Question for Sara Salzman
Black Knight
which he stated that Yale had filed his lawsuit in the wrong court.
Wasn't that the reason for the dismissal-lack of jurisdiction? I don't
trust Fatboy to tell me the truth, so I'm relying on you.
Bruno
Bob Scott
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>I remember some months ago, you posted a letter from Daylin Leach in
>which he stated that Yale had filed his lawsuit in the wrong court.
>Wasn't that the reason for the dismissal-lack of jurisdiction?
I never claimed the lawsuit wasn't dismissed on the basis of jurisdiction you
stupid oaf! I said other factors were involved other than jurisdiction and the
main one being I was never served!
>I don't trust Fatboy to tell me the truth,
Your name calling is based on another Edeiken lie and based on his outright lie
about what my medical record stated which he had no legal right to quote in
public in the first place.
You act like I am lying but here is what I posted in December 2002:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=mqb40vgp83le5nd7obe5b1dcdvtu36crhu%404ax.com&rnum=9
From: Tavish <RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com>
Subject: What Peter Outerbridge and Other Deniers of Reality Won't Face About
the Malicious Prosecution Which Was Waged Against Me aka Re: Who Is That Weird
... Fascist ... Ranting About Nizkor R_1219
Message-ID: <mqb40vgp83le5nd7o...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2002 20:42:19 GMT
"You also forget the fact the plaintiff violated numerous disciplinary rules and
that I was NOT given the chance to refute his numerous wrongful accusations in
court. How can you refute what you are accused IF the plaintiff would not give
your attorney a copy of his complaints but instead told the attorney: "FUCK YOU"
each time a request was made. True- the lawsuit and its judgment were dismissed
on grounds of jurisdiction BUT that was the most convenient and easiest way to
toss a malicious prosecution made by an attorney who also made an obscene
telephone call to the defendant. THOSE ARE THE FACTS YOU CHOOSE TO IGNORE."
<END>
Hardly looks like I have been trying to be deceitful. I merely add That I found
this (I am getting together all of my documents and I am waiting on more
documents still to...) among many of my documents:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
IOW I could never respond to what I was NEVER served!
Are you now trying to imply I lied about the above or that I lied about the
court being told Yale made an obscene call to my residence and it being played
to the court or that Yale told my attorney "Fuck You" every time he tried to get
a "copy of the complaints" which explains why my attorney did not become my
attorney of record UNTIL he read the complaints (which he never got to do!)? You
are stupid Art and I resent you trying to smear me based on a perjurious lawsuit
filed against me. I won and it was for many reasons. You aren't interested in
justice-- you are interested in smear.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
Many of my foes want to believe that the lawsuit which as waged against me and
failed was dismissed solely on account of jurisdiction. This is simply not true.
I have maintained the fact the court was made aware that I was never served with
a copy of the complaint made against me-- and the same being done to David
Michael. I have been gathering together all documents concerning the malicious
prosecution against me (which is now being used to smear me) and I came across
the "Request for Relief From Judgment" document which even my naysayers should
be able to get from the court clerk and it plainly states (in part):
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
I can smear too! Is it true you lost your last job because your employer didn't
like your obsession concerning stalking various people on the internet and
making personal attacks against them while on their time and using their
facility? Want to talk about that Fatmouth?
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=3d1bfd5c.22159639@shawnews&lr=&hl=en
From: kml...@nospam.shaww.ca (Ken Lewis)
Subject: Hey Bruno!
Organization: Electriczen
Message-ID: <3d1bfd5c.22159639@shawnews>
References: <540b9a94.02062...@posting.google.com>
<594c8e48.02062...@posting.google.com>
<Xns92368B12B93B...@216.148.53.93>
<594c8e48.02062...@posting.google.com> <af87rh$ds6$1...@gw.retro.com>
<594c8e48.02062...@posting.google.com>
<dy1S8.89543$3R2.3...@news1.west.cox.net>
<MPG.17827a91a...@news.supernews.net>
<594c8e48.02062...@posting.google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:34:40 GMT
On 25 Jun 2002 16:10:40 -0700, kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight)
wrote:
>Dan Swartzendruber <dsw...@druber.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.17827a91a...@news.supernews.net>...
>> In article <dy1S8.89543$3R2.3...@news1.west.cox.net>, ch...@cox.net
Oh, who the hell cares what you wrote.
What I want to know is why you are still posting to USENET from work
when you were told not to do so?
Don't you consider it theft to steal time and computer resources from
your employer?
The message ID for this post of yours was:
594c8e48.02062...@posting.google.com
and the NNTP-Posting-Host was 170.213.132.250
170.213.132.250 is:
Trying whois -h whois.arin.net 170.213.132.250
Network Management Division (NET-SDCNTY-INET)
The County of San Diego
Department of Information Services
Network Management Division M/S A-S$
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92101
US
Netname: SDCNTY-INET
Netblock: 170.213.0.0 - 170.213.255.255
Coordinator:
SAIC (ZS103-ARIN) hostm...@mnsc.saic.com
800-897-2836
Would they be pleased that you are STILL stealing work time from them
after having been told to stop?
What does this say about your morals?
Better be careful. You might get fired. AGAIN!
ROTFLMAO!
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Care to talk about you getting fired from your job Artie? Care to deny
Patrick L. Humphrey got fired from Rice University for stalking people
in USENET on their time and using their facilities?
You are mentally disturbed and your fixation with me proves such.
BTW your smear campaign against me will not ever negate the cold hard truths
these archives make evident!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=prbo5vkp1825141dem99scia1676el7nqd%404ax.com
Subject: Anti-American Communist Agitator and Tax Exempt Religious Org Which
Gave Him Financial and Moral Support
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:07:42 -0600
Message-ID: <prbo5vkp1825141de...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=q6u65v4lop8l8k31b8po91hvjtta8sr1n9%404ax.com&rnum=1
"NYC Based web site ANTI-FASCISM.ORG Advocates Communist Revolution..."
Date: 19 Feb 2003 12:29:06 GMT
Message-ID: <q6u65v4lop8l8k31b...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3df2a771.119319192%40news5.uncensored-news.com&rnum=5
Subject: Nanaimo BC Resident Ken McVay lies about his agenda to stifle FREE
SPEECH R_1207
Message-ID: <3df2a771....@news5.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 8 Dec 2002 01:58:44 GMT
FREE SPEECH WORLDWIDE UNDER ASSAULT BY B'NAI BRITH AND NIZKOR.ORG
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=u3u65vs5697ofh14kjc34lgo2nu7a2ej8m%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: NIZKOR Director Ken McVay in Bed With Communists and His Animosity
Against Anti-Communists Documented ...
Message-ID: <u3u65vs5697ofh14k...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Feb 2003 12:27:24 GMT
(Very brief excerpt)
The League of Human Rights of B'nai Brith (Ken McVay's Nizkor sponsor) got a
court ruling which declares this about anti-communism:
http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/decisions/docs/league-e.htm
T.D. 15/92 Decision rendered December 16, 1992
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6 (as amended)
HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL
[...]
B. THE COMPLAINTS
These complaints are brought by ... The League for Human Rights B'Nai Brith
Canada ... (1) Themes Which Promote Hatred: ...
(g) Anti-Communist Ideology .... <END>
BTW this archive plainly proves your shyster pal lied and poerjured himself and
made death threats against me in his failed attempt to intimidate me into
silence:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
If you or the bastard who sued me think the above log of perjurious and criminal
conduct has merit then by all means file it in my jurisdiction and see how god
danned quick Yale F. Edeiken finds himself in a whole heap of trouble! Perjury,
manuafacturing of evidence, and making death threats are still crimes in any
jurisdiction-- no wonder Yale F. Edeiken never served myself nor my attorney
copies of his kook komplaints. Read my sig line and get the sense of it!
Need I say more?
Tavish
>so I'm relying on you.
Trying to stir the pot more I see!
>Bruno
---
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned above-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
I don't think I posted any letters from Leach, but the FACT is that the
Judge ruled PURELY on the issue of jurisdiction, NOT on any of the facts
of the case.
The case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds only. The findings of
fact remain facts.
Hope this helps,
Sara
--
If Ernst Zundel is a refugee, Daffy Duck is Albert Einstein. Some
propositions are so ludicrous that they are a betrayal of common
sense and human dignity if allowed a moment's oxygen.
- REX MURPHY, The Globe and Mail
Black Knight
> In article <594c8e48.03022...@posting.google.com>,
> kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>
> > I remember some months ago, you posted a letter from Daylin Leach in
> > which he stated that Yale had filed his lawsuit in the wrong court.
> > Wasn't that the reason for the dismissal-lack of jurisdiction? I don't
> > trust Fatboy to tell me the truth, so I'm relying on you.
> >
> > Bruno
>
> I don't think I posted any letters from Leach, but the FACT is that the
> Judge ruled PURELY on the issue of jurisdiction, NOT on any of the facts
> of the case.
>
> The case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds only. The findings of
> fact remain facts.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Sara
Thanks.I seem to remember from law school that a civil suit between
parties from two different states should be filed in Federal Court.
The state of Pennsylvania and it's courts have no authority over a
Texas resident.
Bruno
Bob Scott
<catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>The findings of fact remain facts.
I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact and for a FACT if I and my
attorney were served with those "complaints" and allowed to file against them
with what I show in the archive below then Yale would not be practicing law
today and he would have done time too! Also my petition for relief from judgment
is very relevant. Also seeing how so many people put credence in that lawsuit
then I suggest it be re-filed in MY jurisdiction and we will all see who gets
some jail time. I have been willing to let sleeping dogs lie but to tell you the
truth-- I am getting tired of being defamed and all on account of a kook lawsuit
filled with numerous outrageous lies and perjury! THAT IS FACT!
No one likes being falsely accused of doing things they did not do and that
lawsuit is filled with numerous false accusations and "doctored" evidence trying
to prove I did what I did not do! I offered to help Yale go after the person who
did all the stuff to him and you know so because I CCd you my search efforts. To
continually accuse me of doing stuff which you know I did not do says much of
you as a person!
The only interest McVay, "Paul Kneisel", and Art Tandy have in that lawsuit is
its smear value. They like posting it to smear me as if all those perjured
statements were true!
BTW the claim that my address etc. became "public information" is another lie!
That subpoena never made it to the docket and for a fact Yale used such info to
make his death threats against me. If you people had any smarts at all you would
stop the smear campaign before I decide to file complaints myself! I am tired of
being harassed, having property damage etc. and all on account of illegal
distribution of subpoenaed information!
Once again-- If you think Yale's lawsuit had such merit then why didn't he
follow through on his appeal to the State Court when he lost at county level?
I know why and I can prove all he wanted me to do is spend more money! THAT IS
FACT!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=0kue2vca1fnca55ls9qoibqjot240qlpdm%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury
Message-ID: <0kue2vca1fnca55ls...@4ax.com>
Date: 17 Jan 2003 03:52:04 GMT
(Excerpt)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=Uvie7.74%249d.11873%40newshog.newsread.com
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Snottie Bradshit, man without a lawyer
Message-ID: <Uvie7.74$9d.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
"Bradshit now claims that he refused to use Daylin because Leach asked
for $2,000.00 for the appeal. The average appeal in a personal injury
action required about 60-75 hours of work by an attorney. The going bottom
rate around here starts at about 5k. Either Bradshit is lying again or he
passed up an incredible bargain."
<END>
The above indicates Yale just wanted me to blow more money at $5000.00 worth to
fight a frivolous lawsuit based on manufactured evidence!
~~End of GOOGLE Excerpt~~
The above shows Yale's motive and it was to make me spend money. He would have
delighted if I spent $5000.00 to fight an "appeal" for which Yale didn't intend
to follow through on and file! Care to deny it?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
Tavish
steve wolk
"Bob Scott" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in
message news:55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com...
And OJ said he was going to hunt for his wife's murderer.
Black Knight
Not only that, but I'm Queen Elizabeth I, too.However, on Mondays and
Wednesdays, I'm Christoper Columbus and on Thursdays, I'm Attila the
Hun.
Bruno
Bruno
Tavish
wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>And OJ said he was going to hunt for his wife's murderer.
Why do you compare me to a murderer? That is insulting! If you would read what
Yale accused me of and see how I could have answered if I were given a fair
chance you would see different. Care to tell all of us what I did and prove it
so that I deserve all the shit that has been perpetrated against me because one
lone shithead abused the legal system for his own personal vendettas?
What another person has claimed with this statement: "The findings of
fact remain facts." is FALSE. I was not allowed any input because I was never
served so the court only "heard" Yale's version without any protest from me.
I hardly consider a one sided argument between two opposing parties being
finding fact especially when so much perjury by the shyster was submitted as
sworn statements! Care to deny the obvious perjury in the following?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
BTW Yale is friggin' nutcase and I would love for him to file the same lawsuit
in my jurisdiction. I would love to be judged by my peers and I would love to
see him answer for his false swearing. Our jail has an open courtyard for
prisoners to get a little sun and the meals are allegedly pretty good.
steve wolk
"Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
news:5bp26vkd49j94fm47...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:45:08 -0500, <ih6dnXCFNLI...@comcast.com>
"steve
> wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>
> >And OJ said he was going to hunt for his wife's murderer.
>
> Why do you compare me to a murderer?
I didn't. I'm merely pointing out that OJ's offer was disingenuous. You
offering to help Yale is also meaningless. Actions speak louder than words.
That is insulting! If you would read what
> Yale accused me of and see how I could have answered if I were given a
fair
> chance you would see different. Care to tell all of us what I did and
prove it
> so that I deserve all the shit that has been perpetrated against me
because one
> lone shithead abused the legal system for his own personal vendettas?
Sorry, I don't see it that way. I think you got off on a technicality.
>
> What another person has claimed with this statement: "The findings of
> fact remain facts." is FALSE.
No, it's not. Even your attorney never disputed the facts of the case.
I was not allowed any input because I was never
> served so the court only "heard" Yale's version without any protest from
me.
If the case had gone to trial, you would have had the ooportunity to tell
your side. Are you complaining that it never went to trial?
> I hardly consider a one sided argument between two opposing parties being
> finding fact especially when so much perjury by the shyster was submitted
as
> sworn statements!
That is your allegation, not a legal fact. If it is fact, why don't you
bring suit against Yale for defamation and slander? Don't you want to be
rich?
Care to deny the obvious perjury in the following?
Of course I deny it.
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%
404ax.com
> Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1"
Is
> Filled With Lies and Perjury...
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
> Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%
404ax.com
> Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
> Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
>
> BTW Yale is friggin' nutcase
There are many who believe you to be the nutcase. Yale hasn't been here for
2 years and you're still crying about this case.
and I would love for him to file the same lawsuit
> in my jurisdiction.
I bet you do.
I would love to be judged by my peers and I would love to
> see him answer for his false swearing. Our jail has an open courtyard for
> prisoners to get a little sun and the meals are allegedly pretty good.
Scott, it's time for you to get over this. Just go back to being the same
old fantasizing Jew-baiter we once knew.
Sara Salzman
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:<catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>...
> > In article <594c8e48.03022...@posting.google.com>,
> > kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
> >
> > > I remember some months ago, you posted a letter from Daylin Leach in
> > > which he stated that Yale had filed his lawsuit in the wrong court.
> > > Wasn't that the reason for the dismissal-lack of jurisdiction? I don't
> > > trust Fatboy to tell me the truth, so I'm relying on you.
> > >
> > > Bruno
> >
> > I don't think I posted any letters from Leach, but the FACT is that the
> > Judge ruled PURELY on the issue of jurisdiction, NOT on any of the facts
> > of the case.
> >
> > The case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds only. The findings of
> > fact remain facts.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Sara
>
>
> Thanks.I seem to remember from law school that a civil suit between
> parties from two different states should be filed in Federal Court.
> The state of Pennsylvania and it's courts have no authority over a
> Texas resident.
>
>
> Bruno
Yes... and no. If the damage occured in PA, the case can be heard there.
That, as I understand it, is why Yale filed in PA.
Sara Salzman
Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
> On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
> <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >The findings of fact remain facts.
>
> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
Are you calling my affidavit perjury, Mr. Bradbury?
Tavish
<catamont-CCA186...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Are you calling my affidavit perjury, Mr. Bradbury?
You yourself say it. If that lawsuit has so much merit then re-file in MY
jurisdiction and see what happens!
I would love for my peers (the jury) and the judge see what I was accused of and
the facts as proven here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
I would love to have the court see Edeiken's false swearings exposed for what
they are one by one as the above shows. I would love for the court to see how
subpoenaed information was used to make death threats. I would love for my local
police to testify about all the harassment I have received (and show broken
window pix) as a result of Yale F. Edeiken circulating subpoenaed information
that never became "public knowledge" because the subpoena was never turned over
to the court or else it would be on the docket! If you are so sure that I am
legally culpable for what other people do and who live in another state and
another country do then re-file that lawsuit and see how quick you are
awakened to reality. I am no more responsible for what David Michael and Don
Ellis/Pat Blakely allegedly did than Hilary Ostrov is for my windows being
broken twice!
I am not being rude and I am not resorting to personal attack and name call BUT
I am tired of being defamed because of that KOOK lawsuit and it is a kook
lawsuit. BTW it won't look good for Yale's cause when sworn testimony is
submitted which describes how my former attorney has been harassed and defamed
by people because they didn't like him defending me. GO AHEAD AND CONTACT YALE
AND TELL HIM TO FILE THAT LAWSUIT IN MY COUNTY AND SEE HOW GOD DAMNED QUICK
HE'LL BE BEHIND BARS!! Making criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information, manufacturing of evidence etc. are criminal offenses in my
jurisdiction and my DA is not one of Yale's pals who will look the other way
like James B. Martin did. Brenham, Texas is only 18 miles away if you don't like
the Wayne Hotel across the street from the Austin County Courthouse.
Read my sig line for a very important admission made by Yale and YES- I will
submit to the court Yale's courthouse escapades in which he assaults a deputy
sheriff and threatens another person by saying he has a gun. Would play real
well to a judge in my jurisdiction who would also get to hear the obscene
telephone call Yale made and get to read all of the thousands of e-mail Yale
sent in all of its vulgarity. BRING IT ON OR TELL THE VERMIN DEFAMING ME TO SHUT
THEIR GOD DAMNED MOUTHS!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
This would play quite well:
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call
Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined
$600 plus costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy
sheriff and another man in a courthouse elevator.
During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda
Hartman with his briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by
saying he had a gun, according to District Justice Diane Jepsen,
who heard the case. Edeiken later was found to have a permit for
and was carrying a .357 Magnum.
Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay
the fine after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and
disorderly conduct filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no
longer has a permit for his gun.
According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side
elevator, which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with
Joanne Keller. Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been
sentenced and Hartman was taking her to pay fines and costs
before her release.
Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public
defender Earl Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.
Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had
burglarized him, pushed his way onto the elevator.
But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already
was on the elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving
match. Witnesses varied on what was said.
Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said
he was referring to Keller.
Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a
house owned by Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a
character witness for Keller at her sentencing.
Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and
Hartman, according to testimony.
Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered
Edeiken to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to
exit, Edeiken told Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was
going to draw it. No weapon was seen.
Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman
took Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held
pending their proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to
stay until she got help. When she returned, Edeiken was gone.
<END>
The above speaks volumes about Yale and so does his self admission
in my sig line! Need I say more other than Yale is a criminal perjurer
and a liar in addition to being (his own words): "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man"!
Scott Bradbury
Tavish
wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>Scott, it's time for you to get over this.
I have tried and I have even offered to help Yale if he wanted to go after who
really posted his parent's addresses and to have him visited by Penn State
Troopers BUT he and his pals would rather defame me by recycling his kook
accusations!
Tell your pals if they don't want me to keep posting evidence to prove Yale is a
nutcase then tell them to drop it. I was going to retie from USENET but the
vermin started with their defamation again and I found that kook lawsuit at two
web sites.
Care to deny Yale admitted he's nutso in my sig line?
Tavish
Tavish
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Subject: Re: Question for Sara Salzman
>Date: 1 Mar 2003 18:09:03 -0800
>Organization: http://groups.google.com/
>Lines: 48
>Message-ID: <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
>References: <594c8e48.03022...@posting.google.com>
><catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
><55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>
><ih6dnXCFNLI...@comcast.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.81.26.173
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Trace: posting.google.com 1046570943 14770 127.0.0.1 (2 Mar 2003 02:09:03 GMT)
>X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Mar 2003 02:09:03 GMT
>Xref: mindspring alt.revisionism:1371227
On 1 Mar 2003 18:09:03 -0800, <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
Showing a multiple personality disorder? Is that why you signed your brayings
twice as we all see below? BTW why are you mum about the lies I caught you in
you stupid kike?
