Face on Mars
dennyreno
Face on mars
Was it there or destroyed? Was is made by a scalar wave weapon?
dennyreno
God is a metaphor for that which trancends all levels of intellectual
thought. It's as simple as that.
Joseph Campbell - Masks of God
Joseph Campbell published a four volume series called The Masks of God
between 1962 and 1968. The work represents almost a lifetime of
exploring most of the cultures of the world. Joseph Campbell had the
superb ability to probe the mysteries of life through the eyes of many
cultures. I know of no other work as broad and as deep as The Masks of
God.
Joseph Campbell was interviewed by Bill Moyers in a public televisions
series called The Power of Myth. The video series and the works below
present a man who truly did "follow his bliss". Please see the works
of Joseph Campbell for an complete list of the works reviewed in
Shared Visions Unlimited Reviews.
Available through Amazon.com
The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology
Parts include:
* Toward a Natural History of the Gods and Heroes
* The Psychology of Myth
* The Mythology of Primitive Planters
* The Mythology of Primitive Hunters
* The Archaeology of Myth
* The Functioning of Myth
Order from Amazon.com
Available through Amazon.com
The Masks of God: Oriental Mythology
Parts include:
* The Separation of East and West
* The Mythologies of India
* The Mythologies of the Far East
Order from Amazon.com
Available through Amazon.com
The Masks of God: Occidental Mythology
Parts include:
* The Age of the Goddess
* The Age of Heroes
* The Age of the Great Classics
* The Age of the Great Beliefs
Order from Amazon.com
Available through Amazon.com
The Masks of God: Creative Mythology
Parts include:
* The Ancient Vine
* The Waste Land
* The Way and the Life
* New Wine
Order from Amazon.com
dennyreno
dennyreno
afar off from the camp, and called it the Tabernacle of the
congregation. And it came to pass, that every one which sought the
LORD went out unto the tabernacle of the congregation, which was
without the camp. 8 And it came to pass, when Moses went out unto the
tabernacle, that all the people rose up, and stood every man at his
tent door, and looked after Moses, until he was gone into the
tabernacle.9 And it came to pass, as Moses entered into the
tabernacle, the cloudy pillar descended, and stood at the door of the
tabernacle, and the LORD talked with Moses. 10 And all the people saw
the cloudy pillar stand at the tabernacle door: and all the people
rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door. 11 And the LORD
spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And
he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun,
a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle. 12 And Moses said
unto the LORD, See, thou sayest unto me, Bring up this people: and
thou hast not let me know whom thou wilt send with me. Yet thou hast
said, I know thee by name, and thou hast also found grace in my sight.
13 Now therefore, I pray thee, if I have found grace in thy sight,
shew me now thy way, that I may know thee, that I may find grace in
thy sight: and consider that this nation is thy people. 14 And he
said, My presence shall go with thee, and I will give thee rest. 15
And he said unto him, If thy presence go not with me, carry us not up
hence. 16 For wherein shall it be known here that I and thy people
have found grace in thy sight? is it not in that thou goest with us?
so shall we be separated, I and thy people, from all the people that
are upon the face of the earth. 17 And the LORD said unto Moses, I
will do this thing also that thou hast spoken: for thou hast found
grace in my sight, and I know thee by name. 18 And he said, I beseech
thee, shew me thy glory. 19 And he said, I will make all my goodness
pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before
thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew
mercy on whom I will shew mercy. 20 And he said, Thou canst not see my
face: for there shall no man see me, and live. 21 And the LORD said,
Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock: 22
And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put
thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I
pass by:23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back
parts: but my face shall not be seen.
On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
dennyreno
of Midian: and he led the flock to the backside of the desert, and
came to the mountain of God, even to Horeb. 2 And the angel of the
LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush:
and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush
was not consumed. 3 And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see
this great sight, why the bush is not burnt. 4 And when the LORD saw
that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of
the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I. 5 And he
said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for
the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.
6 Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham,
the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he
was afraid to look upon God.
