GOP Drops The Troop-Loving Lie
Harry Hope
http://twitter.com/markos/status/6787606495
At least Republicans don't have to pretend to give a shit about our
troops anymore. That must be a relief for them.
___________________________________________________
Nobody believed that they EVER gave a shit.
Harry
Clairbear
news:h0loi55r7uu34oeut...@4ax.com:
So when was the last time you thank one of our soldiers for defending you
right to say all the assinine bs you post here
BTW when and where did you serve
I am a vet and I support our troops no matter who is in power the Congress
or Whitehouse, no matter who is sending our troops to stand in harms way
God bless America and all those who defend her.
liberal
> May as well, since the DNC has ..........
Ummm, list the policy decisions supporting your claim.
Mitchell Holman
198.186.192.136:
> Mitchell Holman <noemai...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:Xns9CE9E56D69EB4...@216.196.97.130:
>
>> leonox1 <wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:30cfa05c-af39-49ee...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>>
>>> Thank god that in 2001 we had a president with balls who knew what
>>> needed to be done and did it..
>>>
>>
>> Indeed. When told that Bin Laden was about to attack the US
>> he responded by....taking the longest vacation in presidential
>> history.
>>
>> Who could find fault with that?
>>
>>
> Leonnox1 provede write by mitchie's own words
Posting while drinking doesn't work for you,
I suggest you find a new hobby.
mr_antone
Yep. Notice his postings deteriorate more and more as the day goes on.
I'm not sure if it's a drinking problem or some prescription drug
wearing off.
--
A Libertarian society is an oxymoron.
mr_antone
Daniel
Except for the indisputable fact that the vast majority of Soldiers
are Republicans, and the ONLY political party to look out for the
interests of the military are Republicans. Two facts that cannot be
disputed.
Daniel
Here are some for you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3563401
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=644
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n9_v45/ai_13794064/
http://www.heritage.org/research/missiledefense/BG1394es.cfm
Care to dispute the facts?
Matt
Except, of course, both are lies.
Prove both. Cite exact numbers, then show us EXACTLY how the
Republicans have "backed" our troops.
Right, can't. Lie.
Matt
Siobhan Medeiros
> On Dec 19, 3:14 pm, liberal <liberalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 19, 7:10 am, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
>
> > > May as well, since the DNC has ..........
>
> > Ummm, list the policy decisions supporting your claim.
>
> Here are some for you.
>
Cutting the military is not the same as disrespecting the troops,
moron. You think Truman disrespected the troops when he powered down
the military after WW2? Or Eisenhower after he went after the
military-industrial complex?
>
> http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=644
>
A rightard blog about Bill Clinton which doesn't do one thing to
address how Democrats feel about the troops.
> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n9_v45/ai_13794064/
>
Again making much-needed cuts to the military is not the same as
disrespecting the troops. Neither is letting gays in.
> http://www.heritage.org/research/missiledefense/BG1394es.cfm
>
A nine-year old whine from a rightard think tank. Meaningless.
Siobhan Medeiros
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:50:18 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>
>
>
>
>
> <noemailple...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CEA1091F47clairbear@
> >198.186.192.136:
>
> >>news:Xns9CE9E56D69EB4...@216.196.97.130:
>
> >>> leonox1 <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>news:30cfa05c-af39-49ee...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>>> Thank god that in 2001 we had a president with balls who knew what
> >>>> needed to be done and did it..
>
> >>> Indeed. When told that Bin Laden was about to attack the US
> >>> he responded by....taking the longest vacation in presidential
> >>> history.
>
> >>> Who could find fault with that?
>
> >> Leonnox1 provede write by mitchie's own words
>
> > Posting while drinking doesn't work for you,
> >I suggest you find a new hobby.
>
> Yep. Notice his postings deteriorate more and more as the day goes on.
> I'm not sure if it's a drinking problem or some prescription drug
> wearing off.
> --
>
> A Libertarian society is an oxymoron.
