Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New ART Poll

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Rob

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 1:40:16 PM11/30/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks
> b. A great way to break into your day
> c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

e. A muppet that speaks backwards.

> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK
> c. The Sport of Champions
> d. Something I hope to have someday
> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?
> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

h. The meaning of life.

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

Well, the girls are pretty much out, since the guy to girl ratio is so
high a guy could possibly take on every girl, but no girl could outlast
every guy here. So I'll have to say myself.

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:
> a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up
> b. Just look babyish
> c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
> give a damn what people think
> d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
> e. Giddyap!

f. Some odd anime fantasy come true.

> 5. My current game addiction is:

Actually, nothing right now.

> 6. Roleplaying:
> a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...
> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

b

> 7. Nekkid people:
> a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
> b. They're nekkid. So what?
> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

d. I'm just happy to be in good company.

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

Monopoly.

> 9. My favorite channel is:

Cartoon Network.

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

Actually, lately I've found it very peacful to watch the government
channel early in the morning when they show what's currently being
recorded by stop light cameras in the valley with music playing in the
background.

Gornul

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 2:08:10 PM11/30/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

> 2. Sex is:


> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

[snicker]

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

Hmm, I have *no* clue. :)

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

> c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
> give a damn what people think

> 5. My current game addiction is:
Thief series

> 6. Roleplaying:


> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

> 7. Nekkid people:


> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

[shrug]

> 9. My favorite channel is:

Sci-Fi.

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

WAYFM, mostly Under Midnight on Saturday nights (the one time they play alternative
music)

Gornul
--
"Calm down, this is just life, things like this happen every day and night.
This is what's real, there ain't no secrets to be concealed!"
-The Dingees - Calm Down
<>< + + + ><>
Cogito ergo confusio: I think, therefore I am confused
ICQ: [one]17449333 (ID yourself) | Email munged | http://gornul.cjb.net


Mark

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 2:11:57 PM11/30/01
to
"LadyJack V." wrote:
>
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks
> b. A great way to break into your day
> c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

d

> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK
> c. The Sport of Champions
> d. Something I hope to have someday
> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?

> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

c

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

huh?

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

> a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up
> b. Just look babyish

> c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
> give a damn what people think

> d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
> e. Giddyap!

c

> 5. My current game addiction is:

Red Faction



> 6. Roleplaying:
> a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...

> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

a

> 7. Nekkid people:
> a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
> b. They're nekkid. So what?

> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

a: the problem with nudist camps is that there's no quality control.

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

tennis ;)

> 9. My favorite channel is:

11



> 10. My favorite radio station is:

95.1, ain't that helpful?

--
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/spyda
ICQ#: 39921647

Ghashûl

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 3:22:18 PM11/30/01
to
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:28:43 GMT, lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com
(LadyJack V.) wrote:

>In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
>Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
>own if you want.
>

>1. Yoda is:
A cool green guy from Star Wars!! He rawks.
Yoga on the other hand, I have no opinion on.

>
>2. Sex is:


>g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

>3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
>[females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>(answer any or all of those)

SR?

>4. Grown women with pigtails:

Not certain on what pigtails specifically are but if they are what I
think they look babyish, but it's cool they don't care what people
think.


>5. My current game addiction is:

None right now. Latest was Fallout 2.


>6. Roleplaying:


>d. I'm in! Where're my dice??
>

>7. Nekkid people:


>c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

>8. Match game: Strip _____

Umm?

>9. My favorite channel is:

Nonexistant.

>10. My favorite radio station is:

Nonexistant.

--
Regards Ghashűl <JCHC><
http://www.3x7.dk | http://ghashul.dk/

"Grabbed ahold my enemy's neck and choked 'till he ceased...blistered
with disbelief I awoke dead! and when I awoke I couldn't believe it was
me, all the time it was me!"
-Project 86, Me Against Me

Nikita Synytskyy

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 5:45:09 PM11/30/01
to

"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks
> b. A great way to break into your day
> c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

e. A way to make sex last longer

>
> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK
> c. The Sport of Champions
> d. Something I hope to have someday
> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?

> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

h. Good for you.

>
> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

It will take extensive research to answer that question. They have meets
over at the Castle, maybe we should institute something similar.

>
> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

> d. Oooooh... Pigtails!

>
> 5. My current game addiction is:

none. too busy.

> 6. Roleplaying:
> a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...

> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

b, then d.

>
> 7. Nekkid people:
> a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
> b. They're nekkid. So what?

> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

b.

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

why, poker of course!

> 9. My favorite channel is:

Speedvision.

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

101.1 X-FM!!!

Nikita.

--
We are what we repeatedly do. Failure, then, is not an act, but a habit.


Time Goddess

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 4:58:58 PM11/30/01
to

"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
Any one of the three paths (asceticism, karma,and bhakti) whereby one
can atain the true knowledge of Brahman.

> 2. Sex is:


> d. Something I hope to have someday

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most


> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)
>

That really depends on what the competition is.


> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

> a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up

> 5. My current game addiction is:
>
Ancestral Recall for LoD.

> 6. Roleplaying:
Hope to someday be [d. I'm in! Where're my dice??], but haven't found
anyone yet who doesn't scream their heads off about witchcraft and suicide
if you mention it.

> 7. Nekkid people:


> b. They're nekkid. So what?

> 8. Match game: Strip Mosh Mosh Revolution

> 9. My favorite channel is:
>

I don't really watch enough television to have one. Two of the three
shows I watch are on UPN, though, so I guess that.

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

105.1, National Public Radio. But only when they're giving news and not
that weird music-like crap.


Gornul

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 5:10:07 PM11/30/01
to
"Time Goddess" <i...@me.com> wrote in message
news:9u8vet$7533h$1...@ID-64699.news.dfncis.de...

> > 6. Roleplaying:
> Hope to someday be [d. I'm in! Where're my dice??], but haven't found
> anyone yet who doesn't scream their heads off about witchcraft and suicide
> if you mention it.

If you're ever in the neighborhood, you're welcome to drop by for one of my groups.
My parents are as pyschotically anti-D&D as yours probably are, but fortunately, they
have no opinion on anything other roleplaying. Ergo, the game I'm creating is
perfectly legitimate to them, even though it involves a modified version of the
Vampire: the Masquerade system (which is far more "occult" than D&D ever was, anyway).
Heck, they buy the pizzas and stay out of our way. :)

Rob

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 4:54:59 PM11/30/01
to
"Gornul" <xgornul...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9u906l$73lh3$1...@ID-12798.news.dfncis.de...

> "Time Goddess" <i...@me.com> wrote in message
> news:9u8vet$7533h$1...@ID-64699.news.dfncis.de...
> > > 6. Roleplaying:
> > Hope to someday be [d. I'm in! Where're my dice??], but haven't
found
> > anyone yet who doesn't scream their heads off about witchcraft and
suicide
> > if you mention it.
>
> If you're ever in the neighborhood, you're welcome to drop by for one of
my groups.
> My parents are as pyschotically anti-D&D as yours probably are, but
fortunately, they
> have no opinion on anything other roleplaying. Ergo, the game I'm
creating is
> perfectly legitimate to them, even though it involves a modified version
of the
> Vampire: the Masquerade system (which is far more "occult" than D&D ever
was, anyway).
> Heck, they buy the pizzas and stay out of our way. :)

Ew, can I come too!?! Role-players hate me! The only one who really
likes me asks me for odd ideas for his character to do. Like the time I
gave him the advice that had his vampire cross-dress with those big melon
grenades for breasts and then shove them into a vampire's stomach he
wanted vengeance on. Oh yeah, and once I get drunk I'm a whole lot of fun
at a party.


Gornul

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 5:25:04 PM11/30/01
to
"Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote in message news:u0g1ep3...@corp.supernews.com...

> Ew, can I come too!?! Role-players hate me! The only one who really
> likes me asks me for odd ideas for his character to do. Like the time I
> gave him the advice that had his vampire cross-dress with those big melon
> grenades for breasts and then shove them into a vampire's stomach he
> wanted vengeance on. Oh yeah, and once I get drunk I'm a whole lot of fun
> at a party.

Heck, Mike and I are the only people out of the six of us with serious RP experience
(though Cursim will probably be quick to point out that he RPs in Everquest, but it's
not the same thing). Provided you can get drunk on Mountain Dew (the hardest thing we
have on hand, or for that matter, can legally consume), you're welcome to join us too.

Rob

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 5:06:29 PM11/30/01
to
"Gornul" <xgornul...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9u912n$70a7r$1...@ID-12798.news.dfncis.de...

> "Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote in message
news:u0g1ep3...@corp.supernews.com...
> > Ew, can I come too!?! Role-players hate me! The only one who
really
> > likes me asks me for odd ideas for his character to do. Like the time
I
> > gave him the advice that had his vampire cross-dress with those big
melon
> > grenades for breasts and then shove them into a vampire's stomach he
> > wanted vengeance on. Oh yeah, and once I get drunk I'm a whole lot of
fun
> > at a party.
>
> Heck, Mike and I are the only people out of the six of us with serious
RP experience
> (though Cursim will probably be quick to point out that he RPs in
Everquest, but it's
> not the same thing). Provided you can get drunk on Mountain Dew (the
hardest thing we
> have on hand, or for that matter, can legally consume), you're welcome
to join us too.

