info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
познавательное
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Oleg Smirnov
Mar 20, 2018, 3:21:17 AM3/20/18
to
История СССР в филиппинском пересказе.
http://tinyurl.com/yb2dxru4
.. The collapse of the Soviet Union reveals the many pitfalls of
federalization. It should have succeeded, its mission having been clearly
defined: to establish an egalitarian proletarian society. ..
This goal was implemented by a leveling of wages among Soviet citizens and
a leveling of incomes among the republics, facilitated by a centrally
planned economy. The central planners allocated resources to the republics
on the basis of perceived needs without reference to economic cost. ..
If one designed a system to facilitate federalization, one would clone
the Soviet model. Nonetheless, on Dec. 26, 1991, the USSR was dissolved;
its downfall was initiated by Russia, Ukraine and Byelorussia, the three
most advanced republics.
In 1917, following the October Revolution, the federation brought together
15 republics that were all in the 19th century in terms of development. By
the 1980s the republics in Europe had moved into the 20th century, while
the southern republics - Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, etc. -
remained in the 19th century. What happened in the USSR was replicated in
the federal systems in Third World countries like Nigeria, India, Brazil,
Mexico, etc., which failed to lessen the inequality between the imperial
capital and its less developed states. ..
In the Soviet Union, the subsidy from the European to the southern
republics was endless. Eventually, the citizens of the wealthy republics
suffered from "subsidy fatigue" to the corrupt southern republics.
The socialist doctrine of "from each according to his ability, to each
according to his needs" was not observed in the southern republics; the
eresource distribution was done by Muslim leaders in accordance with their
own rules. The basis for advancement in the local Communist Party was old-
style patronage, and not "commitment to socialism." In short, the USSR
broke up because there was no modernization in its Muslim republics. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yb2dxru4
.. The collapse of the Soviet Union reveals the many pitfalls of
federalization. It should have succeeded, its mission having been clearly
defined: to establish an egalitarian proletarian society. ..
This goal was implemented by a leveling of wages among Soviet citizens and
a leveling of incomes among the republics, facilitated by a centrally
planned economy. The central planners allocated resources to the republics
on the basis of perceived needs without reference to economic cost. ..
If one designed a system to facilitate federalization, one would clone
the Soviet model. Nonetheless, on Dec. 26, 1991, the USSR was dissolved;
its downfall was initiated by Russia, Ukraine and Byelorussia, the three
most advanced republics.
In 1917, following the October Revolution, the federation brought together
15 republics that were all in the 19th century in terms of development. By
the 1980s the republics in Europe had moved into the 20th century, while
the southern republics - Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, etc. -
remained in the 19th century. What happened in the USSR was replicated in
the federal systems in Third World countries like Nigeria, India, Brazil,
Mexico, etc., which failed to lessen the inequality between the imperial
capital and its less developed states. ..
In the Soviet Union, the subsidy from the European to the southern
republics was endless. Eventually, the citizens of the wealthy republics
suffered from "subsidy fatigue" to the corrupt southern republics.
The socialist doctrine of "from each according to his ability, to each
according to his needs" was not observed in the southern republics; the
eresource distribution was done by Muslim leaders in accordance with their
own rules. The basis for advancement in the local Communist Party was old-
style patronage, and not "commitment to socialism." In short, the USSR
broke up because there was no modernization in its Muslim republics. ..
Const
Mar 21, 2018, 12:07:50 AM3/21/18
to
Хотя, конечно, всё это несомненно было.
Тут надо сказать, что в мусульманских республиках всё же
было гораздо меньше либдемовских долбоебов, которые
искренне верили в коммунизм.
Некоторые, вон, и до сих пор не просто верят,
а еще и активно продвигают.
На самом деле занятно же.
Все эти карло-вулахи, это же в чистом виде МЛ.
"Сначала надо построить материально-техническую базу",
а потом переходить к свободному распределению.
Базы-то, собственно, еще нет и очень долго не предвидится,
но к свободному распределению они хотят переходить уже
сейчас.
Чешутся руки распределять и делить.
А также выращивание советского человека, нового типа.
Преимущественно в гетто.
А также интернационализм.
---
Const
0 new messages