info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
отнять и поделить
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Const
May 4, 2018, 11:08:47 PM5/4/18
to
https://www.vox.com/2018/5/4/17314260/incel-sex-robots-sexual-redistribution-ross-douthat-history
Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for .sexual redistribution.: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex.
.One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,. he wrote.
---
Const
Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for .sexual redistribution.: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex.
.One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,. he wrote.
---
Const
SB
May 5, 2018, 2:53:31 AM5/5/18
to
-СБ
999Vulcan
May 5, 2018, 9:43:34 AM5/5/18
to
Const
May 6, 2018, 9:48:49 PM5/6/18
to
> а ты всю статью прочитал, или как обычно выхватил цитаты из арбата?
Что, не удалось понять, откуда цитата ?
Давай еще раз, попробуй, я в тебя верю.
Кто именно сказал "The government, in other words, should intervene
to provide incels with sex" ?
Итак, две попытки.
---
Const
999Vulcan
May 6, 2018, 9:58:21 PM5/6/18
to
On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 9:48:49 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:
> 999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> > On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 11:08:47 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:
> > > https://www.vox.com/2018/5/4/17314260/incel-sex-robots-sexual-redistribution-ross-douthat-history
> > >
> > > Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for .sexual redistribution.: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex.
> > >
> > > .One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,. he wrote.
>
> > а ты всю статью прочитал, или как обычно выхватил цитаты из арбата?
>
> Что, не удалось понять, откуда цитата ?
Hanson was arguably making a point about economics, not sex. An extreme libertarian, Hanson seems to have been using his post to point out what he sees as the ridiculous nature of any form of government redistribution.
> 999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> > On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 11:08:47 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:
> > > https://www.vox.com/2018/5/4/17314260/incel-sex-robots-sexual-redistribution-ross-douthat-history
> > >
> > > Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for .sexual redistribution.: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex.
> > >
> > > .One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,. he wrote.
>
> > а ты всю статью прочитал, или как обычно выхватил цитаты из арбата?
>
> Что, не удалось понять, откуда цитата ?
> Давай еще раз, попробуй, я в тебя верю.
> Кто именно сказал "The government, in other words, should intervene
> to provide incels with sex" ?
>
> Итак, две попытки.
seems more like your level
Const
May 6, 2018, 10:33:49 PM5/6/18
to
999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 9:48:49 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:^M
Не тебе, а вот именно МНЕ.
В которой имеется подзаголовок:
"Today.s .incels. represent the fusion of misogyny and toxic capitalism"
И далее твой товарищ-социалист пишет буквально следующее:
"Let me be clear: I am not condoning or excusing incels by calling them a product of a deeply flawed culture. Rather, I.m arguing that there are many different variations of toxic, violent misogyny in history, each rooted in different cultural problems, and that this particular strain of toxic, violent misogyny is deeply rooted in late capitalism."
> > Давай еще раз, попробуй, я в тебя верю.
> > Кто именно сказал "The government, in other words, should intervene
> > to provide incels with sex" ?
> >
> > Итак, две попытки.
> иди лучше с Г беседовать
> seems more like your level
Так кто, арбат или Хансон ?
Level ?
Ты бы сначала научился определять кто что написал, что ли.
Потом уже можно будет перейти к более сложному, к пониманию
самого текста.
---
Const
> On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 9:48:49 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:^M
> > 999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 11:08:47 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:
> > > > https://www.vox.com/2018/5/4/17314260/incel-sex-robots-sexual-redistribution-ross-douthat-history
> > > >
> > > > Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for .sexual redistribution.: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex.
> > > >
> > > > .One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,. he wrote.
> >
> > > а ты всю статью прочитал, или как обычно выхватил цитаты из арбата?
> >
> > Что, не удалось понять, откуда цитата ?
> Hanson was arguably making a point about economics, not sex. An extreme libertarian, Hanson seems to have been using his post to point out what he sees as the ridiculous nature of any form of government redistribution.
А, то есть, это мне не удалось прочесть статью.
> > > On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 11:08:47 PM UTC-4, Const wrote:
> > > > https://www.vox.com/2018/5/4/17314260/incel-sex-robots-sexual-redistribution-ross-douthat-history
> > > >
> > > > Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for .sexual redistribution.: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex.
> > > >
> > > > .One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,. he wrote.
> >
> > > а ты всю статью прочитал, или как обычно выхватил цитаты из арбата?
> >
> > Что, не удалось понять, откуда цитата ?
> Hanson was arguably making a point about economics, not sex. An extreme libertarian, Hanson seems to have been using his post to point out what he sees as the ridiculous nature of any form of government redistribution.
Не тебе, а вот именно МНЕ.
В которой имеется подзаголовок:
"Today.s .incels. represent the fusion of misogyny and toxic capitalism"
И далее твой товарищ-социалист пишет буквально следующее:
"Let me be clear: I am not condoning or excusing incels by calling them a product of a deeply flawed culture. Rather, I.m arguing that there are many different variations of toxic, violent misogyny in history, each rooted in different cultural problems, and that this particular strain of toxic, violent misogyny is deeply rooted in late capitalism."
> > Давай еще раз, попробуй, я в тебя верю.
> > Кто именно сказал "The government, in other words, should intervene
> > to provide incels with sex" ?
> >
> > Итак, две попытки.
> иди лучше с Г беседовать
> seems more like your level
Level ?
Ты бы сначала научился определять кто что написал, что ли.
Потом уже можно будет перейти к более сложному, к пониманию
самого текста.
---
Const
999Vulcan
May 6, 2018, 10:38:48 PM5/6/18
to
и то не всерьёз
нах короче иди
достал
Const
May 6, 2018, 11:08:49 PM5/6/18
to
как раз за то, чтобы как-то справиться с проклятым капитализмом ?
И что в этом свете цитата Хансона на самом деле является
вовсе не шуточной ?
> нах короче иди
> достал
Тупой ты.
Как все социалисты, впрочем.
---
Const
0 new messages