Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Car Stero Noise Crackdown; it's about time..

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Angelo Campanella

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 1:47:16 PM9/2/08
to
Dave Fagen (Fagen Acoustical Consultants)
Contributes this little bit of news:

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The City of Sarasota, FL is fed up with booming car stereos and are
getting tough.


http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/pages/ContentDetail?contentId=7310486

/////////////////////////////


Angelo Campanella

wondering

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 8:45:13 PM9/2/08
to
Angelo Campanella <a.camp...@att.net> wrote in news:E_evk.195734
$102....@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:

> Dave Fagen (Fagen Acoustical Consultants)
> Contributes this little bit of news:
>
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> The City of Sarasota, FL is fed up with booming car stereos and are
> getting tough.
>
>
> http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/pages/ContentDetail?contentId=7310486
>

> Angelo Campanella


What sort of cross-country propagation velocity do you think that "fed up
with booming car stereos" wave will have?

Angelo Campanella

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 10:04:47 PM9/5/08
to

wondering wrote:

> What sort of cross-country propagation velocity do you think that "fed
> up with booming car stereos" wave will have?

Ans:

A convenient formula for the speed of sound in air is

c = 20*sqrt(273 + T), T in Centigrade and c in meters/sec

or

c = 49*sqrt(459 + T), T in Fahrenheit and c in feet/sec

The speed of sound in air at a temperature of 0 degrees C and 50%
relative humidity is 331.6 m/s. The speed is proportional to the square
root of absolute temperature and it is therefore about 12 m/s greater at
20 degrees C. The speed is nearly independent of frequency and
atmospheric pressure but the resultant sound velocity relative to the
ground may be substantially altered by wind velocity.

Angelo Campanella

Ron Capik

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 10:52:33 PM9/5/08
to
Angelo Campanella wrote:

However, the legislative portion of the wave will take place in
a very dense medium with much inertia and a large dead band.
Some portion of the wave may become imaginary and some
distortion should also be expected.


Later...

Ron Capik [aka: the NJ Editorial Minstrel]
--


Angelo Campanella

unread,
Sep 10, 2008, 1:03:00 AM9/10/08
to
Ron Capik wrote:
> However, the legislative portion of the wave will take place in
> a very dense medium with much inertia and a large dead band.
> Some portion of the wave may become imaginary and some
> distortion should also be expected.

Please Explain

Angelo Campanella

Ron Capik

unread,
Sep 10, 2008, 12:51:26 PM9/10/08
to
Angelo Campanella wrote:

I do believe "wondering" was asking about propagation
of the ordinance rather than the sound waves. Thus
his "fed up with booming car stereos" [ordinance] wave
would need to propagate through some legislative medium
such as the one sarcastically described above.
Need I continue?


Later...

Ron Capik
--


Angelo Campanella

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 1:24:42 PM9/17/08
to

Ron Capik wrote:
> Angelo Campanella wrote:
>> Please Explain


> I do believe "wondering" was asking about propagation
> of the ordinance rather than the sound waves. Thus
> his "fed up with booming car stereos" [ordinance] wave
> would need to propagate through some legislative medium
> such as the one sarcastically described above.

The only way topenrtate that medium is byconsistent(rapeated) tries...
Not intense, just repeared from time to time. ventually a light will
turn on in some mindto allow the issue to air.

Angelo Campanella

Ron Capik

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 5:30:08 PM9/18/08
to
Angelo Campanella wrote:

Thus, in effect, one needs to make noise to reduce noise.
Been there, done that.
Thanks.


Later...

Ron Capik [aka: The NJ Editorial Minstrel]
--


0 new messages