On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
dennyreno
were thunders and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the mount, and
the voice of the trumpet exceeding loud; so that all the people that
was in the camp trembled. 17 And Moses brought forth the people out of
the camp to meet with God; and they stood at the nether part of the
mount. 18 And mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke, because the LORD
descended upon it in fire: and the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke
of a furnace, and the whole mount quaked greatly. 19 And when the
voice of the trumpet sounded long, and waxed louder and louder, Moses
spake, and God answered him by a voice. 20 And the LORD came down upon
mount Sinai, on the top of the mount: and the LORD called Moses up to
the top of the mount; and Moses went up. 21 And the LORD said unto
Moses, Go down, charge the people, lest they break through unto the
LORD to gaze, and many of them perish. 22 And let the priests also,
which come near to the LORD, sanctify themselves, lest the LORD break
forth upon them.
On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
dennyreno
his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of
grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This
was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before
me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received,
and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and
truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the
only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath
declared him.
On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
dennyreno
2
The Face On Mars - coverups.com
INTRODUCTION:
The "Face on Mars" is one of the great modern mysteries about
Mars. The "Face" first came to our attention 22 years ago, and debate
about what it is has raged ever since. Let's hop in the Wayback
Machine and return to 1976.
The Viking spacecraft reached Mars in July of 1976. It had two
missions. One was to send a lander down to inspect the surface of
Mars. The other was to orbit the red planet, within a 1,000 miles of
the surface, and take thousands of pictures to help to determine the
best landing site for the Viking 2 spacecraft due to reach Mars in a
few weeks.
On July 26, 1976, during Viking 1's thirty-fifth orbit of Mars, a
set of photographic images arived at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
Pasadena, California. One of the photographic frames, taken in the
northern desert Cydonia region, showed a mile long, 1,500 mesa that
looked like a humanoid face.
NASA has attempted to downplay this image from the start. After
showing the JPL press corp a slide of this remarkable image, Viking
project scientist Gerald Soffen attempted to explain it away by saying
that a picture transmitted a few hours later, of the same region,
revealed that the image in the first photo "...was just a trick, just
the way the light fell on it."
SEEING IS/ISN'T BELIEVING:
When it comes to the Face on Mars, people tend to believe one of
two things. That the "Face" is:
A. A striking pattern of light and shadow cast by hills in the
area.
B. A sculpture carved by sentient (intelligent) Martians.
According to author Robert C. Kiviat , "NASA's planetary
scientists have maintained over the years that the face is a natural
rock formation produced by wind erosion and that the particular
lighting angle at which it was photographed created its resemblance to
a human face."
A key member in the opposing camp is lead by Richard Hoagland, a
former member of the JPL press corps, and the author of "The Monuments
of Mars." Hoagland has led a long investigation into the Vking data.
He and his team have analyzed different photographic frames, taken at
different angles, weeks apart. He claims that he and his researchers
have considerable evidence that the "face", as well as some nearby
pyramid-shaped objects and other "artifacts," are the work of sentient
creatures.
Hoagland first became involved with the Martian face in 1981. He
attended a science conference where Vincent DiPietro and Gregory
Molennar made a presentation. As Hoagland puts it, "These two computer-
imaging experts had obtained data tapes of the face and had enhanced
it. Their photographs showed some remarkable, stunning detail that was
not at all evident on the raw image."
Hoagland came to agree with Molennar and DiPietro's contention
that the faceappeared bilaterally symmetrical. According to Hoagland,
he saw that the face "...had features which were humanoid, and it
seemed above chance that it also had the right proportion." It was at
this point that Hoagland began to consider that the face might have
been constructed by intelligent beings. By 1983, Hoagland came to be
convinced of the face's intelligent origin, leading to his fifteen
year quest to "prove" the face on Mars is proof of intelligent life on
Mars, as well as to try to get NASA to a send a photographic mission
to Mars with the primary purpose to get new, better shots of the
Martian face.
Some people in the science community disagree with the conclusions
of Hoagland and his people. According to Michael Carr, the head of the
original Viking orbiter imaging team, "Not one person of scientific
credibility believes this." As to the existence of Martian pyramids,
in close proximity to the face, Carr states that he is not aware of a
"single Viking image that has pyramids on it."
While Carr DOES agree that some JPL staff members DID notice the
Cydonia mesa's resemblance to a face when that photgraphic image was
originally received, he claims that it was published by the lab "only
for laughs."
