Re: Not finding any data from any denialist because there is none
*us*
>...Al Gore is ...
He's irrelevant, if you're honest.
Climate denialism isn't honest, though.
It's not based on any actual evidence.
*us*
>The burden of providing evidence falls on
You.
You have no data.
Others do have data that you can't dispute,
because you have no data.
You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
You do that without any valid basis.
>... Kool-Aid drinkers
Exxon is pissing down your throat, moron.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
Catoni
Reply:
Who's denying climate? Can you name one person who denies climate ?
Even one ?
Of course there is climate. Always has been.
There's always been climate change too.
It's so-called Anthropogenic Climate change we have a problem
believing.
As far as evidence for natural climate change... have you ever
checked into Paleoclimatology ? ? ?
*us*
> There's always been climate change too.
So what?
>... we have a problem
You have no data.
You have only lies.
You do, indeed, have a problem.
*us*
noise, impatiently:
>...so juvenile and rudementary that it's pathetic
>...amatuer [sic] wannabe scientists like ...
You like making a fool of yourself in public, don't you.
You still have no data.
*us*
>If you believe ...
I don't need beliefs. I look at data.
Why don't you have any data?
*us*
>Sounds like ...
Those voices in your head told you not to read the answer, didn't they.
They're lying to you.
Meanwhile, the answer is still right in front of you:
>On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:35:40 -0800 (PST), US_Army_Nutcase <bella...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 31, 10:18�am, Stan de SD <stand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 30, 12:55�pm, * US * wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:23:47 -0800 (PST), Monkey Clumps <spacebrai...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> > >The burden of providing evidence falls on
>>>
>>> > You.
>>>
>>> > You have no data.
>>>
>>> > Others do have data that you can't dispute,
>>> > because you have no data.
>>>
>>> > You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
>>> > and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
>>> > You do that without any valid basis.
>>>
>>> If you believe that CO2 is indeed the culprit to warming temperatures,
>>> can you actually explain the mechanism that causes this to happen? It
>>> would be interesting to see if you understand yourself. I doubt you
>>> can, because if you had any type of scientific background, you would
>>> know that the main "greenhouse gas" on Earth is H2O, not CO2...
>>
>>Sounds like someone got a book on Water Vapor for Christmas!
>>
>>Now here you go, illiterate dipshit, read and educate yourself until
>>your dimwitted heart is content. Or continue to stick your flat-
>>earther, dumbfuck head in the sand while us here in the reality-based
>>community continue to laugh at you. Your choice.
>>
>>http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/f101.asp
>>
>>http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/08/the-co2-problem-in-6-easy-steps/
Good links.
Curly Surmudgeon
<last...@LyingLeftistsare.invalid> wrote:
> God links if you're into unsubstantiated bullshit.
Truer words have never been spoken.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery good, gays bad, snakes talk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
leona...@gmail.com
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:23:47 -0800 (PST), Monkey Clumps <spacebrai...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >The burden of providing evidence falls on
>
> You.
>
> You have no data.
>
> Others do have data that you can't dispute,
> because you have no data.
>
> You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
> and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
> You do that without any valid basis.
>
> >... Kool-Aid drinkers
>
> Exxon is pissing down your throat, moron.
• Those who would call others, "moron"
need only look in a mirror to see a real one.
— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena
*us*
wrote:
>...moron ...
That's your best excuse for your inability to learn science.
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:23:47 -0800 (PST), Monkey Clumps <spaceb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The burden of providing evidence falls on
You.
You have no data.
Others do have data that you can't dispute,
because you have no data.
You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
You do that without any valid basis.
>... Kool-Aid drinkers
Exxon is pissing down your throat, moron.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
*us*
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:50:55 -0800 (PST), "leona...@gmail.com" <leona...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>...moron ...
That's your best excuse for your inability to
learn science.
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:23:47 -0800 (PST), Monkey Clumps <spaceb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The burden of providing evidence falls on
You.
You have no data.
Others do have data that you can't dispute,
because you have no data.
You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
You do that without any valid basis.
>... Kool-Aid drinkers
Exxon is pissing down your throat, moron.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
mrbawana2u
> {who cares?]
The "Science" Mantra
By Thomas Sowell
Science is one of the great achievements of the human mind
and the biggest reason why we live not only longer but more
vigorously in our old age, in addition to all the ways in which it
provides us with things that make life easier and more enjoyable.
Like anything valuable, science has been seized upon by politicians
and ideologues,
and used to forward their own agendas. This started long ago, as far
back as the
18th century, when the Marquis de Condorcet coined the term "social
science"
to describe various theories he favored. In the 19th century, Karl
Marx and
Friedrich Engels distinguished their own brand of socialism as
"scientific socialism."