>Bruno
>
>Bruno
Care to try to use some Chutzpa in some kike damage control to deviate from this
latest bunch of lies I caught you in you kike pigshit vermin:
On 1 Mar 2003 11:39:03 -0800, <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>I just realized the conflict between Fatboy and myself may have an
>ideological side.
You are a communist sympathizer and you are also a pathological liar who has as
fellow travelers- liars and communists. YES-- there are major differences
between you and me!
>I am not one of the Liberals or leftists he claims to be fighting. On
>the contrary, I am a Conservative Republican,
Caught you lying again you stupid oaf! You are NOT a Conservative Republican
because they don't engage in the cheap shots like you do and they don't take
sides with self confessed communists. You are also flip-flopping again and you
accused me once before of being a liar when I pointed out you being the liar as
I prove here to your shame you stupid lying Pharisee:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ldas2vk6kue9174fp9vm7jaefsc7e4il6v%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: Bradbum caught LYING twice more.
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:44:49 -0600
Message-ID: <ldas2vk6kue9174fp...@4ax.com>
References: <594c8e48.0301...@posting.google.com>
<b2er2vorl3i5u6s14...@4ax.com>
<594c8e48.03012...@posting.google.com>
(Excerpt)
From: kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Bradbum caught LYING twice more.
Date: 21 Jan 2003 18:44:20 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <594c8e48.03012...@posting.google.com>
References: <594c8e48.0301...@posting.google.com>
<b2er2vorl3i5u6s14...@4ax.com>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On 21 Jan 2003 18:44:20 -0800, <594c8e48.03012...@posting.google.com>
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Tavish <RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com> wrote in message news:<b2er2vorl3i5u6s14...@4ax.com>...
>> On 21 Jan 2003 10:58:30 -0800, <594c8e48.0301...@posting.google.com>
>> kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>>
>> >Here is an expose of the Nazi distortion of the Talmud that you post
>> >with your overly chubby little fingers. Do they obstruct each other on
>> >the keyboard, Moby Bum?
:
>> Once again personal attacks coming from a person who claims to be a Republican
>> and claims to be a conservative.
:
>That's two more LIES by the filthy lazy BUM.
Now you are accusing me of being a liar YET you are the one who claims being a
conservative and Republican which I pointed out above and which I prove you have
claimed in these archives-- so who is the liar?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=594c8e48.0209190059.52088ef3%40posting.google.com&rnum=1
From: kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Robert Frenchu Exposed as a Dumbass
Date: 19 Sep 2002 01:59:06 -0700
Message-ID: <594c8e48.02091...@posting.google.com>
"I happen to be a Conservative Republican, member of the American
Legion and former U.S. Navy officer."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=594c8e48.0301170827.36026d12%40posting.google.com&rnum=3
From: kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.skinheads,alt.activism
Subject: Re: Mountain INF's Lies and Hypocrisy
Date: 17 Jan 2003 08:27:26 -0800
Message-ID: <594c8e48.03011...@posting.google.com>
"I'm a Conservative Republican, former U.S. Naval officer, NRA member and
American Legion member."
Who is the liar? Who relies on name call and mean spirited personal attacks?
You flip-flop as much about your alleged conservative republicanism as Ken McVay
flip-flops about his dubious funding as described in these two major archives
filled with the documented lies and flip-flops:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
JUST COUNT ALL THE LIES!
BTW YOU ARE A STUPID KIKE!
Here is another stupid kike shootinhg off his big mouth:
Tavish
<catamont-CCA186...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>,
> Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
>> <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >The findings of fact remain facts.
:
>> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
Why did you snip what I posted? Can't refute the self evident truths concerning
all the false sworn statements made against me?
What you snipped:
<START>
<END>
~~End of GOOGLE Excerpt~~
Tavish
[...]
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
<STOP>
>Are you calling my affidavit perjury, Mr. Bradbury?
Are you having feelings of guilt? I made no mention of you or your affidavit and
you would have seen so if you would have taken the time to actually have read
what I posted. I now bring up two of many points contained in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
THE FIRST POINT OF TWO:
Care to deny Yale F. Edeiken "confessing" he made death threats against me using
confidential information he subpoenaed which (for a fact) never became "public
knowledge" as you and others have falsely claimed? That subpoena issued to
FLASH.NET did not show up on the docket (YES-- I have a copy too!) so ONLY and
ONLY Yale F. Edeiken had my unlisted telephone number and address in December
1999. Care to deny Yale framed himself with the following?
> 51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
>to Plaintiff:
>
>Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
>Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
>with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
>for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter."
>Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
I now prove beyond any fault that Yale F. Edeiken made an admission he was
"nazihunter" on December 14th and 15th 1999 and how he hung himself:
For a fact: I was not advised the subpoena to my ISP was going to be made and
(required by law on the plaintiffs' attorney's behalf) allowed to "quash it" NOR
was the returned subpoena entered into the docket! Those are FACTS!
I WAS NEVER GIVEN NOTICE THAT A SUBPOENA WAS GOING TO BE SERVED ON MY ISP AND
THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY E-MAILING ME AGAINST MY WILL AT
THE TIME TOO! HE VIOLATED THE LAW PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
That subpoena was NOT turned over and it does NOT appear on the docket thus it
is NOT public domain and for a fact the plaintiff's attorney illegally
distributed the information he obtained and for a FACT I was not allowed to
object or quash it!
Courtesy of Ken McVay, director of Nizkor, and from Nizkor web site:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH" (Defendant)
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
[...]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: (610) 434-7004
Fax: (610) 434-6978
<END>
From the above admission to Lehigh County Civil Court and on public record as
sworn testimony I now ask these questions concerning the above "ADMISSION OF
FACT":
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you all know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b) Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>? If he did not implicate himself then why
would he be personally threatened with my reply to "nazihunter" who at that time
was just a mentally unbalanced poster who on the night before made a criminal
death threat against me? The above is in court records and was filed as a sworn
complaint against me, the Defendant, who on just the night before had his name,
address, and telephone number posted with an incitement to murder.
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
More supporting evidence which proves that Yale F. Edeiken alone was sole
possessor of my identity, address, and telephone number at that time:
(Yale F. Edeiken's activities on December 14, 1999)
Now take note of the following post from Yale F. Edeiken himself:
Concerning being arrested:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: We Want Porn Please Add Us to Your Lists!
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3856...@news3.enter.net>
References: <82rla9$f...@sirius.infonex.com>
<82s6km$444$2...@dosa.alt.net>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-4-5.enter.net
X-Trace: 14 Dec 1999 14:38:06 -0500, atmax-4-5.enter.net
[... more false accusations linking to an anonymous post deleted]
You will be interested to learn that a civil suit has already been
filed and a warrant for his arrest is about to be issued.
--YFE
~~End of Post~~
Did everyone notice the time and date the post was archived originally by
DejaCom? It was: Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
The above post as well as the posts which follow were all archived in
a very short time frame by DejaCom. Notice in the following posts you see
my name being forged and also my telephone number and address being posted
along with the mention of me being arrested! Now I ask what are the odds
that another person just would happen to obtain my unlisted telephone
number and address and at the same time be posting it to USENET announcing
I am going to be arrested. Once again Yale F. Edeiken engaging in criminal
harassment!
From: "Bradbury MacTavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Tavish's widdle dickie needs a lickin
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Anonymously posted.
Hello to all of my friends and fans out there! Once again,
as the holidays approach, my widdle dickie feels the need
of your attention.
Won't you come and visit my widdle dickie, before Bubba
makes me his and his alone, like before I get arrested?
I live at <address and telephone number deleted>, but
if you are not able to put your lips on widdle dickie in
person, call me for phone sex, at <address and telephone
number deleted> and we'll get it on...
----------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:28:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1999121501...@cotse.com>
From: "Scott Bradbury" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Please suck my tiny dick as a holiday gift
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Lines: 27
Anonymously posted.
My name is Scott Bradbury ..... my adoring and sometimes
sniveling fans know me as "Doc Tavish."
I have a difficult problem. I am about to be arrested,
which means only this guy named Billy Bob will be sucking
my tiny dick.
I don't know when I'm going to be jailed, but the warrant's
been issued... even my close friend and sometimes-lover Fat
Harold won't be able to cuddle my tiny dick then...
Will you show your affection now, by sucking my tiny dick
before I am arrested?
I live in Texas, you know..... where we grow really big
mouths and really small dicks. I live at <address and
telephone number deleted> if you can't suck my tiny dick in
person, can we have phone sex instead? I sure hope so,
because you won't be able to reach me at <address and
telephone number deleted> much longer!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Remember the two posts above mention me being arrested in addition to
giving out my unlisted telephone number and address! What are the odds
that a separate person from Yale F. Edeiken would be posting my unlisted
telephone number and address in addition to announcing I was going to be
arrested? Notice the time and dates of the archival process!
All of the above criminal harassment happened because a mentally disturbed
attorney obtained my unlisted address and unlisted telephone number by use
of a subpoena as shown here:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net.. This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290.. November 30,1999 Return address: Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard
Street; Allentown, PA 18104." (Subpoena on file with my attorney, Flash
Net, and law enforcement) [For the record the subpoena does NOT appear on
the docket- rather my confidential info went directly to one of
Yale F. Edeiken's "drops."]
Yale F. Edeiken had a subpoena issued on November 30,1999 and sent it from
Allentown, Pennsylvania to Flash Net in Dallas, Texas. The travel time and
turnaround would be reasonable to assume that Yale F. Edeiken received
my confidential info on about December 14, 1999! I ask again; what are the odds
that another person other than Yale F. Edeiken would be using the COTSE
anonymizer in a small time frame on the night of December 14, 1999 to
violate my right to privacy!? Yale F. Edeiken did in FACT identify himself
as the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was threatened (personally) when I
replied to "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>.
[...]
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
From the above one can discern that the subpoena Yale F. Edeiken issued on
November 30, 1999 never made it back to the court house to be entered on the
docket. Yale F. Edeiken had my identity, unlisted telephone number and address
returned to his "drop" at:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104
Hence the information he obtained never in FACT became public knowledge like he
wants everyone to believe! Yale F. Edeiken issued the subpoena
on November 30, 1999 from Allentown, Pennsylvania to my ISP Flash Net in Dallas,
Texas. With the time consideration for United State's Postal Service trip two
ways and Flash Net processing the request a fair estimation would say Yale F.
Edeiken received what he wanted on or about December 14, 1999. Seeing how the
subpoena never made it to the docket and became "public knowledge" Yale F.
Edeiken was the sole possessor of my information on December 14, 1999.
The real rub in knowing this comes from the knowledge Yale F. Edeiken engaged in
his criminal acts and death threats against me on December 14, 1999, a full 16
days before his lawsuit was served on me!!
END OF POINT ONE OF TWO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SECOND POINT OF TWO
Care to deny Yale F. Edeiken manufactured evidence as is so obvious here (and I
showed many more examples in the archive you didn't wish to view too!):
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17
> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~
Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"
Witness this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.242633%40newshog.newsread.com&output=gplain
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!!
END OF POINT TWO OF TWO
Care to deny Yale acted criminally? If his lawsuit has so much merit then
persuade him to re-file it in my jurisdiction and see how quick he is
prosecuted! He will find out that he can't get away with his criminal abuse
of the legal system in my county! As for the type of person Yale is-- everyone
read what follows!
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned above-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
<END>
and a liar in addition to being (his own words): "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man"!
>Sara
A.Melon
He is a good example of why Hitler and his followers
were justified in gassing and burning the rats in
Germany.
Black Knight
> On 02 Mar 2003 04:15:36 GMT,
> <catamont-CCA186...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>,
> > Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
> >> <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >The findings of fact remain facts.
>
> >> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
>
> Why did you snip what I posted? Can't refute the self evident truths concerning
> all the false sworn statements made against me?
If someone wants to read what she snipped, they can simply go back to
your post.
You may enjoy making long posts with irrelevant material, but some of
us like to get to the point.
>
> What you snipped:
>
> <START>
>
> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact and for a FACT if I and my
> attorney were served with those "complaints" and allowed to file against them
> with what I show in the archive below then Yale would not be practicing law
> today and he would have done time too! Also my petition for relief from judgment
> is very relevant. Also seeing how so many people put credence in that lawsuit
> then I suggest it be re-filed in MY jurisdiction and we will all see who gets
> some jail time.
Nonsense.You don't get "jail time" from a civil suit.
I have been willing to let sleeping dogs lie but to tell you the
> truth-- I am getting tired of being defamed and all on account of a kook lawsuit
> filled with numerous outrageous lies and perjury! THAT IS FACT!
It is not a fact until it is proven to be so. You could have had those
allegations tested legally, but, you chose instead to have the action
thrown out on procedural grounds. The fault that the allegations were
never evaluated by the legal system is yours alone. Leach represented
you.
>
> No one likes being falsely accused of doing things they did not do and that
> lawsuit is filled with numerous false accusations and "doctored" evidence trying
> to prove I did what I did not do! I offered to help Yale go after the person who
> did all the stuff to him and you know so because I CCd you my search efforts. To
> continually accuse me of doing stuff which you know I did not do says much of
> you as a person!
>
> The only interest McVay, "Paul Kneisel", and Art Tandy have in that lawsuit is
> its smear value.
They like posting it to smear me as if all those perjured
> statements were true!
That's an obvious LIE, since I have never posted any of the
allegations myself.
My interest is in a correct interpretation of the legal issues
involved. Therefore, every time you distort the legal realities, I
correct you.
If you don't like being called names, stop calling other people names.
Bruno
steve wolk
"Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
news:knq36vk2kgrcfqa9p...@4ax.com...
> <catamont-CCA186...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>,
> > Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
> >> <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara
Salzman
> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >The findings of fact remain facts.
> :
> >> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
>
> Why did you snip what I posted?
Scott, you have no right to ask this. After all, look how you snipped what
I posted.
steve wolk
"A.Melon" <ju...@melontraffickers.com> wrote in message
news:cd58595ca126b467...@melontraffickers.com...
Hi, Don. Still as stupid as ever, I see.
>
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message news:<knq36vk2kgrcfqa9p...@4ax.com>...
>> On 02 Mar 2003 04:15:36 GMT,
>> <catamont-CCA186...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>,
>> > Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
>> >> <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The findings of fact remain facts.
>>
>> >> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
:
>> Why did you snip what I posted? Can't refute the self evident truths concerning
>> all the false sworn statements made against me?
:
>If someone wants to read what she snipped, they can simply go back to
>your post.
You and others always snip what you can't refute. If you could refute it you
would leave it intact and slam dunk me royally.
>You may enjoy making long posts with irrelevant material, but some of
>us like to get to the point.
I don't enjoy having pricks make false accusations against me and think they can
get away with it. What I posted proved lies were told!
>> What you snipped:
>>
>> <START>
>>
>> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact and for a FACT if I and my
>> attorney were served with those "complaints" and allowed to file against them
>> with what I show in the archive below then Yale would not be practicing law
>> today and he would have done time too! Also my petition for relief from judgment
>> is very relevant. Also seeing how so many people put credence in that lawsuit
>> then I suggest it be re-filed in MY jurisdiction and we will all see who gets
>> some jail time.
:
>Nonsense.You don't get "jail time" from a civil suit.
You think so!? If a person commits perjury in a civil suit they get jail time.
If an attorney files a civil suit and uses subpoenaed information to make
criminal death threats he gets jail time. Care to remain in denial? Many a
person has spent time for perjury in civil suits! Want to deny it?
>> I have been willing to let sleeping dogs lie but to tell you the
>> truth-- I am getting tired of being defamed and all on account of a kook lawsuit
>> filled with numerous outrageous lies and perjury! THAT IS FACT!
:
>It is not a fact until it is proven to be so. You could have had those
>allegations tested legally, but, you chose instead to have the action
>thrown out on procedural grounds. The fault that the allegations were
>never evaluated by the legal system is yours alone. Leach represented
>you.
I could NOT have done so you ignoramus! I was not served! How could I have had
the accusations thrown out when neither my attorney or myself ever saw them. I
only saw them long after Yale got his judgment.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations as detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Also this document should be available too:
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
>> No one likes being falsely accused of doing things they did not do and that
>> lawsuit is filled with numerous false accusations and "doctored" evidence trying
>> to prove I did what I did not do! I offered to help Yale go after the person who
>> did all the stuff to him and you know so because I CCd you my search efforts. To
>> continually accuse me of doing stuff which you know I did not do says much of
>> you as a person!
>>
>> The only interest McVay, "Paul Kneisel", and Art Tandy have in that lawsuit is
>> its smear value.
>>
>>They like posting it to smear me as if all those perjured
>> statements were true!
>That's an obvious LIE, since I have never posted any of the
>allegations myself.
You have gone along with them and commented on the lies after your pals posted
them. You have brought up that lawsuit numerous times on your own as well so who
is the liar!?
>My interest is in a correct interpretation of the legal issues
>involved. Therefore, every time you distort the legal realities, I
>correct you.
I am not the one distorting-- YOU ARE!
>If you don't like being called names, stop calling other people names.
You are the one who started it and you whine like a spoiled brat when I gave it
back- you hypocrite!
>Bruno
Tavish
wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>I didn't. I'm merely pointing out that OJ's offer was disingenuous. You
>offering to help Yale is also meaningless. Actions speak louder than words.
You should not be commenting on what you know nothing about! You have no idea of
what I did so you have no right to comment or pass judgment.
Tavish
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
Links cited active March 2, 2003
On 2 Mar 2003 07:42:00 -0800, <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
kni...@indystart.com Arthur J. Tandy aka (Black Knight) wrote:
>Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message news:
><knq36vk2kgrcfqa9p...@4ax.com>...
>> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact and for a FACT if I and my
>> attorney were served with those "complaints" and allowed to file against them
>> with what I show in the archive below then Yale would not be practicing law
>> today and he would have done time too! Also my petition for relief from judgment
>> is very relevant. Also seeing how so many people put credence in that lawsuit
>> then I suggest it be re-filed in MY jurisdiction and we will all see who gets
>> some jail time.
:
>Nonsense.You don't get "jail time" from a civil suit.
Once again you show what an ignoramus you are and I offer proof which is a
testament to your stupidity:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june99/clinton_2-17.html
The judge in the Paula Jones lawsuit is considering issuing a contempt citation
against President Clinton for his misleading testimony about Monica Lewinsky in
that case. Washington Post reporter Peter Baker outlines the issues involved and
the potential consequences...
[P]erjury is a very specific criminal statute that has specific requirements. It
means she may believe, though, that by being misleading that he has not
fulfilled his obligation as a litigant to help the court find the truth and
justice in his case...
<END>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A38123-2002Dec25¬Found=true
Judge Eyes Perjury Probe In Lawsuit
Mistrial Declared In Sheriff Case
By Tom Jackman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 26, 2002; Page VA03
A civil lawsuit against the Arlington County sheriff has spun off into a
possible criminal perjury investigation after three deputies failed to appear
for the sheriff's trial, and a judge found that another deputy's explanation for
the absences was "probably intentionally false."...
<END>
http://hotwired.lycos.com/synapse/katz/98/08/katz3a_text.html
13. She has been named a formal target of a federal criminal investigation,
rather than a potential witness to crime, and for weeks has faced the prospect
of testifying, indictment, and even jail for committing alleged perjury in a
civil lawsuit.
<END>
The above referred to Monica Lewinsky and the key phrase was: "jail for
committing alleged perjury in a civil lawsuit"
Care to remain in denial? Perjury is a criminal offense! Lying under oath or
swearing falsely in a civil lawsuit is a criminal offense which could get the
perjurer jail time!
http://www.courtrules.org/form1716.htm
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CUSTODIAL)
INSTRUCTIONS - READ CAREFULLY
In order to determine your eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis in your
civil lawsuit, you are required to complete an Affidavit in Support of Request
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and an Authorization for Release of Institutional
Account Information.
Forms are provided for your convenience. They must be legibly handwritten or
typed, signed, and verified (notarized). Each applicable question must be
answered completely. You may complete the answer to any question on the reverse
side of the page or on a separate blank page. Please indicate the number of the
question you are answering.
Because the Affidavit must be sworn to under oath, any false statement of a
material fact may serve as the basis of prosecution and conviction for perjury..
<END>
What do the terms "prosecution" and "conviction" mean in relation to Affidavits
and sworn testimony in civil lawsuits!? Care to remain an ignoramus and remain
in denial Artie?"
Now for some examples of perjury in the civil lawsuit Yale waged against me and
lost:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
>"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
>"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
>"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :
>
>COMPLAINT
>
> 1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
>adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
>
> 2. Defendant Scott Bradbury (hereinafter "Defendant") is an adult
>citizen and resident of <deleted by Scott Bradbury>
[...]
> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.
you only want to blow joe
you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence! IOW Yale F. Edeiken took a post
made by another person and signed my "Doc Tavish" to it and submitted in a sworn
statement against me! THAT IS PERJURY AND I SHOW MORE EXAMPLES OF THE CRIMINAL
IN ACTION BELOW!! STAY TUNED!!!
