Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Quincke space?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Dulcamara

unread,
Apr 8, 2010, 4:13:19 PM4/8/10
to
Hello all, nice to meet you.
I am doing my first step in acoustic because of work (my company
assigned me the acoustic products and their development). I am trying
to exploit unusual ways to get acoustic insulation and abosorbtion for
buildings rather than the classical vibration dispersing and soft
porous materials. I would like to exploit wave interference and
diffraction. In particular I have an absurd idea and ask you what are
its flaws: think to a movable panel suspended inside a cavity space
with a more porous material on one wall of the cavity. The disturbing
sounds comes from the porous side, could I obtain interference moving
the panel as the moving of the trombone side in Quincke tube
eliminating so the most disturbing frequences? Thank you very much for
your time :)

Angelo Campanella

unread,
Apr 9, 2010, 1:40:59 PM4/9/10
to
"Dulcamara" <zambelli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:96c4791c-3134-475b...@s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

See the SoundBlox product at

http://theproudfootcompany.com/soundblox-information.html

They modify ordinary hollow cement masonry blocks by cutting a slot into the
hollow cavities where an absorber, as well as the porosity of the
cement-cinder mix, absorb over a specified frequency range.

Angelo Campanella

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

Helmut Wabnig

unread,
Apr 9, 2010, 2:48:19 PM4/9/10
to

I do not know what you mean by "interference".
Could it be this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_noise_control

(the Wiki article is rather poor)

w.

0 new messages