By the 20th century, all sorts of notions wrapped themselves in the
mantle of "science."
"Global warming" hysteria is only the latest in this long line of
notions,
whose main argument is that there is no argument, because it is
"science."
The recently revealed destruction of raw data at the bottom of the
global warming hysteria, as well as revelations of attempts to
prevent critics of this hysteria from being published in leading
journals,
suggests that the disinterested search for truth-- the hallmark of
real science--
has taken a back seat to a political crusade.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/22/the_science_mantra__99638.html
we need to look at the way Kyoto has turned into cash for many of the
biggest names
in the climate change world, and to do that we need to understand how
the whole
carbon trading scheme works.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-how-to-follow-the-money/?print=1
Last Post
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:50:55 -0800 (PST), "leonard7...@gmail.com" <leonard7...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>...moron ...
>
> That's your best excuse for your inability to learn science.
•• Those who would call others, "moron"
need only look in a mirror to see a real one.
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:23:47 -0800 (PST), Monkey Clumps <spacebrai...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >The burden of providing evidence falls on
> > the AGW Alarmist cabal
>
> You have no data.
>
> Others do have data that you can't dispute,
> because you have no data.
> You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
> and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
> You do that without any valid basis.
• ROTFLMAO
>
> Exxon is pissing down your throat, moron.
• Those who would call others, "moron"
*us*
>...would call others, "moron"
>need only look in a mirror to see a real one.
You sure advertise your problem, there, a lot.
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:50:55 -0800 (PST), "leona...@gmail.com" <leona...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>...moron ...
That's your best excuse for your inability to learn science.
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:23:47 -0800 (PST), Monkey Clumps <spaceb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The burden of providing evidence falls on
You.
You have no data.
Others do have data that you can't dispute,
because you have no data.
You want to perpetrate waste and pollution
and harm to life, so corporatists can profit.
You do that without any valid basis.
>... Kool-Aid drinkers
Exxon is pissing down your throat, moron.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
*us*
>... getting cornholed...
No one had asked about you.
mrbawana2u
wrote:
> [who cares?]
> the turdtapper is never getting out.
*us*
>... the turdtapper ...
No one had inquired as to any of your nicknames.
mrbawana2u
eating shit wrote:
> [Who cares? garbage flushed]
========================================
In addition to the “global warming” rip-off, you can add
another huge international racketeering operation—
the H1N1 “pandemic” of 2009.
Both of these ploys were designed to fleece the
western nations of billions, possibly trillions,
of dollars. In the case of the H1N1 scam, the
western governments have already coughed up
billions of dollars for vaccines to prevent a
bogus “pandemic.” That means that we,
the taxpayers, have been ripped-off yet again.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/18527
=======================================
the scientific evidence for AGW is remarkably weak.
At Icecap, Lee Gerhard, geologist and reviewer for
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
sums up the key scientific evidence with admirable brevity:
It is crucial that scientists are factually accurate
when they do speak out, that they ignore media
hype and maintain a clinical detachment from
social or other agendas. There are facts and
data that are ignored in the maelstrom of
social and economic agendas swirling
about Copenhagen. Greenhouse gases
and their effects are well-known.
Here are some of things we know:
• The most effective greenhouse gas is water vapor,
comprising approximately 95 percent of the total greenhouse effect.
• Carbon dioxide concentration has been continually rising for
nearly 100 years.
It continues to rise, but carbon dioxide concentrations at present are
near the lowest in geologic history.
• Temperature change correlation with carbon dioxide levels is not
statistically significant.
• There are no data that definitively relate carbon dioxide levels
to temperature changes.
• The greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide logarithmically
declines with increasing concentration. At present levels,
any additional carbon dioxide can have very little effect.
We also know a lot about Earth temperature changes:
• Global temperature changes naturally all of the time,
in both directions and at many scales of intensity.
• The warmest year in the U.S. in the last century was 1934,
not 1998. The U.S. has the best and most extensive temperature records
in the world.
• Global temperature peaked in 1998 on the current 60-80 year
cycle,
and has been episodically declining ever since. This cooling
absolutely
falsifies claims that human carbon dioxide emissions are a controlling
factor in Earth temperature.
• Voluminous historic records demonstrate the Medieval Climate
Optimum (MCO)
was real and that the "hockey stick" graphic that attempted to deny
that fact was at best
bad science. The MCO was considerably warmer than the end of the 20th
century.