> 25 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>Joe me thinks Yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --Yale is a
>queer -- he does suck cock
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-2."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981205232659.3493.qmail%40hades.rpini.com&output=gplain
From: Anonymous <nob...@remailer.ch>
Subject: Re: Teamwork: A Mystery to Joe
Date: 1998/12/05
Message-ID: <199812052326...@hades.rpini.com>#1/1
References: <19981204234321...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was
remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems
or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <ad...@remailer.ch>.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Teamwork: A Mystery to Joe
> > >> A typical smear from Yale.
> > > How can I smear someone by reprinting his own words.
>
>
> > They are not my words, so it remains a smear, and you remain a queer.
>
> They were published under your name.
joe me thinks yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --
yale is a queer -- he does suck cock
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Notice the post was anonymous and it was NOT signed "Doc Tavish" as Yale accused
in his perjured sworn statement. Just another perjured complaint!
> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement.
> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!!
The following false contrived accusation is the pinnacle of perjury or
manufacturing of evidence to be submitted as sworn testimony in a court of law
and this was done by a Plaintiff (who was his own attorney and who is an
attorney) against the Defendant; me. I will slam dunk this criminality in full
just below!
> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
<end>
Witness this:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
<stop>
<END>
PERJURY!!
Now I ask-- Does Arthur J. Tandy aka Black Knight want to go on record and deny
Yale made perjurious accusations against me in his failed civil suit against me?
Come on Artie and make a god damned fool of yourself again and deny that what
Yale did to me below isn't worthy of some serious penitentiary time as a serious
felony:
The next entry shows how evil yale F. Edeiken truly is and it also proves how
stupid he is. He confessed to making a criminal death threat against me in a
sworn statement to a court of law. Yale made the death threat almost two weeks
before I was served with his malicious prosecution against me. Also my
confidential info (my identity, address, and telep;hone number) were not known
until Yale issued a subpoena to my ISP to get and Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F.
Edeiken alone was the sole bearer of that info in December 1999. The subpoena
was never entered into court records and it does not appear on the docket thus
Yale's lie about my confidential information becoming public knowledge is a lie!
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
[...]
[...]
<END>
<END>
Anonymously posted.
<END>
Concerning being arrested:
--YFE
~~End of Post~~
Anonymously posted.
----------------------------------------------------
Anonymously posted.
--------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
For a FACT-- that subpoenaed information (my real identity, my address, and my
telephone number) was not public domain or else a subpoena would not have been
issued to obtain it!! Remember Yale F. Edeiken himself posted these very words
regarding subpoenas:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
AND as the docket plainly shows that Yale NEVER turned over the subpoenaed
information to the court BUT rather he took the information he received (which
he never gave me the chance to "quash" as required by law) and illegally
distributed it to Ken McVay of Nizkor (of all people) who then passed it on to
Marduk aka Nazihunter who then made death threat posts soon after!
Here is that docket again and how to get a copy:
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
FOR A FACT Yale F. Edeiken lied through his teeth about using his power of
attorney to obtain my confidential information too as this archive proves:
<START>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=x68H4.58%243r3.3683%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Bradbury Explains How He Made an Ass of Himself
Date: 04/06/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <x68H4.58$3r3....@monger.newsread.com>
> You maintain that you got my information
> from public domain--
That's a lie. I said it was in the public domain.
<<Comment January 13, 2002: That is a lie. Yale never turned the subpoena over
to make it public domain and the proof he did not turn it over is that it does
not appear on the docket!! IOW Yale used his power of an attorney criminally to
deny me my right to privacy!!>>
> you will be given the chance soon to tell how you got my otherwise unobtainable
> info from any other source than by intimidating my ISP to surrender it to you.
> Flash Net of Dallas Texas has been requested to answer as to whether or not you
> used your power of attorney to obtain otherwise not obtainable information.
<<Comment January 13, 2002: For a fact Yale F. Edeiken badgered my ISP and
threatened to sue them numerous times if they wouldn't turn over my confidential
information. Flash.net attorney Matthew Terrell told Edeiken finally they would
only do so if a subpoena was served. Proof on file.>>
Nope. I won't.
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CBLK4.3314%24%25L6.201547%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: MUST READ! for those who wish to see Bradbury lie again.
Date: 04/17/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <CBLK4.3314$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
[...]
>I am reporting you to PA BAR, D.O.J., and the Disciplinary Board.
All of whom will laugh ay you.
>They are going to get copies of your subpoena, your admission to distributing
> my customer info to YOUR mailing list,
That's a lie, Defendant Bradbury.
<<Special note December 18, 2002: This link proves Yale F. Edeiken propagated
the subpoenaed information to a mailing list thus caught lying again!
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=396b163b.19786667%40news.flash.net&output=gplain
Date: 2000/07/11
Message-ID: <396b163b...@news.flash.net>
"Yale "Tubby" Edeiken's Mailing List and His Numerous Lies Exposed (Short
Version)" MUST READ!>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=jRJR4.5762%24LM4.410341%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: wish tavish good luck with his civil case
Date: 05/09/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <jRJR4.5762$LM4.4...@monger.newsread.com>
Defendant Bradbury <spnn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8f7fg...@news1.newsguy.com...
> On 8-May-2000, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
<<January 13, 2003 comment: I have already proven that Yale F. Edeiken was
"nazihunter" in December of 1999 and notice how he acts below. He did make a
blundering admission as sworn testimony that he was "nazihunter"
<anon...@cotse.com> in December 1999>>
> > with a baseball bat
> > Scott Bradbury
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > (XXX) XXX-XXXX
> >
> > --
> > Anon news web interface. FAQ available for review at:
> > http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
:
> Thanks for providing more fodder for my case. I find it fascinatiing
> that you are only able to make such posts as you have made only with the
> intelligence that Yale F. Edeiken obtained by misuse of the subpoena.
Tgat is a lie and actionavle as such.
A retraction is demanded.
> You made your first post with the same sort of death threat on December
> 14, 1999 -- just two weeks after Edeiken had a subpoena drawn up and sent
> to Flash Net.
That is a lie and acrtionable as such.
A retraction is demanded.
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=RN%25T4.3309%24v%255.235346%40newshog.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Date: 05/15/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <RN%T4.3309$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 21:31:19 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >news:391f5a8d...@news.flash.net...
>
> [...]
:
> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
:
> > At which point it became public information.
<<Comment December 18, 2002: As another document in this very post proves that
subpoena was never turned over to the court and it does NOT show on the docket
and it is thus NOT public domain information! Yale caught lying again!!>>
> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
<<Comment December 18, 2002: Another lie because if it was filed with the court
it would show on the docket along with the other subpoenas!!!>>
> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
(Doc Tavish comment January 16, 2001: Edeiken is lying about a mailing
list as shown with his own words in this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=396b163b.19786667%40news.flash.net&output=gplain
Date: 2000/07/11
Message-ID: <396b163b...@news.flash.net>
"Yale "Tubby" Edeiken's Mailing List and His Numerous Lies Exposed (Short
Version)" MUST READ! Where is the subpoena registered with the court Yale?
It's not on the docket!!!!!)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your
attempts to incite criminal harassment.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my civil
rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
:
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
<STOP>
Need I say more other than the bastard who sued me and lost is a criminal
nutcase. I just wish he would try his shit again but in my jurisdiction. We have
a nice jail in my county and they have room for his fat ass!
Need I say more?
Patrick Keenan
> On 2 Mar 2003 07:42:00 -0800,
<594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
> kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>
> >Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in
message news:<knq36vk2kgrcfqa9p...@4ax.com>...
> >> On 02 Mar 2003 04:15:36 GMT,
> >> <catamont-CCA186...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
> >> >> <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara
Salzman
> >> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >The findings of fact remain facts.
> >>
> >> >> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
> :
> >> Why did you snip what I posted? Can't refute the self evident truths
concerning
> >> all the false sworn statements made against me?
> :
> >If someone wants to read what she snipped, they can simply go back to
> >your post.
>
> You and others always snip what you can't refute. If you could refute it
you
> would leave it intact and slam dunk me royally.
Well, well, well. I guess you're including yourself in this "You and
others always snip what you can't refute".
Within the last couple of days, you've snipped off - with no indication -
over half of one of my posts to you. You wandered off after the first
question, filling the reply with your usual crap. You failed (as usual)
to answer the real questions posed to you. Why?
Here's the post:
"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:K%98a.13369$VG.12...@news20.bellglobal.com...
> "Bob Scott" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in
> message news:1c726vc7nmhu9lhkk...@4ax.com...
> <snip>
> >
> > Funny thing-- Yale F. Edeiken never would furnish neither my attorney
nor
> myself
> > a copy of his accusations or complaints against me BUT you got a copy
and
> you
> > wonder why the court threw it out on the grounds of jurisdiction.
>
> Actually, no one wondered why it was tossed on jurisdictional grounds.
But
> say, weren't you just denying that it *was* tossed on these grounds?
And you snipped everything after this point - which continues below. Why?
Can't refute it?
>
> > If I were
> > allowed to counter the numerous perjuries and contrived lies against me
> Yale F.
> > Edeiken
>
> "If I were allowed"... of course you were allowed. You could have filed
> suit yourself. You didn't, though, did you? Who are you going to blame
> this time for your own failure to follow through?
>
> Did you take your complaints to an attorney, and direct them to proceed?
>
> > would have lost his law license and most likely would have been
> > criminally prosecuted!
>
> Coulda, shoulda, woulda. You're such a whiner. File suit or get off
the
> pot. Prove it in court, if you have the case.
>
> Oh, by the way. You haven't answered my question: why do you beg from
> people who work for the overthrow of your country?
>
> -pk
>
> <snip>
Now, are you going to answer these questions, or are you going to run again?
-pk
Tavish
"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
I don't give a shit what you think. You aren't interested in facts or truth so
why bother and the same for the rest of your fellow kooks!
Patrick Keenan
Can't refute it, can you?
-pk
steve wolk
Ah, but I DO know what you did.
Sara Salzman
A.Melon <ju...@melontraffickers.com> wrote:
"Should of", Pat?
Black Knight
> "Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
> news:5bp26vkd49j94fm47...@4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:45:08 -0500, <ih6dnXCFNLI...@comcast.com>
> "steve
> > wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
> >
> > >And OJ said he was going to hunt for his wife's murderer.
> >
> > Why do you compare me to a murderer?
>
>
>
> I didn't. I'm merely pointing out that OJ's offer was disingenuous. You
> offering to help Yale is also meaningless. Actions speak louder than words.
Comparing him to a hippopotamus would be more appropriate.
That is insulting! If you would read what
> > Yale accused me of and see how I could have answered if I were given a
> fair
> > chance you would see different. Care to tell all of us what I did and
> prove it
> > so that I deserve all the shit that has been perpetrated against me
> because one
> > lone shithead abused the legal system for his own personal vendettas?
>
>
>
> Sorry, I don't see it that way. I think you got off on a technicality.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > What another person has claimed with this statement: "The findings of
> > fact remain facts." is FALSE.
>
>
>
> No, it's not. Even your attorney never disputed the facts of the case.
>
>
>
> I was not allowed any input because I was never
> > served so the court only "heard" Yale's version without any protest from
> me.
>
>
> If the case had gone to trial, you would have had the ooportunity to tell
> your side. Are you complaining that it never went to trial?
>
>
>
>
>
> > I hardly consider a one sided argument between two opposing parties being
> > finding fact especially when so much perjury by the shyster was submitted
> as
> > sworn statements!
>
>
>
> That is your allegation, not a legal fact. If it is fact, why don't you
> bring suit against Yale for defamation and slander? Don't you want to be
> rich?
Why?Did Yale's allegations reduce Fatboy's disability check?
Bruno
White Rose
Abuse report filed with ab...@comcast.com for posting off topic.
--
White Rose-Yorkshire Proud
White Rose
Abuse report filed. Say good bye to another ISP Bradbury. :-))))
--
White Rose-Yorkshire Proud
White Rose
> In article <55526vsjua3ve5h0f...@4ax.com>,
> Bob Scott <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote:
>
> > On 01 Mar 2003 11:58:52 GMT,
> > <catamont-50826F...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> > <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >
> > >The findings of fact remain facts.
> >
> > I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact [...snip]
>
> Are you calling my affidavit perjury, Mr. Bradbury?
>
> Sara
Abuse report file with ab...@concentric.net for posting off topic.
--
White Rose-Yorkshire Proud
Alien
Gutless posts from a true coward.
Black Knight
He gave himself away.Only Don Ellis says "should of" instead of the
correct "should have".
Bruno
Black Knight
Listen, you stupid slob: Perjury may arise from a civil suit IF
someone lies under oath but that is a separate issue from the central
dispute. I thought anyone with common sense would recognize that in
what I said.Do you know what the word "central dispute" means,
ignoramus?
You've been told this before, you deaf and blind idiot. Before someone
can get nailed for perjury, someone knowledgeable in the law, like a
judge or DA would have to determine that perjury was committed. You
complained about it and the DA, thru his inaction, told you you were
WRONG. You're too damn stupid to accept that he knows the law and you
don't.
YOU DO NOT MAKE THE LAW. YOU DO NOT ADMINISTER THE LAW. YOU ARE NOT A
JUDGE.
YOU ARE NOT THE DA. YOU ARE JUST A STUPID BIGMOUTH FAT SLOB WITH THE
IQ OF A TURNIP.
Bruno
Black Knight
OK.Where, according to the judge or other competent authority, should
he have filed and why?
Bruno
Tavish
Refute what? YOUR OPINION! Your opinion is not fact so there is nothing to
refute. You asked why I snipped your remarks so I will tell you-- I don't waste
time refuting another person's OPINION especially when the person is so biased
he consistently ignores factual proofs. You are the type who "says" _Don't
confuse me with the facts because my mind is already made up_.
You and your crowd on the other hand snip my vital proofs. Your crowd claims Ken
McVay doesn't lie and when I post his posts in which he says one thing and then
another and then I even give the URLs your crowd snips it all and then lays on
the personal attacks. There is a major difference between what I snip and what
your crowd snips and that is FACT!
My examples of how I prove what I claim without relying on my opinion and anyone
who is non-biased can see the readily visible lies I catch Mcvay in
as illustrated in these archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3df2a771.119319192%40news5.uncensored-news.com&rnum=5
Subject: Nanaimo BC Resident Ken McVay lies about his agenda to stifle FREE
SPEECH R_1207
Message-ID: <3df2a771....@news5.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 8 Dec 2002 01:58:44 GMT
When you arguments are based on something of substance rather than your BIASED
opinion then we can have a debate-- until then I will ignore your opinions.
>-pk
Tavish
What did I do Steve? Do you have evidence I did such? I can see you implying I
was up to no good!
What I did do was to get all the posts proving who got Yale visited by the Penn
State Troopers, all of the posts proving who posted his parent's names etc. and
e-mailed them to him complete with all header info and all GOOGLE URLs. Some
dastardly deed huh? I also volunteered to be a witness on his behalf if he
decided to go after the real culprit.
I also came close to getting a TV spot on a national television show in which
Yale, sara, and I were to be guests and the travel arrangements were being made
by the production crew until the last minute. I guess they decided we weren't
what they wanted! :-)
Now do you want to keep smearing me based on your ignorant assumptions?
Tavish
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Comparing him to a hippopotamus would be more appropriate.
Eat shit you disgusting kike.
Black Knight
O, My! Fatboy doesn't approve of me.My self-esteem is totally
shattered. I feel a state of clinical depression coming on. Woe is me!
Bruno
Paul Kneisel
supporter, Scot Bradbury, writing via his nym of Tavish
<t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com>
<8m066v4ucvip45ji8...@4ax.com> wrote ...
>
>You and your crowd on the other hand snip my vital proofs. Your crowd claims Ken
>McVay doesn't lie and when I post his posts in which he says one thing and then
>another and then I even give the URLs your crowd snips it all and then lays on
>the personal attacks. There is a major difference between what I snip and what
>your crowd snips and that is FACT!
>
Those familiar with Bradbury know of his propensity to "snip" the author of
some document, and then attribute it to an opponent, using the now-forged
document as "proof" or a "self confession" that Bradbury's opponent wrote
what Bradbury well knows they did not write.
Paul Kneisel
<t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com>
<mm166v861dpq0pb4t...@4ax.com> wrote:
Some may think this is yet another example of Bradbury's anti-Semitism and
anal obsessions.
But then, as Bradbury repeatedly claims, "lies and smears" are all people
like Bruno and I have.
In addition, I seem to recall Bradbury finding "communism" is folks who
find anality in his constant references to anality.
Patrick Humphrey
>>
In other words, you can't refute what he says about you.
Funny how you whine like the two-ton baby you are when your own tactics come
back to bite your Bellville-sized ass, Scottie. Thanks for showing, once
again, that no one needs to take you seriously. You're a kook *and* a crank.
--PLH, and May 15 is gonna be a good one this year
Patrick Humphrey
>Fat Bastard Edeiken should of kept his mouth shut. He is a good example of
>why Hitler and his followers were justified in gassing and burning the rats
>in Germany.
Hi, Donnie! Still as stupid as ever, I see.
--PLH, some things in this universe are constant
steve wolk
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 15:07:04 -0500, <b3to7c$ing$1...@bob.news.rcn.net> "steve
wolk"
> <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in
message
> >news:3vi46vc89p360v5t7...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:45:56 -0500, <qHudne4uq_p...@comcast.com>
> >"steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I didn't. I'm merely pointing out that OJ's offer was disingenuous.
You
> >> >offering to help Yale is also meaningless. Actions speak louder than
> >> >words.
> :
> >> You should not be commenting on what you know nothing about! You have
no
> >> idea of what I did so you have no right to comment or pass judgment.
> :
> >Ah, but I DO know what you did.
>
> What did I do Steve? Do you have evidence I did such? I can see you
implying I
> was up to no good!
Scott, it's all in the record, and it was accepted as fact by the court.
The fact that you got off on a tachnicality doesn't change that.
>
> What I did do was to get all the posts proving who got Yale visited by the
Penn
> State Troopers, all of the posts proving who posted his parent's names
etc. and
> e-mailed them to him complete with all header info and all GOOGLE URLs.
Some
> dastardly deed huh? I also volunteered to be a witness on his behalf if he
> decided to go after the real culprit.
And I volunteered to help you if you ever went after Don Ellis. Why haven't
you gone after him?
>
> I also came close to getting a TV spot on a national television show in
which
> Yale, sara, and I were to be guests and the travel arrangements were being
made
> by the production crew until the last minute. I guess they decided we
weren't
> what they wanted! :-)
What show was that, Scott?
>
> Now do you want to keep smearing me based on your ignorant assumptions?
I haven't been smearing you, Scott. Smearing people with ignorant
assumptions is something I leave to experts like you.
Patrick Keenan
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:58:05 -0500,
<ent8a.651$6z.8...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in
message
> >news:38o46v45rrk24ig36...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:29:12 -0500,
> ><9Ys8a.642$6z.8...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> >> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't give a shit what you think. You aren't interested in facts or
> >> truth so why bother and the same for the rest of your fellow kooks!
> :
> >Can't refute it, can you?
>
> Refute what? YOUR OPINION! Your opinion is not fact so there is nothing to
> refute.
Well, there's this little matter of my observing you consorting with
(begging from, really) people who support communists, work for the
overthrow of your country, and celebrate the murders of your fellow
citizens. Remember that? You snipped it and ran away. It isn't
opinion. That's fact.
Your opinions that people have perjured are simply opinions. They aren't
proven fact. If they were, you would have seen action taken on them,
wouldn't you? What progress have you made?
Your claims that Nizkor and B'nai Brith are engaged in a tax scam are
opinions, not fact. If they were factual, the CCRA would have moved on it.
But they haven't, have they? That's because your opinions are not only not
facts, they are *wrong*.
> You asked why I snipped your remarks so I will tell you-- I don't waste
> time refuting another person's OPINION especially when the person is so
biased
> he consistently ignores factual proofs.
Your claims that things are factual does not make them so. And my remarks
weren't opinions, were they?
> You are the type who "says" _Don't
> confuse me with the facts because my mind is already made up_.
Says the guy who can't accept that the *fact* that no one takes action on
his claims means there's a very strong chance that said claims are *wrong*.
>
> You and your crowd on the other hand snip my vital proofs.
Oh please. They're not vital and they're not proofs. And BTW, you
snipped my vital proof that you beg from communist sympatisers who revel in
the murders of your fellow citizens, didn't you?
> Your crowd claims Ken
> McVay doesn't lie and when I post his posts in which he says one thing and
then
> another and then I even give the URLs your crowd snips it all and then
lays on
> the personal attacks. There is a major difference between what I snip and
what
> your crowd snips and that is FACT!