Silly Gornul, I'll bring my own. You guys want me to pick up anything
in particular. I think TG would be a trip if she ever got wasted :)


Gornul

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 5:33:51 PM11/30/01
to
"Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote in message news:u0g24ar...@corp.supernews.com...

> > Heck, Mike and I are the only people out of the six of us with serious
> RP experience
> > (though Cursim will probably be quick to point out that he RPs in
> Everquest, but it's
> > not the same thing). Provided you can get drunk on Mountain Dew (the
> hardest thing we
> > have on hand, or for that matter, can legally consume), you're welcome
> to join us too.
>
> Silly Gornul, I'll bring my own. You guys want me to pick up anything
> in particular.

Well, since you offered... Pick up a coupla Jolt colas on your way. I haven't found
anywhere in the state that has 'em, and the last time I had one, it was quite a rush.
:)

> I think TG would be a trip if she ever got wasted :)

Considering her normal mode of dry hyperactivity, I can only imagine. ;)

Sandman

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 6:49:51 PM11/30/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks
> b. A great way to break into your day
> c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

e: something some jackass started for who knows what reason

> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK
> c. The Sport of Champions

> d. Something I hope to have someday

> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?
> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

h: our only purpose in life save for dying

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

I'm not going to answer this one

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:
> a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up

> b. Just look babyish
> c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
> give a damn what people think
> d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
> e. Giddyap!

f: Oriental

> 5. My current game addiction is:

Wave Race 64...it's been around for a really long time but I just bought it
for $15 and played it for the first time. It'll be cool until I realize that
it's impossible to kill/injure the rider and/or the dolphin.

> 6. Roleplaying:
> a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...

> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

e: In my mind, "roleplaying" is usually associated with "geek"

> 7. Nekkid people:
> a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!

> b. They're nekkid. So what?

> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

d: suck because usually the only ones willing to walk around naked are the
overconfident, ugly ones.

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

search

> 9. My favorite channel is:

Cartoon Network (my little brother got me hooked)

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

wjrr ( www.wjrr.com )

> --
> Jack V. (lady jack at jedi master yoda dot com)
> ICQ UIN six34four66two
> "But we'll never survive!" "Nonsense. You're only saying that
> because no one ever has."


Mad Jack

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 8:26:42 PM11/30/01
to

"LadyJack V." schrieb:

> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks
> b. A great way to break into your day
> c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

d.

> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK
> c. The Sport of Champions
> d. Something I hope to have someday
> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?
> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

h. I seem to dimly recall it being quite enjoyable indeed.

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the
> most [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

That remains to be investigated.

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:
> a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up
> b. Just look babyish
> c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
> give a damn what people think
> d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
> e. Giddyap!

d. -depending on the women in question, tho.

> 5. My current game addiction is:

Jagged Alliance 2.

> 6. Roleplaying:
> a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...
> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

b. and d.

> 7. Nekkid people:
> a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
> b. They're nekkid. So what?
> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

d. Should appear more often, as long as they're female.

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

Solitaire?

> 9. My favorite channel is:

Viva II, an excellent German music channel. Plays the stuff
that US MTV would never dare to.

--
Cheers and all,

Hardy G.
"Mein Herz brennt"
http://madjack.diaryland.com
http://www.talknet.de/~madjack


Handy Solo

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 8:36:51 PM11/30/01
to
"Gornul" <xgornul...@yahoo.com> allegedly wrote:

<
>
> Heck, Mike and I are the only people out of the six of us with serious RP experience
> (though Cursim will probably be quick to point out that he RPs in Everquest, but it's
> not the same thing).

REally?!? Why do you say such a thing?

I've done PnP/dice and EQ and feel that it *can* be the same thing.

--
Chris Kasten
7six0393six
http://www.kasten-family.com/chris/


A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.

Purple

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 9:00:56 PM11/30/01
to
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) scribbled on the wall
in permanent marker on 30 Nov 2001:

> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
a. OK for freaks

> 2. Sex is:


d. Something I hope to have someday

>

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

Me.

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:
a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up

> 5. My current game addiction is:

Medievia.

> 6. Roleplaying:
a. You mean that D&D stuff?

> 7. Nekkid people:


b. They're nekkid. So what?

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

Poker.

> 9. My favorite channel is:

MTVX and The History Channel. Two-way tie.

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

99.1 WHFS.

--
Purple
I'm out of control...
Evil takes my soul...
~ Jeckyl & Hyde ~ Iced Earth ~

Mickey

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 10:01:37 PM11/30/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:

E. A denizen of Jellystone Park.

>
> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!

Depending on who it's with,

>
> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

Modesty prohibits me from answering this :)

>
> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

> e. Giddyap!

YeeHaaaaaaaaaaa


>
> 5. My current game addiction is:

Talking dirty on mIRC with a certain young lady.

>
> 6. Roleplaying:


> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games

You dungeon, or mine?

>
> 7. Nekkid people:


> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

For a while, true :)

>
> 8. Match game: Strip _____

Jack?

>
> 9. My favorite channel is:

Sci-Fi

>
> 10. My favorite radio station is:

Radio? Wassat?


Mickey


Marshall

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 10:33:13 PM11/30/01
to

"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c08df10...@news.ftc-i.net...
> Yeah, I'm taking my own poll, I forgot to answer.

>
> >6. Roleplaying:
> >a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> >b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> >c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...
> >d. I'm in! Where're my dice??
>
> B and D.

You sure you didn't mean B&D? ;-)
-Marshall


Hanky'

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 10:42:01 PM11/30/01
to
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:28:43 GMT,
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) wrote:

>In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
>Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
>own if you want.
>
>1. Yoga is:

d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

>2. Sex is:

a. Grrrrreat!


c. The Sport of Champions

.

>3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could *turn* on the most


>[females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>(answer any or all of those)

I think this would be a better question

>4. Grown women with pigtails:

e. Giddyap!

>5. My current game addiction is:

None currently, snowboarding if that counts as a game

>6. Roleplaying:

a. You mean that D&D stuff?

>7. Nekkid people:
>a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!

>b. They're nekkid. So what?

>c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

None Of The Above

>8. Match game: Strip _____

Twister

>9. My favorite channel is:

Some sports channel

>10. My favorite radio station is:

Radio sucks

0tarin

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 1:33:20 AM12/1/01
to
Upon the day of Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:28:43 GMT,
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) grabbed a paddle
and smacked out the following gibberish:

>In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!

I'm perpetually bored, don't worry :p

>Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
>own if you want.
>
>1. Yoga is:
d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

>2. Sex is:
a. Grrrrreat!
c. The Sport of Champions

>3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most


>[females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>(answer any or all of those)

Ummm... don't follow.

>4. Grown women with pigtails:

f. Yet another thing I have no opinion on.

>5. My current game addiction is:

LoD, of course :p

>6. Roleplaying:
I lack the necessary experience to make a judgement upon it.

>7. Nekkid people:
Are preferably of the opposite sex. (IMO, of course)

>8. Match game: Strip _____

Tease

>9. My favorite channel is:

Don't watch TV. Remember that question about Game Addictions? :p

>10. My favorite radio station is:

See #9

--
0tarin
Chief Paddle Specialist and Administrator
and Unofficial Baron of B!tching ;)
"Never say goodbye when you still want to try, never give up when you
still feel you can take it, never say you don't love that person
anymore when you can't let go."
...
"Love is like a friendship caught on fire. In the beginning a flame,
very pretty, often hot and fierce, but still only light. And
flickering as love grows older, our hearts mature and our love
becomes as coals, deep-burning and unquenchable."

0tarin

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 1:39:52 AM12/1/01
to
Upon the day of Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:45:09 -0800, "Nikita Synytskyy"
<nikitaLI...@mondenet.com> grabbed a paddle and smacked out the
following gibberish:

>> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most


>> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>> (answer any or all of those)
>
>It will take extensive research to answer that question. They have meets
>over at the Castle, maybe we should institute something similar.

Are you suggesting an annual ART orgy? Or Free For All... or both. I
don't know... Hm.

--
0tarin
Chief Paddle Specialist and Administrator
and Unofficial Baron of B!tching ;)
"Never say goodbye when you still want to try, never give up when you
still feel you can take it, never say you don't love that person
anymore when you can't let go."
...

"Poetry should please by a fine excess and not by singularity. It should strike the reader as a wording of his own highest thoughts, and appear almost as a remembrance."
**John Keats

£ørd £andøn

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 2:26:45 AM12/1/01
to
Squire lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) came out of their
castle & wrote:

>1. Yoga is:
d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

>2. Sex is:
a. Grrrrreat!

>4. Grown women with pigtails:
f VERY unattractive and are trying to look like the teenage sluts ;-)

>6. Roleplaying:


b. Ooooh, kinky sex games

>7. Nekkid people:


b. They're nekkid. So what?

