Recent Blasphemy by the Satanic Reds
dianan...@gmail.com
the profound philosophies of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism.
2) The term Bodhissatva does not refer to satanists, it refers to
a practitioner approaching enlightenment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattva
A Bodhissatva is someone who forgoes complete enlightenment
out of compassion and instead directs his/her attention to
the well-being of humanity.
Satanists are not "enlightened" by any stretch of the imagination
because the belief-system is designed to stop self-growth. Instead
satanists are stepped in self-delusion and lies. Therefore, how
dare you!
If you just can't stop yourself from blaspheming, keep it to
Christianity.
Get a grip. Get a life. Get a clue.
Diana Napolis
http://diananapolis.wordpress.com
Kori Houghton
> Recent and further harassment from Diana Napolis. Satanic Reds, despite the
> title, is not a Satanic organization. The Faq is clear for anyone clear
> enough to read it.
How many people get to the FAQ or just go with the dayglo colored link
titles on the Satanic Reds homepage?
Some examples:
THE NINE POSTULATES OF SATAN (new age clap trap typical of
contemporary satanic groups)
ORDERING SATANISM ARTICLES: LEFT HAND PATH - US or SATAN SHOP (these
are as much about Satanism as the writings distributed by any other so-
called satanic org; mix of politics, racism, pseudo-science, outright
fiction, k00k lit, discredited outdated comparative religion, and
silly occultism.)
SATANISM: DO WE HAVE RITUALS? YES! (speaks for itself; again, pretty
much standard satanic org fare)
>
> Other people also have freedom of speech.
Yes, we do. And call 'bullshitte' when we see it.
>
> The only organization that is legitimatly defining Satanism is the Church of
> Satan and other organizastions that are in fact into Satan.
Okay. Then you should probably remove the satan references from your
meta tags and where visible on your sites. Otherwise, prepare to be
judged by your words. I mean, that IS why you mention 'satan' so many
times. You're trolling.
>
> You need to get a grip (seriously get a grip) and get a life.
Good advice, Comm. There is a fair amount of defamatory text on that
site. You might want to clean that up, drop the oooky spoooky satanic
pose, and just present your ideas. Get a life, indeed!
Luv,
Kori
>
> <diananapol...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:19694fff-c908-4fc6...@17g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> >http://diananapolis.wordpress.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Comm
concerned with. It's called minding your own business.
Imo, every single religious site and org out there, including major
religions of the world, are bullshite, some more than others. All of it is.
But it's religion. As you well know, some atheists think strongly that
every single religion ever thought up is bullshite. So what. Most of them
don't concern themselves with religions.
One more time, Kori. MY opinions do not entirely agree with the opinions of
other founders, including the ones that put the site up in 1997 before I was
even directly involved.
The point is - there is positive stuff up there. People can choose to like
or dislike it - that's what freedom is all about. Freedom of religion,
freedom of choice and - freedom of speech.
Satan Shop is run by a CoS member, btw.
"Kori Houghton" <koriho...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:83e23023-5a44-4a43...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
For your information
protectedd by US law. Slandering it to say that people in that religion are
murderers and so forth, is HATE SPEECH as defined by law. Calling people
serial killers is LIBEL. Cyberstalking is now a criminal offense. And
certainly, using the tax payer's money to file law suits in order to harass
people - eventually will be penalized. If and when that happens, if
someone decides to go offline as they did before with it, they would be
jailed or locked up. It's that simple. But Satanism IS a religion
protected by LAW.
Did you know this?
Islam is also a religion protected by US law. But honor killings are MURDER,
period. Discrimination against females is ILLEGAL. The problem with Islam
is that certain forms of it practiced today DO honor killings and
discriminate against women. In Britain, they decided to make two laws.
British law and SHARIA law for Moslems. This is not a good idea, but that's
what they did. If a Brit looks at someone's daughter the wrong way, that
Brit could be honor killed. So it's not a good idea.
I find it curious that I have no clue what's on Blackwood's site or what he
is about. The same for any other org out there. I don't know - and I don't
care. It just doesn't concern me and I am just not interested. Of course,
you always feel the need to pay attention to Tani, Tani, Tani. Get it thru
your head - if Tani died tomorrow, SR would still be around. The two are
not equatable.
You keep talking about hateful stuff, or plaigerism. WHERE? Just exactly
where?
Wanda Tinasky
On Oct 3, 11:44 am, diananapol...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) The writer is attempting to attribute lowly satanic ideas to
> the profound philosophies of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism.
Most regulars of alt.satanism consider Jantsang/Lysenko as a prime
example of a disturbed and unstable person. Her self-admitted history
shows her to infiltrating the CoS and the MIMs and turning to the
police when people questioned her motives and bigoted political
philosophy. While some like me find this amusing, others are concerned
because she's tried to out people at jobs and made physical threats
either directly or through subordinates. Tani is a small-minded, self-
absorbed killjoy who has a pathological need to be the center of
attention no matter where she rests her head. Don't take this too
personally, but I think you both share this trait, Dianna. Your raison
d'être is a similar quixotic mission to rid the world of diabolical
satanists as you see them through a skewed lens as being diabolical
child molesters and ritual murders. Given your propensity for stalking
celebrities and satanists alike, I'd suggest you obey your court-
ordered parole/probation requirements and take your meds and seek
counseling.
Luv,
Wanda
>
> 2) The term Bodhissatva does not refer to satanists, it refers to
> a practitioner approaching enlightenment.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattva
Comm
outed someone on here, they had been outed by others prior to that on here.
I have a right to have whatever politics I wish - and fyi, just about
everyone I know personally agrees with the politics. So. Nothing strange
there. If anything, it's very ordinary. Extremely ordinary. Not unusual.
