Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Yale Edeiken has a big suprise waiting for him at his job.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Blakely

unread,
May 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/16/00
to
I would say that is below the belt, but since Yale did send me
email also using his employer's email account, its fair. I will
start doing the same from now on when Yale Edeiken sends me
unsolicted email. Maybe by giving his law firm some ugly
publicity (anyone who would hire a disgraced so-called lawyer
deserves to be exposed), only will Yale Edeiken's harassment of
unsolicted email stop.

Yale Edeiken has yet also to explain why he is longer part of
the Lehigh county bar association, the Pennsylvania bar
association, and why exactly is he listed as a disgraced lawyer
by at least two sources. I don't believe he would just quit
those groups.

* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!


Doc Tavish

unread,
May 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/16/00
to
On Tue, 16 May 2000 07:42:10 -0700, Blakely
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:

>I would say that is below the belt, but since Yale did send me
>email also using his employer's email account, its fair.

Did the heafders show an aol.com account? I received much e-mail from
Edeiken from an aol.com account after Flash Net blocked his enter.net
account from e-mailing me. Edeiken insists that he does not have and has
never had an account with aol.com which could all be true but would be a
dodge if he's using his employer's e-mail account. Please make my day and
see if the headers show such stuff as this:

Received: from imo13.mx.aol.com (imo13.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.3])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20325
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:05:57 -0500 (CDT)
From: Crack...@aol.com
Received: from Crack...@aol.com
by imo13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id y.99.3b5219c (4540)
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:05:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <99.3b5219...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:05:49 EDT
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFAMATION: Re: Ahem . . . er . . . Mr Edeiken?
To: sonn...@flash.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Mac sub 189
X-UIDL: e089480ac0dc9a48e7680da7b7186225

----end----

I would love to ruin his day by catching him in still another lie!
Please show that Yale used an aol.com account!

>I will start doing the same from now on when Yale Edeiken sends me
>unsolicted email. Maybe by giving his law firm some ugly
>publicity (anyone who would hire a disgraced so-called lawyer
>deserves to be exposed), only will Yale Edeiken's harassment of
>unsolicted email stop.

He will keep sending you e-mail regardless of how much you complain. He
won't even observe his own standards about e-mail harassment as he's
stated in the past:

http://x45.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=221242655&fmt=text
Re: E-Mail & Non E-Mail and A Threat Yet
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Date: 1997/02/25
Forum: alt.revisionism

> the criminal Giwer displays his ignorance:
> On {23 Feb 1997 16:10:31 GMT}, {ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)} wrote in
> > Please note the technique of the criminal Giwer:

> > 1. Tavish sent me an obnoxious email. He does not deny it. He just
> >claims it was done negligently. That is irrelevant. It matters not whether he said so
> >publically, whether it did not contain a threat, or whether is wa done by accident.
> >I choose, as it my right, not to receive obnxious email (and the email was intended to
> >be obnoxious) from Tavish.

> Care to cite the law governing email?

Been there. Done that. Look it up on Dejanews.

> > 2. I sent him a notice not to send me more email; cc'ing his ISP. This, of
> >course, is the procedure *required* by ISPs, In fact, when netcom.com notified the
> >criminal Giwer that any future communication from him would be "AGAINST THE LAW"
> >{their capitalization) that is exactly what they did.....

Blakely

unread,
May 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/16/00
to
The email came from enter.net, the page his employer is hosted
on. That is why contacting his employers is fair game since he
is using company resources to harass with.

Yale F. Edeiken

unread,
May 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/17/00
to

Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:39218dac....@news.flash.net...


> On Tue, 16 May 2000 07:42:10 -0700, Blakely
> <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:

> >I would say that is below the belt, but since Yale did send me
> >email also using his employer's email account, its fair.
>

That was another of Blakely's lies.

> Did the heafders show an aol.com account? I received much e-mail from
> Edeiken from an aol.com account after Flash Net blocked his enter.net
> account from e-mailing me.

Another lie from Defendant Bradbury who tried to pass off some clumsy
forgeries are "e-mail" from me.

He forgot that:

1. I have no AIL account (and have never had one).


2. I have no access to an AOL account

> Edeiken insists that he does not have and has
> never had an account with aol.com which could all be true

And would make you a forger.

>

:

You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!

The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.

Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.

For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/


--YFE

The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/


Yale F. Edeiken

unread,
May 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/17/00
to

Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:02ddff8c...@usw-ex0106-045.remarq.com...

> I would say that is below the belt, but since Yale did send me
> email also using his employer's email account,

Another lie brom Blakely.

I have never used my "empliyer's email account" since the firm I work
for does not have one.

You attempt at ceiminal harassment has been reported to hotmail.com.

> its fair. I will


> start doing the same from now on when Yale Edeiken sends me
> unsolicted email. Maybe by giving his law firm some ugly
> publicity (anyone who would hire a disgraced so-called lawyer
> deserves to be exposed), only will Yale Edeiken's harassment of
> unsolicted email stop.

When will your lying and fraudluent posing as a Christian stop.

> Yale Edeiken has yet also to explain why he is longer part of
> the Lehigh county bar association, the Pennsylvania bar
> association

I cerainly have.

Nor was I ever a member of the Pa Bar Association.

New why don't you explain your lies about the Order issued against
Bradbury.

Yale F. Edeiken

unread,
May 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/17/00
to

Attacjed please find a post, one of ywo, in which your subscriber
mailto:patbl...@gotmail.com has suggested criminally harassing my
employer. "Blakely" is a noted anti-Semite and this is part of a campaign
he is conducting to spread hate on the internet. It is, moreover, and
attempt to influence ongoing litiagtion against one of his "friends."

This behavior will not be tolerated and I would suggest that your take
some strong action immediately.

Further please retain all logs and other information you have about his
usuage including his application for servie as a subpoena will shortly be
issued for that information.

--Yale F. Edeiken
ya...@enter.net


Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:02ddff8c...@usw-ex0106-045.remarq.com...
> I would say that is below the belt, but since Yale did send me

> email also using his employer's email account, its fair. I will

Yale F. Edeiken

unread,
May 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/17/00
to

Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

news:0faf1df6...@usw-ex0101-007.remarq.com...


> The email came from enter.net,

Which is my personal ISP.

Thank you for admitting that you never received anything from my
employer's account and that your suggestion was just anothber ploy to
attempt to harass innocent people.


:

0 new messages