>8. Match game: Strip _____
poker

--
Łřrd Łandřn

Have you spanked your inner bitch today?

Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 3:02:00 AM12/1/01
to
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:28:43 GMT,
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) wrote:

>In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>

>Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
>own if you want.

>1. Yoga is:


>a. OK for freaks
>b. A great way to break into your day
>c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?

>d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever

Best with fruit at the bottom.


>2. Sex is:

One of the few things that can be both raw and animalistic and
ethereal at the same time.

>3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
>[females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>(answer any or all of those)

I'll plead the fifth for more than one reason on this one.

>4. Grown women with pigtails:

>a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up

>b. Just look babyish
>c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
>give a damn what people think
>d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
>e. Giddyap!

Depends on the woman. For some it's e, for most it's c imo.

>5. My current game addiction is:

>6. Roleplaying:


>a. You mean that D&D stuff?

>b. Ooooh, kinky sex games

>c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...
>d. I'm in! Where're my dice??

>7. Nekkid people:


>a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!

>b. They're nekkid. So what?

>c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

D) form meets function.

>8. Match game: Strip _____

poker?

>9. My favorite channel is:

none.

>10. My favorite radio station is:

Used to be a local high school station - commercials and DJ chatter
were almost non-existant- as in less than a minute's worth a month,
but someone revamped it a few months ago :-(


--

Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 3:10:25 AM12/1/01
to
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:43:40 GMT,
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) wrote:

>Yeah, I'm taking my own poll, I forgot to answer.
>

>>In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>>
>>Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
>>own if you want.
>>
>>1. Yoga is:
>>a. OK for freaks
>>b. A great way to break into your day
>>c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
>>d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever
>

>E. Best done naked.

Karma Supra?


>>6. Roleplaying:
>>a. You mean that D&D stuff?
>>b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
>>c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...
>>d. I'm in! Where're my dice??
>

>B and D.


Doesn't B include B&D?


>>7. Nekkid people:
>>a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
>>b. They're nekkid. So what?
>>c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

>B. Well, actually, I'm trying to get all the way to B, but I admit, I
>do still react some to seeing an attractive naked body when I'm
>unprepared.

unprepared? Think of the nekkid body as music for the eyes. There
is no crime in enjoying music.

--

Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 3:15:09 AM12/1/01
to
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 02:26:42 +0100, "Mad Jack" <mad...@talknet.de>
wrote:

>> 5. My current game addiction is:

>Jagged Alliance 2.

Is Leech still in the game?


--

Blade

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 11:01:59 AM12/1/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...

> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks
>
> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
>
> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)
> Duh....L.J....hands down :)

>
> 4. Grown women with pigtails:
> d. Oooooh... Pigtails! > e. Giddyap! :)))

>
> 5. My current game addiction is:
> LoD
>
> 6. Roleplaying:

> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
>
> 7. Nekkid people:

> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?
>
> 8. Match game: Strip poke-her

>
> 9. My favorite channel is:
> the hot network

>
> 10. My favorite radio station is:
>Q92

Blade

Gornul

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 8:33:17 AM12/1/01
to
"Handy Solo" <handy...@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:t2dg0ugj1ript3thm...@4ax.com...

> "Gornul" <xgornul...@yahoo.com> allegedly wrote:
>
> <
> >
> > Heck, Mike and I are the only people out of the six of us with serious RP
experience
> > (though Cursim will probably be quick to point out that he RPs in Everquest, but
it's
> > not the same thing).
>
> REally?!? Why do you say such a thing?
>
> I've done PnP/dice and EQ and feel that it *can* be the same thing.

My main problem with EQ and other MMORPGs is that the RPGing is entirely secondary to
the play. Powerlevelers and morons can play the game without ever *role*playing.
OTOH, in table-top games, the roleplaying pretty much *is* the game, especially when
one tries to keep things free-formish.

Nikita Synytskyy

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 2:16:25 PM12/1/01
to

"0tarin" <0tari...@spyring.com> wrote in message
news:3c0c7b1a...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

> Upon the day of Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:45:09 -0800, "Nikita Synytskyy"
> <nikitaLI...@mondenet.com> grabbed a paddle and smacked out the
> following gibberish:
>
> >> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> >> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> >> (answer any or all of those)
> >
> >It will take extensive research to answer that question. They have meets
> >over at the Castle, maybe we should institute something similar.
>
> Are you suggesting an annual ART orgy? Or Free For All... or both. I
> don't know... Hm.

Well, the idea in and of itself is not bad, but there is a significant
practical problem: males outnumber females. Since the NG stats were posted
today by Ghashul, it is easy to count:

There are 68 posters that made more then one post to this NG in the last
month. Of these, 5 are female, and an additional one is Purple. Of the
females, one is The BEAST, who is from the Castle--not that she isn't
welcome to attend or anything, but she may choose not to. Another one is
Lady Jack V.--who is supposedly taken, since a "Jack V." also posts here.
The third one is Jessica, whom I've never "met". The fourth one is SR, who
I think is taken as well--or at least it seems so, from her conversations
with Hawk. Purple is... purple.

Last but not least is Time Goddess, who may or may not be interested in
attending our annual meets. Even if she were--and of that we don't have any
guarantee--the ratio of 50 men to one lady is hardly satisfactory.

Nikita.

PS: My spellchecker wants to replace "Ghashul" with "gasohol"!

Bulldog

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 12:00:45 PM12/1/01
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in
message news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART
> poll!

> 1. Yoga is:
> a. OK for freaks


>
> 2. Sex is:


> c. The Sport of Champions

>


> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the
> most [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART
> females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

hmmm...
Jade and Jessica

>
> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

Didn't work for baby spice, not gonna work for you....
you are talking about the hair above the waist right?

>
> 5. My current game addiction is:
>

Subspace (continuum)

> 6. Roleplaying:

> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games

>
> 7. Nekkid people:
Good, you came to class prepared


>
> 8. Match game: Strip _____
>

Poker


> 9. My favorite channel is:
>

MuchLound


> 10. My favorite radio station is:

Edge 102

- --
Listening to rap is like having your teeth pulled...
without the cool drugs! ****
icq: 70six3oneate4
msn: rand...@DIGNITYhotmail.com
remeber to get rid of dignity when msging me...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPAkMu5GNUytZf2WVEQL0dwCgz5cfR4xERPupBKi5kfir0SvWo2AAn1Xy
UZKTAeGxi8fMqFzTZUSGhgGx
=jwiD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Ken Noone

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 12:22:33 PM12/1/01
to

"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c07c865...@news.ftc-i.net...
> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:
> c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?
>
> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK

> c. The Sport of Champions
> d. Something I hope to have someday
> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?
> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...

All of the above except f&g.

>
> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)

Without a question, it would be SR the queen of Perv.


>
> 4. Grown women with pigtails:

> e. Giddyap!


>
> 5. My current game addiction is:

Internet Checkers.
>
> 6. Roleplaying:

> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...

They usually do Yoga too! :-)

> 7. Nekkid people:
> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?

> 8. Match game: Strip _____

"Strip Tease"


> 9. My favorite channel is:

Don't watch TV.


>
> 10. My favorite radio station is:

The radio station with the traffic report so I can cut my drive to work down
from 2hrs.

--
Ken Noone
To mail me replace 3rd Rock with the planet we live on.

TCotBSig #74

"Free speech apparently only applies to liberals. God forbid a
conservative should say something that someone doesn't want to hear".
(Gornul)


Nikita Synytskyy

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 10:27:33 PM12/1/01
to

"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c0c4516...@news.ftc-i.net...
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:16:25 -0800, "Nikita Synytskyy"
> <nikitaLI...@mondenet.com> graced us with the following words of
> wisdom:

>
> >There are 68 posters that made more then one post to this NG in the last
> >month. Of these, 5 are female, and an additional one is Purple. Of the
> >females, one is The BEAST, who is from the Castle--not that she isn't
> >welcome to attend or anything, but she may choose not to. Another one
is
> >Lady Jack V.--who is supposedly taken, since a "Jack V." also posts here.
> >The third one is Jessica, whom I've never "met". The fourth one is SR,
who
> >I think is taken as well--or at least it seems so, from her conversations
> >with Hawk. Purple is... purple.
>
> Jack and LadyJack are both me, on different machines. I'm female. My
> genuine, in-person nickname is Jack.

Oh...

> Being taken precludes going to an orgy????

I've never been "taken", so I never faced this question myself. You tell me
:)
>
> If I really wanted to attend such a party, he'd send me off without
> qualm... ;)

Even if all ladies decided to attend, we'd still have a 1:10 ratio. But
maybe some ladies actually prefer it that way ;)

Nikita.

Time Goddess

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 8:07:59 PM12/1/01
to
"Nikita Synytskyy" <nikitaLI...@mondenet.com> wrote in message
news:9uavnb$78l54$1...@ID-30174.news.dfncis.de...