Not kook. Not way out there. None of that.
The squabble with COS went to full tilt when I put up "Fascism is not
Satanic" articles that one of their own members was persecuted for wanting
to put together. OK? You need an amnesia check. The squabble with MIM is
them trying to get me to do what THEY WANT - and me refusing and telling
them to fuck off. Next, they call me a FBI operative. OK - let them
believe that. Fine. It's not my fault that having a damned convo with
people led them to believe something about me that was just not so - and
then getting huffy when I correct their error. Fuck em.
Neither do I ever seek to be any center of attention - but YOU and your pals
sure the hell try to make me one. Sheesh, already. If you knocked that
off, it would be GREAT. Why don't you leave me alone?
You don't like me. FINE - I have no problem with that. But do you see me
bothering the hell out of you all the time? No, you don't. People do
notice that. You and your pals bother the shit out of me - even mention me
for NO reason, out of the blue. You just make the shit up as you go along -
and you have that in common with the lady, for sure.
Get over it, after all this freaking time, get over it. Go your own way.
Can't you do that?
We have a person here that discovered that they can use the legal system (at
least for awhile) to harass the shit out of people. Forget me. I'm so
peripheral it's not worth it. What about the others? The doctor? The
jurist? Those women are scared to death, OK? This same woman fancies she
doesn't have free speech, or someone tried to stop it. HUH? Say what?
Judges are very soft on pro se plaintifs and anyone/everyone gets a chance
to amend after one try - it's the way things are done. Nobody gets it
dismissed with prejudice first time around.
Whatever. Threaten you or anyone else? Not unless I was threatened first,
Harry and it was just stupid flames that never went anywhere. And forget
about me getting anyone else to "do something for me." That's your fantasy,
your delusion - and you can't seem to get past that. Well - GET PAST IT.
I like the beach, dance clubs, TV, delicious meals, cribbage. THAT is what
I like. Why can't you just accept that? Too square? Yeah, I'm square.
Get over it. Stop inventing me in your head. You are the one that said a
judge said you were a sociopath. I'm just a very easy going old lady and I
USUALLY mind my own fucking business and don't bother anyone. Calling a
person "fucking nut" and stating that I think stalkers that make people's
lives a terror should be put to death - is OPINION, 100% protected by
freedom of speech. I have free speech rights too.
Go away. Can't you say something interesteding about Obama versus McCain?
You aren't in my killfile right now because I'm waiting for a Harry insight.
Guess you don't have one. All you do on here is mention me, here, there,
all the time. GET OVER it. YOU are a stalker. You also share that in
common. Everyone on here? People lurk on here. You'd be shocked to find
out who agrees with me and not with you - but never posts on here. Really
shocked.
"Wanda Tinasky" <wandat...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4bf39476-470a-468b...@a19g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
shawnsto...@yahoo.com
Worrying about the words so much too, it's not what the stuff is
called, but what it is, that matters. I was reading a book of Taoist
poetry and in the preface it was stated that Lao Tzu didn't even want
to write the damn book because he knew that people are idiots and that
they'd bog it all up arguing over the terms.
Somewhere there could be a universal matrix that's trans-cultural/
trans-traditional that explains what all the terms mean.
Wanda Tinasky
Something to keep in mind about Tani's group is that no one who has
posted here in alt.satanism for any length of time takes Tani or her
group as being legitimate. Tani and her proxies have a long history of
trying to out her detractors at their jobs and to their neighbors when
they disagree with her POV. Many, like myself, consider this behavior
amusing. She also has a history of infiltrating groups like the CoS
and the MIMs (Maoist Internationalist Movement) and when they disagree
with her bigoted political viewpoints, she reports them for trumped-up
charges to the FBI and local police.
Given you have a counseling background, you might recognize Jantsang/
Lysenko's behavior as driven by a pathhological need to get attention
at any cost. Not to offend you personally, but this is something you
share with Tani given your proclivity to stalk celebrities like Steven
Speilberg and Jennifer Love Hewitt and to a lesser extent Dr. Aquino.
The best course of action for you is to follow the directives given to
you by the probation/parole department and continue taking your meds.
I can think of many better ways to spend your time than a quixotic
quest to paint all self-described satanists as serial killers and
child rapists. There are exceptions to this, but they are mostly
incarcerated.
I've hung around alt.satanism since the early nineties, and frankly, I
don't think focusing on these people is healthy given your fragile
psychological state. Filing lawsuits without any verifiable evidence
is simply another attention-seeking behavior that is counter-
productive to your life. I assume you still live with relatives in La
Mesa. Consider the toll this must take on them by worrying about you
potentially being put in residential treatment again or worse being in
prison.
Luv,
Wanda
On Oct 3, 11:44 am, diananapol...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) The writer is attempting to attribute lowly satanic ideas to
> the profound philosophies of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism.
>
> 2) The term Bodhissatva does not refer to satanists, it refers to
> a practitioner approaching enlightenment.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattva
Wanda Tinasky
Luv,
Wanda
> 1) The writer is attempting to attribute lowly satanic ideas to
> the profound philosophies of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism.
>
> 2) The term Bodhissatva does not refer to satanists, it refers to
> a practitioner approaching enlightenment.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattva
Wanda Tinasky
Hey Dianna:
Luv,
Wanda
> 1) The writer is attempting to attribute lowly satanic ideas to
> the profound philosophies of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism.