And the CCRA has done exactly what with your "facts" and "proofs"?
And your attorneys have done exactly what with your "facts" and "proofs" of
"perjury"? When are the hearing dates? Where will the hearings be held?
If you haven't gotten anywhere with those efforts, it's a stronger proof
than you've presented, that your charges are baseless and wrong.
But I'm sure that you'll find someone else to blame it on.
> My examples of how I prove what I claim without relying on my opinion and
anyone
> who is non-biased can see the readily visible lies I catch Mcvay in
> as illustrated in these archives:
Anyone can see how you hallucinate to support your delusions, yes. That
doesn't make them factual.
Now. Why did you snip - again - my catching you in your begging for help
from a communist sympathiser, a person who is
dedicated to the overthrow of your country, and who celebrates the murder of
your fellow citizens?
Can you not refute my observation of you consorting with such people? That
observation is not opinion, it's fact. Is that why you snipped it?
-pk
Black Knight
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 15:07:04 -0500, <b3to7c$ing$1...@bob.news.rcn.net> "steve wolk"
> <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
> >news:3vi46vc89p360v5t7...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:45:56 -0500, <qHudne4uq_p...@comcast.com>
> "steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I didn't. I'm merely pointing out that OJ's offer was disingenuous. You
> >> >offering to help Yale is also meaningless. Actions speak louder than
> >> >words.
>
> >> You should not be commenting on what you know nothing about! You have no
> >> idea of what I did so you have no right to comment or pass judgment.
We've been over this before, fumblebrain. Everything people think does
not have to be passed thru a court of law. I am of the opinion, based
on your behavior here on AR, that you did what Yale claimed.
Apparently, Steve has made the same common sense judgement. YOu sure
are a slow learner aren't, you Fatslob?
> :
>
Patrick Keenan
news:szkptp8...@eris.io.com...
> Tavish <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>
> >On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:29:12 -0500,
<9Ys8a.642$6z.8...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> >"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >I don't give a shit what you think. You aren't interested in facts or
truth so
> >why bother and the same for the rest of your fellow kooks!
>
> In other words, you can't refute what he says about you.
And all I did was notice him begging for scraps from Mr. Michael.
-pk
Patrick Humphrey
>"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
>news:szkptp8...@eris.io.com...
>> Tavish <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> >On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:29:12 -0500,
><9Ys8a.642$6z.8...@news20.bellglobal.com>
>> >"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >I don't give a shit what you think. You aren't interested in facts or
>> >truth so why bother and the same for the rest of your fellow kooks!
>> In other words, you can't refute what he says about you.
>And all I did was notice him begging for scraps from Mr. Michael.
Bradbury's a classic kook, and a flagrant hypocrite, to boot. I'd ask him to
prove his accusations that I've taken pictures of his property, but does this
newsgroup really need another spate of 2000-line incoherent reposts of the
same idiocy Bradbury has already posted many times?
--PLH, he's never figured out that you can't prove what never happened
Tavish
Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct-no-spam-or-fascism.org> wrote:
>On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 01:31:58 -0600, the National Alliance political
>supporter, Scot Bradbury, writing via his nym of Tavish
Where is proof that I am a NA political supporter? I vote Republican!
><t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com>
><8m066v4ucvip45ji8...@4ax.com> wrote ...
:
>>You and your crowd on the other hand snip my vital proofs. Your crowd claims Ken
>>McVay doesn't lie and when I post his posts in which he says one thing and then
>>another and then I even give the URLs your crowd snips it all and then lays on
>>the personal attacks. There is a major difference between what I snip and what
>>your crowd snips and that is FACT!
:
>Those familiar with Bradbury know of his propensity to "snip" the author of
>some document, and then attribute it to an opponent, using the now-forged
>document as "proof" or a "self confession" that Bradbury's opponent wrote
>what Bradbury well knows they did not write.
Another lie ans samear from a self confessed little communist shit!
These were YOUR words you lying communist bastard. You posted them and there is
no other name attached to them!
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=ainjrf%241365%241%40pencil.math.missouri.edu&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Subject: The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tuesday, 6 August 2002 -- 6:38
Date: 5 Aug 2002 23:38:07 -0500
Message-ID: <ainjrf$1365$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
"...It is our strategy that participation and intervention in these struggles,
from an anarchist-communist viewpoint... Slowly building a base for a truly mass
revolutionary anarchist movement capable of defeating not only fascist
organizations but also the combined forces of capital and the state... <END>
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=q6u65v4lop8l8k31b8po91hvjtta8sr1n9%404ax.com&rnum=1
"NYC Based web site ANTI-FASCISM.ORG Advocates Communist Revolution..."
Date: 19 Feb 2003 12:29:06 GMT
Message-ID: <q6u65v4lop8l8k31b...@4ax.com>
Tavish
wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>Scott, it's all in the record, and it was accepted as fact by the court.
That is a false statement. It was NOT accepted as fact and ruled upon as
absolute truth! All sworn statements are accepted as being fact for that matter
because the legal system doesn't assume every sworn statement is perjurious!
Your pal lied and filth such as you condones it and that is why your kind are
universally despised! You are no better than Edeiken when you purposely overlook
the fact he lied numerous times. I was sued based on my alleged USENET activity
and USENET documents prove Yale is a perjurer and it is documented here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
---
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=54qips%24asl%40news.enter.net&rnum=1
From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
Subject: Re: The Malady with Malmedy
Date: 1996/10/25
Message-ID: <54qips$a...@news.enter.net>
"The facts are that your nazi heroes lined up disarmed prisoners and
machined-gunned them to death. When they had finished they went over the their
victims and finished off the wounded. Only a few survived." <END>
IOW They were machinegunned twice and only a few survived. Most amusing.
(Thanks to Matt Giwer for the above Edeikook guffaw.)
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>I am of the opinion
Your opinion is worthless because you are as much of a liar as the bastard you
are covering for!
Tavish
"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
Once again- YOUR opinions and they don't mean squat.
Patrick Keenan
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:37:32 -0500,
<JhN8a.961$Xo3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> Once again- YOUR opinions and they don't mean squat.
And Scott Bradury runs away from the facts, yet again.
-pk
Tavish
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>In other words, you can't refute what he says about you.
Why should I waste time when all, he does is give biased opinion? I can post
reams of proofs but his mind is already made up-- hence he's a waste of time!
Tavish
"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Once again- YOUR opinions and they don't mean squat.
>
>And Scott Bradury runs away from the facts, yet again.
My but you think highly of yourself! Your opinions are not facts!
Your opinions are biased. IOW what you say doesn't mean squat!
Patrick Keenan
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 09:31:13 -0500,
<bmn66vgnis1eqtq7q...@4ax.com>
> Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct-no-spam-or-fascism.org> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 01:31:58 -0600, the National Alliance political
> >supporter, Scot Bradbury, writing via his nym of Tavish
>
> Where is proof that I am a NA political supporter? I vote Republican!
Oh. that's easy. That proof - your own words - have been re-posted a
number of times. You are a sincere admirer of William Pierce, deceased head
of the National Alliance, whose pronouncements you recommend highly. It was
his party, and his positions. You support his views - you support his
party.
There's no need for you to carry a party card to be a supporter. That's one
of the principles Joseph McCarthy (mis)used. There's also no need for you
to actually vote NA (or communist, for that matter).. Were there even any NA
candidates in your area?
Pierce was a political figure, running a political party, and you
recommended that people listen to his political messages because you felt he
"hits the mark the greater amount of times". That's clearly political
support.
Here, I'll help remind you:
==========================================
From: Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.usa
Subject: MUST LISTEN!! What's Important by Dr. William Pierce (Real Audio
Download)
Distribution: worldwide
Keywords: <http://x62.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=657843973>
Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
Reply-To: doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com
Message-ID: <394pss0kc0eetcnf8...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 11:34:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.30.160.209
X-Complaints-To: ab...@flash.net
X-Trace: news.flash.net 969708872 209.30.160.209 (Sat, 23 Sep 2000 06:34:32
CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 06:34:32 CDT
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/092300.ra
What's Important by Dr. William Pierce
The story Dr. Pierce refers to (Hendryk the Musician):
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/090900.ra
God bless Dr. Pierce. He is a kind, wise and most benevolent man.
May all pray that he live a long happy life and keep up his valuable
educational work. We appreciate you Dr. Pierce.
Visit this link for other informational talks:
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/
You'll appreciate Dr. Pierce's mild manner and eloquence. You don't have
to agree with everything he says, I don't, but he hits the mark the
greater amount of times. He's worth a listen-- now go download your free
Real Audio player at the same site and snatch some downloads!
Doc Tavish
==========================================
Oh, and do your local republicans know that you beg for help from people who
celebrate the murders of innocent Americans?
>
> ><tavi...@ix.netcom.com>
> ><8m066v4ucvip45ji8...@4ax.com> wrote ...
> :
> >>You and your crowd on the other hand snip my vital proofs. Your crowd
claims Ken
> >>McVay doesn't lie and when I post his posts in which he says one thing
and then
> >>another and then I even give the URLs your crowd snips it all and then
lays on
> >>the personal attacks. There is a major difference between what I snip
and what
> >>your crowd snips and that is FACT!
> :
> >Those familiar with Bradbury know of his propensity to "snip" the author
of
> >some document, and then attribute it to an opponent, using the now-forged
> >document as "proof" or a "self confession" that Bradbury's opponent wrote
> >what Bradbury well knows they did not write.
>
> Another lie ans samear from a self confessed little communist shit!
>
> These were YOUR words you lying communist bastard. You posted them and
there is
> no other name attached to them!
And your words, supporting the National Alliance, are posted above.
There's no other name attached to them.
Glad to help clear that up.
-pk
Tavish
Patrick Keenan
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:01:40 -0500,
<7hQ8a.1293$Xo3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Once again- YOUR opinions and they don't mean squat.
> >
> >And Scott Bradury runs away from the facts, yet again.
>
> My but you think highly of yourself! Your opinions are not facts!
> Your opinions are biased. IOW what you say doesn't mean squat!
And you've gotten nowhere with your claims of perjury and tax fraud
because... .well, exactly why not?
Because they are your opinions. They lack the essential qualites that would
make them facts.
That's why you just post them here, over and over: No-one that matters -
people who actually know the subjects - agrees that your opinions are
correct, and you can't accept that..
Run away, now.
-pk
Patrick Keenan
> On 03 Mar 2003 09:25:33 -0600, <szkptp8...@eris.io.com> Patrick
Humphrey
> <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >In other words, you can't refute what he says about you.
>
> Why should I waste time when all, he does is give biased opinion? I can
post
> reams of proofs but his mind is already made up-- hence he's a waste of
time!
Snip and Run away, then. I'm not asking for much - but the only proofs
I'm interested in seeing are the charge and conviction sheets for perjury
and tax fraud, based on your allegations.
When you can come up with those, I'll agree that you have facts. But as it
stands, and given that your allegations have been consistently ignored and
discarded by those whose business it is to look into such things, there is
no reason to believe you.
Face it. All you have is opinion - and pathetic whining.
-pk
Ken McVay
You mis-spelled "waddled," Patrick.
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :
:
[removed]xxxxxxxxxxxxx :
Bellville TX xxxxxxxxx :
:
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Scott Bradbury (hereinafter "Defendant") is an adult
citizen and resident of the State of Texas residing at [removed]xxxxxxxxx,
Bellville, Austin County, Texas xxxxx with a telephone number of
xxx-xxx-xxxx.
3. At all times material hereto Defendant was supplied access to
the Internet and to electronic mail (hereinafter "e-mail")by Flash.net
Communications, Inc., (hereinafter "flash.net") an internet service
provider located in Forth Worth, Texas, and by other internet service
providers unknown to Plaintiff including several services which allowed
Defendant to publish and communicate by e-mail anonymously.
4. At all times material hereto Defendant published material on
the Internet and by e-mail using aliases which include but are not limited
to of "Doc Tavish," "sonn...@flash.net," "Secret Squirrel," "Mixmaster,"
"Horst Wessel," "-88-," and "Heinrich Himmler."
5. Defendant is a virulent anti-Semite who refers, inter alia, to
Jews as "vermin," advocates a "final solution" to the "Jewish problem" in
the United States and endorses the stereotype of Jews propagated by Julius
Striecher and Adolf Hitler stating, inter alia:
"What I like is the Nazi stereotype which shows the Jew as having
brushy eye brows, close set dark beady eyes and all accented by the
bulbous proboscis (big hook nose). I've seen the cartoons which shows Jews
looking like rats and I really think they are some of the most hilarious
visual images around- after all look at the typical Hollywood comedians--
all Jews! Who can't laugh at those rat like faces with the wiggling bushy
eye brows and those rat like snozzolas flapping in the breeze!"
6. At all times material hereto Defendant uses the services
provided by flash.net, with the knowledge and approval of flash.net, to
propagate his message of hate on the internet.
7. In addition to propagating his anti-Semitic propaganda on the
internet, Defendant has in the past and continues in the present to conduct
campaigns of harassment, defamation, and threats of violence against
individuals, including inter alia, the Plaintiff to this action, who
oppose his bigotry meant to frighten, annoy, and intimidate his opponents.
8. Said campaign of stalking and intimidation has been a
consistent pattern of behavior conducted by the Defendant over an extended
period of time.
9. Said campaign has included in the past threats of violence
against his opponents which has included, inter alia, the following threats
of violence:
a. On December 19, 1996, the Defendant publically made the following
threat to Keith Morrison, a citizen of Canada "I am a good shot Talmudist
if you come and find me I will demonstrate my skill to you. Do you have
any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to your head? I would be legal
too- self defense from a rabid virulent anti-Christ. I promise you that
your kind are not welcome in my part of the country and I am on first name
basis with the local D.A. Hunt me down and you will be put out of your
misery like a rabid dog. One shot one kill. dead eye Doc Tavish."
b. On March 9, 1997, Defendant publically made the following
threat to person unknown "Author: Billy Dale McTavish . . . .Vengeance is
sweet and I know that the day will come when I'll get to see the sneak
that did this to me get a thorough interrogation from Bruno! I will love
standing there watching him peel your skin off layer by layer with his lash
and ever so methodically. Your screams of pain will fall on deaf ears. I
will take extreme delight in watching the foam come spewing out of your
vile mouth as Bruno gives you another! Do not worry for I will not let him
kill you. You must heal up and become well- so the process can start right
back over again to be repeated again and again. You will see no end to your
pain! I solemnly promise the day will come when the tables will turn.
Destiny will place you at my feet and you will pray for death and it will
by no means come. /s/ Tavish."
c On April 15, 1997, Defendant published the following threat to Daniel
Keren, Ph. D.: "I do believe that Bruno would derive great pleasure in
applying his craft to Mr. Keren. Yes Bruno is from the old Bavarian School
of inquisitive acquisition. Bruno knows how to stimulate every nerve but
yet not do any sort of damage. Yes Bruno would spend hours in a cold dark
damp dungeon with him. Bruno is a firm believer in the old adage: "No pain,
no gain." :-) Mr. Keren will probably over react to Bruno BUT Bruno went
back home to Bavaria a while back because certain ones in this ng hurt his
feelings! He is a big dumb brute in the common sort of way but he's such a
likable lug too! I may be able to persuade him to come back but I don't
know. If I can get Bruno back then may be Gunther and Gerhardt may return
too! They all claim that life is too hard for them in America with all of
this hatred by Nizkooks running around. They say it reminds them of when
the Communists ruled and how the Commies kept files on everyone. Reminds me
of what commie East Germany used to be!"
d. On May 2, 1998, Defendant published the following threat to someone
who disagreed with one of his bigoted rants:: "I just wish these dumb asses
would realize that they can't get away with this. I'll send a copy to
tavish-central, a copy to the Houston Branch of the FBI and a copy to the
nut cake's ISP. Now people can understand why I positively abhor the
majority of Kikes I encounter. Bruno at the moment is muttering about how
nice it would be if he would be allowed to interrogate this person. I agree
that Bruno should be able to apply his talents. I could picture Bruno being
slow and very methodical too! :-)"
e Defendant published the following threat to Mark Van Alstine, a
researcher on the Holocaust: " . . . . . Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of
Nizkor [http://nizkor.org; a site on the Internet about the history of the
Holocaust] and that is all we need to bring hin in for an especially
vigorous interrogation! He will not be so cocky after Bruno works with him.
Don't worry Bruno has never killed anyone yet and he is a master at his
craft. Bruno could rightfully be called a master of pain for he knows how
to work every nerve and fiber to achieve the results desired with the very
least amount of tissue damage. The man is devoted to his work as a true
artisan!"
f Defendant has published the following threat to Jeffrey G. Brown
"I'll beat you to a bloody pulp."
g. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to a person
publishing anonymous material: "Why don't you identify yourself then? Bruno
has already picked the lash he will use in my interrogation of you. He at
first opted for his short fat bull whip. This whip does not cut the flesh
but it makes extremely painful throbbing welts that only diminish in pain
over a few days. He has chosen his custom stage coach style whip that is
nearly twenty feet long. Each stroke is just like a hot knife hitting
butter. This whip n each stroke cuts beyond the subcutaneous epidermal
layers. He'll literally peel you like an onion. Each stroke of this lash
will feel just like having a white hot wire streak across your back and
buttocks. Bruno is an artisan at his craft and he most eagerly awaits
hoisting you up in manacles to administer the "truth serum." I will relish
watching you flop around like a fish. Pleasant dreams!"
h. Defendant addressed the following threat to Joel Rosenberg, a citizen
of Minnesota: " Herr Rosenberg so very nice of you to slither out and play
tonight! We all see that you have not for once changed your tone yes? You
will change your tune very soon! They all do; believe me they all do! We
have a nice damp dungeon all prepared for you in Berlin. We will talk at
great length and get to the very root of your attitude yes? I personally
will not let Bruno interrogate you too long no!"
i. Defendant publically addressed the following threat of violence to
another person: "Yeah SOG [sic] just keep your mouth running while you can.
You'll be squealing like stuck pig when we shove the rotisserie skewer
where the sun don't shine on April 20th! You'll cook quite well over an
open fire! You'll probably give us all gas BUT that is why we'll have
plenty of Tagment [sic] on hand. Burp! Bruno says that he knows how to
tenderize you too. I think he wants to use his 20 foot whip! Ouch!:
j. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to another
person: "I can only say that Bruno knows that this happened and right now
he is outside practicing with his whip. Her looks mighty g-d damned furious
in the hot Texas sun cracking that whip. Damn it sounds like a 30' 06 going
off each time he pops that thing. I'd hate to "Count 25" for him! Yes,
indeedy!! :-) Doc Tavish Singing "Our Day Will Come!"
k. In December, 1999, Defendant publically addressed the following threat
to Sara Salzman, a citizen of Colorado: "Bruno [sic] eagerly awaits the day
when he is able to peel your kind like onions with his lash. I could just
see the sweat and blood spray when Bruno lays on the flay. In your case I
wouldn't want him to damage your hide. I want a new shade for my floor lamp
and a new holster for my Desert Eagle pistol. Bruno would, in your case,
use electricity and the various exploitations of body cavities with large
blunt objects. :-) . . . . .Mazel Tob you witch. /s/ Doc Tavish.
j. On or about December 7, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to an unknown person: "I will get revenge sooner or later for your inciting
blacks to harass me by e-mail. You're on federal territory now! You WILL be
ferreted out- make no mistake about it! BTW if you were to only think about
it- your very actions only make others believe that I am justified in my
dislike of your kind. You are sneaky rat like vermin meant to be hunted
down and eliminated. :-) Just call me the Verminator! /s/ Doc Tavish/"
10. Said campaign of threats was maliciously designed to frighted,
intimidate, annoy, harass, and silence any person who objected to
Defendant's anti-Semitic agenda by having a chilling effect on any person
expressing or considering expressing opposition to Defendant's bigotry.
11. Said campaign of harassment and intimidation has included,
inter alia, the publication of the private names and addresses of his
victims and their families with suggestions of violence and the offering of
rewards to those who would supply him with the addresses and telephone
numbers of his victims.
12. Said campaign of harassment has included the forging of
communications and publishing such forgeries representing that they
originated with the victims of his campaigns of harassment.
13. Said campaign of harassment has included the publication and
circulation of claims which are false and known by Defendant to be false
concerning the sexual orientation and practices of his opponents.
14. Said campaign of harassment has included harassment by sending
his opponents harassing electronic communications (e-mail) including sexual
innuendo, threats, and bigoted slurs.