> Last but not least is Time Goddess, who may or may not be interested in
> attending our annual meets. Even if she were--and of that we don't have
any
> guarantee--the ratio of 50 men to one lady is hardly satisfactory.
>
Time Goddess would like just like to reiterate, because it does pop up
far more often than she would like, that even if she was interested it would
still be illegal. She can't figure out why people refuse to understand this.


Nikita Synytskyy

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 12:12:34 AM12/2/01
to

"Time Goddess" <i...@me.com> wrote in message
news:9ubusu$7gk53$1...@ID-64699.news.dfncis.de...

Time Goddess is thanked for pointing out that significant detail.

However, in making all my plans, I always analyze viability and
profitability before legality. Since an ART orgy is not very viable, and
ignoring that, wouldn't be much fun, legality is really a moot point.

Nikita.

SilverRaven

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 11:26:10 PM12/1/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Nikita Synytskyy
pleaded:

>The fourth one is SR, who
>I think is taken as well--or at least it seems so, from her conversations
>with Hawk.

Hawk is a wonderfully sweet man that doesn't mind sharing as long as I
come home to him ;-)

--
SilverRaven
You're a chat addict - If you've been lagged so bad that you've
switched servers so much, that you can see your nick on the
channel list three times.

SilverRaven

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 11:29:29 PM12/1/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Ken Noone pleaded:

>> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
>> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>> (answer any or all of those)
>
>Without a question, it would be SR the queen of Perv.

Awwwwwww, thanks. ;-)

--
SilverRaven
You're a chat addict - If you would like to join more than 10
channels but you get a raw echo from IRC server telling: "You
have joined too many channels."

Hawk

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 12:32:21 AM12/2/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, SilverRaven
<NOSP...@silverraven.com> pleaded:

>While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Nikita Synytskyy
>pleaded:
>
>>The fourth one is SR, who
>>I think is taken as well--or at least it seems so, from her conversations
>>with Hawk.
>
>Hawk is a wonderfully sweet man that doesn't mind sharing as long as I
>come home to him ;-)

Yeah, and you can bring a video tape too, k? ;p

Hawk

Rob

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 9:16:23 AM12/2/01
to
"Time Goddess" <i...@me.com> wrote in message
news:9ubusu$7gk53$1...@ID-64699.news.dfncis.de...

You could always compete in the minor circuit :)


Rob

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 9:17:56 AM12/2/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c0c3872...@news.ftc-i.net...
> On Sat, 01 Dec 2001 23:34:14 -0500, SilverRaven
> <NOSP...@silverraven.com> graced us with the following words of
> wisdom:
> <Lots of good answers>
> >Notice a pattern? ;-)
>
> That's why we all love you, SR :)
>
> (Not like that, well, *I* don't, because I'm hetero and all that)
>
You forgot to tag on, "Not that there's anything wrong with it."


Ghashûl

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 10:31:35 AM12/2/01
to
On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:07:16 -0500, SilverRaven
<NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:

>Only cause you haven't found the right woman ;-)

Perhaps.
The same can NOT be applied for men!!! I can't stress that enough!

--
Regards Ghashűl <JCHC><
http://www.3x7.dk | http://ghashul.dk/

"Grabbed ahold my enemy's neck and choked 'till he ceased...blistered
with disbelief I awoke dead! and when I awoke I couldn't believe it was
me, all the time it was me!"
-Project 86, Me Against Me

SilverRaven

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 10:50:17 AM12/2/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Ghashûl pleaded:

>On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:07:16 -0500, SilverRaven
><NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:
>
>>Only cause you haven't found the right woman ;-)
>
>Perhaps.
>The same can NOT be applied for men!!! I can't stress that enough!

Not true ;-)

--
SilverRaven
$646.66
Next week's Walmart price of the Beast

Ghashûl

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 10:58:37 AM12/2/01
to
On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:50:17 -0500, SilverRaven
<NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:

>Not true ;-)

Very true!
Men are repulsive, I can't figure out how any women could possibly like
them.

SilverRaven

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 12:44:10 PM12/2/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Ghashûl pleaded:

>On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:50:17 -0500, SilverRaven


><NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:
>
>>Not true ;-)
>
>Very true!
>Men are repulsive, I can't figure out how any women could possibly like
>them.

Interesting that you think so lowly of yourself dear.

--
SilverRaven
Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.

Ken Noone

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 12:53:13 PM12/2/01
to

"SilverRaven" <NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote in message
news:t2qk0uoarqetqdisi...@4ax.com...

> While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Ghashûl pleaded:
>
> >On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:50:17 -0500, SilverRaven
> ><NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Not true ;-)
> >
> >Very true!
> >Men are repulsive, I can't figure out how any women could possibly like
> >them.
>
> Interesting that you think so lowly of yourself dear.

I think that was Stephanie (not Stefan) posting that one.


--
Ken Noone
To mail me replace 3rd Rock with the planet we live on.

TCotBSig #74

"Well, I have to save my ass."


0tarin

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 3:45:27 PM12/2/01
to
Upon the day of Sun, 02 Dec 2001 12:44:10 -0500, SilverRaven
<NOSP...@silverraven.com> grabbed a paddle and smacked out the
following gibberish:

>While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Ghashûl pleaded:


>
>>On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:50:17 -0500, SilverRaven
>><NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Not true ;-)
>>
>>Very true!
>>Men are repulsive, I can't figure out how any women could possibly like
>>them.
>
>Interesting that you think so lowly of yourself dear.

That's just the male thought process, silly. It's how guys work :p
As I recall Rob stating once: "She is the prize. She has to offer
only herself in all her glory. You, OTOH, at the beginning have
nothing to offer." We're lowly, humble creatures ;)

--
0tarin
Chief Paddle Specialist and Administrator
and Unofficial Baron of B!tching ;)
"Never say goodbye when you still want to try, never give up when you
still feel you can take it, never say you don't love that person
anymore when you can't let go."
...

"Love is friendship, friendship is love. If love fails, friendship
should remain for friendship is the foundation of love."

Mad'Doug

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 4:14:05 PM12/2/01
to
On (or around) Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:28:43 GMT,
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) deemed themselves
worthy to grace alt.roundtable with his/her presence, and
uttered.....:

>In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
>Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
>own if you want.
>
>1. Yoga is:

>a. OK for freaks
>b. A great way to break into your day

>c. Huh? Yoga? Isn't that, like, some exercise religion?

>d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever
>

e. damn good with regards to #2 (see below).

>2. Sex is:
>a. Grrrrreat!
>b. OK
>c. The Sport of Champions
>d. Something I hope to have someday
>e. Icky
>f. What's sex?
>g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...
>

h. c when combined with question #1 else a.

>3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
>[females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
>(answer any or all of those)
>

Raincheck.....

>4. Grown women with pigtails:

>a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up
>b. Just look babyish
>c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
>give a damn what people think

>d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
>e. Giddyap!
>

e. e. e. e. e......... and d.

>5. My current game addiction is:
>

game? game? you think this is a game?

>6. Roleplaying:
>a. You mean that D&D stuff?

>b. Ooooh, kinky sex games

>c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...

>d. I'm in! Where're my dice??
>

a., b. and d......

>7. Nekkid people:
>a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
>b. They're nekkid. So what?

>c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?
>

all of the above in appropriate situations!

>8. Match game: Strip _____
>

till you can't strip no more!

>9. My favorite channel is:
>

Sky Sports ______!

>10. My favorite radio station is:

Sports Radio!
--
Mad'Doug
I don't have nightmares, I give them!

ALERT! ALERT! Non-human present.......
--------------------------------------------------------------
please remove the apostrophe (') to email me
--------------------------------------------------------------
Join the SETM (Search for Extra-Terrestial Madness) phenomenon
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mad Jack

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 5:22:53 PM12/2/01
to

"Dalai Lama" schrieb:

>"Mad Jack" wrote:
>
> >> 5. My current game addiction is:
>
> >Jagged Alliance 2.
>
> Is Leech still in the game?

No, according to the Veterans Gallery featured in the game,
A.I.M. finally got fed up with Leech and fired him. Apparently
he's been contesting this decision in the courts, and A.I.M.
is now trying to settle this dispute with paying Leech an undisclosed
sum of money.

--
Cheers and all,

Hardy G.
"Mein Herz brennt"
http://madjack.diaryland.com
http://www.talknet.de/~madjack


Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 12:25:38 AM12/3/01
to
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:33:17 -0500, "Gornul"
<xgornul...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>OTOH, in table-top games, the roleplaying pretty much *is* the game, especially when
>one tries to keep things free-formish.

Squad Commander made a great RPG when you considered the rules a
sugested menu and played it D&D style :-)


--

Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 12:31:09 AM12/3/01
to
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 23:22:53 +0100, "Mad Jack" <mad...@talknet.de>
wrote:

>> Is Leech still in the game?

>No, according to the Veterans Gallery featured in the game,
>A.I.M. finally got fed up with Leech and fired him. Apparently
>he's been contesting this decision in the courts, and A.I.M.
>is now trying to settle this dispute with paying Leech an undisclosed
>sum of money.