>
> 2) The term Bodhissatva does not refer to satanists, it refers to
> a practitioner approaching enlightenment.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattva
Kori Houghton
BEHIND AN ANON <n...@none.com> wrote:
> Kori, did you know, I'm sure you do know, that Satanism is a religion
> protectedd by US law. Slandering it to say that people in that religion are
> murderers and so forth, is HATE SPEECH as defined by law. Calling people
> serial killers is LIBEL. Cyberstalking is now a criminal offense. And
> certainly, using the tax payer's money to file law suits in order to harass
> people - eventually will be penalized. If and when that happens, if
> someone decides to go offline as they did before with it, they would be
> jailed or locked up. It's that simple. But Satanism IS a religion
> protected by LAW.
>
> Did you know this?
Since you're not a 'satanist', Tani, I'm not sure what you're on
about. There are very few 'satanists' posting here -- and by
'satanist' I mean someone who views 'satanism' as their religion, as
you discuss above. In fact, the only 'satanist' posting here for many
months whose posts I've read/seen is the guy calling himself GM
Blackwood. I've never seen anyone accusing Blackwood of being a
criminal. Laughing at him, mocking him, sure.
Individuals insult religions in print and other media all the time.
It is 'slander' to claim untruthfully that an individual or group of
named people have done illegal/unethical things whether or not their
religious affiliation is mentioned.
>
> Islam is also a religion protected by US law. But honor killings are MURDER,
> period. Discrimination against females is ILLEGAL. The problem with Islam
> is that certain forms of it practiced today DO honor killings and
> discriminate against women. In Britain, they decided to make two laws.
> British law and SHARIA law for Moslems. This is not a good idea, but that's
> what they did. If a Brit looks at someone's daughter the wrong way, that
> Brit could be honor killed. So it's not a good idea.
The Amish also do 'honor killings' and 'discriminate against women'.
Because of their separation from mainstream society -- plus the strong
anti-government attitudes prevailing in rural areas where most Amish
buy land for their communities -- these incidents rarely make even the
local news in the communities where they take place. I'm guessing
that John Q. Public and his wife Mary D. Public (nee Sixpack) think
the extent of Amish criminality is confined to teens doing/selling
illegal drugs, underage drinking of 'adult beverages' and driving cars
without a license & insurance.
>
> I find it curious that I have no clue what's on Blackwood's site or what he
> is about. The same for any other org out there. I don't know - and I don't
> care. It just doesn't concern me and I am just not interested. Of course,
> you always feel the need to pay attention to Tani, Tani, Tani. Get it thru
> your head - if Tani died tomorrow, SR would still be around. The two are
> not equatable.
Sure thing. And no one would be checking the links pages for k00ks
linking the SRs to nasty stuff, or vetting articles uploaded to the
various SR sites for falsehood, plagiarism (I'm refering to the stuff
your TOSser members stole from Douglas/Dagon), or defamatory
statements. I agree completely! Tani is not the only nutbar involved
with Satanic Reds.
You should note that my interest in the kee-rap on Tani's geoshitties
SR site is unrelated to Satamism? Thank you.
>
> You keep talking about hateful stuff, or plaigerism. WHERE? Just exactly
> where?
I'm not going to review your site. That's your responsibility, Tani.
I only mentioned the linked Family International site on your 'member
orgs' page because I was curious what you would post/do about it being
there, considering your current legal entanglements. Otherwise, N/I.
Luv,
Kori
thed...@comcast.net
On Oct 4, 9:31 pm, "Comm" <n...@spam.com> wrote:
> Oh my lord Harry, I never outed anyone at a job or anywhere else. If I
> outed someone on here, they had been outed by others prior to that on here.
Here we go. Please look for **<< >>** where you did report someone
to the Oregon Police and claiming to be a Magistra in the CoS <<**
**>> which you've denied repeatedly on alt.satanism:
Message from discussion Tani and the Shitanic Pinks
View parsed - Show only message text
Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!
newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!
portc03.blue.aol.com!newsfeed.twtelecom.net!newsfeed.cs.wisc.edu!
loops.cs.wisc.edu!news.cs.uoregon.edu!news.efn.org!garcia.efn.org!kld
From: Kerry Delf <k...@efn.org>
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: Re: Tani and the Shitanic Pinks
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:13:54 -0700
Organization: Oregon Public Networking
Lines: 204
Message-ID: <Pine.GSU.4.21.01091...@garcia.efn.org>
References: <7f178cbb28ef6396...@xganon.com>
<tqglkdr...@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: garcia.efn.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <tqglkdr...@corp.supernews.com>
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, People's Commissar wrote:
> Oh shut the fuck up, you god damned moron. I made no post like that.
From: w...@slip.net (- wolf -)
Subject: From Tani - comments on recent posts
Date: 1997/04/11
Message-ID: <334dcddf...@news.slip.net>
Organization: Slip.Net (http://www.slip.net)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Forwarded to alt.satanism for Tani. HS!
---
To alt.satanism from "Haggy saggy, don't you just wish it was true,
HA!"
Oh my, now they are in a PANIC, grasping for straws, desperately
grasping
at ANYTHING. WOOF!
GENERATIONAL SATANISTS? We have defined this dear. COS IS
generational
Satanism: KNIGHTS TEMPLAR, MASONS. It is the CHRISTIANS who invented
the
word "generational satanist" for people who have families that exist
within specific OTHER traditions. REMEMBER? It is they, their
authorities, who have defined that cultures worshiping or honoring a
kind
of DARK FORCE IN NATURE (remember that?) such as Tantra, Taoism, Ninja
especially, are SATANIC. REMEMBER? OK, they are GENERATIONally Satanic
because they DO tend to marry within their own tradition: LIKE MOST
JEWS
DO. Let us not forget the SATANIZING OF THE JEWS (by Joel Carmichael)
who
explains this perfectly well. Hence: Satanic traditions spanning
generations, equals generational satanist a word the CHRISTIANS coined
recently. OK? Conspiracy? DISCOVERY: "CIA, the Brotherhood, "there
is
the real conspiracy, white xtoid klippothic MISERY-makers that have
come
clean on it. And now that the "world" knows it? All those people gonna
want BLOOD for this shit. RIGHT ON!
