Portrait of a left-wing

[Michael S Payer Jr]

by

Bruce Roberts

Buddy K., a.k.a. Henry E. Kilpatrick Jr., has become
the resident
"liberal" crank and a boring leftist curmudgeon on
the NGs of the Net.
He masquerades as some kind of scholar but he is a
only a pathetic
pseudo-intellectual, academic hack and loser at
best.

For example, the only economist he seems to have
read, is the socialist
popularizer John Kenneth Galbraith, who is not
really an economist at all,

in the opinion of eminent praxologists like F.
Hayek and Ludvig Von Mises
who perceptively claim that to be a true economist
one has to believe in
free market economics and the inviolable sanctity of
private property.
Galbraith, who according to his sophomoric and silly
book The Affluent
Society would nationalize just about everything,
therefore does not qualify

as a genuine economist.

Poor Buddy K. He apotheosizes Galbraith, the Norman
Vincent Peale of
modern of 'liberal economics' as his guru.
Incredibly the foolish utopian,
Galbraith, wrote back in the 1950s that all
important inventions and
discoveries
had already been made and the world's wealth was
fixed--in other words he
adhered to the error of the Reds and the Medieval
Church, as well as the
contemporary RC Church--i.e. Galbraith espoused
zero-sum
economics. Even Newt Gingrich in his recent book, To
Renew America felt
that he had to ridicule the leftist Galbraith for
the latter's naiveté and
absurdity.

But although we can excuse Buddy K's ignorance and
stupidity, (in this
he is more to
be pitied than laughed at) , this illiteracy is
intolerable when combined with the crap head's
bigotry and
maliciousness. For instance he gives
an apocryphal quotation ( one that he has he made up
himself) supposedly
from Von Misses endorsing
fascism (socialism) --this from one of the world's
foremost free-market
economists of the Austrian School, who wrote a
massive work Human
Action, extolling the virtues of economic freedom
and democracy,
iterating the absolute necessity of private
property,
minimal regulation, free trade and small
government.

Buddy K., who like so many other "liberals" keep
referring to the
democratic capitalist Adam Smith as a fascist, has
also called On
Misses and Hayek fascists. (We have previously
pointed out that
the word fascist, coined by the socialist Mussolini,
is now like the
word racist, entirely without meaning. Even back in
the 1940s George
Orwell stated that it was without meaning-- an
abstract word merely
applied to a person or group one did not like or
approve of socially or
politically. But
Kilpatrick, of course, is too stupid, ignorant,
biased and bigoted to
understand this. Buddy K.
is a socialist redneck.

However, if Kilpatrick was not so illiterate,
bigoted and
had read Hayek and Von Mises he would know that both
these men describe
Hitler's
National Socialism as a form of socialism. They
referred to it as
'German socialism'
as opposed to Lenin's, Trotsky's and Stalin's
'Russian socialism' which
was more
internationalist and 'humanitarian and
compassionate'.
(We are joking, of course) The Russian variety was
adopted by such
'compassionate and humanitarian' political leaders
as Mao, Pol Pot,
Mengistu, Castro
etc.

Consequently, if one wants to call Hitler and
Mussolini fascist, he must
also call
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Kim, Pol Pot and other
nefarious socialists,
fascist.
But socialist, communist and totalitarian are far
more accurate and
appropriate words
for these worthies, who are so admired by Comrade
Kilpatrick.

Adam Smith, F. Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, Ronald
Reagan and Margaret
Thatcher
were the antitheses of the statism, organization,
collectivism,
regimentation social engineering, command
"economics" etc. of the
Marxists and socialists. However, J.K. Galbraith and

Buddy K. would fit right in there. Neither one of
them should ever be
taken seriously
as they are 'liberal' sciolists, charlatans,
mountebanks and without
any merit whatsoever.

[hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu]

On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Michael S Payer Jr wrote:

(the nonsense below)

Are you posting this old John Lambourn crap again, MSP? Lambourn has gone
by more names and been kicked off more ISPs than you coule imagine. He
used to post under 4 or more names at once (Cerise Lopez, Joe Sorrento,
Bruce Roberts, etc.) and pretend that there was a whole band of Canadian
right wing loons. He has been rather quiet lately, having been kicked off
more ISPs, including one due to the time he tried to hijack an existing
name. It caused the woman who had it quite a bit of consternation when
several of us replied to Lambourn's e-mail & it went to her.

--
Buddy K

[Henry E. Killearny III]

Michael S Payer Jr wrote:
>
> by
>
> Bruce Roberts
>
> Buddy K., a.k.a. Henry E. Kilpatrick Jr., has become
> the resident
> "liberal" crank and a boring leftist curmudgeon on
> the NGs of the Net.

....

You have to admit though...

Nothing on the net compares to the fun one gets by watching
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. get his big red bulb of a nose (bad
logic) smacked in public.

He demonstrates for all to see the stuttering brain of a true
liberal while portraying himself as an intellectual elite.

In some ways, he is doing all of us a favor. Without him and
Gary Lantz, people might think that we are making up the idiotic
thought processes that have been attributed to liberalism.

For those who may have missed this, I will include an essay I
wrote a while back.