• During the last 100 years, temperature has both risen and
fallen, including
the present cooling. All the changes in temperature of the last 100
years are in
normal historic ranges, both in absolute value and, most importantly,
rate of change.
Contrary to many public statements:
• Effects of temperature change are absolutely independent of the
cause of the temperature change.
• Global hurricane, cyclonic and major storm activity is near 30-
year lows.
Any increase in cost of damages by storms is a product of increasing
population density in vulnerable areas such as along the shores and
property value inflation, not due to any increase in frequency or
severity of storms.
• Polar bears have survived and thrived over periods of extreme
cold and extreme warmth over hundreds of thousands of years
extremes far in excess of modern temperature changes.
• The 2009 minimum Arctic ice extent was significantly larger
than the previous two years. The 2009 Antarctic maximum ice
extent was significantly above the 30-year average.
There are only 30 years of records.
• Rate and magnitude of sea level changes observed during the
last 100 years are within normal historical ranges. Current sea level
rise is tiny and, at most, justifies a prediction of perhaps ten
centimeters rise in this century.
The present climate debate is a classic conflict between data
and computer programs. The computer programs are the source
of concern over climate change and global warming, not the data.
Data are measurements. Computer programs are artificial constructs.
Public announcements use a great deal of hyperbole and
inflammatory language. For instance, the word "ever" is
misused by media and in public pronouncements alike.
It does not mean "in the last 20 years," or "the last 70 years."
"Ever" means the last 4.5 billion years.
For example, some argue that the Arctic is melting,
with the warmest-ever temperatures. One should ask,
"How long is ever?" The answer is since 1979.
And then ask, "Is it still warming?" The answer
is unequivocally "No." Earth temperatures are cooling.
Similarly, the word "unprecedented" cannot be
legitimately used to describe any climate change in the last 8,000
years.
=============================================================
*us*
>... sucking dog cock and
>eating shit ...
No one had asked about your personal habits,
but that does explain why you're too busy to
locate any actual data.
mrbawana2u
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/22/the_science_mant...
we need to look at the way Kyoto has turned into cash for many of the
biggest names
in the climate change world, and to do that we need to understand how
the whole
carbon trading scheme works.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-how-to-follow-the-money/?pri...
*us*
>... sucking dog cock and
>eating shit ...
Were you not preoccupied with that, perhaps
you could learn what data is, and even manage
to locate some.
Bawana
Palin In 2010
> On Jan 11, 5:11 pm, * UScuttlenutts * between
> sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
>
> > [Who cares? garbage flushed]
>
> ========================================
> In addition to the “global warming” rip-off, you can add
> another huge international racketeering operation—
> the H1N1 “pandemic” of 2009.
>
Science is a big conspiracy Obama. It's all lies. Just like 9/11
and the Holocaust.
Wjy would anyone want to learn science when all they are learning is
lies?
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> On Jan 11, 7:59 pm, Bawana <mrbawan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 11, 5:11 pm, * UScuttlenutts * between
> > sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
>
> > > [Who cares? garbage flushed]
>
> > ========================================
> > In addition to the “global warming” rip-off, you can add
> > another huge international racketeering operation—
> > the H1N1 “pandemic” of 2009.
>
when are you getting out, fucktard?
*us*
for the environmental damage it does in general.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:59:54 -0800 (PST), Bawana <mrbaw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... rip-off...
Exxon says US taxpayers should fund the cleanup
of their Valdez debacle.
*us*
>... rip-off...
Exxon says US taxpayers should fund the cleanup
of their Valdez debacle.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:49:07 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
=============================================================
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/22/the_science_mantra__99638.html
we need to look at the way Kyoto has turned into cash for many of the
biggest names
in the climate change world, and to do that we need to understand how
the whole
carbon trading scheme works.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-how-to-follow-the-money/?print=1
*us*
>...sucking dog cock and eating shit ...
You're also expecting others to pay for your polluting
corporate/fascist masters.
mrbawana2u
mrbawana2u
*us*
*us*
>... sucking dog cock and eating shit...
> the turdtapper ...
No one had asked about you. You can't refute the
fact that you want everyone to have to pay so your
fascist masters can pillage and pollute the world.
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [Who cares? garbage flushed]
========================================
In addition to the “global warming” rip-off, you can add
another huge international racketeering operation—
the H1N1 “pandemic” of 2009.
Both of these ploys were designed to fleece the
mrbawana2u
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [Who cares? garbage flushed]
========================================
In addition to the “global warming” rip-off, you can add
another huge international racketeering operation—
the H1N1 “pandemic” of 2009.