PINKY DICK WHITE BOYS? Not "all white men." ONLY those with
diminutive
organs who obviously have a MAJOR HANG UP about the offending pinky
dick
and try to compensate for that in recognizable ways - there are JOKES
about this PROMLEM (the sexually challenged) all over TV. These tend
to be
the types of white people who LOVE to pick on BIG NOSED JEWS or FLAT
NOSED
BLACKS or SLANT EYED ASIANS and so forth. This was made perfectly
clear.
Those in a panic now just don't want to SEE the horror of their own
nothingness. Lupo takes SO MUCH offense at this, tho it was never
aimed
at him. Yet LUPO wants to stand FIRM (and erect) when he sees a
person in
a wheelchair and be allowed to call that person "CRIPPLED" like an
EPITHET
aimed at the person to hurt him, even so the person in that chair
KNOWS he
is hurting every minute of his life, mostly due to some unfortunate
accident, too. So, we are expected to maintain the politically
correct
stance and "not mention the adolescent sized penis" of men like Lupo?
Lupo
is the one who DEMANDED we stop being politically correct! OK. We
obliged. Calling me saggy tits doesn't bother me at all because it's
not
true and it wouldn't bother me even if it WAS true! Calling Lupo a
pinky
dick bothers the fuck out of him because it IS TRUE and he himself let
everyone know this by BOO HOOING far out of proportion (to its
size?)
HA!!! And so he doesn't want to fuck a cunt? So then he is GAY GAY
GAY
and there is nothing wrong with being GAY GAY GAY. Lupo is in the
CLOSET!! The INNER closet. He also overly NOTICED that Derrida was
GAY
GAY GAY. Lupo is SO easy to "read."
Oh, now I'm a threat? Scratch's Camp Koresho? Details on arsenal
styled
weapons? ACCUSING ME OF USING ILLEGAL DRUGS? Guess these brain-deads
forgot this? THIS is what started it up in the first place. Scratch
also
threatened John D. Merrit but everyone forgot that. The ONE! post I
put
on there with lots of others invited to partake of a VIOLENT fantasy
(not
an S&M one, sorry Scratch, that's YOUR dick-problem) is blown way out
of
proportion. And it was OBVIOUSLY not serious. But Scratch's threats
are
ALWAYS serious. Ask Johnathan D. Merrit among others. Scratch even
elaborated on what KINDS of guns he has in his arsenal. Violent?
YUP!
SCHRECK: BLOOD RITUALS. AUSTIN, DEATH THREATS ON LITTLE GIRLS,
TERRORIZING A CRIPPLED LADY. OH, and let us not forget the "famous
letter"
that even LUPO knew, at the time, was pure invention on Scratch's
part.
LET US NOT FORGET. The letter I TOLD THE COPS about so they could GET
IT
and FINGERPRINT IT. Remember that in 1995 ancient history?
I write sado-masochistic fantasies? I do not! But SCRATCH does, they
pour out of his mouth like diarrhea and they ALWAYS DID pour out.
Even
how he defines his weapons REEKS of a man with a tiny penis talking
POWERFUL GUNS. POWERcomes from the LIPS OF A PUSSY and the BARREL OF A
DICK with the thick/long thrust-force to PLEASE that pussy. Pinky
dicks
can go home. Aside from that, Wilhelm Reich said a few gems without
realizing that women doing what he suggested would DEMOLISH
white-CHRISTIAN society. That was already clarified, remember? white
AND
christian, BOTH. Not white and Jewish. Not Hispanic and christian.
TWO
qualifiers: white and christian. They know what kind of backgrounds
they
had. REPRESSIVE to the point that it has twisted them now as adults,
BRED
to be tiny dicks lest they be mistaken for HUNG DEMONS in those woods
or
something. A christian dick. The men in that culture hate women,
they DO
NOT want to fuck either. EVERYONE knows this. Speaking of Scratch's
sado-masochism, remember that girl who he invented that received the
letter he also invented (the one I told the COPS about!)? She was
into
the rough stuff, leather, remember? HIS fantasy. Not mine. All I
said
I'd do if she came near me was kick her ass. Well, I WOULD.
LOOK at them grasping for straws now. LAVEY GANG? OH! t They forgot?
LaVey
SPANIELS? What, don't you like us BARKING together? Now you call it
Tani
drones? OH? WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF. Remember Blanche's advice to UNITE?
AQUINO called Blanche a sychophant -- REMEMBER? So? SYCHOPHANTS
UNITE!
Well, we did. That's a LaVey gang. RIGHT? Right. Aquino accused us
all,
including me, of being LaVey's "gang" of barking dogs. See how they
HATE
IT when we AGREE? After all, Aquino is "not psychotic" when he heard
the
voice of a disembodied entity and wrote that LUNATIC FRINGE "Rook of
Coming forth by Night." I don't hear voices.
You guys are full of shit and you know it. You WANT something from
me,
for sure, and now from Peggy too? Go fuck yourself. You WANT.
That's
the story of your LIFE. You never "GET" however.
**<<Scratch BRAGGED about taking on dangerous Nazis. Poker: "I asked
them,
they never heard of you but they know you now." I asked? Of course,
the
FOOL wouldn't go and check up on whether or not I asked. To do that
he'd
have to INTRODUCE himself! HA!! FUCKING POKER. No, in fact I did
nothing and wouldn't know WHO to ask. POKER, another carnival
favorite.
