info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Deregulation
17 views
Skip to first unread message
999Vulcan
Mar 6, 2018, 12:32:36 PM3/6/18
to
Trump White House quietly issues report vindicating Obama regulations
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/3/6/17077330/trump-regulatory-agenda-omb
The report was released late on a Friday, with Congress out of session and multiple Trump scandals dominating the headlines. A cynical observer might conclude that the administration wanted the report to go unnoticed.
Why might that be? Well, in a nutshell, it shows that the GOP is wrong about regulations as a general matter and wrong about Obama’s regulations specifically. Those regulations had benefits far in excess of their costs, and they had no discernible effect on jobs or economic growth.
...
Believing in the inherent costliness and ineffectiveness of federal regulation is not a religious matter. It’s not an article of faith. It’s an empirical assertion, an argument, and the available evidence indicates that it is incorrect.
It is certainly not a belief to which journalists owe any particular deference.
Until Trump’s administration makes a case that its own OMB and agencies are wrong — not just by a little, but by tens of billions of dollars — the presumption of every journalist and politico in Washington should be that there is no coherent policy rationale for Trump’s deregulatory agenda.
It is, like his health, tax, and infrastructure initiatives, simply the polar opposite of populism: the targeted transfer of wealth to the already wealthy, at the public’s expense.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/3/6/17077330/trump-regulatory-agenda-omb
The report was released late on a Friday, with Congress out of session and multiple Trump scandals dominating the headlines. A cynical observer might conclude that the administration wanted the report to go unnoticed.
Why might that be? Well, in a nutshell, it shows that the GOP is wrong about regulations as a general matter and wrong about Obama’s regulations specifically. Those regulations had benefits far in excess of their costs, and they had no discernible effect on jobs or economic growth.
...
Believing in the inherent costliness and ineffectiveness of federal regulation is not a religious matter. It’s not an article of faith. It’s an empirical assertion, an argument, and the available evidence indicates that it is incorrect.
It is certainly not a belief to which journalists owe any particular deference.
Until Trump’s administration makes a case that its own OMB and agencies are wrong — not just by a little, but by tens of billions of dollars — the presumption of every journalist and politico in Washington should be that there is no coherent policy rationale for Trump’s deregulatory agenda.
It is, like his health, tax, and infrastructure initiatives, simply the polar opposite of populism: the targeted transfer of wealth to the already wealthy, at the public’s expense.
Const
Mar 7, 2018, 12:02:18 AM3/7/18
to
999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> It is, like his health, tax, and infrastructure initiatives, simply the polar opposite of populism: the targeted transfer of wealth to the already wealthy, at the public?s expense.
Абсолютно пустое утверждение.
Начнем с того, что большинство недовольств по поводу регуляций
относятся не к среде.
Продолжать даже лень.
"Believing in the inherent costliness and ineffectiveness of federal regulation is not a religious matter. It.s not an article of faith. It.s an empirical assertion, an argument, and the available evidence indicates that it is incorrect."
Это даже не смешно.
---
Const
> It is, like his health, tax, and infrastructure initiatives, simply the polar opposite of populism: the targeted transfer of wealth to the already wealthy, at the public?s expense.
Абсолютно пустое утверждение.
Начнем с того, что большинство недовольств по поводу регуляций
относятся не к среде.
Продолжать даже лень.
"Believing in the inherent costliness and ineffectiveness of federal regulation is not a religious matter. It.s not an article of faith. It.s an empirical assertion, an argument, and the available evidence indicates that it is incorrect."
Это даже не смешно.
---
Const
999Vulcan
Mar 7, 2018, 7:11:46 AM3/7/18
to
а я повторю, мне несложно
Trump White House quietly issues report vindicating Obama regulations
The report was released late on a Friday, with Congress out of session and multiple Trump scandals dominating the headlines. A cynical observer might conclude that the administration wanted the report to go unnoticed.
Why might that be? Well, in a nutshell, it shows that the GOP is wrong about regulations as a general matter and wrong about Obama’s regulations specifically. Those regulations had benefits far in excess of their costs, and they had no discernible effect on jobs or economic growth.