THE TWO FACES OF NASA:
NASA has claimed for years that the "face" on Mars is not a face
and doesn't offer proof of intelligent life on Mars. Recently however,
following new Mars pictures taken of the Cydonia mesa, NASA claimed
that these pictures, which apparently show no face, are "proof"
finally that the Martian face never existed. If NASA never believed
the mesa was a face, why would they make such a big deal of "proving"
the non-existence of something they never believed in the first place.
That's like a guy buying land that supposedly has no oil beneath it,
then digging a dry hole to "prove" there's no oil. Why bother?
CONCLUSION:
We find it ironic that NASA, who tried really hard to get the
world to believe ancient bacteria on a meteorite came from Mars (which
is looking more unlikely by the minute), would put so much energy into
the notion that intelligent life couldn't/didn't exist on Mars. We
thought NASA's mission was to explore space, reporting back to U.S.
citizens, WHO PAY FOR ALL THIS THROUGH THEIR TAXES, whatever they
find. Wouldn't finding proof of some ancient, Martian civilization be
the greatest NASA accomplishment since sending men to the moon. You
would think so.
Based on the "proof" currently available, we believe it is
difficiult to prove or disprove that the face on Mars is a genuine
alien artifact. Until NASA sends a rover or manned team to the Cydonia
region where the" face" is, the existence of an alien created face on
Mars will remain a mystery.
We believe the American people are interested enough in the answer
to this cosmic question to pay the bill. If intelligent, alien life
once existed on Mars, the American people, as well as the world at
large, deserves to know.
If NASA is ever to live up to the "Star Trek" credo, continuing to
travel, "...where no man has gone before," a manned mission to the
Cydonia desert region is a good place to start. NASA, make it so!
SOURCES for this Web-Page include: "Sky & Telescope, June 1991; "Omni,
August 1994
AutoRentals.com * BigScreens.com * InvestmentBanker.com *
TruckRentals.com
CoverUps.com Index * Great CoverUps * Silly CoverUps * Media CoverUps
* Links
On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
dennyreno
http://www.arador.com/construction/index.html
Section #2 - Helmet Construction
1) Patterns
I have found that making armour without a pattern more likely than not
results in problems. A good pattern can save a lot of time and
headaches; it is much more difficult to cut off parts here and there
once the helmet is completed. You don't want to take off too much and
ruin the helmet or take off too little and have to go through it all
over again. Here is an illustration of patterns I have made for some
of the more common helmets made between 1350 to 1600. Keep in mind
that I have only tried a few of these and the ones I haven't might be
incorrect. I have put stars by the ones I have tried.
2) Helmet Blank Preparation and Edge Thinning
One of the feats of medieval armourers that I often see touted in
books is how they were able to keep the thickness of the metal the
same everywhere on the helmet. Or, even better, make the metal thick
where it needs protection and thin were it doesn't, to keep the weight
down. I thought a long time on this and came to a simple conclusion:
the farther you have to move the metal, the more metal you need.
Generally, the helmet blank needs to be thick in the center and thin
towards the edges where you will hammer the least. At first, I thought
that to get the extra metal in the center, you could weld a plate to
the center of the pattern and when finished with the helmet, you could
just grind or file off the excess metal on the edges. I have since
found that it was just too much work, and believe medieval armourers
were craftsmen who would have done anything to make their work easier.
Besides, medieval armourers bought all of their metal already made in
plates like we do today. Most armourers today, and those in medieval
times, don't have the time or means to make their own plates; it just
doesn't make very good economic or business sense.
So, how did medieval armourers put extra metal where they wanted and
remove metal where they didn't? I think it was done by finding a plate
that is the same thickness as the thickest part needed for the pattern
and then in the places where the metal didn't need to be as thick, was
hammered thin. Ergo, the center of the pattern was left alone and the
edges were hammered down until they were as thin as needed. I have
made an illustration that shows the thick and thin parts for the same
helmet patterns as before. In the illustration, the lighter the shade
of gray the thicker the metal.
3) First Bend and Warp Prevention
Several helmet patterns need to be bent before you start to pound on
them. The purpose of the bend is to maximize the useful area of the
metal. What this means is that if you bend the helmet blank, you are
moving the metal closer to were it needs to be and you will not need
to move the metal as much as you would otherwise. Here is another
illustration that shows where you need to bend each pattern, both a
top view before bending and a side view after the bend. The area
between the dashed lines is where the bend needs to occur.