Both of these ploys were designed to fleece the
mrbawana2u
> [Who cares? garbage flushed]
=============================================================
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/22/the_science_mant...
we need to look at the way Kyoto has turned into cash for many of the
biggest names
in the climate change world, and to do that we need to understand how
the whole
carbon trading scheme works.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-how-to-follow-the-money/?pri...
*us*
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:38:24 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...sucking dog cock and eating shit ...
If you weren't preoccupied with that, perhaps
you could learn something.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/05/22/heres-the-data-on-global-warming/
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... sucking dog cock and eating shit...
> the turdtapper ...
No one had asked about you. You can't refute the
fact that you want everyone to have to pay so your
fascist masters can pillage and pollute the world.
In fact, Exxon wants everyone else to have to pay
*us*
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:23 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... flushed...
You're dizzy from circling the drain.
http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:38:24 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...sucking dog cock and eating shit ...
If you weren't preoccupied with that, perhaps
you could learn something.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/05/22/heres-the-data-on-global-warming/
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... sucking dog cock and eating shit...
> the turdtapper ...
No one had asked about you. You can't refute the
fact that you want everyone to have to pay so your
fascist masters can pillage and pollute the world.
In fact, Exxon wants everyone else to have to pay
for the environmental damage it does in general.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:59:54 -0800 (PST), Bawana <mrbaw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
*us*
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:38:47 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...nutts...
It's your best excuse for all your failures.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:23 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... flushed...
You're dizzy from circling the drain.
http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:38:24 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...sucking dog cock and eating shit ...
If you weren't preoccupied with that, perhaps
you could learn something.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/05/22/heres-the-data-on-global-warming/
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... sucking dog cock and eating shit...
> the turdtapper ...
No one had asked about you. You can't refute the
fact that you want everyone to have to pay so your
fascist masters can pillage and pollute the world.
In fact, Exxon wants everyone else to have to pay
for the environmental damage it does in general.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:59:54 -0800 (PST), Bawana <mrbaw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
*us*
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Bawana
Bawana
*us*
in the past is crucial to understanding how they will change in the future."
*us*
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
mrbawana2u
> [who cares?]
=============================================================
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/22/the_science_mant...
we need to look at the way Kyoto has turned into cash for many of the
biggest names
in the climate change world, and to do that we need to understand how
the whole
carbon trading scheme works.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-how-to-follow-the-money/?pri...
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
*us*
*us*
*us*
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/05/22/heres-the-data-on-global-warming/
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
*us*
"Knowing how these systems are changing and how they have changed
in the past is crucial to understanding how they will change in the future."
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:23 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... flushed...
You're dizzy from circling the drain.
http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:38:24 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...sucking dog cock and eating shit ...
If you weren't preoccupied with that, perhaps
you could learn something.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/05/22/heres-the-data-on-global-warming/
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... sucking dog cock and eating shit...
> the turdtapper ...
No one had asked about you. You can't refute the
fact that you want everyone to have to pay so your
fascist masters can pillage and pollute the world.
In fact, Exxon wants everyone else to have to pay
for the environmental damage it does in general.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:59:54 -0800 (PST), Bawana <mrbaw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... rip-off...
>... the turdtapper ...
>... getting cornholed...
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/30/0152244/Where-the-Global-Warming-Data-Is?from=rss
>...moron ...
You.
You have no data.
>... Kool-Aid drinkers
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:23 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... flushed...
You're dizzy from circling the drain.
http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:38:24 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...sucking dog cock and eating shit ...
If you weren't preoccupied with that, perhaps
you could learn something.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/05/22/heres-the-data-on-global-warming/
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:07 -0800 (PST), mrgarbage <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...garbage ...
It's all you have. You don't have any data.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:27:16 -0800 (PST), mrbawana2u <mrbaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>... sucking dog cock and eating shit...
> the turdtapper ...
No one had asked about you. You can't refute the
fact that you want everyone to have to pay so your
fascist masters can pillage and pollute the world.
In fact, Exxon wants everyone else to have to pay
for the environmental damage it does in general.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:59:54 -0800 (PST), Bawana <mrbaw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Bawana
*us*
Notice how the clueless denier has to run away from this:
"Knowing how these systems are changing and how they have changed
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
*us*
Bawana
*us*
Bawana
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [Who cares? garbage flushed]
UScuttlenutts between sucking dog cock and eating shit is never
getting out
*us*
mrbawana2u
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
USscuttle nutts is never getting out.
*us*
Bawana
sucking dog cock and eating shit wrote:
> [who cares?]
the turdtapper is never getting out.