Billy K
*************ESSAY BELOW ***************
SUBJECT: JUNIOR the Bully with the Bloody Nose.

BY: Henry E. Killearny III

When I was just a young lad, I was one of the smaller kids in my class.
This was unusual when you consider that my two older brothers were both
very large for their age, but my dad had gone through the same type of
development. Because of my small size, bullies would usually want to
prove themselves with me as their victim. With enough experience, I
could spot a bully a mile away.

When I first entered the alt.rush-limbaugh news group, I recognized
Henry Kilpatrick Junior immediately. He was one of the bullies I
remembered from school. There are lots of people who disagree with each
other in this newsgroup, but Junior's tactics could only be regarded as
those of a bully. He rarely contributes to the discussion. Mostly, he
tosses insults around, uses bogus logic, and just tries to disrupt the
operation of the newsgroup. He seems to have an opinion (which lacks
thought) on almost every subject.

What those bullies didn't know is that my brothers and I were very
athletic. We played football, baseball, soccer, boxing, wrestling, just
about every kind of sport you can imagine. When there was nothing else
to do, we would toss a few old mattresses on the back lawn and practice
judo flips or karate kicks on each other. Being the smallest, I was
always practicing on larger kids. Really large kids. I could flip either
of my brothers or pin them with a choke hold that forced them to gasp
for air. It was fun playing these games with them.

So the bully sees me in the crowd and thinks "Now here is an easy
opportunity to prove how tough I am". He would start to push me around
and try to intimidate me. My reaction was well thought out. I would tell
him to stop, tell him again as he pushed me, then; just as he began to
push one more time I would strike. BAM! With a tetherball fist I would
smack him right square in the nose. The nose is the best place to start.
It sticks out and is an easy target. It bleeds easily and forces the
bully to get defensive. It always gave me a place to go if I was not
making progress somewhere else.

For Junior, his poor debate style is his nose.

His lazy debate style, which depends on ad-hominem, diversion, requests
for proof when he offers none, and a host of other sleazy debate
tactics. He never answers a direct question. He uses this style to bully
the entire news group so that the credibility of the group is
diminished. I believe that his objective is strictly to disrupt. What a
bully.

My first post to this news group involved a modified-flat-tax proposal
and within moments Junior was at me with his bogus claims, bad logic,
and detracting style. So what did I do? I dealt with the garbage for a
while and then; WHAM! I smacked him in the nose. I wrote up a clear
statement on just how flawed his logic (generous term) was and
demonstrated it beyond refute. Junior says I "whined". In other words,
he got defensive. The bully had been hit and he got defensive. So far,
things were going as planned.

As the battle went on, the bullies tended to flail about, trying to hit
me or get their hands on me. If they struck out, I counter-punched. If
they grabbed me, I would grab back, pull them towards me, and thrust my
foot into their groin and fall back flinging them through the air.
Before they landed I was on my feet and preparing to strike again. It
was always very humiliating for those bullies. I took my time with them
so all the kids would have a chance to see them torn apart a piece at a
time. Ultimately, I would make them cry out UNCLE before I would stop.

Junior swung out with the "freshman" title and figured he would put
himself above me through this approach. It failed to have its affect. I
counter-punched with the title of "Junior" and went on. As the battle
continued Junior would refuse to respond when challenged. Smack! He
would just blubber "you didn't hurt me" as the blood ran down his face
for everyone to see. His nose was bleeding profusely and everyone could
see it.

So the last little battle involved the introduction of "gdy" who was
impersonating his buddy Junior. gdy thinks he is cool but he actually
just gave me reason to apply the choke hold on Junior. Now was my time
to show Junior that I am NOT attending GMU, and that he has been
sparring with someone with whom he has no clue about. In the mean time,
he has "like the dummy he is" been stupid enough to post his full name
on the web. If you're going to bully people on the internet, you should
have the sense to do it anonymously. All Junior has done is bring
discredit to his family name and open himself to problems. He is a cocky
bully. They fall the hardest.

So I challenge him to call me on the phone and discuss this face to
face. The phone number? Hmm… Now who gave me that number? CHOKE!!!
Junior hates to admit it but HE gave me that number when he posted his
name on the web. I wrap that number around his skinny little neck and
start to twist. "UNCLE!!!" he cries. "I'm gonna tell the teacher if you
don't stop." He threatens to call the GMU computer systems folks to
bring me down. "They will take care of you!" he cries as I release my
grip and let him crawl away into the corner. He no longer represents a
threat. His bloody nose is there for everyone to see. The fact he had
to call out for help from the teacher shows how weak he really is.

The biggest trick to stopping a bully is to publicly humiliate him. I
hope for the readers of this news group that my effort has been
entertaining and useful.

I hope for Junior that he re-considers his bullying tactics.

While I intend to retire from action in this newsgroup, I might just
feel the need to come back and whack him on the nose so everyone can
see it bleed.

Billy K

PS: He has subsequently stopped posting his name on the web. The snail
is learning how easy it is to post something like;

http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=295462396&CONTEXT=890883384.628686864&hitnum=0

or;

http://phone.whowhere.com/telephone.psrch?f-name=Henry&name=Kilpatrick