Dang, he was my favorite merc (when he wasn't locked up saying "In a
minute, I ain't finished with him yet.").


--

Rob

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 1:32:25 PM12/3/01
to
"0tarin" <0tari...@spyring.com> wrote in message
news:3c0a927a....@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

> Upon the day of Sun, 02 Dec 2001 12:44:10 -0500, SilverRaven
> <NOSP...@silverraven.com> grabbed a paddle and smacked out the
> following gibberish:
>
> >While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Ghashûl pleaded:
> >
> >>On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 10:50:17 -0500, SilverRaven
> >><NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Not true ;-)
> >>
> >>Very true!
> >>Men are repulsive, I can't figure out how any women could possibly
like
> >>them.
> >
> >Interesting that you think so lowly of yourself dear.
>
> That's just the male thought process, silly. It's how guys work :p
> As I recall Rob stating once: "She is the prize. She has to offer
> only herself in all her glory. You, OTOH, at the beginning have
> nothing to offer." We're lowly, humble creatures ;)

That's just the train of thought that has the most universal success
rate in getting what you want, be it a relationship, or sex, or something
else, which I don't view as at least morally questionable. I'd say the
coin goes both ways, and that women have the same success, but that
wouldn't seem the case. Women using that system usually end up in a
situation worse than if they would have done the exact opposite. It's
simply an effect of women having more methods at their disposal.
Let's face it, in a lot of ways the double standard is true. Men are
more agreeable to anything sexual while women tend to be more
disagreeable. For instance, if a guy is going to touch a girl in any sort
of romantic way (Now by this I don't mean necessarily out-of-bounds
touching) he should be at least fifty percent sure of acceptance. If it's
not excepted he'll do more damage than good, and if the odds are at like
ten percent or something, he's probably going to do more damage than he'll
ever fix.
A woman on the other hand has like a minimum ninety-five percent
acceptance rate unless the guy in question is with someone else and very
serious about monogamy. This gives the woman a whole pile of things she
can do to make herself more desirable that men just don't have at their
option.
Take another example. Say a woman moves into a new apartment and
invites her next store neighbor guy she just met inside for a cup of copy.
After ten minutes she says, "Let me put on something a bit more
comfortable." Then she comes out wearing nothing at all. What do you think
will happen next?
Now take the same situation but have a guy moving in and a girl
neighbor. All of a sudden everything that happens next dramatically
changes. This whole inequality of sexual advances is what drives so many
men to give up and join the priesthood or become homosexual if they're not
catholic. This is also why the Catholics say God hates homosexuals. It's
because there aren't any catholic homosexuals. They've given their male
members who can't cope with dating women a way out.
The whole sexual advance inequality leads up to the same conclusion
that women are desirable at first meeting and can only become less
desirable, where as men are only as desirable as they're able to prove
themselves to be, and can only go upwards from where they start.
I think this goes back to early human society where women served as
the backbone of the community doing all of the things essential to the
communities survival. They had a clear value both in the long term and the
short term. They were desirable to have. Meanwhile a man's worth was
pretty much hit or miss. They had a long term value, but no short term
value. Even more so there value was simply icing on a cake. Women
sustained the society, they only added to it. Women could survive
asexually, but men could not. There for a man had to prove to a woman that
he was worth hanging around.
Latter on though agriculture came around, and man, being on average
stronger, was better suited to do the two essential things in his
survival, harvest food and fight in wars. This screwed up the whole
natural balance of everything. Women still had an important value in many
societies. For one thing women were usually made the head of households.
In poor families this meant she raised the children and did the shopping.
In rich families this meant she commanded the servants and the slaves and
made sure everything was taken care of. This also opened up freetime for
men to engage in politics, philosophy, religion, art, and fight wars. Some
societies saw this value better than others.
One of the worst cases of getting things so wrong is Aristotle who
believed that everyone had a place where they belonged, and in order for
everyone to be as happy as possible everyone should be in their rightful
place. Women being less intelligent than men he saw their place in life as
right, the same as a slave is better a slave than a manager when he's
strong and the manager is smart. Unfortunately Aristotle seemed to have a
belief of predestination and gave all skill to the quality of a person,
not to the training they required. Thus he doesn't regard the slave as
strong because of a lifetime of manual labor, or the fact that there's not
a female intellectual equal to himself because no woman has had his
quality of education.
This belief system may have made sense had he been a self-taught man.
But he wasn't. He studied with Plato, among attending other well-off
schools. The guy did give us the backbone of all modern political and
scientific theory, but he was only able to do that because he was well
taught and had great advantages. Sure not everyone could have done the
same under his circumstances, but he wouldn't have done as well under
different circumstances.
If Aristotle was alive today he would probably be an underpaid
university teacher riding a back to campus because he couldn't afford a
car. His theories would be disregarded by his intellectual peers as being
to simple and too much geared towards the layman. The masses wouldn't even
know about him since no one really reads, especially on political and
scientific theories. His methods would also be under heavy fire since he
believed in being virtuous in both political and scientific pursuits,
along with everything else in life.
Somehow his views about the value and place of women perpetuated and
were around in Europe for a long time. During certain periods women were
considered too stupid to commit a crime on their own and took advantage of
this being as smart as they were. Nower-days we're starting to view women
as equal, but we're still a far way from the natural balance and that's
why there's so many problems with relationships. When women are viewed as
the higher form of the species things will be right again.
I mean think about it, most truly horrible things done to women in the
course of a relationship are done because the woman is viewed as the lower
part, or even an equal part, of the relationship. That's why they're
ignored, beat-up, abandoned with children, raped, ect. If they were seen
as the higher all those problems would go away.
Meanwhile men have natural defenses against all the above things. Men
don't care if they're constantly ignored because either they won't notice
or they won't care. Even if a girl does beat up her guy he ain't going to
say anything about it, at least not complaining. Then he'd really look
bad. Women can't really abandon men with children, because if the man
isn't pleased with that situation he'll just find someone else to dump the
children off with. And men have a natural defense against being raped by
women.
It'd be a utopian society I tell ya, a utopian society!


Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 4:12:37 PM12/3/01
to
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:32:25 -0800, "Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote:


> I think this goes back to early human society where women served as
>the backbone of the community doing all of the things essential to the
>communities survival.

Take out child rearing, and you've got a reversal of your assertion.
The ability to perpetuate the tribe is something that overrides other
values to a great degree and still does today.

>They had a clear value both in the long term and the
>short term. They were desirable to have. Meanwhile a man's worth was
>pretty much hit or miss.

If you mean in the sense of hitting or missing with a club, I'd agree.
If someone had a Baranar's Star, he could pretty much guarantee his
worth at any price.

>They had a long term value, but no short term
>value.

I'd say the exact opposite was true.

> When women are viewed as the higher form of the species things will be right again.

As long as people think any one of them is more important than a bunch
of others, things will not be right. Viewing any person as
inherently better on such scant information as their sex, age, race,
etc is dangerously faulty reasoning. Evaulate each person on the
basis of their situation and all the info relevant to that situation
and things will be better.

> I mean think about it, most truly horrible things done to women in the
>course of a relationship

Far more men are battered by women than women by men, though the
severe injuries are suffered more often by women.

> are done because the woman is viewed as the lower
>part, or even an equal part, of the relationship.

I'd doubt equal ever factors into it. People who are willing to
beat a "loved" one, do not see others as human, but as mere step
stools in their own personal rise to self gratification.

> Meanwhile men have natural defenses against all the above things. Men
>don't care if they're constantly ignored because either they won't notice
>or they won't care.

Again, a stereotype. Some people are more needy than others in a
relationship, and a lot of this has to do with self esteem, and a lot
to do with just plain boredom. Someone who can entertain themselves a
thsouand different ways is less likely to need as much attention as
someone who is bored out of their mind if they aren't talking to
another person every waking hour or .

>Women can't really abandon men with children, because if the man
>isn't pleased with that situation he'll just find someone else to dump the
>children off with.

This isn't true. Although some male jerks would just as soon leave
their kids at the mall and never come back, so some female jerks.
There may indeed be a percentage difference, but nothing on the scope
of what you are referring to. In R/L I know a few dads who were on
the receiving end of the mom walking out and just abandoning the kids.
Not one of them tried to get out of the situation (oh yeah, there is
some resentment among them, but no more so than the moms I know whom
the dad just walked out on the family).

>And men have a natural defense against being raped by
>women.

For the most part, although there is a workaround if the assailant is
determined enough.


--

Rob

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 9:40:02 PM12/3/01
to
"Dalai Lama" <daia...@aol.kom> wrote in message
news:3c0be487...@news.qwest.net...

> On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:32:25 -0800, "Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I think this goes back to early human society where women served as
> >the backbone of the community doing all of the things essential to the
> >communities survival.
>
> Take out child rearing, and you've got a reversal of your assertion.
> The ability to perpetuate the tribe is something that overrides other
> values to a great degree and still does today.

