???√ <99...@russian.z1> wrote:
> On 5/6/2021 11:50 AM, ???√ wrote:
> > Tucker Carlson?s sloppy efforts to call into question the safety and
> > efficacy of the coronavirus vaccines hit a new low point Wednesday night.
> >
> > In a commentary, the Fox News host, who has unleashed a steady stream of
> > innuendo-laden vaccine skepticism in recent months, raised the idea that
> > the vaccines may be linked to an inordinate number of deaths.
> >
> > He suggested (as he is wont) that he?s simply asking questions that
> > nobody else will. As usual, though, the questions he raised have indeed
> > been addressed in ways he didn?t relay. And as usual, there was a
> > simpler explanation that he ignored in what seems, for all intents and
> > purposes, to be his long-running quest to plant seeds of doubt in
> > people?s minds on a very dangerous topic.
> >
> > ?Between late December of 2020 and last month, a total of 3,362 people
> > apparently died after getting the covid vaccine in the United States ?
> > 3,362,? Carlson said, citing data from the Vaccine Adverse Event
> > Reporting System (VAERS). ?That?s an average of roughly 30 people every
> > day.?
> >
> >
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/06/tucker-carlsons-worst-vaccine-segment-yet
> >
> >
> > Кто тут у нас самый болшой поклонник такера?
> > Шалак?
> шота Шалак молчит про своего кумира
> а тот тем временем не унимается
> "If the vaccine is effective, there is no reason for people who've
> received a vaccine to wear masks or avoid physical contact," he said.
> "So maybe it doesn't work, and they're simply not telling you that.
> Well, you'd hate to think that, especially if you've gotten two shots.
> But what's the other potential explanation? We can't think of one."
>
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/apr/15/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-falsely-claims-covid-19-vaccines-mi
> Окраинец, ты меня спрашиваешь, почему я не могу голосовать за трампа?
> потому, что это было бы эквивалентно сранью на одном поле с вот этими
> вот, которые, и я цитирую, "can't think"
Вообще говоря, это ты ведешь себя как идиот.
Ну да, возможно, что в этом случае он несет хню.
А вопросы задавать всегда полезно.
И твои ссылки на "чекеров" из политифакта - это куда
больший идиотизм, чем такер.
---
Const