logic.
Physically, two one half dimensions are exhibited to one bit of
precision each having one way arrows of a length determines by the
momentum exchanged frequency equivalent. This physical construct
proves general enough to build any conceivable information system and
the universe is not distinct from an information system as far as it
is comprehensible.
>
Given that quantum systems are information systems, without local
hidden variables, that the quantum logical description is complete,
as both experiment and theory suggest, the logical nature of the
universe is unrestricted. No simple model, restricting logic, as say
only frequency in some fixed dimensions, can be complete. A quantum
system can be constructed to contradict any limited logical system
due
to in universal general purpose nature.
>
In the objective information model, no human ideal is allowed, only
the logical action and associated relative delays are allowed in the
model. anything else is considered fantasy. All quantum
interpretations become superfluous. All that matters is the manifolds
of space time interval exhibited by delays by perspective. The notion
of the policing of information in physical systems has recently been
formalized in the notion of Information Causality,
http://arxiv. org/abs/0905. 2292
===================== . .
#
Socratus.
In his book " Isaac Newton " Soviet academician
S. I. Vavilov wrote:
" . . photons with extremely fast frequency . . .
in the experience was observed . . . .
the remarkable phenomenon of transformation
them in … … …electron.
Undoubtedly, reverse process is also possible. "
======== . .
Questions:
Can photon and electron be one and the same particle
in different conditions ?
Can the difference between photon and electron depends
only from frequency ?
============ . .
#
May 23, 2009.
I think not just frequency, but phasing and polarity will differ.
David M. Rountree, AES
Scientific Paranormal Investigative
Research Information and Technology
www.spinvestigations.org
============ . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548
http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . .
Nimo
no., they can't be..!
> Can the difference between photon and electron depends
> only from frequency ?
clueless, don't know :-)
> ============ . .
> #
> May 23, 2009.
> I think not just frequency, but phasing and polarity will differ.
>
> David M. Rountree, AES
> Scientific Paranormal Investigative
> Research Information and Technology
>
> www.spinvestigations.org
> ============ . .
> Best wishes.
> Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htmhttp://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&i...
> ===================== . .
fantastic post, I enjoyed a lot; keep it up :-)
greetings
nimo
_________
Fifty years of intense reflection have not brought
me nearer to the answer of the question
=> ‘What are light quanta?’
Of course nowadays every little mind thinks he knows
the answer. But he is wrong.He said this a
few years before his death
Albert Einstein, 1951
Benj
Nimo wrote:
> fantastic post, I enjoyed a lot; keep it up :-)
>
> greetings
> nimo
> _________
Nimo, You are a person of very low vibration and I'm sure you know
what that means....