>
I disagree. I think it's just a plain moron.
> mr_antone
mr_antone
>I disagree. I think it's just a plain moron.
>
Well, he is a wingnut. :)>
--
A Libertarian society is an oxymoron.
mr_antone
Clairbear
mitchie you are the just plain wrong as usual
It must really suck to be you
Beam Me Up Scotty
you mean like a SMART LIBERAL is an oxymoron.
Not Sure
ROFL, the left's hysterical temper tantrums over being reminded that
they publicly and repeatedly despise the military are always so
delicious :)
mr_antone
It wasn't liberals that drove this country down the drain after 6
years of GOP control.
Beam Me Up Scotty
Actually it is, but the real problem is looking forward from here and it
looks grim, as we head for socialism and no growth.
mr_antone
<Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
Nope.
>, but the real problem is looking forward from here and it
>looks grim, as we head for socialism and no growth.
Fun watching the GOP clowns wet their pants.
leonox1
Ever realize that the economy was expanding until the Dems took
control on Congress?
mr_antone
Nope.
>
>Ever realize that the economy was expanding until the Dems took
>control on Congress?
The recession kicked in on Bush's watch.
leonox1
Which party controlled Congress then?
mr_antone
A majority doesn't mean controlled.
Learn the difference.
Bush signed virtually every bill passed by Congress.
"When you're the captain on the watch, you're responsible."
- Ronald Reagan.
Beam Me Up Scotty
They just passed an unconstitutional health care bill with no republican
support.
Explain how that isn't "controlling" the congress?
mr_antone
That would be the 111th US Congress.
>Explain how that isn't "controlling" the congress?
My comment was about the 110th US Congress.
leonox1
Really? If a party does not control Congress through a majority, how
is it done?
leonox1
> In article <f9610def-47c6-48c6-94ad-d8cacb38e...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,> Republicans, of course.
Republicans controlled Congress in 2008?
>
> --
> Damn the living - It's a lovely life. I'm whoever you want me to be.
> Silver silverware - Where is the love? At least I can stay in character.
> Oval swimming pool - Where is the love? Annoying Usenet one post at a time.
> Damn the living - It's a lovely life. We support you, Sarah.
mr_antone
Yep.
>If a party does not control Congress through a majority, how
>is it done?
Depends on how big of a majority.
You really should learn how your government works...
leonox1
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:34:04 -0800 (PST), leonox1
>
>
>
>
> >Really?
>
> Yep.
>
> >If a party does not control Congress through a majority, how
> >is it done?
>
> Depends on how big of a majority.
>
> You really should learn how your government works...
> --
I see - so which party controlled Congress in 2008?
mr_antone
<wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 27, 6:46�pm, mr_antone <mr_ant...@see.reply.to> wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:34:04 -0800 (PST), leonox1
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> >Really?
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>> >If a party does not control Congress through a majority, how
>> >is it done?
>>
>> Depends on how big of a majority.
>>
>> You really should learn how your government works...
>> --
>
>I see - so which party controlled Congress in 2008?
So explain how the two years of Democrat majority in Congress drove
this country down the drain.
--
leonox1
Oh, so now you're saying that Democrats did control Congress in 2008?
mr_antone
No, I said majority.
You didn't answer the question.
leonox1
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:22:51 -0800 (PST), leonox1
>
>
> >> >> --
>
> >> >I see - so which party controlled Congress in 2008?
>
> >> So explain how the two years of Democrat majority in Congress drove
> >> this country down the drain.
> >> --
>
> >> A Libertarian society is an oxymoron.
>
> >> mr_antone
>
> >Oh, so now you're saying that Democrats did control Congress in 2008?
>
> No, I said majority.
>
Please explain the difference to me
Thanks.
> You didn't answer the question.
Yes
mr_antone
Start with filibuster and cloture.
>
>Thanks.
You're welcome.
>
>> You didn't answer the question.
>
>Yes