The next step is to do some warp prevention, because as you hammer on
the helmet, it has a tendency to twist or curl up. It is very hard to
correct this problem once it has gotten too far. The best thing to do
is to try and prevent this from happening at the onset. This is only a
problem at the very first stages of the forming process, at least as
far as I have found. What you do is to hammer very close to the edge
of the helmet all the way around until all of the edges have been
turned up. Try not to hammer on the edge as it is already as thin as
it needs to be from the edge thinning step before.
I recommend that after you have compleated this step that you should
anneal the helmet before you start the next step.
4) Hammering the Helmet
When I am hammering, I like to hammer on opposite sides, first one
side and then the other as I work my way around the helmet. This will
help keep the helmet from curling up and warping and helps to spread
internal stresses around evenly. Try to keep the edges straight,
because if they bend too much, a crack in the metal may develop. Once
a crack develops, it is very hard to fix and can ruin a helmet. As you
are hammering, keep in mind the areas that need more metal, like the
front, top, and left side of the helmet. I have found that there is
usually some extra metal on the sides that you can either pull to the
front or to the top. Only work the metal between about halfway from
the center of the helmet to the edge at first. I hammer using the
reverse inside technique until I have the helmet about half as deep as
I need it. Once you have the sides almost vertical, start moving the
rest of the unhammered metal until it matches the rest of the helmet
and is as deep as you need. You can do this with a stake and hammer on
the outside of the helmet, or if you have a long-necked hammer, on the
inside. Remember that as you are hammering the metal is becoming work-
hardened and may crack if pushed too far. You should anneal the metal
if it becomes harder to work than normal. This is something you need
to learn to feel, myself, I still can't tell when the metal needs to
be annealed. So, I usually like to anneal after major modifications,
like after the edge thinning or after the helmet is hammered out but
before I finish the surface.
Some helmets need both inside and outside work done on them before
they are finished. This depends on the helmet and where the metal
needs to be pushed. Just remember to work slow and think things out,
you can always speed things up later when you become more experienced.
I have found that 14 gauge is thick enough for a simple bowl; for
anything else, the plate needs to be thicker. I am going to try to
make a bascinet out of 1/8-inch plate to see if that is enough metal
to do the job.
5) Crests and Using Dobbles
If your helmet needs to have a crest or comes to a point, you need to
use a crest stake or a dobble. The first thing you need is enough
metal to hammer the helmet out as far as about half as tall as the
finished crest. Then use a crest stake and hammer the metal down
around the stake until the crest is the correct shape. Start from the
top of the stake and work your way down until finished.
A dobble is for very large modifications and is used not only to do
these modifications, but also to keep the helmet from warping out of
shape. You could use a stake to make the point on a bascinet, but it
would be more difficult to keep the helmet in the correct shape. A
dobble is easily used and can be made out of iron, steel, or wood.
When using the dobble, start from the bottom and work your way up,
holding the helmet down as you go.
6) Finishing the Surface
Start finishing the surface of your helmet by hammering out the small
bumps and dips. I like to use a small, round, flat hammer on the easy
to reach spots and a mushroom stake on the hard to reach areas. The
crest should already be smoothed by the crest stake; the point on a
bascinet needs to be smoothed by a specially made stake or an iron/
steel dobble. Next, file the surface using long strokes and follow the
surface as best you can. In this process, problem areas will show up
and might need to be re-hammered. Once you have the surface completely
filed, you can sandpaper it to remove the file marks. I usually start
with 120-grit sandpaper and then move to 320-grit; this gets most of
the file marks out.