Actually in a hunting-gathering society (One step down from a tribe as
it doesn't have a ruler) women generally served the gathering portion of
the work. The gathering was the food that sustained them, as hunting was
hit or miss and could take long periods of time before food was made
available through this method. Although they would have a less varied, and
thus not as healthy, diet women would still survive. The nessecary
vitamins and minerals provided by meat, such as protien, could be gotten
through alternate available food sources, such as insects and wild nuts.
So even if both sexes could reproduce homosexually, only women would
survive on their own in their given roles.

> >They had a clear value both in the long term and the
> >short term. They were desirable to have. Meanwhile a man's worth was
> >pretty much hit or miss.
>
> If you mean in the sense of hitting or missing with a club, I'd agree.
> If someone had a Baranar's Star, he could pretty much guarantee his
> worth at any price.

Read above. You seem to be stuck in some higher form of society than
myself. I'm talking earliest forms where men hunted, women gathered and
gave birth, and wars were non-existant.

> >They had a long term value, but no short term
> >value.
>
> I'd say the exact opposite was true.

Man's only value to his family, and to the community since he was
living in perfect communism, was what he brought in from the hunt, which
didn't pan out as often as it didn't in most areas.

> > When women are viewed as the higher form of the species things will be
right again.
>
> As long as people think any one of them is more important than a bunch
> of others, things will not be right. Viewing any person as
> inherently better on such scant information as their sex, age, race,
> etc is dangerously faulty reasoning. Evaulate each person on the
> basis of their situation and all the info relevant to that situation
> and things will be better.

No, give my idea a chance. Every other idea for improving society has
either failed or been proven unfeesable. But no one's ever tried a
matriarchiol society. If women ruled everything would just be perfect. Men
would still be allowed into lower end jobs, but only women would be able
to achieve important postitions, managerial positions, and hold any
political office. Men can be househusbands if they prefer.
Think of some of the benifits:
Unnessecary government spending which you've said you're against.
Political theory says human nature says it can't be stopped. I say it's
male nature. Let's look at what happens with a common commodity like
toliet paper.
A man runs out of toliet paper. He goes to the nearest store that'll
probably have toliet paper. He walks in, goes to the isle that says toliet
paper, picks up the first name brand he sees with out regard for price or
quality, walks up to the clerk, pays for his purchase with a twenty, and
leaves.
This is how the government spends. They need a school house built.
They go find someone to build it, pay them their money, and they don't
worry about the fact that they may have gotten cheaper through alternate
routes or that the roof may need repair in three years because these guys
they hired do shitty roof work.
Now let's take a woman in the same situation. First off she doesn't
run out of toliet paper. It's not going to happen save in case of an act
of God that destroys all of her possesions or if she staying at a guy's
house. While she still has toliet paper she'll see a sale ad for toliet
paper. If the qualities good she'll go to the store and get it, even if
she has to drive across town. She won't spend more on gas though since
she'll stop at several other places. She take her purchase to the clerk,
pull out a coupun she's been saving, argue over price if nessecary, and
pay with rolls of nickels.
This is true. Only a woman will use a coupun. The only time a man ever
uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only two
times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never seen a
man use a copoun for any other reason. With women in office they'll still
spend the same, but they'll get us a hell of a lot more for their money.
We'd be all set on nukes after the soviet going out of buisness sale.
Let's look at military power. Some might think we'd be weaker with
women rulers. On the contrary, if we were ruled by women everyone would be
scared shitless to fuck with us. Ask a bouncer which is worse, a guy fight
or a girl fight. When men fight they walk away with black eyes and broken
ribs. When women fight they walk away with scars across their faces.
Women are viscous in a fight, and no one will even think about talking
bad about us once they realize what women rulers are capable of. Men fight
with honour. Generally they don't do anything in a fight that they would
be highly disagreeable with the other guy doing to them. Women have no
such code. Nuclear deterance would cease to exist. The moment someone
became disagreeable they'd be nuked to hell, regardless of the fact we
wouldn't like it if they did that to us.
Those are just a few of the benefits of female rulership. What are the
disadvantages? Fox becomes a second rate capable channel and Lifetime
becomes a syndicated network. I can live with that.
I'm telling you, women are by nature better suited to rule than men.


> > I mean think about it, most truly horrible things done to women in
the
> >course of a relationship
>
> Far more men are battered by women than women by men, though the
> severe injuries are suffered more often by women.

Any guy who can't handle his girl beating him up shouldn't be called a
guy, if for no other reason than the fact that he got beat up by a girl.

> > Meanwhile men have natural defenses against all the above things.
Men
> >don't care if they're constantly ignored because either they won't
notice
> >or they won't care.
>
> Again, a stereotype. Some people are more needy than others in a
> relationship, and a lot of this has to do with self esteem, and a lot
> to do with just plain boredom. Someone who can entertain themselves a
> thsouand different ways is less likely to need as much attention as
> someone who is bored out of their mind if they aren't talking to
> another person every waking hour or .

Men are far easier to entertain for extended periods of time with far
less stimuli. I once knew a guy who could enjoy himself for hours upon
hours with just a stick, and nothing sexual about it. Show me a girl that
can do that.

> >Women can't really abandon men with children, because if the man
> >isn't pleased with that situation he'll just find someone else to dump
the
> >children off with.
>
> This isn't true. Although some male jerks would just as soon leave
> their kids at the mall and never come back, so some female jerks.
> There may indeed be a percentage difference, but nothing on the scope
> of what you are referring to. In R/L I know a few dads who were on
> the receiving end of the mom walking out and just abandoning the kids.

> Not one of them tried to get out of the situation.

They were probably living in a state that doubles jail time for
drinking and driving if kids are in the car and since they haven't been
sober enough to drive the kids to the mall without having to be to work at
a certain time or too hung-over to go outside. Happens all the time.

> >And men have a natural defense against being raped by
> >women.
>
> For the most part, although there is a workaround if the assailant is
> determined enough.

The reason why men don't file rape charges against women is because
they have a special way of saying yes, and if they don't say yes there's
nothing that can be done about it, except for possible use of a nail file
as a stand-up stick. I wonder if that would really work. I see problems
with the whole idea already, but you'd never really know the full
consequences of it unless it were tried. Anyone done this? Possibly before
the release of viagra? C'mon, speak up. You don't have to be ashamed. This
is for the sake of science.

SilverRaven

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 10:32:00 PM12/3/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Rob pleaded:

>The only time a man ever
>uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only two
>times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never seen a
>man use a copoun for any other reason.

My ex was the king of coupons. That man could walk out of a store with
$100 worth of food for only $25.

--
SilverRaven
You're a chat addict - If your motto is "Topaz sucks."

Time Goddess

unread,
Dec 3, 2001, 10:34:44 PM12/3/01
to
"Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote in message
news:u0of9k5...@corp.supernews.com...

> Men are far easier to entertain for extended periods of time with far
> less stimuli. I once knew a guy who could enjoy himself for hours upon
> hours with just a stick, and nothing sexual about it. Show me a girl that
> can do that.
>
Me. There are times when I'm really happy, bouncy and scattered-brained,
and during those times sticks are just plain awesome. Especially if they're
green enough that the bark peels easily. I once spent an entire afternoon
peeling bark off of sticks.


Hanky'

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 12:28:49 AM12/4/01
to
On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 14:18:56 GMT,
lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com (LadyJack V.) wrote:

>On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 19:27:33 -0800, "Nikita Synytskyy"


><nikitaLI...@mondenet.com> graced us with the following words of
>wisdom:
>

>>Even if all ladies decided to attend, we'd still have a 1:10 ratio.
>

>Well, subtract one female and about 10 males for underagedness, right?
>Oh hey, that works out...

Bah! Hold it on some island with no age of consent laws.

Hanky'

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 12:29:54 AM12/4/01
to

That's no fair, it's fairly obvious that TG could take every minor
male here.

Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 7:53:27 AM12/4/01
to
"SilverRaven" <NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote in message
news:ksgo0uof5grvqelb7...@4ax.com...

> While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Rob pleaded:
>
> >The only time a man ever
> >uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only two
> >times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never seen a
> >man use a copoun for any other reason.
>
> My ex was the king of coupons. That man could walk out of a store with
> $100 worth of food for only $25.

I wish I had sent my wife to him for training :)

>
> --
> SilverRaven
> You're a chat addict - If your motto is "Topaz sucks."

WHAT?!?!?! Perfect Topaz is great... expecially in a skulldur's ire

Mickey


Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 10:43:24 AM12/4/01
to
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:40:02 -0800, "Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote:

> Actually in a hunting-gathering society (One step down from a tribe as
>it doesn't have a ruler) women generally served the gathering portion of
>the work. The gathering was the food that sustained them, as hunting was
>hit or miss and could take long periods of time before food was made
>available through this method. Although they would have a less varied, and
>thus not as healthy, diet women would still survive. The nessecary
>vitamins and minerals provided by meat, such as protien, could be gotten
>through alternate available food sources, such as insects and wild nuts.

Trying to go without meat in a primitive society would be a deathkiss.
Not only are the proteins essential and hard to replace, but so is the
fat (for instance if you tried to live off rabbits, squirrels and most
fish as your meat source, and didn't have some other fatty source,
you would die)

>So even if both sexes could reproduce homosexually, only women would
>survive on their own in their given roles.

The presumption that one sex did most of the gathering doesn't mean
the other sex isn't capable of gathering. Just as female lions in a
pride doing the hunting (which they usually do) doesn't mean the
males can't or won't hunt.

>> >They had a clear value both in the long term and the
>> >short term. They were desirable to have. Meanwhile a man's worth was
>> >pretty much hit or miss.
>>
>> If you mean in the sense of hitting or missing with a club, I'd agree.
>> If someone had a Baranar's Star, he could pretty much guarantee his
>> worth at any price.

> Read above. You seem to be stuck in some higher form of society than
>myself.

Actually I am thinking more primitive.

> I'm talking earliest forms where men hunted, women gathered and
>gave birth, and wars were non-existant.

Adam and Eve- no war, add Cain, no war, add Able and you had war.

violent possession of another's property has existed before man came
along. Watch a pack of hyenas go to war with some jackals and some
lions and you will see what I mean.

> Man's only value to his family, and to the community since he was
>living in perfect communism, was what he brought in from the hunt, which
>didn't pan out as often as it didn't in most areas.

Perhaps in some quaint park setting where wolves and lions don't roam
the forests. Perhaps if primitive man had some sort of mental
baggage like people today do (and if he did, humanity would have
been extinct long ago). Just as projecting anthropomorphism onto
animal behavior is wrong, so is projecting modernism onto primitive
man. Anthroplogists are still discovering the basic mechanisms of
ancient societies. Trying to figure out the mental attitudes of a
group that didn't write is not something they are qualified to do, and
anyone who does so is conjecturing however they wish.

> No, give my idea a chance. Every other idea for improving society has
>either failed or been proven unfeesable. But no one's ever tried a
>matriarchiol society.

Uh, yeah they have, hundreds of times. Just plug in "The Goddess"
into your browser and see how the woman dominated society (mommy
earth/Gaia) used to be prevalent in many places in the world until it
was replaced with the male dominated (sky gods) model.

> If women ruled everything would just be perfect.

You'd make a great one year king, though I hope your floaties can
withstand the whirlpool they'd toss you in.

> Men would still be allowed into lower end jobs, but only women would be able
>to achieve important postitions, managerial positions, and hold any
>political office. Men can be househusbands if they prefer.

> Think of some of the benifits:
> Unnessecary government spending which you've said you're against.

ROFL! The annual dept of defense shoe budget would bankrupt us as
surely as it did the soviet union.

>Political theory says human nature says it can't be stopped. I say it's
>male nature. Let's look at what happens with a common commodity like
>toliet paper.

> A man runs out of toliet paper. He goes to the nearest store that'll
>probably have toliet paper. He walks in, goes to the isle that says toliet
>paper, picks up the first name brand he sees with out regard for price or
>quality, walks up to the clerk, pays for his purchase with a twenty, and
>leaves.

> This is how the government spends. They need a school house built.
>They go find someone to build it, pay them their money, and they don't
>worry about the fact that they may have gotten cheaper through alternate
>routes

Ah, so instead, you'd rather have someone whose time is worth say 15$
an hour, spend an extra twenty minutes to drive to Super Paper Inc,
and get a slightly better brand of paper and save 35 cents to boot!
Or are you saying that you would prefer if 5 other customers waited an
extra five minutes in line while the non twenty using customer roots
for exact change and that coupon that they know they have.

> or that the roof may need repair in three years because these guys
>they hired do shitty roof work.

Now, see you are speculating. Based on experience with people
shopping for construction, more men than women are likely to be
concerned with integrity of the product and work. More women than men
are going to be concerned with appearance of final product. I base
my statement on thousands of experiences. As to cost vs quality,
you'll see a fairly even break down there, with a slight edge in men
who are willing to pay more for a good product than women.

> Now let's take a woman in the same situation. First off she doesn't
>run out of toliet paper.

Bwahaha! They might not go without toilet paper for very long, but
to say they don't run out is wishful thinking.

> It's not going to happen save in case of an act of God that destroys all of her possesions or if she staying at a guy's
>house. While she still has toliet paper she'll see a sale ad for toliet
>paper. If the qualities good she'll go to the store and get it, even if
>she has to drive across town. She won't spend more on gas though since
>she'll stop at several other places. She take her purchase to the clerk,
>pull out a coupun she's been saving, argue over price if nessecary, and
>pay with rolls of nickels.

> This is true. Only a woman will use a coupun. The only time a man ever
>uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only two
>times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never seen a
>man use a copoun for any other reason. With women in office they'll still
>spend the same, but they'll get us a hell of a lot more for their money.

Just let me know what day to clip out the Strategic Defense Initiative
coupons. Coupons are a gimmick, as are most sales. The fact is,
if you wait till you need something to buy it, you will pay a lot
more for it. Contrast the wise shopping habits of males vs females
when it's time for a swimsuit and tell me who is going to save money
and who is going to spend frivolously!

Now, does that mean it applies to anything else? Of course not.
You just can't take presumed toilet paper buying habits and use them
to justify what went wrong in neanderthal society.

>We'd be all set on nukes after the soviet going out of buisness sale.

Except that the soviet union wouldn't have gone out of buisness,
because they never would have had to keep up with our spending.

> Let's look at military power. Some might think we'd be weaker with
>women rulers. On the contrary, if we were ruled by women everyone would be
>scared shitless to fuck with us. Ask a bouncer which is worse, a guy fight
>or a girl fight. When men fight they walk away with black eyes and broken
>ribs. When women fight they walk away with scars across their faces.

Ok, which is weaker, Terrosists or the USA? Look at the way they
fight: The USA fights nicely, while Terrorists fight viciously, yet
who wins and who loses when they go head to head?

> Women are viscous in a fight, and no one will even think about talking
>bad about us once they realize what women rulers are capable of.

Wolverines are more vicious than any sane human, and yet any old
podunk with a gun can go take out a few wolverines. War isn't an
exercise in violence, it is an exercise in power.

<snip of silliness>
-though some of the responses were entertaining :-)

> They were probably living in a state that doubles jail time for
>drinking and driving if kids are in the car and since they haven't been
>sober enough to drive the kids to the mall without having to be to work at
>a certain time or too hung-over to go outside. Happens all the time.

> The reason why men don't file rape charges against women is because


>they have a special way of saying yes, and if they don't say yes there's
>nothing that can be done about it, except for possible use of a nail file
>as a stand-up stick.

Biting. No, Im not going to elucidate any more than that, but you
can check it for yourself.


--

Craig

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 6:37:53 AM12/4/01
to

> In case you're bored, it's time for, that's right, another ART poll!
>
What! more polls? ;)

> Most questions multiple-choice for the less-creative. Write in your
> own if you want.
>
> 1. Yoga is:

> d. Something I have no opinion on whatsoever
>


> 2. Sex is:
> a. Grrrrreat!
> b. OK
> c. The Sport of Champions
> d. Something I hope to have someday
> e. Icky
> f. What's sex?
> g. (Just for you, Josh) I'm saving myself...
>

A, C, E (at times) and the most fun a person can have while still breathing.

> 3. (Courtesy of Mickey) Which ART male/female could take on the most
> [females/males] (or to make it interesting, [ART females/males])?
> (answer any or all of those)
>

Pass, next question please

> 4. Grown women with pigtails:
> a. Are acting babyish and need to grow up
> b. Just look babyish
> c. Are asserting their independence and it's cool that they don't
> give a damn what people think
> d. Oooooh... Pigtails!
> e. Giddyap!
>

should learn to focus their webcam better ;ppp
Oh, and D and E

> 5. My current game addiction is:
>

LOD of course, since Hooning about isn't a game

> 6. Roleplaying:
> a. You mean that D&D stuff?
> b. Ooooh, kinky sex games
> c. People who do (a/b/both) are freaks and/or cultists, ewww...
> d. I'm in! Where're my dice??
>

B and D, and occaisionally B&D :)

> 7. Nekkid people:
> a. ACK! I'm BLIND! Cover up already!
> b. They're nekkid. So what?
> c. Would be sexier with *some* clothes on; where's the mystery?
>

need love too?

> 8. Match game: Strip _____
>

Jack Naked, Or D2 (a fun concept for PK'ing)

> 9. My favorite channel is:
>

what is TV?

> 10. My favorite radio station is:

MMM FM

Craig


SilverRaven

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 12:44:19 PM12/4/01
to
While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Mickey pleaded:

>"SilverRaven" <NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote in message
>news:ksgo0uof5grvqelb7...@4ax.com...
>> While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Rob pleaded:
>>
>> >The only time a man ever
>> >uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only two
>> >times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never seen a
>> >man use a copoun for any other reason.
>>
>> My ex was the king of coupons. That man could walk out of a store with
>> $100 worth of food for only $25.
>
>I wish I had sent my wife to him for training :)

The man was downright scary when it comes to food.

>> SilverRaven
>> You're a chat addict - If your motto is "Topaz sucks."
>
>WHAT?!?!?! Perfect Topaz is great... expecially in a skulldur's ire

Psssst Mickey. Topaz is a crappy bnet chat client.

--
SilverRaven
You're a chat addict - If you don't even bother answering the
phone anymore.

Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 4:39:23 PM12/4/01
to
"SilverRaven" <NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote in message
news:dq2q0ukclsojd8dsi...@4ax.com...

> While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Mickey pleaded:
>
> >"SilverRaven" <NOSP...@silverraven.com> wrote in message
> >news:ksgo0uof5grvqelb7...@4ax.com...
> >> While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Rob pleaded:
> >>
> >> >The only time a man ever
> >> >uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only
two
> >> >times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never
seen a
> >> >man use a copoun for any other reason.
> >>
> >> My ex was the king of coupons. That man could walk out of a store with
> >> $100 worth of food for only $25.
> >
> >I wish I had sent my wife to him for training :)
>
> The man was downright scary when it comes to food.

Better that $75 is your pocket than theirs ;)

>
> >> SilverRaven
> >> You're a chat addict - If your motto is "Topaz sucks."
> >
> >WHAT?!?!?! Perfect Topaz is great... expecially in a skulldur's ire
>
> Psssst Mickey. Topaz is a crappy bnet chat client.

Pssssst SR, I know, I used to use it on bnet, and it was Topaz that I used
as a starting point for writing my OS/2 battle bot that I used to use in
channel wars :)

Mickey

Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 4:41:26 PM12/4/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c0d349...@news.ftc-i.net...
> On Mon, 03 Dec 2001 22:32:00 -0500, SilverRaven
> <NOSP...@silverraven.com> graced us with the following words of
> wisdom:
>

> >While kneeling at the altar of the alt.* hierarchy, Rob pleaded:
> >
> >>The only time a man ever
> >>uses a copoun is if a woman told him to or if he's unemployed. Only two
> >>times. I've checked out enough people to know this, and I've never seen
a
> >>man use a copoun for any other reason.
> >
> >My ex was the king of coupons. That man could walk out of a store with
> >$100 worth of food for only $25.
>
> Best I ever did with coupons was walking out of a store with $50 worth
> of stuff and $5.81 they paid me back... ;)

My wife just got back from the supermarket... $440, and she complains that
my ciggies ($28.00) were the reason. Mind you, this didn't include any meat,
as I get that all from a butcher. Then again, we are talking about a woman
that cannot exit a Wal*Mart, Target or mall for less the $500.

Mickey


Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 4:44:38 PM12/4/01
to
"Dalai Lama" <daia...@aol.kom> wrote in message
news:3c0ce62c...@news.qwest.net...

> On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:40:02 -0800, "Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote:
>
> > Actually in a hunting-gathering society (One step down from a tribe
as
> >it doesn't have a ruler) women generally served the gathering portion of
> >the work. The gathering was the food that sustained them, as hunting was
> >hit or miss and could take long periods of time before food was made
> >available through this method. Although they would have a less varied,
and
> >thus not as healthy, diet women would still survive. The nessecary
> >vitamins and minerals provided by meat, such as protien, could be gotten
> >through alternate available food sources, such as insects and wild nuts.
>
> Trying to go without meat in a primitive society would be a deathkiss.
> Not only are the proteins essential and hard to replace, but so is the
> fat (for instance if you tried to live off rabbits, squirrels and most
> fish as your meat source, and didn't have some other fatty source,
> you would die)
>

Going without meat? We spent a million years getting to the top of the food
chain to eat leaves? Bwahahaha... not me, I'm a reverse vegetarian. I am a
carnivore, and proud of it. If it knows how to moo, oink, cluck, baa,
whinny, honk, or quack, it's a potential meal. Other less noisy creatures
also may make their way to my table :)

Mickey


Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 4:46:29 PM12/4/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c0d0035...@news.ftc-i.net...
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:43:24 GMT, daia...@aol.kom (Dalai Lama)

> graced us with the following words of wisdom:
>
> >On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:40:02 -0800, "Rob" <r...@lvcm.com> wrote:
> <snip>

> >> Now let's take a woman in the same situation. First off she doesn't
> >>run out of toliet paper.
> >
> >Bwahaha! They might not go without toilet paper for very long, but
> >to say they don't run out is wishful thinking.
> >
>
> I don't. I notice that I've taken the last roll out of the bag, and
> go buy more while there's still some on the roll.
>
> I'm pretty sure I've never run out of toilet paper since I've been in
> charge of such things...

Whitni buys those HUGE honking packs of them 2 or 3 at a time, and when she
is half way through the last pack, they go on the list for resupply. The
only thing worse than running out or toilet paper is running out of ciggies.

Mickey


Ghashûl

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 5:25:48 PM12/4/01
to
On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 21:44:38 GMT, "Mickey" <mickeybTI...@home.com>
wrote:

>Going without meat? We spent a million years getting to the top of the food
>chain to eat leaves? Bwahahaha... not me, I'm a reverse vegetarian. I am a
>carnivore, and proud of it. If it knows how to moo, oink, cluck, baa,
>whinny, honk, or quack, it's a potential meal. Other less noisy creatures
>also may make their way to my table :)

If it wasn't for the fact that you couldn't eat meat, I'd have no
problem being a vegetarian.

Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 6:09:22 PM12/4/01
to
"LadyJack V." <lady...@jedimasterlittlegreenguy.com> wrote in message
news:3c0d535c...@news.ftc-i.net...
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 21:41:26 GMT, "Mickey"
> <mickeybTI...@home.com> graced us with the following words of
> I still think them giving you money to take the food is better :)
>
> I'm not going to mention how many months' grocery budget $440 is
> 'round here... 'Course, you've got, what, eight people who still live
> in the house? Even so...

That's about one weeks food and sundries and some odds and ends. As to the
eight people, 2 or 3 years old and consume nearly nothing, one is 6 and one
is 9, and they eat not much either. Adam, who is 12 now, is also a very
light eater. Whitno also eats nothing. It mostly comes down to me and Dana.
She can outeat a horde of locust, and 20 minutes later, be looking for food
again. She is lucky that her metabolic rate is mostly like mine, and she
never gains a pound. She is a big girl, in the sense that she's 15 years
old, 5'10" and like her mom, has broad shoulder and hips, and is filling out
quickly. But she hasn't got one ounce of fat on her. Then of course, there's
me and my 5-7 square meals a day. I also have a rather expensive chocolate
habit, as I consume 2 of the large Lindt bars every night, and they are
about $2 a throw. Ah well, if I can't take it with me, I'll eat it all
before I go :)

Mickey


Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 7:56:48 PM12/4/01
to
On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 23:25:48 +0100, Ghashûl <new...@3x7.dk> wrote:

>If it wasn't for the fact that you couldn't eat meat, I'd have no
>problem being a vegetarian.

Vegetarians will have a hard time gaining converts when slabs of meat
can be cloned, and no animals killed or harmed to get that meat.
You could easily get a 20-50 to one ratio of meat to the amount of
meat that the animal would originally have provided, and that's only
if they can't improve the copying limits with telomerase. If they
can, we might have some celebrity cows, known for their prize winning
flesh throughout the world.

The Brahmanists will lose out to the Buddists as a consequence as
well.


--

Mickey

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 9:28:25 PM12/4/01
to
"Dalai Lama" <daia...@aol.kom> wrote in message
news:3c0d6d16...@news.qwest.net...

Amen.... cows are food, plain and simple.

Mickey


Bulldog

unread,
Dec 4, 2001, 10:21:00 PM12/4/01
to

"Mickey" <mickeybTI...@home.com> wrote in message
news:dDfP7.37230$qM2.6...@news1.rdc1.fl.home.com...
and tastey too

--
Listening to rap is like having your teeth pulled...
without the cool drugs! ****
icq: 70six3oneate4
msn: rand...@DIGNITYhotmail.com
remeber to get rid of dignity when msging me...


Ghashûl

unread,
Dec 5, 2001, 2:43:53 AM12/5/01
to
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 02:28:25 GMT, "Mickey" <mickeybTI...@home.com>
wrote:

>Amen.... cows are food, plain and simple.

Cows look so nice and innocent... And they taste damn good!

Dalai Lama

unread,
Dec 5, 2001, 4:38:44 AM12/5/01
to
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 02:28:25 GMT, "Mickey"
<mickeybTI...@home.com> wrote:

>> The Brahmanists will lose out to the Buddists as a consequence as
>> well.

>Amen.... cows are food, plain and simple.

The only reason cows became sacred was so the Brahmanists could oust
the Buddhists and restructure society into castes.


--

Mickey

unread,
Dec 5, 2001, 7:44:45 AM12/5/01
to
"Dalai Lama" <daia...@aol.kom> wrote in message
news:3c0deaaa...@news.qwest.net...


I had a cast once... on my knee...

Mickey


0 new messages