15. Defendant is supported and assisted in his campaigns of
harassment as aforesaid by various accomplices who Plaintiff believes and
therefore avers include, inter alia:
16. The aforesaid campaigns arise from Defendant;'s pathological
hatred of Jew and/or any person opposed to his pathological hatred and are
conducted maliciously, wantonly, wilfully, and recklessly by the Defendant
and his accomplices and in outrageous disregard of the rights of his
victims with the specific purpose of intimidating and silencing his
opponents, intentionally causing them mental distress, anguish and grief,
and adversely affecting their reputation in the communities in which they
reside.
17. That such purpose and intent of Defendant is known to
Defendant's accomplices who actively support Defendant's goals and purposes
and assist him in stalking his victims during his campaigns of harassment,
defamation, and intimidation.
18. Such agreement on the part of his accomplices includes the
ethnic prejudice and hatred that motivates Defendant.
19. That said accomplices include, inter alai:
a. David E. Michael, a British neo-Nazi and denier of the Holocaust who is
an adherent of and/or organizer for the neo-Nazi British National Party.
b. Don Ellis, an anti-Semite and debunker of the Holocaust who resides in
Star City, Arkansas.
c. A person publishing material on the internet through remarq.com under
various pseudonyms including but not limited to, "Mike Kalvatis," "Pat
Blakely," "Jesus Christ," "RevWhte," "Rabbi Brimstone" and various forged
headers. Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that said person is the
aforementioned Don Ellis.
20. That the various accomplices of Defendant are aware of his
activities and act in concert with him and with his aid, assistance and
approval.
21. That the existence, purpose, nature, and intent of Defendant's
activities is know to flash.net which continues to allow the Defendant to
use their facilities for such purposes and otherwise supports the
activities of the Defendant.
COUNT I: Harassment by Telephonic Communication
21. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 20 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
22. At various times Defendant has communicated with Plaintiff by
electronic mail (e-nail) which is sent through interstate telephone lines
and received through a telephone connection maintained by Plaintiff and, as
such, constitutes telephonic communication.
23. That as part of his campaign of harassment and intimidation
Defendant has, in the past, sent Plaintiff electronic communications
consisting of the word "kike" repeated several hundred times.
24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only want to blow Joe
You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
25 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Joe me thinks Yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --Yale is a
queer -- he does suck cock
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-2."
26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Are you homosexual, Yale?
Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
make trouble like a malicious fag does
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
27. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale wants to suck your cock Joe and he doesn't know how to ask so he
persists in his silly games to get your attention -- fags are in a lot of
ways just like little girls -- just ignore cock sucker Edeiken and he'll
most likely will try to go after another person."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-4"
28 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"and you still want to wrap your lips around his aryan cock"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-5."
29 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Yale Edeiken wants to suck Joe Bellinger's cock
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-6"
30. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale still wants to suck Joe's aryan cock"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-7"
31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"So why do you still want to suck his cock?
Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
Doc Tavish"
32 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff
an electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"And you're still a flaming fag cock sucker/"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-9."
33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
lifestyle.
When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all?"
I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
your Barbie doll faggot child molester
Doc Tavish:
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made.
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A11."
35 That on July 31, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic
communication stating in pertinent part:
"You want to suck Tavish's, Vange's and Phillips' Nazi cocks. Why does your
side call others homophobes? You must either be homo or at least
sympathetic to their utterly disgusting ways! I'd bet that you suck cock
and butt fuck too! Careto deny it?
Bickhus Dickhus
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-12."
36. That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You want to lick Tavish's prick like a little kid licks a lollipop."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-13."
37 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only act up because Tavish won't let you use your tongue on him."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-14."
38 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale and Jeffrey want to gang rape Tavish because Tavish won't give in to
their homosexual lusts."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-15."
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
40. Said telephonic communications were intended and designed to
alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress
upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred.
41. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
42, Said telephonic communications were received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
43. Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
44, Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
45. Said telephonic communications were made willfully, wantonly,
and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT II: Harassment by Terorrostic Threat
46. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 45 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
47. Defendant has, at various times, publically made threat of
violence against Plaintiff consistent with the pattern of his threats
against others.
48 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
49. Said telephonic communication was received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
50. On November 14, 1999, Defendant made the following public
statement to Plaintiff:
"I'd say that the above is explicit evidence of libel and slander. I surely
wish Mr. Richard Phillips et al immediately files suit, has subpoenas
herewith issued. I will be glad to attend the trial and I hope that a good
public flogging is part of the reparations Yale has to receive in lieu of
monetary damages he will have to render. . . . BTW Richard- Bruno has
volunteered to administer the flogging if is permissible [sic] by the
court. He has been practicing a lot lately. Perhaps he senses something
in the air. I hate saying it but he is somewhat bestial or animalistic in
his instincts but he is loyal to me to the end."
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
52. On December 18, 1999 Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
"Remember Yale- the jury award I seek is not monetary but to have full
access to you for thirty [sic] minutes in front of the court house to
literally beat you black and blue without any civil or criminal
repercussions. I really believe that this would be the only fair and
equitable verdict! : It will be just you and me Yale and I promise you that
you will think a long damned time because you will hurt for a long time
before you will engineer anymore of your malicious devilish mischief. Doc
Tavish Merrily Waiting on Judgment Day."
53. On December 19, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
"Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH (Standing Behind Yale With a Big Fat
Truncheon) . . . . Give me a break and just let a court grant me thirty
minutes immunity from any criminal or civil action- I would just love to
beat Yale to a jolly bloody pulp in front of his family. To me this is the
only form of fair justice. I promise that I will not take his life nor do
any permanent physical harm but I guarantee Yale will be sore for a very
long time. That is a solemn promise I would like to make and keep!"
54. Defendant has repeatedly published this and similar threats
to Plaintiff on various occasions since the original publication of these
threats.
55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and that such damages actually occurred.
56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
57. Said threats were made over the internet in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
58, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
59. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT III: Harassment by Incitement of Others
60. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 59 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
61. As part of his consistent pattern of harassment Defendant has,
individually and in collaboration with others published the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of his opponents with requests that others
harass those who object to the anti-Semitic propaganda he distributes.
62. Said information has included the names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of his detractors families, parents, children, employers,
associates, and neighbors with instructions that they be contacted with
false and/or outrageous material about his detractors private lives.
63. Said campaigns of stalking and harassment have included the
offering of rewards and other encouragements to various of Defendant's
accomplices to provide him with such information to assist Defendant in his
stalking, harassment, and intimidation of his victims.
64. Together with the accomplices named above and various others
unknown to Plaintiff, Defendant has compiled and published and/or assisted
in the compilation and publication of the "Nizkor Telephone Book" which
publishes such information in a malicious effort to harass, annoy, and
intimidate his detractors and to have a chilling effect upon their exercise
of their right of free speech
65. Such acts were done maliciously with the intent of harassing,
annoying and intimidating his detractors, adversely affecting their private
lives and employment, and chilling their exercise of their right of free
speech.
66. In or about April, 1998, Defendant commenced such a public
campaign of stalking, harassment, and intimidation against Plaintiff.
67. Prior to commencing this campaign of harassment Defendant
published the following statement on April 28, 1998, directed at Plaintiff
under his nom de plume of "Doc Tavish":
Hey, Yale, you were right about you being easy to find . What do the folks
in Allentown think knowing the have a socialist living on the block? :-) Be
sure to give my regards to "Alta" if you get my drift! /s/ Tavish
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-1."
68. Said message was intended and published in order to alarm and
harass Plaintiff and by making him believe that Defendant knew where
Plaintiff lived, intimidate Plaintiff from publishing material critical of
Defendant.
69. At approximately the same time Defendant, referring to himself
as "Gumshoe Tavish" made similar claims about the location of one Jeffrey
G. Brown and threatened to reveal to the alleged neighbors of Jeffrey G.
Brown that he was a pederast.
70. Shortly thereafter Defendant began to publish Plaintiff's
name, address, and telephone number using a variety of services which
disguised his location together with requests that others harass the
Plaintiff.
71. The first such message was published on June 1, 1998, with the
phrase "Reach out and touch someone." Attached. Said post is attached
hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-2."
72. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
harass Plaintiff.
73, That similar messages were published by Defendant on a regular
and continual basis with the final form of the message being to following
example published on December 7, 1999:
Yale F. Edeiken, ZHID, of 1590 Alta Dr., Allentown, Pa, wants lots of
late night callers, and will even welcome visitors, late nights, to
discuss the Holohoax. He can be reached at 610 435-9820 He even likes
discussing, and even meeting with faggots, and other pedophiles to discuss
matters. His specialties are butt-fucking, cocksucking, and fondling
tinky winkies.
Yale likes to go to peep shows and likes group grope at the local gay bar
in Allentown. -88- Horst Wessel
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit
"B-3."
74. Said message was published by Defendant over one hundred (100)
times.
75. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
harass Plaintiff.
76. In addition to publishing the Plaintiff's name, address, and telephone
number, Defendant acting individually and by and/or in concert with his
aforementioned accomplices published the names addresses and telephone
numbers of Plaintiff's ,family including his wife, father, brother, sister,
stepmother and business associates with similar invitations to harass,
annoy and frighten them.
77. Said information was provided both separately and as part of
the aforementioned "Nizkot Telephone Book" where other opponents of
Defendant and his accomplices were similarly harassed.
78. All such publications were made either by the Defendant and/or
with his knowledge, consent, approval, and cooperation.
79. Said publications and incitements were intended and designed
to alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional
distress upon Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
80. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
91. Said publications and incitements were made over the internet
in violation of the criminal laws of the United States and the criminal
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
82, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
83. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT IV: Defamation
84. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 83 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
85. As part of his publications concerning Plaintiff and other,
Defendant consistently fabricated false allegations against Plaintiff and
others and knowingly published said fabrications as fact with the malicious
intent of damaging the reputations of Plaintiff and others.
87. Said fabrications were known by the Defendant and his
accomplices to be false and defamatory.
88. Many of the said defamatory publications were made directly to
third parties within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with the intention of
damaging the reputation of Plaintiff within the community in which he
resides thereby vesting jurisdiction with this Honorable Court.
89. On or about October 26, 1999, Defendant began a campaign of
defamation against Plaintiff by publishing a claim that Plaintiff had sent
hin and electronic communication stating: ""Scottie if only I have you just
one night I's give you something no woman will ever be able to give you.
Give up women and join our ranks." Said publication is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C-1."
90. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to Defendant.
91. No such communication was made but, rather, it was
maliciously fabricated by Defendant with the intent of defaming Plaintiff.
92. When Plaintiff complained to Defendant about his forgery,
Defendant again published said forgery and threatened to send said
publication to Plaintiff's internet service provider who would then
"wonder" about the Plaintiff. Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C-2."
93. Said publication is a direct admission of the malicious intent
on the part of Defendant to defame Plaintiff.
94. On or about November 2, 1999, Defendant published the claim
that "You have threatened to do a "homosexual gang rape" to be ASSisted by
your pals Jeffrey G. Brown and Ken McVay - what else can you say other than
you're gay? /s/ Doc Tavish." Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C-3."
95. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had threatened Defendant with sexual
molestation.
96. No such communication was made but, rather, it was
maliciously fabricated by Defendant with the intent of defaming Plaintiff.
97 On or about October 27, 1999, Defendant published an article
entitled "Attention Faggots Yale F. Edeiken and Jeffrey G. Brown" in which
he again repeated\ his allegation that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual
advances to him. Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof
as Exhibit "C-4."
98. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to Defendant.
99. On or about October 27, 1999, Defendant again maliciously
published a communication which he falsely and maliciously claimed had been
written by the Plaintiff and, again, falsely and maliciously claimed that
the Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to hi,. Said publication
is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-5."
100. Said defamatory publication was forwarded directly to
Enter.net, business located within the County of Lehigh. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, thereby vesting jurisdiction in this Honorable Court.
101. On or about October 28, 1999, Defendant again refused to
retract his false and defamatory statements insisting that the fabrications
he had published were accurate. Said publication is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C-6."
102. Defendant again forwarded said malacious and defamatory
communication to Enter.net, a third person located within Lehigh County,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
103. On or about October 28, 1999, Defendant again refused to
retract his false and defamatory statements insisting that the fabrications
he had published were accurate, stating in pertinent part:
". . . . what we have here is a textbook case of how homosexuals really
hate being rejected. Yale will not take "NO" as answer [sic] O don't
care that he can use his tongue in his misguided attempt to show "50 Ways
to Leave My (Female) Lover."
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-7."
104. On or about November 3, 1999, published a false and
defamatory statement claiming that Plaintiff was sexual pervert engaging in
sex with animals. Said publication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "C-8."
105. On or about November 3, 1999, Defendant made a further false
and defamatory publication again stating that Plaintiff had sex with
animals and further stating that Plaintiff was a "neo-Bolshevist" who
wanted to turn the United States into a Soviet-style dictatorship. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-9."
106. On or about November 7, 1999, Defendant again fabricated
material which he claimed had been written by Plaintiff and maliciously
published it on the int4rnet and sent a copy of his false and defamatory
statement to Enter.net, a business located within the County of Lehigh,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C- 10."
107. On or about November 11, 1999, Defendant published the
following false and defamatory statement about Plaintiff on the internet
stating in pertinent part:
" . . . . .faggots Brown and Edeiken will positively not leave me alone.
What is it about homosexuals that the more they are rejected and dejected
the more they have to keep coming after a person? It must be some
"feminine" quirk resembling "hell hath no fury like a rejected or scorned
woman." . . . .Again Yale F.. Edeiken won't leave me alone and now his
fellow anti-Christ and Sodomite is moving in for the kill. See what being
the quintessential Aryan gets you."
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-11."
108. In addition to the defamatory material recited above
Defendant has continually referred to Plaintiff in his various publications
as a "shyster," a "criminal" and a "Bolshevist."
109. In each of the hundreds of times Defendant has maliciously
published such false and defamatory material both published on the internet
and communicated to third persons within the County of Lehigh, Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania material Defendant has intended to adversely effect the
reputation of the Plaintiff.
110. Plaintiff has continually contacted Defendant, informed him
of the defamatory nature of the material that he publishes and sends to
third parties.
111. Plaintiff has additionally contacted Flash.net Communications
and informed them of the various defamatory statements made by Defendant
and the various forgeries he has distributed through their facilities.
112. In response to the demands for retraction Defendant has
replied "Fuck off, Kike." and "Eat shit, Kike."
113. Defendant has, further, acted in concert with Flash.net
Communications to block any demands for a retraction by threatening the
internet services of others.
114. Defendant has, further, acted in concert with his accomplices
named above to further spread the defamatory statements published by
Defendant.
115. Said publications and their distribution were intended and
designed to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and others and that such damages actually occurred.
116. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
116. Said defamation was done maliciously willfully, wantonly, and
in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT V: Invasion of Privacy
117. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 116. of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
118. The falsehoods and forgeries as stated above constitute an
invasion of privacy under the false light doctrine.
119. Said invasions of privacy and their distribution were
intended and designed to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and alarm,
harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon
Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
120. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
121. Said invasions of privacy were done maliciously willfully,
wantonly, and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the
malicious intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating
Plaintiff and to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of
free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
610-435-9820
--
If Ernst Zundel is a refugee, Daffy Duck is Albert Einstein. Some
propositions are so ludicrous that they are a betrayal of common
sense and human dignity if allowed a moment's oxygen.
-REX MURPHY, The Globe and Mail
Paul Kneisel
not-so-neo-Nazi and theorist of terrorism William Pierce, writing under his
nym Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com>
<cui76v8obnu21sps6...@4ax.com>
>Where is proof that I am a NA political supporter? I vote Republican!
>
Bradbury is an avowed political supporter of William Pierce. The
not-so-neo-Nazi National Alliance, which Pierce heads, is described by the
Anti-Defamation League as "the single most dangerous organized hate group
in the United States today."[1]
Pierce runs a tight organization, demanding that he be the principle
spokesperson for the group and requiring members to get his permission
before conducting actions in the name of the group.[2]
We are not supporters of Joseph McCarthy and therefore don't fetishize the
existence of a "party card" by Bradbury. Nor do we support McCarty's
particular interest in political duckery, whereby one determines an
individual's core political beliefs on the basis that it looks and walks
like a duck.
Out method is the opposite; we do not wish to explain Bradbury by Pierce
but, by looking at Bradbury, discover the people to whom Pierce
successfully appeals. One understands ducks by looking at ducks; one
examines fascist agitators like Bradbury to understand how fascism
functions. Politics comes first; the organizational issue of a "party card"
in the National Alliance is quite extraneous.
Pierce, who is the rare fascist with a doctorate, presents himself as the
soft-spoken grandfatherly type with a fondness for pussycats instead of the
German Shepherds once hailed by earlier fuehrers.
But even without a card, Bradbury openly supports the politics of William
Pierce's National Alliance, calling them "the leading patriotic
organization."[3] Of Pierce, whose infamous Turner Diaries represented the
terrorist blueprint behind the bombing of the Oklahoma Federal Building,
Bradbury demands that people "speak respectively"[4]
Indeed, in something reminiscent of Bradbury particular sexual actions,
Bradbury demands that we "bow" before this terrorist's "greatness."[5]
Finally, Bradbury, while paralleling Pierce's instructions, announced he
did "not speak for" Pierce's National Alliance web site, immediately went
on to advertise it, writing that it was one of the "web sites that [he]
support[ed]."[6]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
[1] Anti-Defamation League, "Explosion of Hate: The Most Dangerous
Organized Hate Group." www.adl.org/explosion_of_hate/introduction.html
[2] Anti-Defamation League, ""Explosion of Hate: A Tight Ship. "
www.adl.org/explosion_of_hate/intro_tight_ship.html
[3] Doc Tavish (doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com) [sic: Scot Bradbury],
"Subject: Jeffrey's Sleepless Nights? Yes?," post to usenet newsgroups:
alt.revisionism; alt.politics.white-power; alt.politics.nationalism.white;
alt.conspiracy. 26 September 1998.
[4] Doc Tavish (tav...@phoenix.net) [sic: Scot Bradbury], "Subject: Great
Reading- White Power Novels," post to usenet newsgroups:
alt.politics.nationalism.white; alt.politics.white-power; alt.revisionism.
11 January 1997.
[5] From: Doc Tavish (tav...@phoenix.net) [sic: Scot Bradbury], Subject:
Re: IQ and Brains and Liberals, Oh My!" post to usenet newsgroups:
alt.politics.clinton; alt.discrimination; alt.politics.white-power;
alt.politics.nationalism.white; alt.politics.immigration; alt.skinheads;
alt.conspiracy, soc.culture.europe. 11 January 1997.
[6] [1] From: Doc Tavish (doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com) [sic: Scot
Bradbury], " Subject: Jeffrey's Sleepless Nights? Yes?" post to usenet
newsgroups: alt.revisionism; alt.politics.white-power;
alt.politics.nationalism.white; alt.conspiracy. 26 September 1998
Patrick Keenan
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:26:36 -0500,
<tEQ8a.1313$Xo3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"
What was that you said the other day?
From: Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com>
Message-ID: v9g46vo2bcdhd9i6c...@4ax.com
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:47:16 -0600
"> You and others always snip what you can't refute. If you could refute it
you
> would leave it intact and slam dunk me royally.
> <snip>
Snip what you can't refute, right?
If we use your own standard, then, you agree that you can't refute the
statement that you don't have proofs of either perjury or tax fraud. You
also can't refute that you consort with people who sympatise with communists
and celebrate the murders of American citizens.
Thanks for playing.
-pk
Tavish
Tavish
kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Thoroughly debunked with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
Patrick Keenan
From: Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com>
Message-ID: v9g46vo2bcdhd9i6c...@4ax.com
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:47:16 -0600
"> You and others always snip what you can't refute. If you could refute it
you
> would leave it intact and slam dunk me royally.
> <snip>
By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National Alliance
supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip and run.
By your own words and actions, you demonstrate your support.
-pk
Tavish
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Why are you using a phoney e-mail address and a phoney name-- care to answer me
Peter Outerbridge!? Your real e-mail address is <tall...@nyct.net> and the
<tall...@nyct.net> is Peter Outerbridge's not someone named "Paul Kneisel."
If you choose to be a god damned seditious and subversive communist then you
should wear your "Hammer and Sickle" with pride!
Registrant:
anti-fascism.org (ANTI-FASCISM-DOM)
200 East Tenth Street #603
New York NY,10003 US
Domain Name: ANTI-FASCISM.ORG
Administrative Contact:
Outerbridge, Peter (PO815) tall...@NYCT.NET
<<Notice there is no "Paul Kneisel" associated with the <tall...@NYCT.NET>
e-mail address! That e-mail address belongs to Peter Outerbridge NOT Paul
Kneisel.>>
anti-fascism.org
200 East Tenth Street #603
New York,, NY 10003
<<That street address is actually the address of the "FEH! Press" which
distributes radical underground anarchist-communist publications. See more
info below about FEH! Press>>
212-568-6690
Record expires on 20-Dec-2002.
Record created on 19-Dec-1997.
