> On Oct 11, 12:24 pm, Wanda Tinasky <wandatina...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > Hey Dianna:

> > For every document case of self-described satanists committing child
> > abuse, they're literally *thousands* of these crimes done by
> > Christians. A recent example:http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/09/20/evangelist.raid/
> > Why don't you do the world a favor and turn your sights to the people
> > that really commit these crimes, the Christians and the Catholics?

> It is obviously useless to point this fraud, this phony "child
> protector" to *real* child abuse going on.  Linda exposed this person
> on sci.psychology.psychotherapy, after having talked to this person on
> the telephone and gotten many details.

> It is obvious that this person has no problem with real child abuse,
> child slavery, the selling of children's internal organs (going on now
> due to the drug and sex slave traffic in Central Asia, with the
> Taliban and their colleagues making lots of money).  A real child
> protector would be on the front lines advocating for these poor young
> girls in the Middle Eastern dictatorships, young girls,  8 and 9 years
> old, forcibly married to old men, after having their clitoruses cut
> off.  This person is a fraud and a coward.

> It would seem to me that this person has no interest in going after
> NAMBLA, an organization that advocates Gay sex with adult men and boys
> under 8 years old, an organization that also hands out literature to
> their members on how to seduce children and get away with it.  Forget
> the Catholic Church, this person would never go after *real* child
> abusers.  This person has no problem with Islamic Imam rulings against
> women and Gays.  Killing Gays is OK under Sharia law, and it has been
> done.  Killing women is OK too, honor killings.  This person has no
> problem with this.  Forcing 8 and 9 year old girls to marry old men is
> OK under Sharia law.  That's also OK with this "child protector."
> This person seems to be obsessed on one thing only, this so-called
> satanism, the Satan thing.  This person has a very unrealistic view of
> what these so-called satanic organizations even think about this so-
> called Satan bogeyman.  Nobody except the Theistics under Diane Vera
> even believe that there is such a thing as Satan.

> The Church of Satan has, to-date, 3 convicted child abusers to their
> name, two of them were Priests for quite some time.  The Temple of Set
> has none.  The SR organization is political, not religious.  One has
> to agree to 10 *political* statements to join it.  Obama would
> qualify :)  It doesn't matter what religion anyone is.

> This person makes *all real child abuse* sound like bullshit because
> this person keeps bringing up bullshit.  In that sense, this person is
> *aiding and abetting* real child abusers.  And sure, that was no
> mispelling.  VIGILANTE?  That's what this person wrote:  vigilante.
> This person *ignores* real child abusers and real child abuse.  This
> person wants to pretend to the throne of child protector, yet this
> person protects no children at all.  This person is merely a predator
> with an obsession on a group of people that are linked together only
> in an hallucination.  This person protects no children at all.  This
> person ignores real child abusers in the world, Islamic and Catholic
> and NAMBLA. That makes this person a total fraud.

> It seems to me that this person has a major hallucinatory Thang for
> Aquino, and this person is escalating, adding other innocent people to
> the hallucinations or perhaps they are just libels.  It is patently
> insane to even link Aquino to Tani or anything Tani believes or
> thinks, yet this person has done this.

> I read what Tani wrote this person.  No threat at all.  Voicing your
> opinion about "what punishment you think stalkers should receive" is
> not a threat.  Therefore, there is no threat.  I have opinions on what
> should be done to stalkers, too.  I'm not liberal on that issue.  This
> person seems to think that freedom of speech is one way, that no one
> else has that right.  This is exactly how this person is behaving.

> This person could very easily be counter sued, one, for harassing
> people for expressing free speech and opinion making it a dangerous
> environment to have free speech/opinion, and two, for filing a
> malicious a law suit that was designed solely to harass people, cost
> them money and time, forcing people to *pay attention* to this
> person.  "How dare you ignore me." "I'll force you to pay attention."
> This person feels invulnerable, despite claiming to be the victim of
> impossible technology.  This person is clearly a cunning predator who
> expects others to see a victim instead of a predator.  This person
> should beware of retaliation.  People can only take so much of being
> harassed and bothered like this when there is no apparent end to it.
> Eventually, something breaks.  Then it is finally finished.  Ended.

> Take the street gang "the Bloods", which is a gang this person is
> probably familiar with, being in the same state.  Surely, they abuse
> the children that they get into their gangs, they make these kids into
> brutal murderers.  Imagine if this person played this lawsuit game
> with them.  This person would be shot in the face before it ever saw a
> courtroom.

> This person is accusing people of impossible, but horrible sounding
> things.  This person is accusing all these people, including people in
> a university and people that were on a jury, of causing harm.  This
> person is also relentless.  That these accused people have done
> nothing to anyone falls by the wayside.  This person has escalated to
> using the courts to harass people.  This person also laughs and mocks
> the real fear these others are feeling, fear they have attested to in
> their own letters.

> > Despite your obsessive, unprovable claims against Aquino, there hasn't
> > been a lick of prosecutable evidence against him. Have you ever
> > considered that the military has a lower standard of evidence for
> > crime? I'm not sure, but I doubt anyone else you've named in your
> > lawsuit are guilty of anything more than having speeding tickets. You
> > might want to pick up the book, Satanic Panic, and look at a scholarly
> > account of the Satanic hysteria that was present in the county in the
> > 1980s.

> You might get yourself added to this person's shit list for saying
> that.  After all, aren't you the one and only Harry Lime, master of
> manipulation and deceit and Satanist par excellance?  Aren't you the
> person that made veiled rape threats against Tani and suggested you'd
> show up at her home to - hug her?  You betcha, that's you.  I remember
> that.  She went to the damned cops over that one and the cops agreed
> with her.  And you betcha, Tani said that if you showed up at her
> home, she'd shoot you.  Just keep that in mind.  I told her you were
> goofing around.

> > As an aside, I was sent to a parochial school in LA from the 5th thru
> > 8th grades. What they did to me and my fellow students then was/is
> > *severe* child abuse. I was eventually expelled from this school. My
> > experience colors my life today. During much of my adult life, I've
> > had violent outbursts, substance abuse, and trust issues. If I had the
> > ability to seek revenge on these people without prosecution, I'd be
> > happy to boil each of them in oil and feed them to my pets.

> It is unfortunate when things like this happen.  You could prosecute
> those people.  Too bad your father didn't go there and kick the shit
> of those people.  You should, however, not project that kind of
> experience onto other people, or call people "nutters" when they are
> goofing around.  You seem to take out your vengeance on the wrong
> people, instead of on the right people.  This background would explain
> the venom you aim at people who have done nothing to you but disagree
> with you.

> For instance, you needlessly obsess on the DD.  But you don't seem to
> obsesss on the flying Jesus rising from the dead and other
> foolishness.  There is nothing superstitious in the DD, however.

> > I'm not writing this stuff for sympathy or any other such nonsense
> > that some of the nuttters in alt.satanism might jump on (i.e Egan, Dan-
> > Ron Garguillio, or Tani).

> Here is where I'm speaking up, Harry/Wanda.  I don't know Egan or Dan
> or Ron.  As a Gay, I take offence at anyone that supports NAMBLA, even
> if they are doing it as a freedom of speech statement, or to be
> outrageous, as Egan once did.  That organization has caused Gays harm,
> but