You boys are too intent on displaying your little PEE PEES for us
grown-ups to look at. So when we looked, we didn't see anything. You
SUPPLY US with with the dupe-tools to use on yourselves, the rubes.
So?
I really DID write a letter to the Oregon police because ASSHOLE
brought
up illegal drugs MORE THAN ONCE; unable to control himself, he went
TOO
FAR with his runny mouth. I told the cops that a letter was received
by a
woman who was being stalked that HUNT KNEW. I really DID do that. But
I
never outed Scratch: he did that HIMSELF, picture and all. And
remember
the THEATENING AUSTIN of TOS fame and NEO-NAZI FAME? REMEMBER HIM????
AND
SCHRECK with his BLOOD RITUALS? Scratch and Austin threaten underaged
people, and they claim I'm a threat? Gee, how desperate can they
possibly
get? How demolished are they?>>**
Now they want to say I'm phoning them? Let them say it. That's as
far as
it would or could go because I NEVER called any of them and any voice
print can be made of a tape. I had to do that DOWN HERE for a friend
at
Captiva -- went with him to the COPS to voice print a tape. They do it
here. Also, bills are easily checked. They are DESPERATE now.
<<**I have been a Magistra of the COS for awhile, it's not new. But I
consistently referred to people who have such titles that no one knew
about. Didn't think I was talking about myself and others I've met?
NO?
Gee Watson.... Lupo was TOO FOCUSED on wanting to call people
names.>>**
RIGHT, my friends, DECENT HUMAN BEINGS, know a whole other Tani. I
don't
hate TOS because TOS is a cancer tumor now REMOVED from the COS. But
the
3 guys and their slave-girl are desperately TRYING to get me to hate
them.
See, HATING them would be better than NOTHING. It's an emotion. For
them
that's like LOVE. The fact is, the 3 men love no one and love
nothing.
NOTHING! NO ONE! And no one loves them. The same goes for Delf.
Love is
an alien concept to this creature.
What they don't know and will never know is the FRIENDLY
correspondence
that has passed with us all for years - in the SLOW MAILS which they
have
NO access to. The internet is a Spider's Web designed to catch misfits
such as these 3 men and their slave-girl. They can caw-caw with their
serious-sounding advice and warning all they want. People who know me
for
real will only look at them as if they are nuts and surely, they know
what
their own experience is. Who they fuck are they? NO ONE. Just poor
misguided boys on a crazy internet desperately LOOKING to get
themselves
in real trouble. Oh yes, Kerry Delf is a boy too, functionally. Lupo
got
himself into trouble by TRUSTING his personal info to the TOS -- a
Satanic
CULT -- in the middle of a Satanic Panic all over the media. What a
FOOL.
I am a writer. It is very easy for me to write nutty stuff since I've
written nutty stuff when I have to write dialogue for a nutty
character in
a tale. But you fellas are not doing this at all. You are DISPLAYING
YOURSELF FOR REAL for all to see, as if you think it will make you
famous.
As if you think you have some kind of clout. And all the while, you
just
let me SLAP YOU AROUND like so much puppet meat. But that's better
than
NO response, we know, we know.
So, Lupo's main THRUST of complaint is political correctness! He
WANTS to
be able to say "nigger, kike, gook, Count Chocula, saggy titties" and
other such things. He WANTS to be able to call a war veteran in a
wheelchair a "CRIPPLE." OK. Looks like HE can't take it himself when
the
white gloves come off. BOO HOO HOO. He wants to do what TOP TOSSER
AUSTIN did and terrorize a cripple - and put DEDATH CURSES ON
CHILDREN.
REMEMBER AUSTIN of newsfame?
As for Dan Clore? Phil wrote you a response. You WISH you could read
as
well and write as well as he can. YOU WISH. You are a dysfunctional
person, unfit to even dialogue with the few ethnics you bumped into,
the
ones you attracted to yourself who were, by your words, misfits. The
last
post from YOU about me was quite apropo. HA HA HA HOOOOO is an
accurate
rendition of the sounds I HAVE BEEN MAKING whenever I wrote anything
to
these FOOLS. The only problem, Dan, is that YOU are not laughing at
all.
I know that when I spend one second to ponder "Dan Clore," and you
know it
too. You did not have good feelings when you had your disasters with
the
few encounters you had at school, after leaving your door open BEGGING
someone to walk in. You are a lonely man. Thanks for (whatever
possessed
you?) putting the name on a fanatical African newsgroup. Maybe
they'll
read the flames I wrote and get INSPIRED. I'm not black, by the way
--
but no matter. Whatever. (what a weird thing to do, unexpected!)
Watch
where else you put it - you might get yourself into BIG trouble, Dan.
I
already write for certain publications that these people might read;
you'd
never recognize the style so don't even try to find it -- it's wholly
outside your sphere of existence, you know, that spaghetti thin
reality
tunnel you live in called Stepford City, USA. Clore, The PENULTIMATE
Impotent Administrator.
These people are SO DESPERATE that they notice WHEN a person pushes a
button to send a post they wrote in school -- if it happens that the
button to mail it is pushed on a Saturday night when they assume YOU
ALL
will be reading. PATHETIC logic, Lupo Holmes. Some people work an
weekends and take week-days off so as to AVOID the fucking herd. Some
people HAVE girlfriends and don't have to go looking for them to "get
laid" because they can KEEP the girls they have. Remember? Now we
know
this is outside YOUR experience. Nuff o' dis. You've been HAD. /end.
>
> I have a right to have whatever politics I wish - and fyi, just about
> everyone I know personally agrees with the politics. So. Nothing strange
> there. If anything, it's very ordinary. Extremely ordinary. Not unusual.
> Not kook. Not way out there. None of that.