7) Hardening and Tempering
Now it's time to harden the helmet by one of two methods. One, if you
are constructing your armour out of high-carbon steel then you can
harden the metal by heating it to a cherry red color and quenching it
in water. Make sure to continuously move the helmet in the water as
you are quenching it because steam bubbles that collect on the surface
of the metal can retard the quenching process. Next, re-polish the
surface with some sandpaper so you can see the color changes as you
temper the helmet. When you temper the helmet, heat it from the
inside, as this will make the metal softer on the inside and leave a
harder exterior like the original helmets. The second method for
hardening steel is called case hardening, and is very useful if you
are using mild steel to construct your helmet. Practical Blacksmithing
says the following about case hardening: "Case hardening consists in
the conversion of the surface of wrought iron into steel. The depth to
which this conversion takes place ranges from about one sixty-fourth
to one thirty-second of an inch. The simplest method of case hardening
is to heat the work to a red heat and apply powdered prussiate of
potash to the surface. In this process the secret of success lies in
crushing the potash to fine powder, rubbing it well upon the work, so
that it fuses and runs freely over the work, then the latter must be
quenched in cold water. It is essential that the potash should fuse
and run freely, and to assist this a spoon-shaped piece of iron is
often used, the concave side to convey the prussiate of potash and the
convex side to rub it upon the work. If by the time the potash fuses
the work has reduced to too low a heat to harden, it should be placed
again in the fire, the blast being turned off, and worked over and
over till a light blood-red heat is secured, and then be quenched in
quite cold water. Work case hardened by this process has a very hard
surface indeed, and appears of a frosted white color, resisting the
most severe file test." Again temper the piece to a blue color. To
have better control of the tempering process, heat a bar to yellow
heat and use it to heat the helmet. Or, you can use a torch to do the
same, just be careful to remember some torches don't work well in a
enclosed space where there might not be enough oxygen. As you heat the
helmet, look on the outside and watch the metal change color. When it
turns a blue color move to another area, and when the entire helmet is
blue quench in water again to set the temper. I haven't tried to
harden and temper any of my armour because my welder can't heat a
helmet sized piece of metal hot enough to do it. After tempering you
can either leave the helmet blue or polish it again with 400-grit to
600-grit sandpaper, or use emery paper. You can also treat the metal
with gunblueing or stove black, etchings, etc.
On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
dennyreno
I would like the readers of alt satanism to see this video! I call it
the Devils Head Formula!
Towards the end of this video you will see a rock by a volcano that
looks like a devils head.
You see two horns and in between the horns is a circle cup that
catches hot water coming out of a volcano! In the water are aminos
acids and they change into long protein like molecules and produce a
basic cell which life came from on earth!
In Search Of Ancient Mysteries (1975) (Part 2 of 6)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOsudlgg1Tw
Dennis Garrett
On May 14, 11:42 pm, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2
>
> TheFaceOnMars- coverups.com
>
> INTRODUCTION:
>
> The "FaceonMars" is one of the great modern mysteries aboutMars. The "Face" first came to our attention 22 years ago, and debate
> about what it is has raged ever since. Let's hop in the Wayback
> Machine and return to 1976.
>
> The Viking spacecraft reachedMarsin July of 1976. It had two
> missions. One was to send a lander down to inspect the surface ofMars. The other was to orbit the red planet, within a 1,000 miles of
> the surface, and take thousands of pictures to help to determine the
> best landing site for the Viking 2 spacecraft due to reachMarsin a
> few weeks.
>
> On July 26, 1976, during Viking 1's thirty-fifth orbit ofMars, a
> set of photographic images arived at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
> Pasadena, California. One of the photographic frames, taken in the
> northern desert Cydonia region, showed a mile long, 1,500 mesa that
> looked like a humanoidface.
>
> NASA has attempted to downplay this image from the start. After
> showing the JPL press corp a slide of this remarkable image, Viking
> project scientist Gerald Soffen attempted to explain it away by saying
> that a picture transmitted a few hours later, of the same region,
> revealed that the image in the first photo "...was just a trick, just
> the way the light fell on it."
>
> SEEING IS/ISN'T BELIEVING:
>
> When it comes to theFaceonMars, people tend to believe one of
> two things. That the "Face" is:
>
> A. A striking pattern of light and shadow cast by hills in the
> area.
>
> B. A sculpture carved by sentient (intelligent) Martians.
>
> According to author Robert C. Kiviat , "NASA's planetary
> scientists have maintained over the years that thefaceis a natural
> rock formation produced by wind erosion and that the particular
> lighting angle at which it was photographed created its resemblance to
> a humanface."
