Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Black Ice" Now Available At All US Retail Outlets

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Emma Smith

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 11:29:57 PM10/30/09
to
It'll be interesting to see if sales go up with wider availability.

http://www.ac-dc.net/news/news.php?news_id=322

"Black Ice" & "No Bull" Now Available At All US Retail Outlets
26 Oct. 2009
Exactly a year after the initial release of "Black Ice" in the US
exclusively through Walmart, the album is being re-released on October
26th and now available at all US retail outlets. "Black Ice" is now
Double Platinum in the States with over 2 Million units sold.

The DVD & BluRay "No Bull - The Directors Cut," also a Walmart
exclusive a year ago, is being re-released through all outlets on
December 8th.

drdrew

unread,
Oct 31, 2009, 9:26:28 AM10/31/09
to
I'm surprised they didn't add a bonus track of something w'eve heard
a million times just to entice more buyers


--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -

badlands420

unread,
Oct 31, 2009, 2:53:24 PM10/31/09
to

> I'm surprised they didn't add a bonus track of something w'eve heard
> a million times just to entice more buyers

Maybe they'll do a pink and purple Extra Super Duper Special Collector's
Edition cover.


Boogieman

unread,
Oct 31, 2009, 4:03:56 PM10/31/09
to

"badlands420"

"Maybe they'll do a pink and purple Extra Super Duper Special Collector's
Edition cover."

LOL! My thoughts exactly man!


Frieda Ferguson

unread,
Oct 31, 2009, 7:46:11 PM10/31/09
to
On 31 Oct 2009 13:26:28 GMT, drdrew <screwba...@noway.com> wrote:

>I'm surprised they didn't add a bonus track of something w'eve heard
>a million times just to entice more buyers
>
>


All their songs sound alike anyway so what's the difference?

badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 1:39:23 AM11/1/09
to

> All their songs sound alike anyway so what's the difference?

They have different colored covers, silly! Everybody here owns all four!


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 9:07:56 AM11/1/09
to
On Oct 31, 6:46 pm, frieda5...@aol.com (Frieda Ferguson) wrote:
>
> All their songs sound alike anyway so what's the difference?

First you post under the name "Bonnie Hearns" and now this name...you
could of at least changed the sentence around a bit...idiot.

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 2:09:33 PM11/1/09
to

>First you post under the name "Bonnie Hearns" and now this name...you
>could of at least changed the sentence around a bit...idiot.

Did you just say "could of" and call somebody an idiot in the same sentence?


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 2:24:13 PM11/1/09
to

Make your point and please, be blunt.

Shawn - Philly

Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 2:47:32 PM11/1/09
to
On Nov 1, 2:09 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:

Second Attempt:

First you post under the name "Bonnie Hearns" and now this name...you

could have at least changed the sentence around a bit...idiot.

There...satisfied???

The next time you want to insult me, have some balls and come right
out and say it.

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:03:46 PM11/1/09
to

>The next time you want to insult me, have some balls and come right
out and say it.

Don't take yourself so seriously, man. It ain't my fault you wrote something
that was unintentionally funny. If I'd done something similar, I wouldn't
get pissed about somebody pointing it out. I'd just laugh at myself right
along with them.


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:06:07 PM11/1/09
to

You are telling me that you were NOT calling me an idiot, even though
what you posted insinuated that?

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:14:39 PM11/1/09
to

>You are telling me that you were NOT calling me an idiot, even though
what you posted insinuated that?

Again, you shouldn't take yourself so seriously. Is this how you react every
time a friend makes an innocent joke at your expense, especially one you
walked into on your own?

If you took what I said as some sort of explicit, literal insult, I think
you've got some serious skin thickness issues.


badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:26:10 PM11/1/09
to

"badlands420" <mike...@uranus.net> wrote in message
news:C_lHm.41645$Tx1....@newsfe15.iad...

PS- If it'll help, please feel free to make some jokes at my expense. As
many as you like, I don't mind at all.


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:29:39 PM11/1/09
to
On Nov 1, 3:14 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:
> >You are telling me that you were NOT calling me an idiot, even though
>
> what you posted insinuated that?
>
> Again, you shouldn't take yourself so seriously. Is this how you react every
> time a friend makes an innocent joke at your expense, especially one you
> walked into on your own?

No...it is not.

>
> If you took what I said as some sort of explicit, literal insult, I think
> you've got some serious skin thickness issues.

Yeah, maybe I interpreted it wrong, but then again, how well do I
really know you? How am I supposed to know whether or not you are
serious or joking?

Shawn - Philly


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:37:14 PM11/1/09
to
On Nov 1, 3:26 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:
> "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote in message


That is not my way...I said it before and I will say it again...I am
the nicest guy in the world who will bend over backwards to help
someone in need. I do not enjoy making myself look better at the
expense of someone else, nor do I enjoy being disrespected. I guess
everyone in the world can say that they don't like to be disrespected,
but I take it a step further because I go out of my way to try and be
respectful to those who deserve it.