Not according to the post above. So why aren't you a CoS Magistra
anymore?
>
> The squabble with COS went to full tilt when I put up "Fascism is not
> Satanic" articles that one of their own members was persecuted for wanting
> to put together. OK? You need an amnesia check. The squabble with MIM is
> them trying to get me to do what THEY WANT - and me refusing and telling
> them to fuck off. Next, they call me a FBI operative. OK - let them
> believe that. Fine. It's not my fault that having a damned convo with
> people led them to believe something about me that was just not so - and
> then getting huffy when I correct their error. Fuck em.
Actually, I thought it was because you outed the fellow who committed
suicide in the CoS?
>
> Neither do I ever seek to be any center of attention - but YOU and your pals
> sure the hell try to make me one. Sheesh, already. If you knocked that
> off, it would be GREAT. Why don't you leave me alone?
Leave you alone? This is a newsgroup where people can excercise their
Freedom Of Speech.
>
> You don't like me. FINE - I have no problem with that. But do you see me
> bothering the hell out of you all the time? No, you don't. People do
> notice that. You and your pals bother the shit out of me - even mention me
> for NO reason, out of the blue. You just make the shit up as you go along -
> and you have that in common with the lady, for sure.
The lady? You referring to Napolis?
>
> Get over it, after all this freaking time, get over it. Go your own way.
> Can't you do that?
>
> We have a person here that discovered that they can use the legal system (at
> least for awhile) to harass the shit out of people. Forget me. I'm so
> peripheral it's not worth it. What about the others? The doctor? The
> jurist? Those women are scared to death, OK? This same woman fancies she
> doesn't have free speech, or someone tried to stop it. HUH? Say what?
> Judges are very soft on pro se plaintifs and anyone/everyone gets a chance
> to amend after one try - it's the way things are done. Nobody gets it
> dismissed with prejudice first time around.
So you're a legal expert too?
>
> Whatever. Threaten you or anyone else? Not unless I was threatened first,
> Harry and it was just stupid flames that never went anywhere. And forget
> about me getting anyone else to "do something for me." That's your fantasy,
> your delusion - and you can't seem to get past that. Well - GET PAST IT.
You've admitted that Brendan used your computer in your home to post
threats to people who offended you then said you're not responsible
and he's a minor.
>
> I like the beach, dance clubs, TV, delicious meals, cribbage. THAT is what
> I like. Why can't you just accept that? Too square? Yeah, I'm square.
> Get over it. Stop inventing me in your head. You are the one that said a
> judge said you were a sociopath. I'm just a very easy going old lady and I
> USUALLY mind my own fucking business and don't bother anyone. Calling a
> person "fucking nut" and stating that I think stalkers that make people's
> lives a terror should be put to death - is OPINION, 100% protected by
> freedom of speech. I have free speech rights too.
No one is contesting the statement above, but it omits your previous
bad behavior.
>
> Go away. Can't you say something interesteding about Obama versus McCain?
> You aren't in my killfile right now because I'm waiting for a Harry insight.
> Guess you don't have one. All you do on here is mention me, here, there,
> all the time. GET OVER it. YOU are a stalker. You also share that in
> common. Everyone on here? People lurk on here. You'd be shocked to find
> out who agrees with me and not with you - but never posts on here. Really
> shocked.
There's an election coming up? “Democracy is the theory that the
common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and
hard.” H. L. Mencken,
Really, really, shocked? Superdooper shocked? If you think I give a
tinker's damn about *anyone* in the "satanic" community (a motley
group of neo-fascists, bitter pagans, and wannabe faux Rosicrucian
poseurs) you're kidding yourself. My responses here have always been
political and nothing else despite you wanting to morph them into
something else.
>
> "Wanda Tinasky" <wandatina...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > Diana Napolishttp://diananapolis.wordpress.com- Hide quoted text -
Comm
bimbo. That would be heh, well, the second time me and one other used a
borrowed a nick - and it caused MUCHO confusion, but so what. See in.
"Kori Houghton" <koriho...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:93a973c2-3061-4ff3...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 4, 8:22 am, "For your information" AKA TANI JANTSANG HIDING
BEHIND AN ANON <n...@none.com> wrote:
> Kori, did you know, I'm sure you do know, that Satanism is a religion
> protectedd by US law. Slandering it to say that people in that religion
> are
> murderers and so forth, is HATE SPEECH as defined by law. Calling people
> serial killers is LIBEL. Cyberstalking is now a criminal offense. And
> certainly, using the tax payer's money to file law suits in order to
> harass
> people - eventually will be penalized. If and when that happens, if
> someone decides to go offline as they did before with it, they would be
> jailed or locked up. It's that simple. But Satanism IS a religion
> protected by LAW.
>
> Did you know this?
GODDAMMIT, where are your > marks? I'll have to insert them.
> Since you're not a 'satanist', Tani, I'm not sure what you're on
about.
That what some people say about Satanists, such as the Church of Satan and
others who claim Satanism as their religion - is HATE CRIME as defined by
law. I'm not on about anything.
> There are very few 'satanists' posting here -- and by
'satanist' I mean someone who views 'satanism' as their religion, as
you discuss above. In fact, the only 'satanist' posting here for many
months whose posts I've read/seen is the guy calling himself GM
Blackwood. I've never seen anyone accusing Blackwood of being a
> criminal. Laughing at him, mocking him, sure.
I agree. Well, Bobo is a Satanist too. He's on here from time to time.
What am I doing here, girl WATCHING MY FREAKING BACK. Like - what the hell
does it take to REMOVE ME from your head? What can possibly make you forget
that I exist?
> Individuals insult religions in print and other media all the time.