Database last updated on 21-Dec-2002 06:52:24 EST.
Domain servers in listed order:
BSD1.NYCT.NET 216.139.128.3
BSD2.NYCT.NET 216.139.128.4
<END>
Special Note March 3, 2003: I just saw the slick trick you pulled concerning
your web domain registration too but there are many archives which will prove
the above. You had it changed in Feb 2003!
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=tall...@NYCT.NET&as_epq=anti-fascism.org%20%28ANTI-FASCISM-DOM%29&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_uauthors=%20&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=1&as_miny=1994&as_maxd=3&as_maxm=3&as_maxy=2003&num=20&hl=en
Searched Groups for tall...@NYCT.NET "anti-fascism.org (ANTI-FASCISM-DOM)" from
Jan 12, 1994 to today. Results 1 - 20 of about 372
You are nailed with these archives vermin:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=xyC5OyJZDwG8d8gJFjRe9KV5LNWc%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: More Spam From Bradbury: Re: Bradbury's Libels and A Call For Him to
Retract Them.... (Peter Outerbridge continues His Pathetic Denial)
Organization: http://www.anti-fascism.org
Message-ID: <xyC5OyJZDwG8d8...@4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 02:11:07
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=lsaa5uk1kuddr467l0fjoubgqqo8od7b7c%404ax.com&rnum=5
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Robert Scott Bradbury keeps libeling Paul Kneisel
Message-ID: <lsaa5uk1kuddr467l...@4ax.com>
Just more proof that you are a cowardly vermin and you are trying to cover your
tracks! I knew you would pull the trick you did and that is why I snap shot the
feedback from Verisign and GEEKTOOLS concerning who anti-fascism.org is
registered to! Anyone wanting copies of the snapshots just ask and I will e-mail
them as a ZIP file.
Here is Peter Outerbridge trying to cover his tracks:
http://www.netsol.com/cgi-bin/whois/whois?STRING=anti-fascism.org&SearchType=do&STRING2.x=32&STRING2.y=10
Domain Name:ANTI-FASCISM.ORG
Created On:19-Dec-1997 05:00:00 UTC
Last Updated On:04-Feb-2003 15:15:55 UTC
Expiration Date:18-Dec-2003 05:00:00 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:R63-LROR
Status:OK
Registrant ID:63-C
Registrant Name:CONTACT NOT AUTHORITATIVE
Registrant Street1:Whois Server:whois.networksolutions.com
Registrant Street2:Referral URL:www.networksolutions.com
Registrant City:N/A
Registrant Postal Code:N/A
Registrant Country:CA
Registrant Email:n...@available.org
Admin ID:63-C
Admin Name:CONTACT NOT AUTHORITATIVE
Admin Street1:Whois Server:whois.networksolutions.com
Admin Street2:Referral URL:www.networksolutions.com
Admin City:N/A
Admin Postal Code:N/A
Admin Country:CA
Admin Email:n...@available.org
Billing ID:63-C
Billing Name:CONTACT NOT AUTHORITATIVE
Billing Street1:Whois Server:whois.networksolutions.com
Billing Street2:Referral URL:www.networksolutions.com
Billing City:N/A
Billing Postal Code:N/A
Billing Country:CA
Billing Email:n...@available.org
Tech ID:63-C
Tech Name:CONTACT NOT AUTHORITATIVE
Tech Street1:Whois Server:whois.networksolutions.com
Tech Street2:Referral URL:www.networksolutions.com
Tech City:N/A
Tech Postal Code:N/A
Tech Country:CA
Tech Email:n...@available.org
Name Server:BSD2.NYCT.NET
Name Server:BSD1.NYCT.NET
<END>
Looks to me like you are trying to cover your tracks you commie bastard BUT that
February 4, 2003 update doesn't detract from what the results were that I snap
shotted in December 2002! Anyone wanting the ZIP filed web page saves just ask!
More info on Peter Outerbridge's (aka Paul Kneisel) FEH! Press:
Paul Kneisel" claims Peter Outerbridge is a writer AND the address which "Paul
Kneisel" supplied for his domain registration was: 200 East Tenth Street #603
That address belongs to:
FEH! Press
200 E 10th St #603
New York NY 10003.
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Feh%21+Press+200+E+10th+St+%23603+&num=20&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=+&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
Searched the web for Feh! Press 200 E 10th St #603 " ". Results 1 - 19 of
about 27
The above GOOGLE search returned many links to "anarchists" such as:
THEY DON'T CALL IT SUBGENIUS FOR NOTHING by Bob Black
... (Regarding the PW debacle, consult my first and worst book, THE BABY AND THE
BATHWATER, $10 from Feh! Press, 200 E. 10th St. #603, New York NY 10003.). ...
www.spunk.org/library/writers/black/sp001674.html
Spunk Library- an online anarchist library and archive.
Same address as "Paul Kneisel's" anti-fascism.org and the same type politics
"Paul Kneisel" has espoused!
FEH!--(#17), 200 E 10th St #603, New York NY, 10003.
http://www.mindpollen.com/book/appenb1.htm
Outposts 2 has been published (as Psychotropedia)!
It's a massive guide to radical and unorthodox books.
Feh! Press
200 E 10th St #603/New York NY 10003
Shipping: none
Payment: cash, ck, mo
http://www.spunk.org/library/writers/black/sp001674.html
Spunk Library: An Online Anarchist Library and Archive
"...PW control group, one Adam Cornford (who, ironically, 13 years ago told me
how much he despised SubGenius), nephew of an English Communist so prominent in
the Party, until he was killed fighting in Spain, that After the Revolution his
comrades wanted to rename London "Cornfordgrad." I'm not making this stuff up,
folks. I COULDN'T make this up. (Regarding the PW debacle, consult my first and
worst book, THE BABY AND THE BATHWATER, $10 from Feh! Press, 200 E. 10th St.
#603, New York NY 10003.)"
Looks like an anarchist web site lists Peter Outerbridge's FEH! Press offering
as a "work" dedicated to a communist revolution by comrades!
Once again I caught you lying you little communist bastard! Those were NOT my
words. The were the words of Ian McKinney of Western Imperative Network and that
post was forged in my identity! Care to deny it you lying communist bastard?
Compare the headers to that post and prove that I ever had an ISP etc such as
appears in the headers!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=26099805053459%40news.accesscom.net&rnum=2
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: Jeffrey's Sleepless Nights? Yes?
Date: 1998/09/26
Message-ID: <2609980...@news.accesscom.net>
References: <2609980...@news.accesscom.net>
X-Complaints-To: use...@ux2.accesscom.net
X-Trace: ux2.accesscom.net 906844460 24385 204.181.183.6
(26 Sep 1998 21:14:20 GMT)
Organization: AccessCom, THE New Orleans Internet Provider
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Sep 1998 21:14:20 GMT
<END>
Care to prove I ever had a New Orleans ISP or I ever lived in Cajun Country. You
are a pitiful liar!
>Of Pierce, whose infamous Turner Diaries represented the
>terrorist blueprint behind the bombing of the Oklahoma Federal Building,
Of course Al Gore's book "Earth in the Balance" was Unabomber's Bible!
>Bradbury demands that people "speak respectively"[4]
Another lie from you- you communist bastard!
I did not say what you attribute to me and all I did was make a tongue in cheek
remark to one of your fellow commies as I will quote below.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=32D84F5A.4B2B%40phoenix.net&output=gplain
From: Doc Tavish <tav...@phoenix.net>
Subject: Great Reading- White Power Novels
Date: 1997/01/11
Message-ID: <32D84F...@phoenix.net>
Andrew Mathis wrote:
>
> i...@usaor.net (Roger Hughes) wrote:
>
> >In message <5b1noj$hn5$1...@news.nyu.edu> - fr...@scscomm.com (Andrew Mathis)
> >writes:
> >:>
> >:>beo...@heimdall-scot.co.uk wrote:
> >:>
> >:>>The 2 classic White Power novels published by the National Alliance,
> >:>>"Hunter" and "Serpents Walk" are available in the UK.
> >:>>I have them for sale at only £2.50 per copy plus 95p postage
> >:>>and packaging within the UK.
> >:>>If you are interested contact me via e-mail.
:
> >:>That's right; act now, and you can too can be like OK City bomber Tim
> >:>McVeigh. Read William Pierce's "Hunter" and start picking off
> >:>interracial couples with a rifle.
> >:>
> >:>What fun!
> >:>
> >:>Sick bastards...
:
> >If you actually knew anything about the novel, Hunter, you'd realize that one
> >of the main ideas put forth in it is that killing iterracial couples is a
> >futile and unproductive activity. I think the book was written partly to
> >discourage such acts by racial activists. So, in that regard, I'd think you,
> >of all people, should be praising it for that reason.
:
> I'd kiss a frog's fat fanny before I'd praise anything that William
> "Got Bob Mathews in an urn on my desk" Pierce writes.
>
> Andrew Mathis
My personal favorite is: "The Day of the Rope" from The Turner Diaries.
I read it to Johann and Wolfgang every other week! Speak respectfully of
Lord Pierce squid! Pierce is like me- he doesn't like homos! HUNTER
tells about homos and how society reacts to them. Elsa gets off to Oscar
Yeager- I have to keep telling her he's fictional and Doc is real. Andy
I am wearing my jack boots as I write this!
Doc Tavish :->
~~End of Complete Archive~~
It is obvious I was tweaking Mathis and I also prove that you lied about what
you claim I said! That is two lies exposed you communist bastard!
>Indeed, in something reminiscent of Bradbury particular sexual actions,
>Bradbury demands that we "bow" before this terrorist's "greatness."[5]
Once again I was tweaking one of you fellow whining little communist shits as I
prove again.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=32D82771.56B2%40phoenix.net&rnum=1
From: Doc Tavish <tav...@phoenix.net>
Subject: Re: IQ and Brains and Liberals, Oh My!
Date: 1997/01/11
Message-ID: <32D827...@phoenix.net>
Andrew Mathis wrote:
>
> whit...@mindspring.com (Will Williams) wrote:
>
> >no...@somewhere.com (norm) wrote:
> >>Any thoughts out there?
> >"Liberalism is not a philosophy, but a disease of the brain."
> > -- Dr. William L. Pierce
"Liberalism is an essentially feminine, submissive world view.
Perhaps a better adjective than feminine would be infantile. It
is the world view of men who do not have moral toughness, the
spiritual strength to stand up and do single combat with life,
who cannot adjust to the reality that the world is not a huge,
pink-and-blue, padded nursery in which the lions lie down with
the lambs and everyone lives happily ever after."
(page 42, paragraph 5) -- Dr. William L. Pierce The Turner Diaries
Bow before greatness squid!
Doc Tavish
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
>Finally, Bradbury, while paralleling Pierce's instructions, announced he
>did "not speak for" Pierce's National Alliance web site, immediately went
>on to advertise it, writing that it was one of the "web sites that [he]
>support[ed]."[6]
Again you quote a post which was forged in my identity! How many lies have I
caught you in you little bastard? For a fact you are a communist and you have
stated in first person all of the following:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=ainjrf%241365%241%40pencil.math.missouri.edu&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Subject: The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tuesday, 6 August 2002 -- 6:38
Date: 5 Aug 2002 23:38:07 -0500
Message-ID: <ainjrf$1365$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
"...It is our strategy that participation and intervention in these struggles,
from an anarchist-communist viewpoint... Slowly building a base for a truly mass
revolutionary anarchist movement capable of defeating not only fascist
organizations but also the combined forces of capital and the state... <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b61ru4nhbn5pakn88k7p89c2bu1fa3rgn%404ax.com&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct-nospam-or-fascism.net>
Subject: The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tue, 15 October 2002 -- 6:58 (#706)
Message-ID: <4b61ru4nhbn5pakn8...@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:32:07 -0400
"-- Call for a Revolutionary Anti-Fascist Bloc... Perhaps five hundred
anti-fascist demonstrators were there... Most of the demonstrators were part of
leftist groups like Left Turn, InternationalSocialist Organization (ISO), and
Anti-Capitalist Convergence (ACC).... <END>
What political ideology is anti-capitalist and is in good company with
socialists?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=aanq90%24pfu%241%40pencil.math.missouri.edu&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Subject: TINAF Supplement #188 (#677): Fascist Le Pen and the French
Date: 30 Apr 2002 23:17:36 -0500
Message-ID: <aanq90$pfu$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
"The hope it's also the youth which fights massively against the capitalist
globalization and the fascism. I address all the left voters, the socialists,
the environmentalist communists but also the associative, union activists to
organize a popular resistance on the way up of the extreme right, in a big
all together against the fascism and the employers."
What political ideology has views you espoused above?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8lbjkucvi5f54ieop8p9svtq6g6fpo208o%404ax.com&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct-nospam-or-fascism.net>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.socialism.trotsky
Subject: Re: WV Did NOT Lie about the anti-Klan rally
Message-ID: <8lbjkucvi5f54ieop...@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:57:39 -0400
"Diamond must mean neofascist Russia, neofascist because it worships
capitalist technology.." <END>
It is obvious you are upset because the Russians forsook their communism!
Here you are advocating schools educate against anti-communism among
other things (who other than a communist would be against being
anti-communist?):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=x3F13.898%24G3.28089%40news13.ispnews.com&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Subject: (en)[excerpts] The Internet Anti-Fascist, Fri 14 May 99 -- 3:36/37
(#264-265)
Date: 1999/05/22
Message-ID: <x3F13.898$G3.2...@news13.ispnews.com>
"The prescription for the political illness of fascism is education...
Teachers, school administrators, students and parents need to recognize
and talk frankly about the dangers posed by fascist organizers in their
midst or on the internet... [T]he response should be.. why the whole student
body has an interest in taking a stand against... anti-communism, " <END>
If you are against anti-communists then it is a reasonable assumption
you're pro-communist!
How about this communist psycho-babble?
http://csf.colorado.edu/mail/pen-l/jan98/0071.html
Psycho-dynamics of Homo Economicus
Sun, 04 Jan 1998 00:48:08 -0500
Paul Kneisel (tall...@nyct.net)
My own researches in this area, though, initially centered on the anal
theory of money and the anal character. Specific work involved the changes
in the class and sub-class identifications of the anal character as key
industrial dynamics underwent internal changes (e.g. the identification of
the anal character with the early bourgeoisie to the later identification
with remaining entrepreneurs and the petty bourgeoisie.)
Recently my interests have been around the transformation question as
examined in Vol. II of Capital and elsewhere. The intense intra-firm and
intra-industry competition around the transformation problem has given rise
to a particular real world phenomenon with massive impact on internal
psycho-dynamics.
The shift in the industrial dynamic from accumulation to transformation has
also produced significant shifts in characterology, from the compulsive
saving/hoarding anal character to the impulsive discharging/spending
urethral character.
Ironically, urethral eroticism has become the fourth lost libido in
classical psychoanalysis. While my interest in psychoanalysis is
anthropological and not therapeutic, urethral aspects of early theories of
narcissism were never examined. Nor have even the therapeutic-oriented
psychoanalysis investigated such areas for the treatment of narcissistic
and borderline conditions that afflict (or are afflicted by) late
capitalism they way that Victorian society produced sexual hysterics.
<END>
What other mind than a communist mind would compose the twaddle above!?
The above text also gives a hint of your sexual orientation too! You only
prove many communists are also homosexualist in their perverted and distorted
view of the world.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=2rckstkv3ut27b8dh8b41u93mbodar27io%404ax.com&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Subject: Re: A Response to Burnore
Message-ID: <2rckstkv3ut27b8dh...@4ax.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 01:26:01 GMT
"The "net cops" (in the good sense) focus their efforts on the worst
problem. They don't look for political spam; they search for spam whose
content is sexual or reflects cockroach-capitalism..." <END>
Here is the New York Sate Branch of Communist Party USA linking to YOUR web
site:
http://www.dezines.com/nyscpusa/tocpage.html
New York State Communist Party USA
Anti-Fascist Web Site
Fascism, the most evil child of capitalism, threatens all working class people
and all progressive organizations... To see how we can fight fascism, please
read the articles on the following web and FTP sites:
http://www.anti-fascism.org
ftp://ftp.nyct.net/pub/users/tallpaul/publish/misc/
<END>
Care to deny it commie bastard?"
Here is YOUR web site linking to other communist filth:
http://www.anti-fascism.org/page-links-trad.html
Traditional Anti-Fascist Groups
Fascism victimized many groups with its crimes against humanity...
Three groups, however, understood the special nature of fascism even before
it took power... They were, respectively, the labor movement, the socialists,
and the communists...
The Second 'Socialist' International
http://www.socialistinternational.org/
Reflecting the politics of the Third 'Communist' International
http://www.yclusa.org/links/wrldlink.html
(The above link returns the following)
World Communist Movement Links
The communist movement of youth, students and young workers is on the move
in most countries today. Check out the activities of communist youth
organizations from this partial list of links.
Link Notes
Kommunistischer Studentinn/ en Verband (KSV) Communist Students Union of Austria
Kommunistische Jugend Österreichs (KJÖ) Communist Youth of Austria
Coletius de Juventut Comunista de Catalunya (CJC) Communist Youth of Catalonia
Juventud Comunista Colombiana (JUCO) Colombian Young Communists
United Democratic Youth Organization of Cyprus (EDON)
Kommunistisk Parti i Danmark Ungdom (KPID-U) Youth of the Communist Party in
Denmark
Mouvement Jeunes Communistes du France (MCJF) Movement of Young Communists of
France
Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterjugend (SDAJ) Socialist German Workers Youth
Communist Youth of Greece (KNE)
Workers Youth Party of Ireland (WPY)
Giovani Communisti /e (GC) Young Communists of Italy
Democratic Youth League of Japan (DYLJ)
Norges Kommunistiske Ungdomsforbund (NKU) Norwegian Communist Youth Union
Juventude Comunista Portuguesa (JCP) Portugese Communist Youth.
Sveriges Kommunistiska Ungdomsförbund (SKU) Swedish Communist Youth Union
Union de Juventudes Communistas de España Union of Young Communists of Spain
<end>
Care to deny you little commie bastard agent of smear? I expose you with truth
and you spread lies and quote posts which were forged in my identity or you
exaggerate the intent of my tongue in cheek remarks to little communists shits
like you! I tell you what you little commie bastard-- If America were as fascist
as you claim and America was filled with fascists you would already be arrested,
vigorously interrogated, and gassed and burned!! That is what I think of your
delusional rants!
Here you are eulogizing a fellow commie and everyone take notice of what is said
about churches and religion!
http://csf.colorado.edu/pen-l/2000IV/msg03883.html
The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tuesday, 19 Dec 2000 -- 4:102 (#498)
by Paul Kneisel
21 December 2000 03:29 UTC
[...]
OBITUARY
Ralph Bates: Writer who kept his devotion to republican Spain alive in
his novels Valentine Cunningham (Guardian) 12 Dec 00
Ralph Bates, who has died in New York, aged 101, was the oldest
survivor of that legendary group of British writers who gave their energies,
their writings, and - in some cases - their lives to the cause of the
Spanish republic in its doomed fight against fascism in the 1930s.
At some point in the 15 years before the Spanish civil war broke out
in 1937, he was a communist trade union agitator and organiser in the
docks and fishing industries of Catalonia, where he became a fluent speaker
of Spanish and Catalan. His knowledge of Spanish working-class and
peasant life would turn him into one of the Comintern's best experts on Spain.
....By 1923 he had joined the Communist party....
In 1937, Bates was sent by the Communist party to the United States to
drum up financial support and attract more volunteers. There were huge
rallies in venues such as Madison Square Gardens, and he became a darling of
the American left...
In one of his best Spanish pieces, Compa Sagasta Burns A Church,
published in Left Review in October 1936, Bates pays understanding
tribute to the Spanish anarchist's need to calmly burn out the signs and
symbols of religious oppression; he was very ready to go along with what WH
Auden called "the necessary murder" in a revolutionary cause. But he also
dwells compellingly on the fatalism of anarchists - the belief that, at
bottom, anarchism, "noble, just and beautiful", is "unrealizable" and
therefore doomed.
When he wrote this, Bates's line was that, by contrast, communism was
not only noble but also realisable...
<END>
Didn't communists burn churches in Russia and other places too?
BTW here is one of YOUR political ideologues and you even link to his commie
babble and "Hate America" rhetoric from your commie front web site:
Document Archives
Anti-fascist theory
http://www.anti-fascism.org/doc-af-prop.html
The above will take you to this (and others too):
Lethbridge, David (Bethune Institute for Anti-Fascist Studies) -- see also
Lethbridge writings in "tactics" archive
"Prescription For Fascism: Alternative Medicine and Right-Wing Politics, March
2001 http://www.anti-fascism.org/da/afp/lethbridge-perscription.html
<END>
Just who is Peter Outerbridge's fellow "anti-fascist" and apparent mentor?