>
> A key member in the opposing camp is lead by Richard Hoagland, a
> former member of the JPL press corps, and the author of "The Monuments
> ofMars." Hoagland has led a long investigation into the Vking data.
> He and his team have analyzed different photographic frames, taken at
> different angles, weeks apart. He claims that he and his researchers
> have considerable evidence that the "face", as well as some nearby
> pyramid-shaped objects and other "artifacts," are the work of sentient
> creatures.
>
> Hoagland first became involved with the Martianfacein 1981. He
> attended a science conference where Vincent DiPietro and Gregory
> Molennar made a presentation. As Hoagland puts it, "These two computer-
> imaging experts had obtained data tapes of thefaceand had enhanced
> it. Their photographs showed some remarkable, stunning detail that was
> not at all evident on the raw image."
>
> Hoagland came to agree with Molennar and DiPietro's contention
> that the faceappeared bilaterally symmetrical. According to Hoagland,
> he saw that theface"...had features which were humanoid, and it
> seemed above chance that it also had the right proportion." It was at
> this point that Hoagland began to consider that thefacemight have
> been constructed by intelligent beings. By 1983, Hoagland came to be
> convinced of theface'sintelligent origin, leading to his fifteen
> year quest to "prove" thefaceonMarsis proof of intelligent life onMars, as well as to try to get NASA to a send a photographic mission
> toMarswith the primary purpose to get new, better shots of the
> Martianface.
>
> Some people in the science community disagree with the conclusions
> of Hoagland and his people. According to Michael Carr, the head of the
> original Viking orbiter imaging team, "Not one person of scientific
> credibility believes this." As to the existence of Martian pyramids,
> in close proximity to theface, Carr states that he is not aware of a
> "single Viking image that has pyramids on it."
>
> While Carr DOES agree that some JPL staff members DID notice the
> Cydonia mesa's resemblance to afacewhen that photgraphic image was
> originally received, he claims that it was published by the lab "only
> for laughs."
>
> THE TWO FACES OF NASA:
>
> NASA has claimed for years that the "face" onMarsis not aface
> and doesn't offer proof of intelligent life onMars. Recently however,
> following newMarspictures taken of the Cydonia mesa, NASA claimed
> that these pictures, which apparently show noface, are "proof"
> finally that the Martianfacenever existed. If NASA never believed
> the mesa was aface, why would they make such a big deal of "proving"
> the non-existence of something they never believed in the first place.
> That's like a guy buying land that supposedly has no oil beneath it,
> then digging a dry hole to "prove" there's no oil. Why bother?
>
> CONCLUSION:
>
> We find it ironic that NASA, who tried really hard to get the
> world to believe ancient bacteria on a meteorite came fromMars(which
> is looking more unlikely by the minute), would put so much energy into
> the notion that intelligent life couldn't/didn't exist onMars. We
> thought NASA's mission was to explore space, reporting back to U.S.
> citizens, WHO PAY FOR ALL THIS THROUGH THEIR TAXES, whatever they
> find. Wouldn't finding proof of some ancient, Martian civilization be
> the greatest NASA accomplishment since sending men to the moon. You
> would think so.
>
> Based on the "proof" currently available, we believe it is
> difficiult to prove or disprove that thefaceonMarsis a genuine
> alien artifact. Until NASA sends a rover or manned team to the Cydonia
> region where the"face" is, the existence of an alien createdfaceonMarswill remain a mystery.
>
> We believe the American people are interested enough in the answer
> to this cosmic question to pay the bill. If intelligent, alien life
> once existed onMars, the American people, as well as the world at
> large, deserves to know.
>
> If NASA is ever to live up to the "Star Trek" credo, continuing to
> travel, "...where no man has gone before," a manned mission to the
> Cydonia desert region is a good place to start. NASA, make it so!
>
> SOURCES for this Web-Page include: "Sky & Telescope, June 1991; "Omni,
> August 1994
>
> AutoRentals.com * BigScreens.com * InvestmentBanker.com *
> TruckRentals.com
>
> CoverUps.com Index * Great CoverUps * Silly CoverUps * Media CoverUps
> * Links
>
> On May 8, 12:42 am, dennyreno <dennyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWNnpMW5dh4
> >Faceonmars
>
> > Was it there or destroyed? Was is made by a scalar wave weapon?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -