Wealthy male seeks special, sincere female
Joe Dlhopolsky
[snip]
>Above all she will be
>prepared to devote herself entirely to my needs. I am not seeking a 'liberated'
>woman, but one who will allow me satisfaction at the snap of my fingers
[snip]
This is too funny.
I suggest you post your offer to E-Bay. I understand that someone recently
auctioned off his soul on there. Your post seems to fall into a similar
category.
My advice is to stick with your whores. That's still what you're looking for, as
far as I can tell. The way you phrased your offer, you will entice anyone but a
sincere woman.
Joe Dlhopolsky
joe...@yahoo.com
Peanut in Spring
>>Above all she will be
>>prepared to devote herself entirely to my needs. I am not seeking a
>'liberated'
>>woman, but one who will allow me satisfaction at the snap of my fingers
>My advice is to stick with your whores. That's still what you're looking for,
>as
>far as I can tell. The way you phrased your offer, you will entice anyone but
>a
>sincere woman.
Exactly - you get what you pay for.
Peanut
Pete Turk
Clues to pick-up from this post of "Owen G" ....
In article <20010305092834...@ng-mh1.aol.com>,
UKEntrepreneur <ukentre...@aol.com> writes
>My name is Owen G. I am a 45 year old businessman living and working in the UK.
>
>
>Quite simply I am looking for a (preferably) younger female to share my life.
>Permanantly. Perhaps even to marry. I am not looking for cheap-sexual conquest
>or any form of 'transactional' sexual arrangement. I AM seeking a relationship
>in the fullest sense of that word with a very special women.
But then, he somehow never gets around to giving you
his idea of what a relationship "in the fullest sense"
would actually be, according to him ...
A cursory description of your social and sexual duties isn't
enough IMO!
He also doesn't actually say why the special woman would
be so special (in the sense of uncommon) -- from what he
writes, it could apply to millions in the UK...
> But does my
>special women exist. I do hope so, I really do. I can offer a very luxurious
>lifestyle in the country and abroad.
"very luxurious lifestyle"? -- very vague! So vague it may
in fact simply be residing inside his head ....
> I have extensive business interests in
>both Europe and the United States
Again -- vague -- again, is it simply in his head?
(notice that he's overloaded two words already -- "lifestyle"
and "interests")
>and have homes in several countries around
>the world.
>
>Let me tell you more about myself, and the sort of woman I am seeking.
>
>I am 45 years old, and privately educated to a very high standard.
Anyone who's proud of his education would certainly
have elaborated on that "_very_ high standard" -- his
phraseology "educat[ion] to a very high standard" itself
suggests an uneducated or semi-literate person....
>I come from
>a family of (very) high achievers,
Not "high achievers", but -- "_very_ high achievers"...
Yet again, does this exist outside his head?
>and have built up a very successful business
>career in various aspects of the media and publishing.
Once more, his vagueness (wishful thinking?) betrays him ...
>My interests encompass
>the UK, Europe and the United States.
"interests" ?!! People internationally involved in
matters to do with the Media won't talk of _interests_!
>
>I live a very transient lifestyle at the moment.
Notice that this "highly educated" person didn't say
"peripatetic", "that takes me travelling", "that keeps
me on the move" "wandering" etc....
.. but misuses the word transient.
Even Romanies don't live a _transient lifestyle_ ....
>My main home is a 'mansion' in
>the Lake District.
A mansion! .. in quotes yet? ... either it is a mansion
or it isn't.
> I also maintain a flat in London, a cottage in County Cork,
>a villa in Spain and a house in San Francisco.
At this point, you might well be doubting him .. and who'd
blame you?
> I have a classic Ferrari and a
>Z3. I enjoy fast cars and driving for its own sake.
>
>So what sort of a woman do I wish to meet. Well, one interested in sharing my
>life. I will be honest and say that I would vastly prefer a younger woman, and
>one nearer 18 than 44!. I have a very vigourous sex-drive which I have
>satisfied up until now by using expensive and exclusive call-girls. Now I want
>to satisfy my emotions and my intellect and not simply my groin.
He's specified an age-range, strong sexual drive, and the
ability to satisfy his "emotions" (whatever _they_ are)
and an intellect of his that's still hiding from you ....
but nothing that makes you "special" ...!
>
>So my special woman should be prepared to travel and make several places her
>home. She will be also prepared to mix social with the elite of business and a
^^^^^^
"social" ????? .....
Typo? or ignorance? With what's gone before, this isn't good ...
"the elite of business" ?? -- how vague can you get?
>number of high profile people whom I call friends. Above all she will
be
"high profile people whom I call friends"
If you were one of those "so-called" friends, would you trust
him? Could anyone trust a person who has " ... people whom he
_calls_ friends"?
>prepared to devote herself entirely to my needs.
Only body-slaves devote themselves _entirely_ to someone's
needs....
I am not seeking a 'liberated'
>woman, but one who will allow me satisfaction at the snap of my
fingers.
Now ... if he feels after all this that he still
needs to say he's _not_ "seeking a liberated woman"
(liberated comes in quotes, you'll notice) then that
should put the kibosh upon his "high standard of
education" ....
"snap of my fingers" -- an image straight out of
Mae West's 'Butler -- peel me a grape!'
In
>return, she will have a special life.
?????? Perhaps he means your arms in his sink? :)
>
>So, do you exist...?
>
If you do, then how about posting a reply to
this "Wealthy male"? .... a full, frank reply ....
>:-)
Pete Turk <Pe...@ragtag.demon.co.uk> ICQ# 11981084
RFA Moonshadow
--
May your doorstep ever be dirty.
-- Romany blessing
Dwayne Conyers
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
They are not 100% naked
http://www.dwacon.com
___________________________________
Peanut in Spring
> Clues to pick-up from this post of "Owen G" ....
<Snipped for brevity....er, is that the right word Pete?> :)
The things you have picked up,are wot i picked up too. :)
....now, I am educationally challenged myself....I was hardly ever in
school....but even I noticed that our Mr Mansion of the Lake District (could
it be Mr Bluebird?) was not as 'well edjemacated' as he was stating.
Peanut
Pete Turk
<dwa...@theglobe.com> writes
Rick Rockwell? ... enlighten me, someone.
Pete Turk
Spring <peanuti...@aol.com> writes
Yeah! .. sorry about that, Peanut!
I'm in the market for anti-pompous-remark-devices.
After all, what can these university types do, anyway?
>;-)
Peanut in Spring
>Yeah! .. sorry about that, Peanut!
> I'm in the market for anti-pompous-remark-devices.
Don't worry about it Pete, it was a very interesting post. :)
>After all, what can these university types do, anyway? >;-)
Oh, I don't know....I like a nice university type myself, (I 'nearly' got
there, but I only passed one 'A' level - as you probably know they want three).
I like the kind of man you would meet in a bookshop. :)
Peanut
terra incognita
Spring <peanuti...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> I like the kind of man you would meet in a bookshop. :)
>
> Peanut
i know he is there,
reading Chomsky,
with a beard and gentle hands...
so i never go in.
or i sneak thru the stacks,
ferret-like.
:)
x