It is 'slander' to claim untruthfully that an individual or group of
named people have done illegal/unethical things whether or not their
> religious affiliation is mentioned.
Yes, libel to accuse a person of illegal things he/she did not do - and
there's a hell of a lot of that going on right now being done by someone
claiming that they have no free speech, LOL.
But hate crime as defined by law (I did look it up) to claim that SATANISM
IS a religion that does a, b, c, d, e and it's all libelous criminal shit.
> Sure thing. And no one would be checking the links pages for k00ks
linking the SRs to nasty stuff, or vetting articles uploaded to the
various SR sites for falsehood, plagiarism (I'm refering to the stuff
> your TOSser members stole from Douglas/Dagon),
You know damned well that as soon as I was alerted to that, I removed it.
You blame the cop for claiming HE WROTE IT to Walter. Walter got it from
Scratch's files!
> I'm not going to review your site. That's your responsibility, Tani.
No it isn't - and when did it become MY site?
Comm
<thed...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:809156f2-5165-4fa0...@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
Let's see Harry - just exactly WHAT will it take to get me out of your head?
Huh? What? What would enable you to forget I exist, huh? What?
I am SO - NOT - the center of anything, and not the type to want anything
like that - and so NOT the type to tell anyone what to do lest they do it,
it gets fucked up and I get the blame/credit - I don't give a shit what
others do - yes, I DO NOT CARE - so your reinventing me every few months,
like an obsessed stalker, is high comedy. What you say is a joke. You
keep reinventing me - along with others.
YOU can't forget me. YOU can't stop harassing me. YOU ARE harassing me,
Harry. Whassa matter boy? What's wrong with you?
I'm asking you now - STOP. Just stop. Forget I exist. Stop mentioning me
out the blue all the time, stop mentioning things you think are related to
or pertaining to me. FORGET ME, Harry.
Here is the truth about the non-existent letter
http://www.geocities.com/satanicreds/huntletter.html
And that is the be all and end all of all of it.
Now - just what exactly would enable you to forget I exist? What? What
would extract me out of your brain? Huh? What?
Comm
Your posts are all here
Oh my lord Harry, I never outed anyone at a job or anywhere else. If I
outed someone on here, they had been outed by others prior to that on here.
I have a right to have whatever politics I wish - and fyi, just about
everyone I know personally agrees with the politics. So. Nothing strange
there. If anything, it's very ordinary. Extremely ordinary. Not unusual.
Not kook. Not way out there. None of that.
The squabble with COS went to full tilt when I put up "Fascism is not
Satanic" articles that one of their own members was persecuted for wanting
to put together. OK? You need an amnesia check. The squabble with MIM is
them trying to get me to do what THEY WANT - and me refusing and telling
them to fuck off. Next, they call me a FBI operative. OK - let them
believe that. Fine. It's not my fault that having a damned convo with
people led them to believe something about me that was just not so - and
then getting huffy when I correct their error. Fuck em.
Neither do I ever seek to be any center of attention - but YOU and your pals
sure the hell try to make me one. Sheesh, already. If you knocked that
off, it would be GREAT. Why don't you leave me alone?
You don't like me. FINE - I have no problem with that. But do you see me
bothering the hell out of you all the time? No, you don't. People do
notice that. You and your pals bother the shit out of me - even mention me
for NO reason, out of the blue. You just make the shit up as you go along -
and you have that in common with the lady, for sure.
Get over it, after all this freaking time, get over it. Go your own way.
Can't you do that?
We have a person here that discovered that they can use the legal system (at
least for awhile) to harass the shit out of people. Forget me. I'm so
peripheral it's not worth it. What about the others? The doctor? The
jurist? Those women are scared to death, OK? This same woman fancies she
doesn't have free speech, or someone tried to stop it. HUH? Say what?
Judges are very soft on pro se plaintifs and anyone/everyone gets a chance
to amend after one try - it's the way things are done. Nobody gets it
dismissed with prejudice first time around.
Whatever. Threaten you or anyone else? Not unless I was threatened first,
Harry and it was just stupid flames that never went anywhere. And forget
about me getting anyone else to "do something for me." That's your fantasy,
your delusion - and you can't seem to get past that. Well - GET PAST IT.
I like the beach, dance clubs, TV, delicious meals, cribbage. THAT is what
I like. Why can't you just accept that? Too square? Yeah, I'm square.
Get over it. Stop inventing me in your head. You are the one that said a
judge said you were a sociopath. I'm just a very easy going old lady and I
USUALLY mind my own fucking business and don't bother anyone. Calling a
person "fucking nut" and stating that I think stalkers that make people's
lives a terror should be put to death - is OPINION, 100% protected by
freedom of speech. I have free speech rights too.
Go away. Can't you say something interesteding about Obama versus McCain?
Comm
Sorry if this is a repost, but someone has been cancelling my posts.
Comm
marques de sade
shawnsto...@yahoo.com wrote:
>Oh hell...still this stuff! It's almost funny.
>Worrying about the words so much too, it's not what the stuff is
>called, but what it is, that matters. I was reading a book of Taoist
>poetry and in the preface it was stated that Lao Tzu didn't even want
>to write the damn book because he knew that people are idiots and that
>they'd bog it all up arguing over the terms.
>
>Somewhere there could be a universal matrix that's trans-cultural/
>trans-traditional that explains what all the terms mean.
blavatsky tried...
>
>
>
>
>http://www.artcyclopedia.com/red-dragon-william-blake.html
--
``In the Babylonian legends of creation the seven associate-gods, who are the creators in the Egyptian mythos, have been converted into the seven evil spirits of a later theology. And ... it is said of these seven evil spirits, 'The woman from the loins of the man they bring forth.' Thus the creation of woman is made to be the work of seven evil spirits,...'' -Gerald Massey
ka...ko...ki...KORI
On Oct 4, 8:22 am, "For your information" AKA TANI JANTSANG HIDING
BEHIND AN ANON <n...@none.com> wrote:
Excuse please, I missed this. An ANON is an untraceable message. For
example, this message right here is traceable. It's not ANON. I do not
know how to, and do not need to, make ANON posts.