детали - по ссылке
Why might that be? Well, in a nutshell, it shows that the GOP is wrong about regulations as a general matter and wrong about Obama’s regulations specifically. Those regulations had benefits far in excess of their costs, and they had no discernible effect on jobs or economic growth.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/3/6/17077330/trump-regulatory-agenda-omb
сорс - тут
https://www.eenews.net/assets/2018/02/26/document_pm_01.pdf
SB
Mar 7, 2018, 7:04:25 PM3/7/18
to
Зачем ты постишь сюда fake news?
999Vulcan
Mar 7, 2018, 7:13:54 PM3/7/18
to
On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 7:04:25 PM UTC-5, SB wrote:
> Зачем ты постишь сюда fake news?
эх, Серёга ты, Серёга
> Зачем ты постишь сюда fake news?
https://www.eenews.net/assets/2018/02/26/document_pm_01.pdf
999Vulcan
Mar 7, 2018, 7:16:03 PM3/7/18
to
and Costs of Federal Regulations and Agency
Compliance with the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
The principal findings of this Report are as follows.
The estimated annual benefits of major Federal regulations reviewed by OMB
from October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2016, for which agencies estimated and
monetized both benefits and costs, are in the aggregate between $219 billion and
$695 billion, while the estimated annual costs are in the aggregate between $59
billion and $88 billion, reported in 2001 dollars.
SB
Mar 7, 2018, 7:37:29 PM3/7/18
to
-СБ
999Vulcan
Mar 7, 2018, 7:43:28 PM3/7/18
to
Const
Mar 11, 2018, 1:04:10 AM3/11/18
to
999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:02:18 AM UTC-5, Const wrote:
> > 999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> > > It is, like his health, tax, and infrastructure initiatives, simply the polar opposite of populism: the targeted transfer of wealth to the already wealthy, at the public?s expense.
> >
> > Абсолютно пустое утверждение.
> >
> > Начнем с того, что большинство недовольств по поводу регуляций
> > относятся не к среде.
> >
> > Продолжать даже лень.
> >
> > "Believing in the inherent costliness and ineffectiveness of federal regulation is not a religious matter. It.s not an article of faith. It.s an empirical assertion, an argument, and the available evidence indicates that it is incorrect."
> >
> > Это даже не смешно.
> т.е. ты или не кликнул ссылку, или не пропарсил текст
Это ты не понял замечания.
> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:02:18 AM UTC-5, Const wrote:
> > 999Vulcan <z...@vulakh.us> wrote:
> > > It is, like his health, tax, and infrastructure initiatives, simply the polar opposite of populism: the targeted transfer of wealth to the already wealthy, at the public?s expense.
> >
> > Абсолютно пустое утверждение.
> >
> > Начнем с того, что большинство недовольств по поводу регуляций
> > относятся не к среде.
> >
> > Продолжать даже лень.
> >
> > "Believing in the inherent costliness and ineffectiveness of federal regulation is not a religious matter. It.s not an article of faith. It.s an empirical assertion, an argument, and the available evidence indicates that it is incorrect."
> >
> > Это даже не смешно.
> т.е. ты или не кликнул ссылку, или не пропарсил текст
О регуляциях, прошу любить и жаловать, как это выглядит
в реальности, там, где либдемовское мудачье имеет власть.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/02/21/san-francisco-man-has-spent-4-years-1-mi
Это именно что есть ваш идеал.
> а я повторю, мне несложно
> Trump White House quietly issues report vindicating Obama regulations
> The report was released late on a Friday, with Congress out of session and multiple Trump scandals dominating the headlines. A cynical observer might conclude that the administration wanted the report to go unnoticed.
> детали - по ссылке
> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/3/6/17077330/trump-regulatory-agenda-omb
Заметим, что никто никогда не говорил, что ВСЕ регуляции плохи.
И тут, о удивительно, трампизм разумен и не все регуляции хочет выбросить ?
Это, типа, что, новости ?
---
Const
Const
Mar 11, 2018, 1:06:45 AM3/11/18
to
составляют регуляции, сочинили бы отчет, в котором
бы доказывали свою бессмысленность.
Я на самом деле не очень понимаю, в чём вообще могут состоять
выгоды от регуляций.
То есть, оно обычно вещь нужная, но никогда не выгодная.
Я полагаю, что ты слишком молод и никогда не писал бумаг
на тему о предполагаемом экономическом эффекте твоих
предложений.
---
Const
0 new messages