Here is what the Bethune Institute returns on David Lethbridge (schill for
communist Norman Bethune):
[Links active December 7, 2002 for verification]
http://bethuneinstitute.org/
This site is dedicated to the militant anti-fascist spirit of Dr. Norman
Bethune.
http://bethuneinstitute.org/index2.html
Once at the index click to read (left hand margin bottom):
BETHUNE:
"Dr. Norman Bethune was born in Gravenhurst, Ontario, in 1890...
After a visit to the Soviet Union, in 1935, he organized the Montreal
Group for the Security of the People's Health, the first organization in Canada
to fight for socialized medicine and universal free medical care. It was in that
same year he joined the Communist Party of Canada and dedicated himself to the
struggle against fascism...
In 1938, Bethune went to China to help Mao-Tse Tung's revolutionary army
defeat the Japanese imperialists... As a Communist, he fought against fascism
and won the gratitude of the working class of the whole world..." <END>
Thus we see one of Peter Outerbridge's aka Paul Kneisel's mentors as being a
communist.
At the same index click to read (left hand margin bottom):
LINKS:
Political Parties
Communist Party of Canada (CPC)
Communist Party USA (CPUSA)
South African Communist Party(SACP)
Anti-fascist and Anti-racist Organizations
Arm the Spirit(ATS)
Anti-Racist Action (ARA)
Political Research Associates (PRA)
Anti-Fascism.org http://www.anti-fascism.org/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<<NOTE: ANTI-FASCISM.ORG is Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's web site.>>
[...]
"Let us have done, then, with the miserable deception of anti-communism. It has
served Hitler and Mussolini well, but not the enslaved German and Italian
people. It may have a pleasing sound in Tory ears, and salve the consciences of
some spinsterish British labor leaders, but it is rank dishonesty nevertheless."
Dr. Norman Bethune
<END>
UPDATE:
More "communist wisdom" from Peter Outerbridge's comrade's web site:
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
http://bethuneinstitute.org/home.html
...As long as capitalism exists, the threat of fascism will never be eliminated.
Fascism, as a social and political movement, is a form of capitalism that does
away with the pretence of parliamentary democracy, and rules instead by force
and terror.
Today, neo-fascism is again on the rise... Fascist ideas have entered the social
mainstream and are shifting the political consensus ever further to the right.
In order to help combat and defeat contemporary fascism, the Bethune Institute
is providing an on-going series of documents exposing every facet of this most
anti-democratic form of political expression.
But neo-fascism cannot be eliminated without a radical transformation of
society. Capitalism breeds racism and fascism the way a fly breeds maggots.
The struggle against fascism, and its organized racist core, is at the same time
a revolutionary struggle against capitalism itself....
<END>
That revolution against capitalism is a communist revolution and Norman Bethune
was, in fact, a communist who supported Chairman Mao in his slaughter of
millions of anti-communists.
GOOGLE returns using key words: "Mao Bethune Revolution"
http://www.google.com/advanced_search
collect.at Mao Badges: Pins and Badges from the Cultural ...
... used in China during the Cultural Revolution and it ... white badge:
Commemorating Bai Qiu En (Norman Bethune). ... red with the character "Chong"
and Mao Portrait www.collect.at/badgeoffer.htm
Lesson Plans on China
... poem on the Long March and his speech on the selflessness of Norman Bethune,
noting two important aspects of Mao's vision of the revolution: selflessness...
Revolutionary China: The Rise Of The Communist Party...
www.columbia.edu/itc/eacp/webcourse/chinaworkbook/Lesson_Plan/RevCh_Rise_Communist.htm
1939: In Memory of Norman Bethune
... text of the Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung ... Comrade Norman Bethune,[1] a
member of the Communist ... Leninism teaches that the world revolution can only
succeed if ... www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/1939/12.htm
(Excerpts)
In Memory of Norman Bethune
by MAO TSE-TUNG December, 1939
Comrade Norman Bethune, a member of the Communist Party of Canada, was around
fifty when he was sent by the Communist Parties of Canada and the United States
to China... He arrived in Yenan in the spring of last year, went to work in the
Wutai Mountains, and to our great sorrow died a martyr at his post. What kind of
spirit is this that makes a foreigner selflessly adopt the cause of the Chinese
people's liberation as his own? It is the spirit of internationalism, the spirit
of communism, from which every Chinese Communist must learn. Leninism teaches
that the world revolution can only succeed if the proletariat of the capitalist
countries supports the struggle for liberation of the colonial and semi-colonial
peoples and if the proletariat of the colonies and semi-colonies supports the
proletariat of the capitalist countries. Comrade Bethune put his Leninist line
into practice. We Chinese Communists must also follow this line in our practice.
We must unite with the proletariat of all the capitalist countries, with the
proletariat of Japan, Britain, the United States, Germany, Italy and all other
capitalist countries, for this is the only way to overthrow imperialism... <END>
NEED I SAY MORE? Norman Bethune was a Comrade of MAO TSE-TUNG himself and the
Bethune Institute is nothing more than a communist front for revolution and
subversion!
Read more about David Lethbridge and Jewish B'nai Brith aiding him financially
in his America Bashing7 and other demented communist rants with this link:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=prbo5vkp1825141dem99scia1676el7nqd%404ax.com
Subject: Anti-American Communist Agitator and Tax Exempt Religious Org Which
Gave Him Financial and Moral Support
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:07:42 -0600
Message-ID: <prbo5vkp1825141de...@4ax.com>
Also see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=q6u65v4lop8l8k31b8po91hvjtta8sr1n9%404ax.com&rnum=1
"NYC Based web site ANTI-FASCISM.ORG Advocates Communist Revolution..."
Date: 19 Feb 2003 12:29:06 GMT
Message-ID: <q6u65v4lop8l8k31b...@4ax.com>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Footnotes
>
>[1] Anti-Defamation League, "Explosion of Hate: The Most Dangerous
>Organized Hate Group." www.adl.org/explosion_of_hate/introduction.html
>
>[2] Anti-Defamation League, ""Explosion of Hate: A Tight Ship. "
>www.adl.org/explosion_of_hate/intro_tight_ship.html
>
>[3] Doc Tavish (doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com) [sic: Scot Bradbury],
>"Subject: Jeffrey's Sleepless Nights? Yes?," post to usenet newsgroups:
>alt.revisionism; alt.politics.white-power; alt.politics.nationalism.white;
>alt.conspiracy. 26 September 1998.
>
>[4] Doc Tavish (tav...@phoenix.net) [sic: Scot Bradbury], "Subject: Great
>Reading- White Power Novels," post to usenet newsgroups:
>alt.politics.nationalism.white; alt.politics.white-power; alt.revisionism.
>11 January 1997.
>
>[5] From: Doc Tavish (tav...@phoenix.net) [sic: Scot Bradbury], Subject:
>Re: IQ and Brains and Liberals, Oh My!" post to usenet newsgroups:
>alt.politics.clinton; alt.discrimination; alt.politics.white-power;
>alt.politics.nationalism.white; alt.politics.immigration; alt.skinheads;
>alt.conspiracy, soc.culture.europe. 11 January 1997.
>
>[6] [1] From: Doc Tavish (doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com) [sic: Scot
>Bradbury], " Subject: Jeffrey's Sleepless Nights? Yes?" post to usenet
>newsgroups: alt.revisionism; alt.politics.white-power;
>alt.politics.nationalism.white; alt.conspiracy. 26 September 1998
See- I did not snip one bit of your smear and I proved you to be a liar and a
communist who is desperately trying to cover his tracks! ZAfraid the fascists
are after you!?
Tavish
---
>I ask-- why do we never see Jews criticize the communism
>which existed before Stalin took control?
"Because there was very little to criticize."
Susan Cohen - January 24, 2001
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&selm=3A6F230F.3AFF4272%40his.com
Message-ID: <3A6F230F...@his.com>
Tavish
"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National Alliance
>supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip and run.
Just read the extended reply I made to your fellow Marxuist smear agent if you
believe that tripe. I did not snip one iota either!
Black Knight
Do you know what the word "solipsism" means, Pat? It describes the
Fatboy perfectly. You can't talk sense to the hippo-he's not playing
with a full deck.
Bruno
Black Knight
<snipped material posted many times>
Note to readers:
The allegations made by Yale Edeiken were never tested legally because
Fatboy
Scotty alleged lack of jurisdiction and the judge concurred. However,
they are consistent with Fatboy's behavior on this newsgroup. I do not
presume to speak for others, but I,personally, am of the opinion that
the BLOB did every bit of it.
Bruno
Patrick Keenan
news:riv76v4go9ofd39j4...@4ax.com...
Did you address my repost of your words? No. You snipped all of it. Which
means, by your standard, that you can't refute it.
That's quite apart from the plain meaning of your words: You endorsed (in
glowing terms), William Pierce, leader of a political party, and encouraged
others to listen to them. That's known as political support.
By the way, I have no "fellow Marxuist" or "fellow Marxists". You're
projecting your opinions *again*; they are not facts, and are not based on
facts.
Now, what action has the CCRA taken on your opinion that Mr. McVay has
engaged in tax fraud? What action have prosecutors and bar associations
taken on your opinion that Mr. Eideken commited perjury?
The answers are "none", is that not correct? What is your opinion as to
why that is?
-pk
Black Knight
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 01:31:58 -0600, the National Alliance political
> supporter, Scot Bradbury, writing via his nym of Tavish
> <8m066v4ucvip45ji8...@4ax.com> wrote ...
>
> >
> >You and your crowd on the other hand snip my vital proofs. Your crowd claims Ken
> >McVay doesn't lie and when I post his posts in which he says one thing and then
> >another and then I even give the URLs your crowd snips it all and then lays on
> >the personal attacks. There is a major difference between what I snip and what
> >your crowd snips and that is FACT!
> >
>
> Those familiar with Bradbury know of his propensity to "snip" the author of
> some document, and then attribute it to an opponent, using the now-forged
> document as "proof" or a "self confession" that Bradbury's opponent wrote
> what Bradbury well knows they did not write.
The lying scum actually tried to tell me that the doctrine of
separation of church and state prohibits voluntary religious activity
after school. He's just a bald-faced liar.
Black Knight
YOU DID IT,FATBOY.
Black Knight
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:37:32 -0500, <JhN8a.961$Xo3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> Once again- YOUR opinions and they don't mean squat.
>
> ---
Get a job, you bum.
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>The lying scum actually tried to tell me that the doctrine of
>separation of church and state prohibits voluntary religious activity
>after school. He's just a bald-faced liar.
Proof? You accuse but you never substantiate! Another kike trait?
BTW there is no such thing as "the doctrine of separation of church and state"
because it is a concoction of kikes who hate America's Christian Heritage.
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>YOU DID IT,FATBOY.
Prove it kike!
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Get a job, you bum.
My life is not any of your business you Pharisee. I am retired and I, unlike
your pal Ken McVay who regularly begs for donations, am not a bum. I am self
sufficient and Ken McVay is not. You should be telling him to get a job instead
of devising some self serving FUND after another!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
Patrick Humphrey
Scott, you fat fraud of a human being...he's talking about posting a direct
quote from YOU about your brown-nosing Pierce and his goose-steppers. You,
being the 53-year-old enfant terrible that you are, deleted that quoted
article because you're a truly gutless coward.
Thanks for showing all and sundry what you're about. You've convinced me that
the only thing you deserve in this life is to share a room with Don Ellis.
You two deserve each other.
--PLH, Bradbury's just a local annoyance, not a National one
Tavish
"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Tavish" <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
>news:riv76v4go9ofd39j4...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:13:53 -0500,
><3dS8a.1721$Or5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com>
>> "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National Alliance
>> >supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip and run.
:
>> Just read the extended reply I made to your fellow Marxist smear agent if
>> you believe that tripe. I did not snip one iota either!
:
>Did you address my repost of your words? No. You snipped all of it. Which
>means, by your standard, that you can't refute it.
I addressed you and your fellow Marxists' smear in one post. Both of you have
the same type smear so I elected to kill two birds with one stone.
>That's quite apart from the plain meaning of your words: You endorsed (in
>glowing terms), William Pierce, leader of a political party, and encouraged
>others to listen to them. That's known as political support.
Your futile efforts to smear me fall flat Marxist. You assume tongue in cheek
remarks to be serious which is what you leftists do!
You need to learn to discern the difference between a person stating his true
belief and a person being sarcastic to pinheads such as you.
For a FACT you vermin accuse Pierce of being a Nazi and for a FACT your side
claims Nazis claim "capitalism is Jewish and must be replaced with National
Socialism" or claims to that effect. If I were a Nazi I would not be voting
Republican NOR would I be defending capitalism from Marxist shits like you!
Care to show any posts where I disparage capaitalism like your fellow Marxist
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel does as I show in these examples:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=ainjrf%241365%241%40pencil.math.missouri.edu&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Subject: The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tuesday, 6 August 2002 -- 6:38
Date: 5 Aug 2002 23:38:07 -0500
Message-ID: <ainjrf$1365$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
"...It is our strategy that participation and intervention in these struggles,
from an anarchist-communist viewpoint... Slowly building a base for a truly mass
revolutionary anarchist movement capable of defeating not only fascist
organizations but also the combined forces of capital and the state... <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=aanq90%24pfu%241%40pencil.math.missouri.edu&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Subject: TINAF Supplement #188 (#677): Fascist Le Pen and the French
Date: 30 Apr 2002 23:17:36 -0500
Message-ID: <aanq90$pfu$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
"The hope it's also the youth which fights massively against the capitalist
globalization and the fascism. I address all the left voters, the socialists,
the environmentalist communists but also the associative, union activists to
organize a popular resistance on the way up of the extreme right, in a big
all together against the fascism and the employers."
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=2rckstkv3ut27b8dh8b41u93mbodar27io%404ax.com&output=gplain
From: Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net>
Subject: Re: A Response to Burnore
Message-ID: <2rckstkv3ut27b8dh...@4ax.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 01:26:01 GMT
"The "net cops" (in the good sense) focus their efforts on the worst
problem. They don't look for political spam; they search for spam whose
content is sexual or reflects cockroach-capitalism..." <END>
All of the above are rants froim the same person you are now rubbing elbows
with! You're judged by the company you keep you vermin!
>By the way, I have no "fellow Marxist" or "fellow Marxists".
Yes you do! The majority of people you side with are either self confessed
communists or those who are very much in sympathy with communists. You are
defensive of Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel and Ken Mcvay and here is my
proof about their love of communism:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=q6u65v4lop8l8k31b8po91hvjtta8sr1n9%404ax.com&rnum=1
"NYC Based web site ANTI-FASCISM.ORG Advocates Communist Revolution..."
Date: 19 Feb 2003 12:29:06 GMT
Message-ID: <q6u65v4lop8l8k31b...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=u3u65vs5697ofh14kjc34lgo2nu7a2ej8m%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: NIZKOR Director Ken McVay in Bed With Communists and His Animosity
Against Anti-Communists Documented ...
Message-ID: <u3u65vs5697ofh14k...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Feb 2003 12:27:24 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=prbo5vkp1825141dem99scia1676el7nqd%404ax.com
Subject: Anti-American Communist Agitator and Tax Exempt Religious Org Which
Gave Him Financial and Moral Support
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:07:42 -0600
Message-ID: <prbo5vkp1825141de...@4ax.com>
>You're projecting your opinions *again*; they are not facts, and are not based on
>facts.
You are judged by the company you keep and you are allied with those who have
sympathy for communism and that is FACT!
>Now, what action has the CCRA taken on your opinion that Mr. McVay has
>engaged in tax fraud?
My opinion? The evidence is obvious:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
>What action have prosecutors and bar associations taken on your opinion that
>Mr. Eideken commited perjury?
DAs are very aware that they are elected to office and James B. Martin did not
want to take the case even though a detective said what was done against me was
criminal just as much as the same as what happ=ened to Yale when he went to a DA
in Arkansas about a certain person! Now going by your standards then DA Greene
proved Yale had nothing then because he didn't want to prosecute his fishin'
buddy!
>The answers are "none", is that not correct? What is your opinion as to
>why that is?
You are in a state of denial.
>-pk
Patrick Humphrey
>On 03 Mar 2003 09:25:33 -0600, <szkptp8...@eris.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>In other words, you can't refute what he says about you.
>Why should I waste time when all, he does is give biased opinion? I can post
>reams of proofs but his mind is already made up-- hence he's a waste of time!
You're a waste of DNA, Bradburied. You're a gutless, infantile coward. You
can't prove a single one of your fraudulent assertions -- are you ever going
to get around to proving I took pictures of your hovel and property? No,
because you can't prove something that never happened, and you're afraid of
your own fat shadow.
I'm not going to mourn the day YOU die, freak.
--PLH, being something that Bradbury is incapable of being in this life:
honest
Tavish
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Scott, you fat fraud of a human being.
---
"It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jeff_brown-1111961218190001%40news.zippo.com&rnum=6
Message-ID: <jeff_brown-11...@news.zippo.com>
Allan Matthews
> Tavish <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>
> >On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:13:53 -0500, <3dS8a.1721$Or5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> >"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National Alliance
> >>supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip and run.
>
> >Just read the extended reply I made to your fellow Marxuist smear agent if you
> >believe that tripe. I did not snip one iota either!
>
> Scott, you fat fraud of a human being...he's talking about posting a direct
> quote from YOU about your brown-nosing Pierce and his goose-steppers.
Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
allan
--
allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com
=========================================
"I am a 'Nazi'"
- "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
steve wolk
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:02:02 -0500, <R0KdnWXf2_L...@comcast.com>
"steve
> wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>
> >Scott, it's all in the record, and it was accepted as fact by the court.
>
> That is a false statement. It was NOT accepted as fact and ruled upon as
> absolute truth! All sworn statements are accepted as being fact for that
matter
> because the legal system doesn't assume every sworn statement is
perjurious!
> Your pal lied and filth such as you
I've been trying very hard to be civil to you. Obviously, it has been for
naught. So I guess I'll have to play by your rules from now on. Prepare
yourself.
Patrick Humphrey
>In article <szkisuz...@eris.io.com>, pat...@io.com says...
>> Tavish <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> >On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:13:53 -0500, <3dS8a.1721$Or5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com>
>> >"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National Alliance
>> >>supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip and run.
>> >Just read the extended reply I made to your fellow Marxuist smear agent if
>> >you believe that tripe. I did not snip one iota either!
>> Scott, you fat fraud of a human being...he's talking about posting a direct
>> quote from YOU about your brown-nosing Pierce and his goose-steppers.
>Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
>talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
I know -- but since he's already in TILT mode, I figured I'd help him implode
and get it over with sooner.
--PLH, sooner or later, they'll come to take him away
Ken McVay
He's been in TILT mode ever since his mother explained that she'd sold
his brain to an implant mill.
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
1. Defendant Scott Bradbury publishes material on the Internet under
the pseudonym "Doc Tavish."
2. Defendant Scott Bradbury has in the past and continues in the
present to use various services to publish his material in a manner in
which it cannot be traced back to its source.
3. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published material on the Internet
under the pseudonym "Nazihunter."
4. Defendant Scott Bradbury has created and published on the
Internet under the name of "Nazihunter" a website which gives his own
address and telephone number.
5. Defendant Scott Bradbury has thereafter falsely claimed that said
website was created by others in an attempt to harass him.
6. Defendant Scott Bradbury has, at various times, published his own
address and telephone number under the name of "Nazihunter" together with
various threats of violence.
7. Defendant Scott Bradbury has thereafter made the false claim,
based upon such publications, that he is being harassed and threatened by
others.
8. Defendant Scott Bradbury has at various times contacted various
internet service providers and, using the false pretense that he was the
author, cancelled the published work of others.
9. Defendant Scott Bradbury has participated in campaigns of
threats, defamation, forgery, and harassment in order to intimidate and
harass his opponent and prevent them from exercising their rights of free
speech.
10. Defendant Scott Bradbury has assisted and/or obtained the
assistance of others in said campaigns, including but not limited to David
E. Michael, Donald Ellis, and "Pat Blakely."
11. That Donald Ellis has published material under the pseudonyms
"Mike Kalvatis," "Pat Blakely," "RevWhite" and "Rabbi Brimstone."
12. That at all times relevant hereto Defendant Scott Bradbury was
aware of the use of those pseudonyms by Donald Ellis.
13. The targets of said campaigns of harassment have included, inter
alia, Plaintiff, Sara Salzman, Jeffrey G. Brown, Ken McVey, Scott Murphy,
David Gehrig, Andrew Skolnick, Steven Wolk, Mike Curtis, Andrew Mathis, and
all others named in "The Nizkor Phonebook."
14. Defendant Scott Bradbury has forged material which he claimed
originated from Jeffrey G. Brown and published said material on the
Internet falsely claiming that it originated from Jeffrey G. Brown.
15. Defendant Scott Bradbury has forged material which he claimed
originated from Andrew Skolnick and published said material on the Internet
falsely claiming that it originated from Andrew Skolnick.
16. Defendant Scott Bradbury has forged material which he claimed
originated from Plaintiff and published said material on the Internet
falsely claiming that it originated from Plaintiff.
17. Said forgeries have included forgeries making unwanted sexual
advances to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
18. That no such unwanted sexual advances were ever made.
19. That notwithstanding the fact that said communications were
forgeries and known to be such by Defendant Scott Bradbury, Defendant Scott
Bradbury forwarded them to third persons claiming that they were true and
accurate.
20. That the purpose of Defendant Scott Bradbury in distributing said
forgeries was to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and to induce others to
terminate a business contract with Plaintiff.
21. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published the statement that he has
been threatened with homosexual rape by Plaintiff, Jeffrey G. Brown and
Kenneth McVay.
22. Said claim was published despite the fact that no such threat had
ever been made to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
23. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published the claim that Andrew
Mathis, Ph. D., had solicited minor boys by offering them alcoholic
beverages.
24. Said claim was made despite the fact that Defendant Scott
Bradbury knew that no such offer or solicitation had ever been made.
25. Since the filing of this lawsuit Defendant Scott Bradbury
increased his efforts to harass and threaten Plaintiff and to distribute
false and defamatory information about him in an effort to intimidate
Plaintiff.
26. Defendant has been assisted in this effort by David E. Michael
and Donald Ellis publishing material either under their own names,
pseudonyms, or anonymously.
27. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by
"mailbombing" him by sending gigantic files to him as electronic
communications.
28. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by asking
various commercial services to send him electronic communications thereby
overwhelming his service provider with "spam."
29. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt the internet service of others by send
them "mailbombs" in Plaintiff's name and using Plaintiff's name to spam
such persons.
30. On or about July 2, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates acting then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published personal information about Plaintiff's family including his
father, mother, sister and brother including their names addresses,
telephone numbers with instructions to call and harass them. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as "Exhibit "A."
31. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him and his family.
32. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
33. On or about July 7, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates a ting then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published four threats of violence against Defendant Scott Bradbury. One
such publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B."
34. The purpose of such forgeries was to harass Plaintiff with false
charges.
35. Notwithstanding that he was aware said publications were
forgeries, Defendant Scott Bradbury forwarded copies of said publications
to Plaintiff's internet provider claiming that Plaintiff had published said
material.
36. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to the law firm of Todd S. Miller & Associates
notwithstanding the fact that said publications were known to him to be
forgeries.
37. The purpose of said action was to adversely affect the
professional standing of Plaintiff.
38. That such distribution was done with the approval, consent, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who was at all times aware of the
forgery.
39. Said publication was made with the consent, approval, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.
40. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to Plaintiff's internet service provider and to various
law enforcement agencies notwithstanding the fact that said publications
were known to him to be forgeries.
41. The purpose of said action was to adversely affect the
professional standing of Plaintiff and to have fraudulent criminal charges
brought against him.
42. That such distribution was done with the approval, consent, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who was at all times aware of the
forgery.
43. On or about July 10, 2000, a forgery was published under the name
of Plaintiff making a death threat against the Woman's Center of Allentown.
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit " C."
44. Said publication was made by Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely"
a/k/a "RevWhite" a/k/a "Rabbi Brimstone" with the purpose of harassing,
threatening, and intimidating the persons named on said list.
45. Said publication was made with the assistance, consent, approval,
and knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.
46. On or about July 14, 2000, a forgery was published under the name
of "Wendy Edeiken" making a death threat against Plaintiff. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit " D."
47. Said publication was made by Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely"
a/k/a 'RevWhite" a/k/a 'Rabbi Brimstone" with the purpose of harassing,
threatening, and intimidating the persons named on said list.
48. Said publication was made with the assistance, consent, approval,
and knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.
49. On or about July 22, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury published a
direct threat of violence against Plaintiff. Saud threat is attached
hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit 'E."
50. Defendant Scott Bradbury has contributed to, participated in
and/or cooperated with the establishment on the Internet of a site known as
"The Nizkor Phonebook."
51. The purpose of "The Nizkor Phonebook" is to threaten, harass,
and/or intimidate Jews and others who disagree with Defendant Scott
Bradbury and his accomplices.
52. The purpose of 'The Nizkor Phonebook" was at all times known to
Defendant Scott Bradbury.
53. On or about July 24, 2000, "The Nizkor Phonebook" was edited to
display a picture of an automatic pistol above personal information about
Plaintiff and his wife including their names addresses, telephone numbers,
and a map whereby they could be located.
54. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him.
55. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
56. On or about July 25, 2000, "The Nizkor Phonebook" was edited to
display personal information about Plaintiff and his wife including their
names addresses, telephone numbers, and a map whereby they could be located
surrounded by images of dripping blood.
57. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him.
58. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
59. On or about July 29, 2000, "The Nizkor Phonebook" was edited to
display personal information about Plaintiff's father, mother, sister, and
brother including their names addresses, telephone numbers, and a map
whereby they could be located surrounded by images of dripping blood.
60. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against them.
61. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
62. On or about July 14, 2000, a publication called "The Dead Pool"
was made by Donald Ellis under the pseudonym "Rabbi Brimstone" which named
various opponents of Defendant Scott Bradbury and his associates asking for
wagers as to which would die first. Said publication is attached hereto
and made
part hereof as Exhibit "F."
63. Said publication was made by Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely,"
a/k/a "RevWhite" a/k/a "Rabbi Brimstone" with the purpose of harassing,
threatening, and intimidating the persons named on said list.
64. The title of said publication was intended as a reference to a
list of death threats in a motion picture of the same title, and in said
motion picture members of the "Dead Pool" list were murdered.
65. In subsequent publications on the topic, Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat
Blakely" demonstrated that he was familiar with this significance of the
title, and therefore the "Dead Pool" post can reasonably be construed as a
series of death threats against the individuals listed therein.
66. Defendant Scott Bradbury was aware of the threatening nature of
the publication at the time that it was made.
67. Defendant Scott Bradbury advocates that Jews be deprived of the
civil, political, and human rights in the United States.
68. Defendant Scott Bradbury endorses the stereotype of Jews as
depicted in the propaganda of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as true and
accurate.
69. Defendant Scott Bradbury has claimed that the Holocaust
did not occur.
70. Defendant Scott Bradbury has endorsed the positions of William
Pierce and the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi and violently anti-Semitic
organization which teaches that Jews are "mud people" who should be
murdered in a nationwide pogrom.
Tavish
kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
>
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
The shyster you like to quote NEVER (I mean NEVER EVER) served me nor my
attorney a copy of his perjured complaints. It is on record at the courthouse
too! Every time my attorney requested the complaints he was told "Fuck You" by
the bastard you like to quote. Funny though that you somehow got a copy of all
the accusations made against me long after the lawsuit against me was dismissed
in my favor!
You are evil and a liar and the vermin (B'nai Brith of Canada) who channel your
funding are just as evil. You propagate smear and they bless you with tax
credited donations.
Here is legal proof how your pal, Yale F. Edeiken of Allentown, Pennsylvania;
Supreme Court ID# 40290, subverted the legal system:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
IOW I could never respond to what I was NEVER served!
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations as detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Also this document should be available too:
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Do not forget-- Yale did exactly the same thing to David E. Michael (so
Yale F. Edeiken has a pattern of using the tactic to harass and intimidate
people):
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk&lr=&hl=en
Message-ID: <39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:13:59 +0100
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: The other Edeiken lawsuit
[...]
Mr Edeiken has filed a lawsuit against me in Pennsylvania. No documents
were ever served on me with regard to this lawsuit. Moreover, it stated
no cause of action. As Mr Edeiken had obviously assumed that I would
chicken out, allowing the thing simply to lapse unserved, I appointed an
attorney in PA to deal with him in a very non-chickenly way.
I recently received a communication from that attorney's paralegal that
stated, inter alia:
<begin quote>
Please be advised that we have filed the Rule to Show Cause in your
case. Mr. Edeiken must now move forward with this matter and file a
complaint . . . we are awaiting the statutory allowed time period during
which Mr. Edeiken can make a response.
<end quote>
Mr Edeiken evidently thought that he could use the law to silence
certain revisionist posters here.
We are now waiting for HIM to produce his arguments and evidence and
place them before the courts where he may rest assured that they will
meet a vigorous response. <END>
As for the failed lawsuit against me-- it was based on my alleged internet
activity and the following archive proves Yale F. Edeiken of Allentown,
Pennsylvania; Supreme Court ID# 40290 lied/perjured and actually perpetrated
criminal acts against me. If you and the shyster think the kook lawsuit has
merit then refile it in my jurisdiction and see how quick Yale F. Edeiken is put
behind bars! He won't have his Allentown cronies around to overlook his
unethical and criminal acts. Perjury, manufacturing of evidence such as faking
digital sigs, and making death threats using subpoenaed information would get
that shyster in a heap of trouble in my neck of the woods!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
Yale F. Edeiken is:
1) Known for assaulting a deputy sheriff in an elevator at the Lehigh County
CourtHouse as these two "The Morning Call" local newspaper stories reported:
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
by VALERIE HILDEBEITEL, The Morning Call
A Lehigh County deputy sheriff has filed harassment charges
against an Allentown attorney over a courthouse confrontation
that happened last month, Sheriff Ron Neimeyer has confirmed.
The charges against attorney Yale F. Edeiken were filed in the
district attorney's office Wednesday, according to the deputy
involved.
Deputy Brenda Hartman said Edeiken shoved her as she was taking
a female prisoner from a courtroom to a holding cell to await
probation processing on the afternoon of June 12.
Hartman said she took the prisoner into an elevator and Edeiken
and another man followed.
The deputy said Edeiken confronted the man, who was later
identified as the woman's ex-husband, and she ordered both to
stop and that one man leave the elevator.
The ex-husband complied and as he exited, Hartman said, Edeiken
shoved her to the back of the elevator and swung his briefcase
at the man.
Sheriff Neimeyer said the deputy reported the incident to him,
and he sent her to the district attorney's office.
"It certainly was conduct that is not expected," Neimeyer said
Friday. "We're on the same side. My officers are officers of the
court, as is Mr. Edeiken.
"We won't brook that type of conduct from anyone else," the
sheriff said. "Why should we (take it) from him?"
<END>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call
Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined
$600 plus costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy
sheriff and another man in a courthouse elevator.
During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda
Hartman with his briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by
saying he had a gun, according to District Justice Diane Jepsen,
who heard the case. Edeiken later was found to have a permit for
and was carrying a .357 Magnum.
Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay
the fine after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and
disorderly conduct filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no
longer has a permit for his gun.
According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side
elevator, which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with
Joanne Keller. Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been
sentenced and Hartman was taking her to pay fines and costs
before her release.
Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public
defender Earl Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.
Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had
burglarized him, pushed his way onto the elevator.
But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already
was on the elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving
match. Witnesses varied on what was said.
Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said
he was referring to Keller.
Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a
house owned by Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a
character witness for Keller at her sentencing.
Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and
Hartman, according to testimony.
Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered
Edeiken to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to
exit, Edeiken told Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was
going to draw it. No weapon was seen.
Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman
took Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held
pending their proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to
stay until she got help. When she returned, Edeiken was gone.
<END>
The doshonest person who keeps propagating the failed lawsuit against me is Ken
McVay who is a reputed tax dodger and con man:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Tavish
Allan Matthews <allan_m...@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote:
>Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
>talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
---
Black Knight
> "Tavish" <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
> news:t9j76v0dl9s4jfk23...@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:02:02 -0500, <R0KdnWXf2_L...@comcast.com>
> "steve
> > wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Scott, it's all in the record, and it was accepted as fact by the court.
> >
> > That is a false statement. It was NOT accepted as fact and ruled upon as
> > absolute truth! All sworn statements are accepted as being fact for that
> matter
> > because the legal system doesn't assume every sworn statement is
> perjurious!
> > Your pal lied and filth such as you
>
>
>
> I've been trying very hard to be civil to you.
<deletia>
Is this Be Kind to Bigots Week?
Bruno
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message news:<p9k46voc9c03l39fn...@4ax.com>...
>> <<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
>> distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
>> a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
>> research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
>>
>> Links cited active March 2, 2003
>>
>> On 2 Mar 2003 07:42:00 -0800, <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
>> kni...@indystart.com Arthur J. Tandy aka (Black Knight) wrote:
>> >Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message news:
>> ><knq36vk2kgrcfqa9p...@4ax.com>...
>>
>> >> I hardly consider perjury to be finding of fact and for a FACT if I and my
>> >> attorney were served with those "complaints" and allowed to file against them
>> >> with what I show in the archive below then Yale would not be practicing law
>> >> today and he would have done time too! Also my petition for relief from judgment
>> >> is very relevant. Also seeing how so many people put credence in that lawsuit
>> >> then I suggest it be re-filed in MY jurisdiction and we will all see who gets
>> >> some jail time.
:
>> >Nonsense.You don't get "jail time" from a civil suit.
You are now waging personal attacks because I proved you wrong about your claim
above!
>> Once again you show what an ignoramus you are and I offer proof which is a
>> testament to your stupidity:
>>
>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june99/clinton_2-17.html
>> The judge in the Paula Jones lawsuit is considering issuing a contempt citation
>> against President Clinton for his misleading testimony about Monica Lewinsky in
>> that case. Washington Post reporter Peter Baker outlines the issues involved and
>> the potential consequences...
>>
>> [P]erjury is a very specific criminal statute that has specific requirements. It
>> means she may believe, though, that by being misleading that he has not
>> fulfilled his obligation as a litigant to help the court find the truth and
>> justice in his case...
>>
>> <END>
>>
>> <deletia>
Why did you delete this Artie? Because it proved you wrong?
http://www.courtrules.org/form1716.htm
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CUSTODIAL)
INSTRUCTIONS - READ CAREFULLY
In order to determine your eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis in your
civil lawsuit, you are required to complete an Affidavit in Support of Request
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and an Authorization for Release of Institutional
Account Information.
Forms are provided for your convenience. They must be legibly handwritten or
typed, signed, and verified (notarized). Each applicable question must be
answered completely. You may complete the answer to any question on the reverse
side of the page or on a separate blank page. Please indicate the number of the
question you are answering.
Because the Affidavit must be sworn to under oath, any false statement of a
material fact may serve as the basis of prosecution and conviction for perjury..
<END>
What do the terms "prosecution" and "conviction" mean in relation to Affidavits
and sworn testimony in civil lawsuits!? Care to remain an ignoramus and remain
in denial Artie?"
>Listen, you stupid slob: Perjury may arise from a civil suit IF
>someone lies under oath but that is a separate issue from the central
>dispute.
And I gave plenty examples too which you also deleted! What else do you call it
when a person takes USENET posts made by other people and adds your NYM as a
signature to a post you did not make and then submit it as evidence against
you!? What do you call it Artie?
This archive which you choose to ignore is filled with many fabrications made by
Yale F. Edeiken:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:37 -0600
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
Here is one example of many:
> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
What do you call it Artie that Yale took a post made by another person
and then added Doc Tavish to it and then submit as sworn testimony?
Answer that Artie? YOU CONDONE LYING IN SWORN STATEMENTS AND THAT IS AN
IRREFUTABLE FACT!!
Just one more example:
> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it!
Well Artie-- what do you call what Yale did?
>I thought anyone with common sense would recognize that in
>what I said.Do you know what the word "central dispute" means,
>ignoramus?
>
>You've been told this before, you deaf and blind idiot. Before someone
>can get nailed for perjury, someone knowledgeable in the law, like a
>judge or DA would have to determine that perjury was committed. You
>complained about it and the DA, thru his inaction, told you you were
>WRONG. You're too damn stupid to accept that he knows the law and you
>don't.
>
>YOU DO NOT MAKE THE LAW. YOU DO NOT ADMINISTER THE LAW. YOU ARE NOT A
>JUDGE.
>YOU ARE NOT THE DA. YOU ARE JUST A STUPID BIGMOUTH FAT SLOB WITH THE
>IQ OF A TURNIP.
"It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jeff_brown-1111961218190001%40news.zippo.com&rnum=6
Message-ID: <jeff_brown-11...@news.zippo.com>
>Bruno
Black Knight
They'll need a fork lift.
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>They'll need a fork lift.
---
Patrick Humphrey
>In article <szkwujf...@eris.io.com>,
>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>Allan Matthews <allan_m...@bigfoot.nospam.com> writes:
>>>In article <szkisuz...@eris.io.com>, pat...@io.com says...
>>>> Tavish <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>>>> >On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:13:53 -0500,
>><3dS8a.1721$Or5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com>
>>>> >"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National
>>>> >>Alliance supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip
>>>> >>and run.
>>>> >Just read the extended reply I made to your fellow Marxuist smear agent
>>>> >if you believe that tripe. I did not snip one iota either!
>>>> Scott, you fat fraud of a human being...he's talking about posting a
>>>> direct quote from YOU about your brown-nosing Pierce and his
>>>> goose-steppers.
>>>Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
>>>talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
>>I know -- but since he's already in TILT mode, I figured I'd help him implode
>>and get it over with sooner.
>He's been in TILT mode ever since his mother explained that she'd sold
>his brain to an implant mill.
...and the mill rejected it, even though it was in mint condition -- obviously
never having been used.
--PLH, and it's still in mint condition today, too feeble to be used for
anything but a doorstop
Patrick Humphrey
>On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:04:09 GMT, <MPG.18ce19efe...@news.randori.com>
>Allan Matthews <allan_m...@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote:
>>Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
>>talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
>"It takes no thought whatsoever
...to conclude that you're a kook, Scottie.
--PLH, and Bradbury keeps going out of his way to demonstrate it
Patrick Humphrey
They'll need a Saturn 5 booster at a minimum.
--PLH, and we haven't got the charged black hole technology down yet
steve wolk
"Black Knight" <kni...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com...
I wanted to see how the morbidly obese shame of Bellville would react to
civility. He reacted the same way he does to everything else - like the
uncouth, stupid, crazed netwacko he is. Its only a matter of time before
diabetes or a stroke silences him forever.
> Bruno
Black Knight
> In article <szkwujf...@eris.io.com>,
> Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> >Allan Matthews <allan_m...@bigfoot.nospam.com> writes:
> >
> >>In article <szkisuz...@eris.io.com>, pat...@io.com says...
> >>> Tavish <tavi...@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>
> >>> >On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:13:53 -0500,
> <3dS8a.1721$Or5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> >>> >"Patrick Keenan" <pkeenan!x...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> >>By your own standards, you can't refute that you are a National Alliance
> >>> >>supporter. You don't even attempt to deny it; you just snip and run.
>
> >>> >Just read the extended reply I made to your fellow Marxuist smear agent if
> >>> >you believe that tripe. I did not snip one iota either!
>
> >>> Scott, you fat fraud of a human being...he's talking about posting a direct
> >>> quote from YOU about your brown-nosing Pierce and his goose-steppers.
>
> >>Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
> >>talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
> >
> >I know -- but since he's already in TILT mode, I figured I'd help him implode
> >and get it over with sooner.
>
> He's been in TILT mode ever since his mother explained that she'd sold
> his brain to an implant mill.
>
DA:Objection! That remark implies that Fatboy once had a brain.
Attorney for the defense is assuming facts not in evidence.
Judge:Sustained.
Bruno
Black Knight
Fatbum silenced forever? Now, that's what I call positive thinking. I
hope you are a prophet.
Bruno
Allan Matthews
@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com says...
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:04:09 GMT, <MPG.18ce19efe...@news.randori.com>
> Allan Matthews <allan_m...@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >Patrick, you forget... This is "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury you're
> >talking to - the "Boogerman" who thinks that quoting him is "slander."
>
> ---
> "It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
> this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
This is what I just did, "Boogerman." You've said in the past that
quoting you is "slander." That's verifiable evidence. As are the facts
you've called yourself "Boogerman" and signed posts "Sieg Heil".
> Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
> reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
You're the cheap shot artist, Nazi boy.
allan
--
allan_m...@bigfoot.com
===========================================
"Eat shit, choke on it and die"
-"Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury showing what
passes for rational debate in his "mind"
===========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Tavish
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
---
"It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jeff_brown-1111961218190001%40news.zippo.com&rnum=6
Message-ID: <jeff_brown-11...@news.zippo.com>
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>DA:Objection! That remark implies that Fatboy once had a brain.
---
Tavish
Allan Matthews <allan_m...@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote:
>You're the cheap shot artist, Nazi boy.
---
"It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jeff_brown-1111961218190001%40news.zippo.com&rnum=6
Message-ID: <jeff_brown-11...@news.zippo.com>