A good exercise: In black and white or greyscale, sketch according to
shade and light, not shape and form. Or, draw with your eyes closed,
with only the picture you have in your mind's eye to guide your hand.
>The first thing I advise you do to is to not be stuck on realism.
>Don't worry if what you're drawing doesn't look exactly like what's on
>the paper. Frida Kahlo and Henri Matisse are good examples of artists
>who went on their impressions of the figure and face rather than the
>literal graphic translation. Look at Degas' nude sketches - the way he
>treats the lines is graceful and tender despite their roughness.
I politely dissagree. People like to point to great artists and draw
their inspiration from the artist's lack of structure and realism.
What they fail to realise is that all of these artists were also
masters of realistic painting. Picasso could paint a still life as
well as and realist, he just took that one step further. Abstraction
as an artistic ideal came from the impressionistic and other movements
of centuries past. It (abstractionism) was an attempt to capture
ideas rather than images, but in some ways it is much harder than
realism.
Let me put it another way. These artists painted what was in their
minds eye and was generated by years of study in basic asthetics. How
could they have hoped to pain their imagination if they couldn't even
capture what was right there in front of them?
My advice would be to keep at the realism, improvement comes slow.
And remember that art should be fun, don't worry about being too
good.