This is not an ANON post.
pingin...@tani'sanidiot.net
If Satan exists, you do what he manipulates you into doing. WHY he
wants you to do the absurd things he gets you to do is the biggest question.
Maybe the reason won't be made clear within our lifetime, if ever. Then
again maybe you know very well already, but of course you can't afford to
explain it any more than Howard could.
dh..@&^
<pinging_Tani@tani'sanidiot.net> wrote in message
news:117ke4trpr52gle2e...@4ax.com...
Hi David, nice slither under the killfile, hey?
>
> If Satan exists, you do what he manipulates you into doing. WHY he
> wants you to do the absurd things he gets you to do is the biggest
> question.
Let me spell something out to the likes of you, He Who Slithers Under the
Killfile. I don't DO anything dumb or reckless or absurd in real life.
THIS is a fucking newsgroup, a stupid usenet nothingness that amounts to
absolutely nothing. In real life, religion is something I never think about
or care about, and fucked up people the likes of which are RAMPANT on usenet
and in satanism, are people I just do not happen to come in contact with.
Perhaps that's because I belong to PRIVATE DANCE CLUBS with older couples in
them like ourselves - or older (I'm a senior, btw), or I go to the BEACH
almost every day. I just don't run into garbage in real life. On the other
hand, on alt.satanism, almost everyone I run into is garbage. One has to
watch one's back on here. But maybe not really.
Do I regard these evil bastards that live ONLY to make other people
miserable, or try to do that very hard, do I regard them as evil? YES,
David, I do. Do I believe that something equivalant to SATAN (the Christian
concept of this) is inside them, influencing them to libel people, invent
stories about people, harass people? YES, David, I do. I just don't call
it Satan because that is NOT what It is. I know that the only pleasure they
get in life vanishes as soon as they feel it, and that pleasure is to try to
harm others, torment others or make others LIKE THEMSELVES. I know this.
And that is precisely WHY me and others that know this, wrote up what we
wrote up. I don't expect you to understand it - and you'd have to read it
to SEE what was done. I also don't owe you an explanation for any of it.
> Maybe the reason won't be made clear within our lifetime, if ever. Then
> again maybe you know very well already, but of course you can't afford to
> explain it any more than Howard could.
You are obsessed with this garbage. I'd give you the advice to get the hell
away from it and from them - and especially from that Howard obsession you
have. Just walk away. Do that before "THEY" don't LET YOU walk away,
David. Got me?
ping...@tanishit.net
Hi Tani.
>> If Satan exists, you do what he manipulates you into doing. WHY he
>> wants you to do the absurd things he gets you to do is the biggest
>> question.
>
>Let me spell something out to the likes of you, He Who Slithers Under the
>Killfile. I don't DO anything dumb or reckless or absurd in real life.
Everyone does.
>THIS is a fucking newsgroup, a stupid usenet nothingness that amounts to
>absolutely nothing. In real life, religion is something I never think about
>or care about,
You can't do it realistically because it's outside of your comfort
zone. You would need to expand the zone before you could make
the attempt.
>and fucked up people the likes of which are RAMPANT on usenet
>and in satanism, are people I just do not happen to come in contact with.
>Perhaps that's because I belong to PRIVATE DANCE CLUBS with older couples in
>them like ourselves - or older (I'm a senior, btw), or I go to the BEACH
>almost every day. I just don't run into garbage in real life.
Good. You still have the association though, and if the beast
exists you must be doing his bidding.
>On the other
>hand, on alt.satanism, almost everyone I run into is garbage. One has to
>watch one's back on here. But maybe not really.
>
>Do I regard these evil bastards that live ONLY to make other people
>miserable, or try to do that very hard, do I regard them as evil? YES,
>David, I do. Do I believe that something equivalant to SATAN (the Christian
>concept of this) is inside them, influencing them to libel people, invent
>stories about people, harass people? YES, David, I do. I just don't call
>it Satan because that is NOT what It is.
Are you aware you just said you believe it is what it is?
>I know that the only pleasure they
>get in life vanishes as soon as they feel it, and that pleasure is to try to
>harm others, torment others or make others LIKE THEMSELVES. I know this.
Something you did pissed these people off.
>And that is precisely WHY me and others that know this, wrote up what we
>wrote up. I don't expect you to understand it - and you'd have to read it
>to SEE what was done. I also don't owe you an explanation for any of it.
All you're saying is that nothing with any intelligence has beliberate
influence one the development of life in the universe, and that the
non-intelligent whateveryouthinkitis somehow is in direct contact
with every part of every thing every place simultaneously. You promote
the idea of an omni-present whatever which has no intelligence or ability
to perform deliberate acts. You promote pretty much the same idea most
theists do, but without there being superior intelligence associated with it.
>> Maybe the reason won't be made clear within our lifetime, if ever. Then
>> again maybe you know very well already, but of course you can't afford to
>> explain it any more than Howard could.
>
>You are obsessed with this garbage. I'd give you the advice to get the hell
>away from it and from them - and especially from that Howard obsession you
>have.
Since he had such a big part in it, what's wrong with talking about
what he did?
>Just walk away. Do that before "THEY" don't LET YOU walk away,
>David. Got me?
Is that what happened to you?
marques de sade
at
> Brit could be honor killed. =A0So it's not a good idea.
they were unable to keep them covered up?