Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!
0 views
Skip to first unread message
ex-PFC Wintergreen
Dec 24, 2009, 3:35:08 PM12/24/09
to
dh@. wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:18:37 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>> <dh@.> pointed out:
>>
>>> I don't know which of his pathetic and dishonest supposed
>>> "arguments" he would consider to be his best but what I mentioned is
>>> his dishonest claim that referring to consideration for animals as
>>> consideration for animals, is equivocation.
>> It is equivocation, you equivocate on the word "consideration" because it
>> has a second meaning
>
> LOL! You can't prevent consideration from
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:18:37 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>> <dh@.> pointed out:
>>
>>> I don't know which of his pathetic and dishonest supposed
>>> "arguments" he would consider to be his best but what I mentioned is
>>> his dishonest claim that referring to consideration for animals as
>>> consideration for animals, is equivocation.
>> It is equivocation, you equivocate on the word "consideration" because it
>> has a second meaning
>
> LOL! You can't prevent consideration from
You don't show any consideration for the lives of animals.
0 new messages