Sure, calling that poster an idiot may conflict with what I just said,
but that poster did not deserve my respect because he is just a troll
surfing under aliases to provoke trouble...plain & simple.

My Father always said: "If you do not have anything nice to say, then
say nothing at all." I believe this up until the point of being
disrespected...then it is open season.

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:52:21 PM11/1/09
to

>Yeah, maybe I interpreted it wrong, but then again, how well do I
>really know you? How am I supposed to know whether or not you are
>serious or joking?

Dude, you've known me for at least eight years. Did you really never notice
that I bust people's balls all the time?

For god's sake, I call Doof an idiot every time he says "loose" instead of
"lose." Then he calls me a malnourished Kid Rock-looking Swedish fag porn
lover, then we both laugh our balls off.


badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:55:55 PM11/1/09
to

>My Father always said: "If you do not have anything nice to say, then
>say nothing at all." I believe this up until the point of being
>disrespected...then it is open season.

My dad taught me life's too short to spend it searching for things to get
pissed off about.


tomScotland

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 4:03:58 PM11/1/09
to

You're a malnourished Kid-Rock-looking swedish fag-porn lover.

--
'91 MkII Golf GTi 8v
'05 Polo FSi
www.facebook.com/tomscotland

Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 4:05:07 PM11/1/09
to
On Nov 1, 3:55 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:

> My dad taught me life's too short to spend it searching for things to get
> pissed off about.

I wasn't searching at all. You replied to my post.

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 5:29:13 PM11/1/09
to

> You're a malnourished Kid-Rock-looking swedish fag-porn lover.

I'm offended that you don't know I switched to Icelandic fag porn at least
six months ago.


TV

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 8:23:20 PM11/4/09
to
> Dude, you've known me for at least eight years. Did you really never
> notice that I bust people's balls all the time?

He's totally lying Shawn. Bads is normally the model of courtosy, he's just
trying to piss you off for some reason. I wouldn't take that kind of shit
from an Icelandic porn addict.

TV


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 8:39:40 PM11/4/09
to

Be prepared Tony...Bads will most probably get on your shit for
misspelling courtesy...

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 10:11:46 PM11/4/09
to
>Be prepared Tony...Bads will most probably get on your shit for
misspelling courtesy...

Oh dear me....


TV

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:25:53 PM11/5/09
to
No, that's totally a Canadian spelling. But I should behave about now.

Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 1:11:35 AM11/6/09
to
On Nov 5, 10:25 pm, "TV" <g...@bent.com> wrote:
> No, that's totally a Canadian spelling.  But I should behave about now.
>
> TV

Quitting so soon?

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 1:55:09 AM11/6/09
to

> No, that's totally a Canadian spelling.

I find this a very weak defence.


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 9:01:19 AM11/6/09
to
On Nov 6, 1:55 am, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:
> > No, that's totally a Canadian spelling.
>
> I find this a very weak defence.

Using the British English dictionary today, huh?

Shawn - Philly

badlands420

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:15:18 PM11/6/09
to

> Using the British English dictionary today, huh?

Oh dear me....


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:22:19 PM11/6/09
to
On Nov 6, 4:15 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:
> > Using the British English dictionary today, huh?
>
> Oh dear me....

Nouns ending in -ce with -se verb forms: American English and British
English both retain the noun/verb distinction in advice / advise and
device / devise, but American English has abandoned the distinction
with licence / license and practice / practise (where the two words in
each pair are homophones) that British spelling retains. American
English uses practice and license for both meanings.

American English has kept the Anglo-French spelling for defense and
offense, which are usually defence and offence in British English;
similarly there are the American pretense and British pretence; but
derivatives such as defensive, offensive, and pretension are always
thus spelled in both systems.

Australian[43] and Canadian[citation needed] usage generally follows
British.

badlands420

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:33:44 PM11/6/09
to

>Australian[43] and Canadian[citation needed] usage generally follows
British.

What an absolutely shocking revelation.


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:40:04 PM11/6/09
to

Who sad it was a "revelation?

Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:41:10 PM11/6/09
to

2nd attempt...

Who said it was a "revelation"?

badlands420

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:46:31 PM11/6/09
to

>Who said it was a "revelation"?

Is your grasp of subtlety really this tenuous, or are you just trolling me?

If you're trolling me, it's brilliant.


Shawn - Philly

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 4:51:46 PM11/6/09
to

LOL...I'll let you decide

TV

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 10:34:15 PM11/6/09
to
I like pie.

TV

"Shawn - Philly" <shaw...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:05fa2aaa-5f8e-4cf2...@15g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...

0 new messages